HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 1.B-Minutes 03/17/2003MAR 17 2003 1
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 1
` S A L r7-
aw City o f Petaluma, California
REGULAR MEETING
z85a OF THE PETALUMA CITY .COUNCIL AND THE PETALUMA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
1 Draft City Council PCDC Meeting Minutes
2 Monday, March 3, 2003 - 3:00 P.M.
3 Regular Meeting
4
5 3:00 p.m. - CITY COUNCfI. MEETING
6
7 CALL TO ORDER
8
9 Roll Call
10
11 Members Canevaro, Harris, Healy, Moynihan, O'Brien, Torliatt
12 and Mayor Glass
13
14 PUBLIC COMMENT
15
16 Jay Stewart, Petaluma, addressed the City Council supporting the Communities
17 for Schools for Career Success: CS Program.
18
19 Greta Viguie, Petaluma, addressed the City Council in support of the
20 Communities for Schools for Career Success: CS Program.
21
22 Bill Hammerman, Petaluma, addressed the City Council in support of the
23 Communities for Schools for Career Success: CS Program.
24
25 Rick Savel, Chairman of Zone 2A Advisory Committee, addressed the City
26 Council regarding extensive drainage facilities being constructed on a parcel
27 owned by Agilent within Zone 2A.
28
29 Geoff Cartwright, Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding flood plain
30 maps and the Petaluma Watershed.
31
32 COUNCIL COMMENT
33
34 Council Member Torliatt, in response to Mr. Savel, asked the City Manager to
35 send a letter to the Sonoma County Water Agency to get information on the
36 construction happening on the property owned by Agilent.
37
38 Council Member Moynihan commented he noticed there is only an afternoon
® 39 session scheduled for the City Council on March 17, 2003. He indicated he
40 would like to see some issues that have been delayed brought forward as soon
Vol. XX, Page 2 March 3, 2003
1 as possible and possibly schedule a Special Meeting to address them. He
2 indicated with the new budget coming up, there is a need to look at Council
3 Committee structures,:a compensation policy, the litigation budget and policy,
4 and an update on the CIP with the possibility of creating -some new ones.
5
6 Council discussion ensued regarding availability for a Special Meeting to be held
7 March 24, 2003. It was determined by Council to have the City Manager review
8 what items could be brought forward •and - to - schedule them action" - by the
9 Council at the earliest meetings possible including perhaps a special meeting for
10 March 24 2003.
11
12 Mayor Glass thanked the community for being kind to the Girl Scouts who are in
13 the midst' of their cookie sales, commended the "Sister-to-Sister" Program, and
14 reported on the successful soccer tournament, which took place this last
15 weekend.
16
17 CITY MANAGER COMMENTS -There were none.
18
19 AGENDA CHANGES AND DELETIONS - There were none.
20
21 PRESENTATION
22
23 Ellen Lewis, Barbara Welch, Donnie Frank and Ruth Lefkowitz were present to
24 make a presentation regarding Communities and Schools for.Career Success
25. (CS2).
26
27 Council Member Torliatt thanked the group for coming and noted she sees them
28 having an important role in the education component of the Storm Water
29 Management Program. She clarified with them that interested individuals could
30 get involved by calling 778 -4702.
31
32 1. APPROVAL OF- PROPOSED AGENDA, FOR COUNCIL'S REGULAR MEETING OF
33 _MARCH 17, 2003.
34
35 M/S Moynihan and Harris, to approve the proposed agenda, CARRIED
36 UNANIMOUSLY.
37
38 2. CONSENT CALENDAR
39
40 Items A, B, D, F, G, I, -and L were removed from Consent for discussion. - The
41 remaining items were approved as submitted by the following vote:
42
43 M/S Moynihan and Healy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
44
45 A. Resolution Accepting the Claims and Bills from Demand Dates
46 12/20 /2002, 01 and 01/17/2003. (Thomas) Removed from
47 Consent for discussion.
48
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 3
„
1
B.
Resolution, Approving Street Closure in. the Downtown Area for: Butter
2
a nd Eggs Day Parade for Saturday, April 26, 2003. (Cook)
3
Removed from Consent for discussion.
4
5
C.
Resolution No. 2003 -33 N.C.S. Approving Street Closures for Antique
6
Faire for Sunday, April 27, 2003: Fourth Street between "B" Street
7
and Western Avenue; Kentucky Street between Western Avenue
8
and Washington Street; and the "A" Street Parking Lot between
9
Fourth and Fifth Streets. (Simms /Sears)
10
11
D.
Resolution Accepting the Completion of the Animal Shelter
12
Renovation Project No. 9009. This Project Included Renovation of
13
Existing Structure, Expansion of Animal Care, Adoption, Public and
14
Office Areas, Expansion of Isolation, Animal Holding Areas and
15
Other Improvements as Required by State Law. Final Project Cost:
16
$1,379,434.00. Funding Sources: $146,000 Private Contributions;
17
$1,166,000 Community Facilities Fund. (Skladzien) Removed from
18
Consent for discussion.
19
20
E.
AGIGPtien (SGGend Reg�jn ^g) Gff - QFdiRGRGP— GUtheriziRg
21
—C,`;y
22
of the BankeF and ,
23
'
24
25
This was moved to Unfinish ed Business.
26
27
F.
Resolution Awarding Contracts for Landscape Maintenance for the
28
Landscape Assessment Districts. (Anchordoguy) Removed from
29
Consent for discussion.
30
31
G.
Resolution Re- authorizing City Manager to Execute a
32
Reimbursement Agreement with G &W /Great Petaluma Mill, LLC for
33
the Replacement of the Sanitary Sewer Main Along the Wharf
34
Between Western Avenue and B Street. (Ban /Nguyen) Removed
35
from Consent for discussion.
36
37
H.
Resolution No. 2003 -34 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma Approving
38
the Applicant to Apply for Grant Funds for the Per Capita Grant
39
Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean
40
Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. (Carr /Thomas)
41
42
I..
Resolution Approving the December 31, 2002 Quarterly Treasurer's
43
Report. (Thomas) Removed from Consent for discussion.
44
45
J.
Resolution No. 2003 -35A N.C.S Approving a Final Map and
46
Resolution No. 2003 -3513 N.C.S. Approving a Lot Line Adjustment for
®
47
the Washington Creek Subdivision. (Moore /Bates)
48
Vol. XX, Page 4 March 3, 2003
1
K.
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2145 N.C.S. Amending Ordinance No.
2
2133 NC.S. to Change Certain Appropriations for the Operation of
3
the City of Petaluma from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2003. (Thomas)
4
5
L.
Resolution Amending Council Rules, Policies and Procedures.
6
(Rudnansky) Removed from Consent for discussion.
7
8
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT FOR DISCUSSION
9
10
A.
Resolution No. 2003 -36 N.C.S. Accepting the Claims and Bills from
11
Demand Dates 12/20%2002, 01 /03 and 01 /17/2003. (Thomas)
12
13
Council Member Moynihan abstained from voting on Check 27131
14
payable to Livingston & M'attesich dated '12/20/02; and continued
15
by asking'for clarifications on Check 25915 payable to Melrose Ford
16
demand date 1:2/19/02 Ch °eck. 27434 payable to Meyers, Nave,
17
Riback, Silver and Check E2492 payable to Corollo Engineers
18
demand date 1/2/2003', Check 27753 payable to Hortus
19
Connecting People and Check. 27875 payable to Sheraton
20
Petaluma. Hotel demand date 1/16/2003.
21
22
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -36
23
24
M /S.Moynihan and Harris. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
25
26
B.
Resolution No. 2003 -37 N.C.S Approving Street Closure in the
27
Downtown Area for Butter and •Eggs Day Parade for Saturday, April
28
26,:2003. (Cook)
29
30
Council Member Torliatt commented that in this year's budget
31
process, she would like the, budget to reflect this event so there are
32
no Police Department overtime charges resulting.
33
34
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -37:
35
36
M/S Torliattand Healy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
37
38
D.
Resolution No. 2003 -38 N.C.S. Accepting the Completion of the
3.9
Animal Shelter Renovation Project No. 9009. This Project Included
40
Renovation of Existing Structure, Expansion . of Animal Care,.
41,
Adoption, Public and Office Areas, Expansion of Isolation, Animal'
42
Holding Areas and Other Improvements as Required by State Law.
43
Final Project Cost: $1,379,434:00. Funding Sources:. $146,000
44
Private Contributions; $1,166,000 Community Facilities Fund.
45
(Skladzien)
46
•
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 5
1
2
Council Member Moynihan clarified with staff that they are still
tracking
•
3
contributions coming in, which are expected to be
approximately $200,000.
4
5
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -38:
6
7
M/S Moynihan and Torliatt. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8
9
10
F. Resolution No. 2003 -39 N.C.S. Awarding Contracts for Landscape,
11
Maintenance for the Landscape Assessment Districts.
(Anchordoguy)
12
13
14
Council Members Torliatt, Harris and Canevaro abstained from
discussion and /or voting on the matter due to a conflict of interest
15
16
resulting from living within one of the designated assessment
districts.
17
18
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -39:
19
20
M/S O'Brien and Healy. (Vote: 4 -0 -3) CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY with
21
Council Members Canevaro, Harris and Torliatt abstaining.
22
2 3
24
G. Resolution No. 2003 -40 N.C.S. Re- authorizing City Manager to
25
EXecute a Reimbursement Agreement with G&W /Great Petaluma
Mill, LLC
for, the Replacement of the Sanitary Sewer Main Along the
26
Wharf, Between Western' Avenue and B Street. (Ban /Nguyen)
27
.28
Council Member Torliatt clarified this included the removal of the
2 9
deck and not the trestle and stressed that should the trestle have to
30
be taken down, she would urge it be replaced in the some place.
31
32
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -40:
33
34
M/S Torliatt and'O'Brien. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
35
36
37
I. Resolution No. 2003 -41 N.C.S. Approving the December 31, 2002
Quarterly Treasurer's Report. (Thomas)
38
39
Council Member Moynihan clarified with Mr. Thomas that the cash
40
receipts for the quarter included the property tax increment, that
41
42
the 31d column of investments was "transfers" and thanked him for
the quarterly inter -fund loan statement. He also clarified with Mr.
43
Thomas that Council could expect the matter of conversion of the
44
Marina Fund to PCDC to be before the Council by the end of the
45
fiscal year.
46
47
48
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -41:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26'
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Vol. XX, Page 6 March 3, 2003
M/S Moynihan and O''Brien. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
L. Resolution No. 200342 N.C.S. Amending Council Rules, Policies and
Procedures. (Rudnansky)
Council Member Moynihan expressed his desire to see the Council
reconsider a "censure" policy.
Council Member Torliatt commented she feels each Council
Member should be held responsible for his or her own actions and
there is no need for a policy.
Motion,.to adopt Res,o. No. 2003 -42
M/S Torliatt and O'Brien
AYES: Canevaro, Harris, Healy, Vice Mayor O'Brien, Mayor
Glass, Torliatt
NOES: Moynihan
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
B. RRes No:. 2003 -43 N.C:S. Approving the Storm Water
Management agement Program and, Authorizing the City Manager #o
Execute and Submit the Notice of Intent and Storm Water
Management Program to the ;San Francisco 'Bay Regional Water
Quality Control Board for Coverage Under the State General Permit
for Storm, 'Water Discharge Pursuant to the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPD.ES) Phase II Storm Water
Regulations. (Ban /Eckerson)
Dean Eckerson, Water Resources .and Conservation Engineering
Manager, gave the staff report and introduced Toni `Bertolero of
Winzler & Kelly, who made the official presentation of the-pro
gram.
Public Input
Geoff Cartwright, ;Petaluma, addressed' the' City Council, indicating
this is an excellent idea. He then pointed .out When you have
industrial sites you have industrial pollutants, as well as car exhausts,
etc. He stressed the importance of realizing these are carcinogens..
•
- This item has been moved to the March 17,
2003' City Council Agenda.;
•
•.
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 7
1 City. Council discussion ensued regarding the business sector
2 educational component, Fire Department. enforcement options,
3 program annual costs, and the unlikelihood of reducing the
4 number of personnel. It was also noted the program could be
5 modified and it is an evolving program. Concern was expressed
6 regarding the numerous quantifiable targets, which didn't have
7 much.to do with water quality.
9 Council Member Torliatt stressed if this program is not implemented,
10 the City may incur fines down the line. She also commented on
11 the great opportunity in targeting water quality and student
12 participation.
13
14 Council, also discussed the issue of residential car washing and how
15 that would affect future ordinances. It was noted there would be
16 extensive education on how to minimize the potential impact of
17 those pollutants or at least reduce them to the maximum extent
18 practicable.
19
20 Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -43:
21
22 M/S Moynihan and Healy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
23
24 Council Member Harris left "the ,chambers for a few moments.
25
26 C. Ordinance No. 21 N.C.S. authorizing City Manager to Complete
27 all Necessary Transactions for the Purchase of the Banker and
28 Amaral Properties, Industrial Avenue (APNs 150- 020 -017, 150 -020-
29 018, and 048- 080 -029) Pursuant to Direction from City Council, Set
30 Forth in Resolution #2002 -015 N.C.S., adopted January 28, 2002.
31 (Tuft)
32
33 Motion to adopt Ord. No. 2144:
34
35 M/S Torlidtt and O'Brien
36
37 AYES: Canevaro, Healy, Vice Mayor O'Brien, Mayor Glass,
38 Torliatt
39
40 NOES:. None
41
42 ABSENT: Harris
43
44 RECUSED: Moynihan
45
46 Council Member Harris returned to the Council Chambers.
47
48 The City Council took a recess at 4:43 p.m. to 4:48 p.m.
Vol. XX, Page 8
1
March 3, 2003
2 D. Resolution No. 2003 -44 N:J. Approving Amendments and
3 Clarification to Request for Proposal and form of Franchise
4 Agreement for the Grant of An Exclusive Right to Provide Services
5 for the Collection of Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Yard
6 Trimmings Within the City of Petaluma. (R,udnansky)
7
8 Rick. Skladzien, Director of Public Facilities and Services, gave the
9 staff report.
10
11 City Council discussion ensued and clarification was made
12 regarding the exclusion of the 20 gallon recycling can; that the
13 draft Franchise Agreement, Section 8.1 be amended to provide for
14 power washing and /or steam" services; with the inclusion of the
15 contractor shall be responsible for and shall assume liability for any
16 pollution issues that may result from washing or spills "by the
17 Contractor" upon City streets; and that the City consider alternative
18 proposals if proposers want to present collection services and costs
19 that rely on -use of out -of- county facilities.
20
21 Motion to adopt Reso..'N,o. 2003 -44 as submitted with the suggested
22 changes discussed:
23
24 M/S Torliatt and O'Brien. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
25
26 4. NEW BUSINESS
27
2 8 The City Council took Items C and D out of order as follows:
29
30
C.. Consideration of Applicants and Possible Appointments to
31 Vacancie 9 s on Building Board of Appeals, ppeals, Planning Commission and
Youth Commission. (Petersen)
33
34 Gary Imm, Petaluma, addressed the City Council and urged their
35 support for his appointment.
36
37 Terry 'Kosewic, Petaluma, addressed the City Council and indicated
38 he would like to be considered for appointment.
39
40 A short City .Council, discussion ensued regarding an upcoming
41 opening on the S.P.A.R.C. `The City Clerk indicated that - one of the
42 applicants, - Joseph Railla, had expressed an interest to serve on the
43 SPARC Committee as his first choice. Members of the Council cast
44 ballots for the applicants who indicated their interest in serving on
45 the Planning Commission. The following vote was announced;
46
47 Gary Imm 7 votes *cast in favor..
48 Terry K'osewic No votes
•
0
1
3
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
March 3, 2003
John Mills No votes
Joseph Railla No votes
Vol. XX, Page 9
Mr. Gary Imm was thereby appointed to fill the vacancy on the
Planning Commission, for a term that would expire on June 30,
2003. Adoption of Resolution No 2003 -46 N.C.S.
D.. Resolution.'No. 2003 -47-N- C S . Approving 37d-Cost -of= Living' Increase
in the Petaluma Municipal Airport Rental Rates for Hangars and Tie -
down spaces. (Skladzien /close)
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003-47,-
MJS Harris and Moynihan, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Council then moved to Item 5.A:
PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A.' 'Discussion and Action Approving PCDC Resolution No. 2003 -02
Establishing Pay Parking Rates for
(Marangella) 'the Keller Street Garage.
Paul Marangella, Director of Economic Development &
Redevelopment, gave the staff. report.
Council Member Torliatt commented she personally favors
Alternative B' with the change to 50, cents per hour, because she
feels it reduces the City's liability more -than Alternative B-1, referring
to the cost for 2nd and 3(a' floor- parking. She clarified if there is a
deficit it will come out of the Redevelopment Agency funds.
City Council discussion ensued' with questions regarding metered
parking possibility, jumping of cars from one place to another and
the possibility of going to color zones to prevent "jumping.
Following the discussion a Motion was made to adopt PCDC Reso.
No..2003 -02 with support for rates as,sfated in Alternative B- 1, which
would assume 50 cents per hour on the ground floor, $35.00 a
month permit on the second floor, and $20.00 a month permit for
the third floor. There was also direction to. staff to bring back a
report and review of this matter in 90 days.
MJS Healy and O'Brien. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Vol XX, Page 10 March 3, 2003
1 4. NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
2 •
3 A. Discussion Regarding Campaign' Financing Ordinance /Reform.
4 (Rudnansky)
City Attorney Rich Rudnansky gave a brief overview of information
he had provided from the City of Santa Rosa; a .,memo to the
Council from his office *ddted August 2001 with suggested c`hdnges'
a relined revised version of Petaluma,'s Ordinance discussed. in
August 2001 but never formally adopted;: and a memo. to the
Council :dated Oct. 11, 200`1 with an attached memo from Steven,
Cl urchwell which included comments and recommendations fora
revised ordinance.
Council Member Canevaro explained he requested. bringing this
ordinance forward due to apparent Loopholes in the ordinance.
Council Member Harris agreed there are loopholes and the City
should have an ordinance they can be proud of. He indicated he
would not be supporting the 'public financing aspect and would
support adopting an ordinance modeled after Santa :Row's
Ordinance'.
Council Member 'Torliatt commented on Council Member,
Moynihan being the only candidate who took issue with complying
with, the ordinance. She indicated there are always ways to make
things better, but she feels this ordinance worked fine during - the:
last election, She indicated- 'support for the public financing
component of the ordinance stating it is most critical in th'e 'last
week of an .election and creates .a more level playing field. She
concluded by' eating she *hopes the Council can get behind the
full, disclosure rule.
Council Member Moynihan clarified any action to change :the
current ordinance would have no'impact on the current litigation.
City. Council, discussion ensued regarding whether or not there :is a
'need to revise the City's current ordinance -., There was extensive
.discussion regarding the public financing aspect of th'e ordinance
with Mayor Glass stating `his strong fee_ lings for leaving that aspect
in place indicating public' financing 'is mandatory if you have a
voluntary expenditure limit,, and the implication of what control that
gives the development community if a contribution limit is -not in
place is very, important. He also 'interjected his 'feelings that the
public financing aspect provides for a level playing field.
Discussion continued regarding. the issue that all candidates did
not adhere to the voluntary expenditure cap and perhaps a raise
March 3, °2003 Vol. XX, Page 1 1
l
2
• 3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
3.9
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
in the contribution reporting limit would be something the Council -
should consider.
Council Member Moynihan suggesting modeling Petaluma's
ordinance after Santa Rosa and additionally suggested raising the
reporting limits.
Vice Mayor 0 ; Brien noted the public financing monies come out of
the City's General Fund and he would be supportive of raising the
campaign contribution reporting limits.
Public Comment
Geoff Cartwright, Petaluma addressed the City Council, stating no
matter what ordinance you have, if someone violates it they will go
to' court. He commented if you get rid of the public financing, that
would be the end of the cap. He felt the Santa Rosa ordinance
does not deal with the: same election cycle as Petaluma, as there is
no directly elected. Mayor-aspect. He continued by adding if the
Council changes the ordinance, it will limit participation.
Additional City Council discussion continued regarding the raising
of the contribution limits, raising of the contribution reporting limit
and possible elimination of' the public financing /subsidy. The City
Council directed the City Attorney to bring back for future Council
action .options .to amend the City's current ordinance, based on
suggestions made this:, evening.
B: Discussion and Possible Action to adopt ' Resolution No. 2003 -45
N.C.S. Approving a City Council' Expenditure Policy. (Rudnansky)
Council Member Torliatt thanked the City Attorney for providing a
draft policy. 'She indicated her support for the proposed policy with
two suggestions. She would like, to see, on page 2, #6, "except in
case of travel inside Sonoma County" removed from the proposed
language; and would like to see a cap on expenses for cell phones
and /or conferences.
Council Members Harris and Canevaro also supported the draft
with the amendments suggested by Council Member Torliatt.
'Council Member Healy supported 'memorializing a $1,500.00 limit
on conferences, that 3rd party meals not be reimbursable, and that
all other reimbursable expenses should be actual expenses.
Vice Mayor O'Brien agreed. with the $1,500.00 cap per Council
Member for conferences.
Vol. XX, Page 12
March 3, 2003
1 Council Member Moynihan expressed the desire to see an overall
2 limit on expenses. He indicated he has had no problem in handling .
3 these expenses and would support a cap of $2,000.00 for all.
4 expenses per. Council Member. Any expenses over Jh'at amount
5 would need to come back to the full Council for approval.
6
7 Council Member Torliatt clarified the $1,500.00 cap for conferences
- - 8 - -would be 'conferenc'es ' a - Council Member chose. to attend - and - - -. - - -
9 that normal meetings- would not come out of the cap. In addition,
10 she stated she did not support an overall cap on expenses,
11 indicating her concern that Council; Members have the opportunity
12 for continuing education.
13
14 Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2003 -45 as amended to include:
15
16 ._Amending #6,. Parking G.arade and Toll Charges,, to read:
17 "Parking, garage and toll expenses will be reimbursed when an
18 automobile is used for transportation. Receipts shall be
19 obtained and filed."
20 0 A,$1,50Q.00 cap for conferences.
21 • No reimbursement for 3rd party meals.
22 Reimbursement for expenses will be for actual expenses
23 incurred.
.24
25 M/S Healy and O'Brien. `CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
26
27 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - CITY COUNCIL ONLY
28
29 PUBLIC COMMENT: 'There was none.
30
31 • CONFERENCE -WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR, Government Code' §'54957.6 - City
32 Re
presenfative; Heather:Renschler, .Ralph Anderson & Associates.
33 Unrepresented Employee Position: City Manager
34
35 ADJOURN TO EVENING SESSION
36'
37 Meeting adjourned to the evening session at 6:18 p.gpt in memory of Steve
38 Proctor.
39
March 3, 2003
EVENING SESSION
CITY COUNCIL M'EETI'NG
CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
All members were present for the evening session.
Pledge of Allegiance
Moment of Silence
Vol. XX, Page 13
12
13 REPORT OUT OF CLOSED .S'ESSI.ON. ACTIONS TAKEN
14
15 The_ re was no reportable action taken.
16
17 PUBLIC COMMENT
18
19 Becky Winslow, Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding the Magnolia
20 subdivision. She stated her concerns with the removal of more trees, said that
21 the General Plan should mean more to the City Council, and concluded by
22 indicating she: feels the developers have bought out the General Plan.
23
24 Stan .Gold, Petaluma; addressed -the City Council, indicating he is in a state of
25 despair for the citizens of Petaluma in light of the Council's decision on the
26 . Magnolia subdivision last week. 'He'indicated ;the citizens of Petaluma should not
27 have to.fight fheir own Council. He..urgecl'the Council to look at the overall
28 picture and not just one project at a time.
29
30 Richard Brawn, Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding the state of the
31 City's finances. He stated he feels Petaluma, has a l'ot in common with Enron. He
32 noted the lack-of funds for roads, and /or preventive maintenance of roads and
33 the needed monies for the flood control project.. He concluded by stating the
34 City needs to ge:t their infrastructure in order. -
35
16 Bill Donahue, Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding Sandalwood
37 Mobile .Home Estates and urged Council's` continued support for zoning for
38 mobile home parks; He indicated that although the City won their case two
39 weeks ago., °park residents have receiyed another recent rent increase, which will
40 have; to do -to arbitration, again
41
42 Geoff . Cartwright, Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding dredging of
43 the Pet.alum`a , ,River and, development in the floodplain.
44
45 Diane Reilly Torres; Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding an
46 upcoming Petaluma Live program regarding domestic violence.
47
Vol. XX, Page 14 March 3, 2003
1 CORRESPONDENCE
2
3 There was none.
4
COUNCIL COMMENT AND LIAISON REPORTS
7 Council Member. Harris commented on the General Plan, indicating he feels
8 .there is a need' -to, go a step further to enhance the "General Plan. process to
9 include an Economic Element and a, strategic analysis. He commented that
10 currently there is a Central Petaluma Specific Plan, the River Access and
11 Enhancement Plan, .cross -town connectors, potential outlet mall expansion; and
12 the expansion of the airport hangars, and the ulfimate :goal of encouraging a
13 theatre to lo_ cate in ,Petaluma. He added f hat all of these specific plans and
14 projects will go through the appropriate public process but by nature they will'
15 be competing and he feels :the Council should be more pro- active. 'He stated; in;
16 order to get to the "Renaissance" there `is a need for on .Economic Element and
17 a strategic analysis for a 3, 5 and 7 year period from now from more of - a macro-
18 economic view, He commented on the need to have a City that: is sustainable,
19 Continuity he noted eo . le; are currentl
y g given the on the highWay unnecessarily,
g, p P . y gent
20 to drive to other areas- to 'bu oods. If he choice, they would buy here.
21 He stressed part of this Economic Element must be an 'immediate "/eakage'!
22 study so we would know exactly what retail businesses to attract to 'Petaluma.
23 Then, we can finalize retail, expansion plans, which- will in turn expand the tax
24 base so there are actually funds to pay :for roads. and general infrastructure and
25 make Petaluma more of a ,sustainable, self- sufficient community.. He . continued
26 by stating the Council should take, the Chamber of Commerce 'up on their
27 generous ''show of faith :$5,000 off
er'to start a "leakage" study. He stressed the
28 importance of having a cooperative relationship. with the Chamber in order to
29 achieve the economic' goals of the y -. He urged the Council to immediately'
30 move forward on this ,and would .like to` see this be a discussion item on an
31 agenda in'the very nearfuture..
33 Council Member Moynihan co'mrnented on the desire to discuss the issue of City
34 -Council Committees at the April 7_2003 Council Meeting and additionally would
35 like to see a discussion regarding the matter of id'entify'ing .a City -owned site on
36 Garfield as a potential housing location for workforce housing, The proceeds .
37 from the sale of the site could be used for road maintenance.
38
39 Council Member .Healy stated his support for the "leakage" study, using the work'
40 done with the General Plan as, a base to start from. He additionally started he
41 would be prepared to explore the opportunities on Garfield if there is a� buy -in
42 from the community..
Vice 'Mayor O'Brien started his support for Council Member Harris's suggestion for
a "leakage" study,, agreed with the Garfield proposal with community buy -ih, .
and asked that staff provide , a stafusreport on the,repair of roads.
•
1
2
3.
5
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2,3
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42:
43
`44
45
46
47
48
March` 3; 2003'
Vol. XX, Page 15
Mayor Glass noted that a recent report from Public Facilities and Services
Director Rick Skladzien indicated that 240 potholes were filled in February.
Council Member Torliatt commented on the history of the General Plan process;
noted the Citizens Advisory Committee on Streets will be coming to the Council
options; and report on streets; that staff is reviewing mobile home park zoning
so with a that she had recently attended an 'event
by the Exchange Club, at
which Officer Martin Frye was honored as. Officer of the Year. She also
commented on having attended the No. "California State Soccer Championship
games this last weekend.
Council Member Canevaro concurred with:Council Member Harris's comments.
CITY MANAGER COMM ENTS
There were none.
6. 'PUB'LIC HEARING
A. Redwood 'Technology Center Discussion and Possible Action
Regarding .a Recommendation from, the Planning Commission to
Approve Redwood Technology Center Proposed for a 14.4 Acre
Site at the Southwest Corner of Old Redwood .highway and North
McDowell Boulevard, APN 007 -41' 1-7, 9, 11, 1.8, and 19. (Moore)
(Continued from. the February'3, 2003 City Council Agenda.)
Jayni Allsep, Contract Planner for the project, gave the staff report
and overview of the proposal.
City Council discussion ensued regarding the letter received from
Basin S °treet Properties gas well as traffic /over crossing issues.
Concern was also expressed regarding the adequacy of
statements for the overriding considerations.
Matt White', Basin Street Properties, addressed the Council
regarding changes he would like to see made to the conditions of
approval, issues relating to hydrology and traffic, and added they
eet the definition of "zero net runoff." He also commented on
their request to see the distribution for traffic. impact fees more fairly'
distributed. .
° Public Input
Rick Parmer, Petaluma, addressed the City Council in opposition to
the: proposed project due to traffic and flood plain impacts.
Paul McG'avin, Petaluma, addressed the City Council in opposition
to the project due to traffic /over crossing concerns.
Vol. XX, Page 16 March' 3, 2003
John Cheney, Petaluma, addressed the City Council in opposition •
to the.project due to traffic impacts, as well as hydrology concerns.
Rick Sa�ez, Penngrove Area Plan :Committee, ad.d'ressed "the City
Council in opposition to the project due to concerns with' the
inadequacy of FEIR,
Stan Gold, -Petaluma, addressed the City Council in opposition 'to.
the project, indicating that for the Council to make an overriding
consideration would be saying it is in the best interests of Petaluma
to have gridlock in exchange for office space, which could remain
vacant.
Geoff Cartwright, Petaluma, addressed. the City Council in
opposition to the project due. to flood plan problems and
cumulative impacts that are not being identified.
Diane Reilly= Torres; Petaluma, addressed the City Council in
opposition to the proposal and �su,pported reopening the, theatre
on the site, She stated Council should look into the fair- share
distribution issue and let the General Plan Update do the work for
this site:
Matt White, Basin Street P 'readdressed the City Council .
regarding.the Master Plan done for the site in 1998.
Council Member Torliatt clarified that traffic 'projects made were
done with existing and previous traffic models,, that they did not'
include the Petaluma Specific Plan impacts, but did include: the
expansion for the Factory Outlet.
Steve Weinberger,, Traffic Consultant, addressed the Council,
explaining the .traffic model used, and clarified they did not
estimate future delays of`serviceof Petaluma' Hill Road and Adobe
Road.
Discussion ensued re'gardi'ng the fair share impact fee distribution
issue.
Mr. Smith argued they disagree with the determination that their'
project is, 30% of the new capacity,
Extens'iv.e City Coubdil discussion rensQed regarding zoning,
concerns that retail; at that location would generate additional
traffic, water supply issues, and the fair share distribution of impact
fe "s.
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 17
{
l;'
Council ,Member Torliatt commented on the Council being asked
2
to approve a General Plan Amendment from Special Commercial
3
to Special Industrial Office. Park and the foss of potential sales tax
4
dollars.
5
6
Council Member Healy clarified the City's current allocation of
7
water is sufficient to hand °build -out of the City's General Plan.
8 ..
9
Council Member Moynihan' supported the proposed project and
10
voiced concerns wit h distribution of the impact fees. He would
11
dike to 'see that issue revisited. Me, additionally, would like to see a
12
cross-town connector included as it relates to having them
13
participate in their fair share.
14
15
Council Member Harris supported -the, proposed project, indicating
16
the rendering :looks pleasing, that the project would improve the
17
wetlands area; and there are no impacts with regard to flooding.
18
He feels; it all comes down to a traffic issue and indicated that with
19
or without this project the levels of traffic are unacceptable. He
20
el'ab'orated 'on the County jobless rate, which is at its highest since
21
1996. He `stressed this project would give Petaluma 1,000 full -time
22
higher paying jobs. People -could live and work in Petaluma, which
23
would result in a more sustainable community. He additionally
24
noted this project' would not be built until ;the tenant space is filled.
25
He would like to see staff: explore, :fQnding opportunities for the
26
overpass and renegotiate a fairer share distribution of the impact
27
fees.
28
29
Council Member Canevoro expressed concerns that this location is
30
not a place for retail and he would prefer to see office use there.
31
He stated the need to be proactive and.ready for businesses when
. 32
there'is a turnaround in' the economy. .
33
34
Council Member Healy noted concerns with the water supply and
35
also comrnented that the propos,01 is complying with zero net fill
'36
and will' comply with zero net "runoff,. With respect to flooding, he
37
stated the Council would have the opportunity to revisit that issue
38
when the theatre site comes forward. He noted he still has
39
concerns with grandfather rights' with respect to existing fill, which
40
was legal at the time and would not be legal now on the theatre
41
site and would like to address that rnoving ;forward, but it was not
42
„ before the Council tonight. With regard to the fair share of traffic
43
uses, he indicated he would like staff'to try to resolve that issue. He
44
indicated the fair share contribution for Old Redwood. Highway
45,
should be reserved specifically and set aside for those
46
i'mproveme'nts, as well as the fair share funds for the Penngrove
47
intersection. With respect to the traffic impacts on Highway 101
48
and Old Redwood Highway in general, he indicated he continues
vol..XX, Page 18
March 3, 2003
1
to have a. level of concern that is something that should be
2
addressed in. some kind of a focused' way here in Petaluma. 'He
3
stated he is prepared to support staff and the P,lann'ing
4
Commission, He requested a rno:dific to the findings of
5
overriding considerations,, attachment 4, page 5, Item #1, to
6
include the addition of, "it is anticipated that the project will
7 , .
primarily serve the expansion needs of high -tech companies
already- present .in..--Petaluma and will.,be. built 1n. phases Jo. serve - -
9
those expansion needs.,'" He, .concluded ,that the -need to retain
10
and nurture the existing. `high -tech companies in our community
11
provides° a basis for overriding considerations with respect to the
12
traffic issues.
13
14
Vide Mayor O'Brien commented this is a ;good project and .noted
15
he also, has concerns with traffic and would support starting a
16
Separate CIP to set things up for tUfure needs.
17
18
Council 'Member Torlatt stated she felt it important to point out that
19
the planning Commission approved this project by a 3 -2 vote, with
20
then Commissioner Glass and, Council Member O'Brien voting in
21
favor of.' it. She indicated she. has a tough time with this proposal
22
based on the public: testimony. Sh - e stated concerns with 4h'e
23
adequacy of the traffic and. circulation model and would have a
24
difficult time in moving, .forward with this projecf. She noted
25
concerns with the.legal defensibility of the EIR,'as well as with the
26
fact that th'e flood' control project is not yet completed. ',She-
27
indicated she. couldn`t believe the Council would move forward,
28
stating the Highway 101 impacts are insignificant. Given there are-
29
no pending pressures to build the project at this time; she indicated'
3.0
there, would be enough time to do the prudent thing. 'She
31
expressed: concern for the; existing businesses in the Redwood
32
Business Park, indicating they will experience traffic impacts. She
33
stressed this project would not pay any housing fees to .deal` with
34
the affordable housing demand it will create through the number
35
of employees, she feels it would be prudent to analyze this with the
36
models that will be ready in. the next couple:of months.
3:7
38
Mayor Glass stated he would prefer to see a financing :mechanism
39
rather than an overriding consideration for the Old Redwood
40
Highway overpass widening,. His vote .as a Planning Commissioner
41
was based on a recommendation to t`he Council that there not be
42
a statement of overriding consideration. He asked that as this
43
project goes forward, Council make mitigation in that area a
44
top priority. '
45
46
Motion to adopt -Reso. No. 2003 -48:
47 .
•
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 19
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
1. Resolution No. 2003 -48 N.C.S. Certifying' the Final
Environmental Impact Report.
M/S Moynihan and O'Brien
AYES: Harris, Canevaro, Healy, O'Brien, Moynihan
NOES: - - Torliatt and Mayor Glass..... -. -
Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -49:
2. Resolution No. 2003 -49 N -.C.S. Adopting a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and Approving the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). (To include the
change proposed by Council Member Healy to finding # 1.)
M/S Healy and O'Brien
AYES: Harris, Canevaro, Healy, O'Brien, Moynihan
NOES: Torliatt and Mayor Glass
Motion to adopt Reso. No: 2003 -50:
3. Resolution Amending the General Plan Land Use Map From
"Special Commercial" to "Special Industrial /Office Park."
M/S Moynihan and Canevaro
AYES: Harris, Canevaro, Healy, O'Brien, Mayor Glass
and Moynihan
NOES: Torliatt
Mayor Glass noted his vote of support was based on the EIR
identifying fewer impacts from this zoning change.
Council Member Torliatt clarified she voted in opposition due
to the loss in the sales tax base.
Motion to introduce Ord. No. 2147:
4. Introduction of Ordinance No: 2147 N.C.S. Rezoning
Property From Highway Commercial (CH) on Parcel A and
Light Industrial (ML) on Parcel B to Planned Unit District (PUD).
M/S Moynihan and O'Brien
Vol. XX, Page 20 March 3, 2
1 AYES: Harris, Canevaro, Healy, O'Brien, Moynihan
2
3 NOES: Torliatt and Mayor Glass
4
5 Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -51;
6
7 5. Resolution No. 2003-51 N.C.S Adopting a Unit Development
8 Plan for- Redwood Technology Center. (Motion .included
9 changes to the fair. share language (which will be
10 negotiated with the developer) .and. the changes requested
11 by Basin Street with regard to Mitigation Measures CIR -1, CIR -
12 2-and CIR -3 as recommended in their letter dated February
13 28, 2003.)
14
15 Mike Moore, Director of Community Development, clarified
16 the amendment for the ",fair share" wording in CIR -1:c;
17 second paragraph, last two sentences shall be amended to
18 read: "Such share shall be determined through negotiation
19 with the project applicant prior to issuance of any
20 development permit. The agreed upon fair share
21 contribution formula shall be deemed consistent with the
22 approved mitigation monitoring report."
23
24 The City Attorney recommended that the indemnity clause
25 be amended to reflect that they would be required to
26 defend us in the event of an attack on the approval of the
27 project "and the certification of the EIR."
28
29 M/S Moynihan and O'Brien
30
31 AYES: Harris, Canevaro, Healy, O'Brien, Moynihan
32
33 NOES: Torliatt and Mayor Glass
34
35 Council recessed at. TO p.m. to 10 :13 p.m.
36
37 B. Rockridae Pointe Discussion and Possible Action Regarding a
38 Recommendation 'from the Planning Commission to Approve a
39 Request for Pfezoning to Planned Unit Development, a Request to
40 Annex to the City of Petaluma and a Request for a Tentative
41 Subdivision Map for 62 residential lots on 'a 123 -Acre Site at Windsor.
42 Drive and Western Avenue, APN 020 -030 -037,, 039, 013 and 015 file
43 ANX 0.0004, TSM.00003, PRZ 0,001, PUD 00004. (Moore /Lafler)'
44
45 Laura Lafler, Project Manager, gave the staff' report and an
46 overview of the proposed project. She noted the tota.I amount of
47 grading proposed has been reduced to from the original. 275.,000
•
C7
I ,
March 3_2003 Vol. XX, Page 21
1
2
cubic, yards to 80,000 cubic- yards: She noted the followin
corrections to the Conditions Approval: g
3
of
4
5
Attachment 9, Mitigation Measures: Land Use and Planning,
deletion of #3;
6
7
g
Attachment 12,. Approval, of the Tent ative Subdivision
9
Conditions Map,
of Approval Item #3 now supercedes Item #9,
and #9 is now deleted.
10
11
12
Council Member Torliatt pointed out that Attachment 12 does not
13
reflect all the conditions and it ppears there is a page missing.
14
15
It was additionally noted that the hours or operation for
construction activities, referred to in a couple different
16
places, do
not match and should be consistent.
17
18
19
Council discussion ensued regarding which ma appropriately
ppropriately
reflects the proposal before them,
20
the land to be provided to the
County for Helen Putnam Park, traffic circulation
21
22
concerns and
open space aspects of the proposed project.
23
24
Vin Smith, Delco. Builders, went over the project in greater detail
and urged Council's approval. He
25
commented on their request for
changes to Attachment 12,
26
as follows:
27
28
1- The title of the Resolution and all other references within the
Resolution should state that the e a pproval is fora "Vesting
Ten totive_Subdivision Map."
30
31
2. .Engineering condition number 19 should be revised to require
installation of the sidewalk on the
32
southwesterly side of Windsor
Drive.
33
34
3. Engineering Condition number 20 should be deleted. As
35
discussed at the Planning Commission meeting, Western
Avenue along the
36
project frontage is under the jurisdiction of
the County of Sonoma.
37
38
4. Conditions' 91, 92, 93, 94, 103 and 107 should be deleted. Some
39
of these conditions conflict with the discussion and action by
the Planning commission
40
and others they have consistently
requested be removed.
41
42
Publics Input
43
44
45
Mark Coggan, Victoria Homeowners Association, addressed the
City Council in support of the
46
47
proposed project. He commented
there has been an ongoing agreement to use the four parks
48
owned by the Victoria's HOA and there should be a reciprocal use
agreement
with this project.
Vol. XX, Page 22 March 3, 2003'
Paul McGavin, Petaluma, addressed, the City Council in support of
the project and -stressed the need for prohibiting truck traffic on
Windsor Drive.
Scott Loveless, Petaluma, addressed the City Council 'indicating a
majority of their neighborhood is supportive of the project if the
increase, in traffic is mitigated. • -He added- that -- traffic islands - ne.ed
to be specifically incorporated into the first phase and that the
open space should be used solely for recreational activities.
Chris Arras, Petaluma, addressed the City Council in support of the
project proposed. He indicated the City should retain the, right to
take back the open space property to put in ball fields if necessary.
With regard to streets, he stressed the need for the upgrade of the
segment of Western Avenue' between Windsor Drive and
Cleveland. Lane.
Carol Carlson deRener, Petaluma, addressed the City Council,
indicating her elderly parents live in the neighborhood and their
view has now become one that is filled with "story poles'." She
indicated her parents have had no contact with the developer
and did not receive any notice about the meeting this evening.
She urged the Council.to support more green space or move.the
homes further away from the property line near her parent's home.
•
Geoff Cartwright, Petaluma, addressed the City Council regarding
water drainage and traffic uses.
Fete Gang, Petaluma, addressed, the City Council and noted the
public notice signs should have been larger on the site. He
indicated his opposition to the proposal with concerns regarding
hillside development, and house and lot sizes.
Edward Giodano, Petaluma addressed the City Council, expressing
issues with traffic and stated he is generally opposed to the project.
He indicated traffic on Western Avenue and' traffic issues in general
should be addressed before• developing this site.
Doyle Heaton, Developer, addressed the City Council indicating
the original project would. have been 240 units and .they.have.now
pared it down to 62 lots with 42 up and downs and 18 or 19 flats.
He concluded by urging the support of the ,project.
Council Member Healy stated he agreed with Mr. McGavin's
request for modification to condition 79 with respect to the other
three structures; of the same time acknowledging that one of those
is conditioned on there being enough property for the traffic circle
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 23
1
at- the first intersection. With respect to Mr. Heaton's February 28'"
2
letter, he indicated he has no problem with requests 1 and 2, but
3
would not be supportive of 3, as ultimately there will be an
4
opportunity to connect those through to the City limits.
5
6
Council Member Torliatt pointed out that is on one of the County
7
Bike Plan Maps as an area that needs to be upgraded, as well.
.
8
' Council Member Healy indicated with respect to request 4 and the
10
various bike path issues, he would request staff's input. He added
11
he doesn't feel Council will be able to reach a decision tonight on
12
Mr. McGavih's other request (referring to prohibiting truck traffic),
13
as it is more of a General Plan issue and would be beyond the
14
purview of the. matter before Council this evening. He does,
15
however, believe there are issues around the community regarding
16
truck traffic and noise related issues.
17
18
He additionally stated he is reluctant to move forward with the
19
annexation of the other two parcels, but he is wondering if there is
20
a way to do it so there are not entitlements created that are not
21
there already.
22
23
Mike Moore responded there are no additional entitlements that
24
they do not already have.
25 .
26
Council - Member Healy indicated his support for the land to be
27
provided to the County for Helen Putnam Park. He indicated he is
28
glad to see that the park will actually be built now and he would
29
support the City actually taking ownership of the open space land.
30
He indicated his support for the proposal in front of Council, as it is
31
a project that will respect the existing contours of the land as
32
opposed to just rearranging everything. He feels it is a positive
33
development.
34
35
Council Member Torliatt stated her agreement with Council
36
Member Healy''s statements 'and asked if the Council would
37
entertain' some kind of maintenance fund sponsored by the
38
developer for maintenance of the open space. She clarified with
39
the developer that there would be an annual fee paid through the
40
homeowner's association for maintenance costs. She asked that
41
staff reflect that in the .conditions of approval. She commented
42
further she is supportive of the traffic islands in the street being
43
constructed in the first phase, as well as the standard of
44
construction of the streets to be approved by the City's Public
45
Works Department to a level that is sufficient to maintain our
46
infrastructure and would like those.:issues documented also. With
47
regard to the Western Avenue traffic issue, she agrees with the
®
48
need to address the intersection of Bantam and Western Avenue.
Vol. XX, Page 24
March 3, 2003
1
She indicated she does not necessarily see.it as of this.
2
part project,
but there should be some way for the City and the County to work
3
together to make safet y improvements in that area. She
4
concluded by commenting on public noticing signs and stated the,
5
need for a policy, including story poles to be on any other
6
development proposals coming forward.
8
Mike Moore,- -- Di'rector 'of Community Development; ,com "merited
9
that the Planning Commission is in the process of a story pole policy
10
that will also include some sign requirements.
11
12
Council Member Torliatt commented the amounts of in -lieu housing
13
fees of '$150,000 are woefully inadequate. She stated she would
14
like to see the housing fund. allocation increased, as well as the
15
impact fees for traffic mitigation. She expressed concern with the
16
size of the homes. She indicated this is. her biggest hesitation for
1 7
voting in favor of this project because of the need for smaller,
18
starter'homes at lower prices.
19
20
Vice Mayor O'Brien commented he agreed with Council Member
21
Healy's.comments. He stated he is not supportive of raising fees for
22
in -lieu housing or traffic impacts at this late date and would
23
encourage the developer to reduce the impact on the view of Mr.
24
& Mrs. Carlson, as noted by their daughter.
25
26
Council Member Moynihan had the developer clarify why he was
27
requesting removal of condition 91, 92, 93, 94, 103 and. 107.
28
29
City Manager Bierman pointe:d out for the Council that :staff
30
indicated they would work out, in terms of which of the conditions
31
would apply or not, and he feels that is a reasonable approach to
.32
take regarding this issue.
Mayor Glass commented ,there is a good argument to be made for
the fact that the area here is being preserved when 95 acres out of
123 is preserved and publicly accessible open space.
38 . Motion to adopt Reso. No. 2003 -52:
39
40 1. Resolution No. 2003 -52 K.C.S Approving a Mitigated
41 Negative, Declaration for the Rockridge Pointe Project to 'be
42 Located at Western Avenue, and Windsor Drive ('APN.'0207
43 030.037,, 039, 013 and 015. File ANX 00004, TSM 00003, PRZ
44 0001, P:UD 00004)
•
M/S O'Brien and Hedy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
March 3, 2003 Vol. XX, Page 25
1
Motion to introduce Ord. No. 2148:
2
3
2. Introduction of Ordinance No. 2148 N.C.S Prezoning a 123-
4
Acre Parcel to Planned Unit Development, to Allow for 62
5
Residential Lots, and Development of 62 New Residences
6
Located at Western. Avenue and Windsor Drive (APN 020-
7
030-037-039, 013 and 015. File ANX 00004, TSM 00003, PRZ
8
0001, PUD 00004)
9
10
M/S O'Brien and Harris. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11
12
Motion to adopt Reso. 2003 -53:
13
14
3. Resolution No. 2001-53 N.C.S. Making Application to the
15
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to Initiate
16
Proceedings for Reorganization of a 123 -Acre Property
17
Known as Rockridge Pointe to be Located at Western
18
Avenue and Windsor Drive., Pursuant to the Cortese /Knox
19
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
20
21
M/S O'Brien and Canevaro. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
22
23
Motion to adopt Reso: No. 2003 -54:
24
25
4. Resolution No. :2003 -54 N.C.S .Approving the Vesting
26
Tentative Subdivision Map for Rockridge Pointe Project
27
Which Would Allow for.62 residential Lots Located at Western
28
Avenue and Windsor Drive. (The conditions, as negotiated
29
based on Council discussion /direction, will be memorialized
30
as an attachment to this resolution.)
31
32
M/S O'Brien and Healy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
33
34
ADJOURN
35
36
The meeting was adjourned at 11:5.7 p.m.
37'
38
39
40
David Glass, Mayor
41
42
ATTEST`.
43
44
45
46
Gayle Petersen, City Clerk
47
48
* * * * * **