Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 95-100 04/17/1995 A Resolution No. 95-loo N.C.S. of the City of Pet~lum~. California 1 2 3 GRANTING 1996 ALLOCATIONS 4 5 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a residential growth management system and established 6 the procedure for granting the allocation pool on a yearly basis with Ordinance 1716 N.C.S. 7 (Municipal Code Chapter 17.26); and 8 9 WHEREAS, interested developers and/or property owners filed their Notice of Intent to 10 Develop forms in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1716 N.C.S. and these, in 11 combination with reservations made the previous year and regulatory obligations for smaller 12 in-fill projects, comprise the total number of allocation requests for 1996; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the total number of allocation reyuests equals 246 units; and 15 16 WHEREAS, the 1996 allocation pool was set at 246 allocations; and 17 18 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that granting allocations does not constitute a project 19 pursuant to the California Enviromnental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 1578, and, therefore, 20 no environmental action is necessary at this time; 21 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council grants the 1996 allocations as 23 described below based on the findings that follow: 24 25 Project Name Allocations Granted 26 Cross Creek 86 27 Perry Property 40 28 Willow Glen 75* 29 In-fill 45 30 Total 246 31 32 Reservations for 1997 33 Cross Creek 75 34 Perry Property 25 35 36 * Previously reserved. 37 Minimum amount reyuired by ordinance to be reserved for exempt in-till development. 38 39 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council makes the following findings in support 40 ofits 1996 allocations: 41 42 Findines 43 44 1. The number of 1996 allocations granted is consistent with the provisions of the 45 Residential Growth Management System (Municipal Code Chapter 17.26) and the applicable 46 goals, objectives, policies and programs of the 1987-2005 Petaluma General Plan. 47 48 2. The decision to grant 1996 allocations as specified is not detrimental to the public 49 health, safety, or welfare when viewed in context of the City's overall growth rate, adequacy 50 of public facilities, and subsequent environmental review procedures to which each project is 51 subjected. 52 53 3. There is no known need for secondary ("special") allocations in the foreseeable future. 54 1 ety. rcu 95-100..... n~.cs. 1 4. The Willow Glen project is allowed to retain its 75 allocations previously reserved for 2 the 1996 pool due to the complexities of planning for this particular project site, the 3 applicant's willingness to work with staff towards optimum site design, the relative scarcity of 4 competing requests for 1996 allocations, and the desire of the City Council to encourage 5 applicants to request reservations, when needed, at the earliest possible time in the review 6 process. 7 8 5. There is no compelling reason to deny allocations to any project. 9 10 11 12 96ellres/kyd Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. RF.FEKENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) Qthflf8di376~Rk'SSIC~.HI~ meetin -~-form` g j J\ on the ..17~n day of .........A.pCll.....................-----.._-----.., 19.9.x.., by the following vote: City Attorney AYES: Shea, Maguire, Barlas, Stompe, Hamilton, Vice lVla~ror Read, lilayor Hilligoss NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: `~.`.C. - .:~.1"' City Clerk MaYOr Council File....2 cn io-xs rzea na__9.5-10.0........ N-cs.