Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 3.E 04/07/20034 4 CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA AGENDA BILL Agenda Title Resolution Approving the Final Map fora the Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 Ridgeview Heights Subdivision. l: Meeting Time 2 3.-00 PM • ❑ 7:00 PM Category (check one) gConsent Calendar ❑ - Public Hearing ❑ New Business ❑ Unfinished Business ❑ Presentation Department Director Contact Person Phone Number Comm. Dev. Mike Moor Curt Bates 778 -4311 Cost of Proposal N/A Account Number N/A Amount Budgeted N/A Name of Fund: N/A Attachments to Agenda Packet Item Draft Final Map Approval Resolution Vicinity Map Resolution No. 00 -220 Approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision Resolution No. 00 -221 Approving a'Tentative Subdivision. Map and adopting PUD development standards for the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision Resolution No. 2001 -044 Amending resolution 00 -220 N.C.S. and resolution 00 -221 N.C.S. deleting the condition of approval requiring the dedication and construction of a bicycle /pedestrian path from Sunnyslope Road to Sunnyhill Drive for the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision Summary .Statement Ridgeview Heights is a 9 -lot subdivision with a remainder parcel located off of Sunnyslope Road. The subdivision received tentative map approval on December '21 2000. On February 20, 2001, the City Council approved resolution 2001 -044 therein deleting the condition of approval from resolution 00 -221 requiring the dedication and construction of a bicycle /pedestrian path from Sunnyslope Road to Sunnyhill Drive. Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee applications for individual lots have been submitted to the Community Development Department and can be approved oncej the lots are created, upon final map recordation. Recommended City 'Council Action /Suggested Motion Approve final map. Reviewed by Finance Director: Reviewed by City Attorney Approved bal City Ma nager : Date: te: Today's Date Revision #'au to evised: File_Code: # March 20, 2003 SACC -City CouneiliReports\Ridgeview Heights Final Map New.doc CITY OF PETAL V MA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7;.2003 • AGENDA DEPORT FOR RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL NIAP'FOR THE RIDGEVIEW HEIGHTS SU>aDI"SION 1. EXECUTIyE SummARY. Ridgeview Heights is a 9 -lot subdivision with a remainder'parcel located off of Sunnyslope Road. The subdivision received tentative map approval on December 21, 2000. On February 20, 2001,'the City Council approved resolution 200.1 -.044 therein deleting the condition of approval from resolution 00 -221 requiring the dedication and construction of a bicycle /pedestrian path: from Sunnysloope Road to Sunnyhill Drive. Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee applications for individual lots have been submitted to the Community Development Department and can be approved once the lots are created, upon final map recordation. 2. BACKGROUND The project applicant, Linda Beafie, is requesting final map approval for the project. The final map, improvement plans and landscape plans have been designed to comply with all conditions of approval set forth in the tentative map approval resolution and the mitigated negative declaration approval resolution as well as all pertinent !City standards. 3. ALTERNATIVES Disapprove the final map 4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS The developer has, posted bonds and agreements to complete the public improvements, estimated to be $227,725.00. The developer is'responsible for all costs of public improvements and, once completed and accepted by the City, the improvements will be -dedicated to the City for maintenance. There is no cost to the City for construction of public improvements other than plan review and inspection services by City personnel. This plan review and inspection cost is covered by t he Engineering fees already collected' with the project application (4% of the estimated $227,725.00 = $9,109.00 paid to the City for inspection and plan review)." 5. CONCLUSION The developer has met all the? requirements of the City to obtain City Council final map approval. Once the final map is approved, SPARC applications are approved and the necessary building permits are • issued, construction should commence immediately. 6. OUTCOMES OR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS WHAT WILL IDENTIFY SUCCESS OR COMPLETION: N/A 7. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council. adopt axesolution approving the final map for the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision. a 0 1 0 2 3 DRAFT RESOLUTION 4 5 6 7 APPROVING THE FINAL MAP 8 FOR RIDGEVIEW HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION 9 IO WHEREAS, the Community Development Director and the City Engineer have reviewed the 11 final map of the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision and have reported it to be in conformity with the 12 Subdivision Ordinance, and such reports have been forwarded to and reviewed by this Council; 13 and, 14 15 WHEREAS, the certifications required by law have been endorsed on said map; and, 16 17 WHEREAS, this Council finds that the final map conforms to the requirements of this City's 18 Subdivision Ordinance and is consistent with, and conforms to the general plan for the area; and, 9 0 WHEREAS, this Council finds the final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map 21 previously approved for the subdivision by Resolution No, 00 -221 N.C.S., the findings of which 22 are hereby incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth - herein. 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT,RESOLVED; 25 26 1. That said final map of the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision 'is hereby approved, provided 27 that the conditions, which have been previously set forth in said Resolution No. 00 -221 28 N.C.S., incorporated herein by reference, shall be carried out; and, 29 is 1 2. That upon execution of the Subdivision Public Improvements Agreement "in the form 2 approved by the City Attorney, and the furnishing of the required improvement .security 3 and insurance, approved as to .form by the City Attorney and as to sufficiency by the City 4 Manager, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to sign the certificate on said 5 final map certifying that the City Council has approved the same and accepted all streets 6 and other dedications thereon. The City Clerk shall thereupon.cause said. final maps to be 7 recorded in the Office of the Sonoma County Recorder. 8 9 1.0 11 S: \CGCity CounciRresohitions\Ridgeview Heights FM Reso!doc • • Ah Rrdgeview Heights Subdi'v" - Sunnyslope R ad Final Map Exhibit �. p J � 1 �� , �� I ?, ' � �� is � � � �� a Q , 1Z _j V* Legend T S-`\ eO " Z' HIGHLAND Selecte4 By Buffer / �. / �� � f #; V 0 Street Names City Limits r B ullding F ootprints j &/ creeks A Ej Parcels Ej Urban Growth Bouridary \ �� r � �\ 44>- 0 4 W, / ; %'i/ X, s. ; � 0� tw -V NO v W X % A ' " A JOSETTE e r 17 N Contents of this map are Copyright 2002, KoosePoint Technology and may not be reproduced without prior written permission. WARNING This map does not meet national map ,3CC411 standards and CaI7170t be used for e17_q117eer117 S purposes D, Printed: 3/21/2003 9:03:38 AM Powered by GeoSmart.net Resolution No. 00� -220 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California • ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND 1VII'ITGATION 'lOrI'ONITORING REPORT FOR RIDGE VIEW HEIGHTS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, A NINE LOT SUBDIVISION WITH A REMAINDER, APN 019- 201 =006 & 025 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map, PUD Development Standards, and,Mitigated Negative Declaration, on June 22, 1999, after giving notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended; and , WHEREAS, at the end of the June 22nd public hearing "the; Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the proj ect; and WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on the proposed project on August 16th, August 23 November 15, 1999, and May 1.5, 2000 and additional deliberations following the close of the public hearing, on November 20' and _December 11, 2000 after giving notice of said hearing, in themanner, for th&period,, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as • amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that, pursuant° to Article 6, Negative Declaration Process, of the California Environmental, Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the requirements. of CEQA have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study; and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate to the project; based on the following findings: That based upon the Initial Study, potential impacts resulting from the project have been identified. Mitigation measures have been proposed and agreed to by the applicant as a condition, of project approval that will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. In addition, there is no substantial ,evidence that supports a fair argument that the project, as conditioned and mitigated, would have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project does not have the potential to affect wildlife resources as defined in the State Fish and Game Code, either individually or cumulatively, and is exempt from Fish and Game filinzfees because it is proposed on a partially .developed site Arid is surrounded by existing residential development, with none of the resources as defined in the Code. That the project is not located on a site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site List compiled by the State,Pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code. 4. That the Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and considered public comments • before making a recommendation on the project, and found that a Mitigated Negative Declaration "is appropriate to the project. Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 1 5. That the record of proceedings of the decision on the project is available for public review at the City of Petaluma Planning Department, City Mall, 11 English Street; Petaluma, California. 6. That a previous Environmental Impact Report (Proposed Sunnyslope Assessment District and Annexation EIR, accepted by the City Council in 1991, adequately evaluated the environmental impacts of the project and mitigation measures were adopted to . reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant. Based on the Initial 'Study prepared for the current Ridge View Heights project, no new significant environmental impacts will result which were not previously evaluated, and therefore, a subsequent EIR need not be prepared. 7. That. the mitigation measures adopted with the previous EIR shall still apply to the Ridge View Heights project. S. That based on the evidence in the record presented during the course of the public hearings before the City Council,, the City Council has determined that the proposed development will have traffic, traffic safety and air quality impacts resulting from anticipated vehicle trips on the local road system and has determined ' that a bicycle /pedestrian connection` between,Sunnyslope.Road and SunnyhillDrivewill,mtigate those impacts to a level that is less than significant. Said evidence of potential environmental impacts includes;_: a) The average single - family household generates 10' vehicle trips per day; or 90 potential trips per day for the proposed 9 -lot subdivision (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 6 Edition,. 1997 ) ; b) Most daily vehicle trips are less than five miles in length and as a result generate far more air pollution than trips in excess of five miles (California Air Resources Board, "Land Use Air Quality Linkage ", 1997, p.2) . c) Each one- pecent reduction in vehicle trips can result in a two to four- percent reduction in air pollution emissions (Victoria Transport Policy Institute "Quantifying the Benefits of Non- Motorized Transport", 1999; p.4); d) A lack of safe, convenient bicycle /pedestrian connections between neighborhoods and schools; shopping, parks and other facilities "thwart attempts to increase walking and bicycling and force pedestrians and :bicyclists onto arterial and collector streets" (Petaluma Bicycle -Plan, p. 5); increasing the potential for conflicts with motor vehicles and the potential for accidents. NOW, TBEEREFORk BE IT RESOLVE D that the City Council of the City of`Petaluma does hereby adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Ridge View Heights, 'located at.APN 0,19 -201- 006 and 025 on Sunnyslope Road, subject to the following'Mitigation Measures as outlined in the project Initial Study: • Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 2 MInGTATTONMEASURES GEOLO AND, SOILS: • Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring .for Potential Construction Related Impacts: The applicant shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by a registered professional engineer as an integral part of the - grading plan. The Erosion and Sediment Control, Plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineering and Planning Departments; prior to issuance of a grading permit. The Plan shall include temporary erosion control measures to be used .during -construction of cut and fill slopes excavation for foundations, and ,other grading operations at the site to prevent discharge of sediment and contaminants into' the drainage system. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall include the following measures as applicable: Throughout the . construction process, disturbance of groundcover shall be minimized and the existing vegetation. shall, 'be retained to the extent possible to reduce soil erosion. All construction and grading activities, including short term needs (equipment staging areas, storage areas; and field office locations) shall minimize the amount of land area- disturbed. Whenever possible, existing disturbed areas shall be used for such purposes. b. All drainageways shall be protected from silt and sediment in storm runoff through the eas shall, be .'mul'ched diversion berms� and ll or check. dams. All e xposed surface cut and fill .slopes shall be protected with hay mulch and/or erosion control blankets as appropriate. C. Material and equipment for implementation of erosion control measures shall be on -site by October J. ". All grading activity shall be completed by October 15` prior to the on -set of the rainy season, with all. disturbed areas stabilized and revegetated by October 31s Upon approval 'by the Petaluma City Engineer, extensions for. short -term grading may be allowed. Special erosion control measures may be required by the City Engineer in conjunction with any specially permitted rainy season grading. 2. All construction 'activities: shall meet the Uniform Building Code regulations for seismic safety (i.e., reinforcing perimeter and /or load bearing walls, bracing parapets, etc.). 3. All construction shall comply with the recommendations of the Soils Investigation Report for the B'eatie Subdivision - prepared by Giblin Associates, July '3, 1991, and the update to the report. 'prepared by Giblin Associates, March 5, 1999, subject o the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Chief Building Official (also see Mitigation Measure 44 below).. Mitigation. Measures and Applicable Monitoring of Potential Geologic Hazards Related to • Operation/Use: Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 3 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall provide a Soils Investigation and Geotechriical' Report prepared by a registered professional civil engineer with the the Subdivisprr _the City Engineer Subdivision ordinance and Chief Building: Official in accordance ance and Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance. The soils • report shall address site .specific soil conditions (i. e. highly. expansive soils) and include recommendations for: site preparation and grading; foundation and soil engineering, design; pavement .design, utilities, roads, bridges and structures. 5. The design of all earthwork; cuts and fills drainage, pavements, utilities; foundations and tructural components shall conform with the specifications 'and criteria contained. in the geotechrircal` report, as approved by the City Engineer. 'The geotechnical. engineer shall �, design g geotechnical; engineer shall also inspect the construction work and shall certify to the City, prior to acceptance. of the improvements' or issuance of a certificate- of, occupancy, thatthe improvements have been constructed in accordance with the geotechnical specifications. Construction and improvement plans shall be reviewed for conformance with the g ote ce of an specifications by the City Engineer and Chief Building .Official prior to eoteclinical gr or building Permits and /or; advertising for bids on public 'g g P improvement projects. Additional soils information be required: by '.Chief Building Inspector during the plan' check of building plans in accordance with Title 17 and' 20 of the Petaluma Municipal Code. 1. 6. Foundation and structural design for buildings shall conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, as well as state and local laws /ordinances. Construction plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Building Di ision prior to the issuance of a building permit. All.wor y g k shall be subject to inspection b the 'Building Division and must • _. conform to all applicable::code requirements and approved improvement plans prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading- or 'building permit, the applicant shall submit a , detailed schedule for field, inspection -of work in progress to ensure.'that all a livable codes; conditions and mitigation measures are being properly implemented through construction of the project. AIR• Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring of Potential Air Quality .Impacts Related to Construction: The applicant shall incorporate the following Best Management Practices into the construction and improvement plans and cfearl y indicate these provisions 'in the specifications. The construction contractor shall .incorporate °these measures into the required Erosion and Sediment: Control Plan to limi during' construction. t. fugitive dust and exhaust :emissions a. Grading and construction equipment operated during construction activities shall be properly muffled and maintained to minirnize emissions. Equipment shall be turned off when not in use. • Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 4 b. Exposed, soils shall be watered periodically during construction a minimum of twice daily." - The frequency of watering shall be increased if wind. speeds exceed 15 mph. Only purchased city water or reclaimed water shall be used for this purpose. Responsibility for watering to include weekends and holidays when work is not in progress. C. Construction sites involving earthwork shall provide for a gravel pad area consisting of an impermeable 'liner and drain, rock at the construction entrance to clean mud and debris from construction vehicles prior to entering the public roadways. Street _surfaces in the vicinity of the project shall be. routinely swept and cleaned of mud and dust carried onto the street by construction vehicles. d. During excavation activities, haul trucks used - to transport soil shall utilize tarps or other similar covering devices to reduce dust emissions. e. Post - construction revegetation, repaving or soil stabilization of exposed soils shall be completed in a timely manner according to the approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and verified by City inspectors prior to acceptance of improvements or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Applicant shall 'designate a person with authority to require - increased watering to monitor the dust and erosion control program and provide name and phone number to the City of Petaluma prior to issuance of grading permits. • HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Mitigation Measures and Applicalle Monitoring. for Potential Water Quality Impacts Related to Construction: 1. All construction activities shall be performed in a manner that minimi the sediment and /or pollutants entering directly or indirectly into the storm drain system or ground water. The applicant shall :incorporate the following provisions into the construction plans and specifications, to be verified by the Planning Department, prior to issuance of grading or building permits: a. The applicant shall; designate construction staging areas and areas for storage of any hazardous materials (i.e., motor oil, fuels, paints, etc.) used during construction on the improvement plans. All construction staging areas shall be located away from any stream and adjacent drainage areas to prevent runoff from construction areas from entering into the drainage system. Areas designated for storage of hazardous materials shall include proper containment features to prevent contaminants from entering drainage areas in the event of a spill or leak. b. No debris, soil, silt; sand, cement, concrete or washings thereof, or other construction related materials or wastes, oil or petroleum products or other organic: or earthen material shall be allowed to enter any drainage system. All • discarded material including washings and any accidental spills shall be removed and disposed of at an approved disposal site. The Applicant shall designate Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 5 appropriate disposal methods and /or facilities on the construction plans or in the specifications. Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring of Potential Water Quality Impacts Related to Operation/fTse: 0 2. The applicant shall develop and implement a comprehensive Urban Runoff .Control Plan submitted for review and approval of the Planning Department prior to approval of improvement plans or issuance of grading or ,building permits. At a minimum, the plan shall (1) identify specific types and sources of storm,water pollutants; (2) determine the location and nature of potential impacts; and, (3) specify and incorporate .appropriate control measures into the project'design and improvement plans. Construction plans shall be reviewed by City Planning Department for conformance with the Urban.Runoff'Control Plan prior to approval of improvement ;plans or issuance of grading or building permits. City inspectors shall inspect the improvements and verify compliance prior to acceptance of .improvements or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Urban. Runoff Control Programs shall include the following as appropriate: a. Where practical, street runoff should 'be conveyed through vegetated, swales or retained. in small detention basin or swales which serve to filter and absorb sediment and chemical constituents in urban runoff prior to .entering a stream channel or storm drain. Alternatively "filters'-' of oil and contaminants may be incorporated into the design of storm drain drop inlets where an annual maintenance program is provided. b. All drainage improvement plans shall°include installation of permanent signs, where applicable (concrete stamps or equivalent) at each storm. drain inlet, where i applicable. The sign at each inlet shall :read "No Dumping, Flows To The Petaluma River" or equivalent' and shall be installed at the time of construction and verified prior to acceptance of public improvements or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring for'On -Site Flooding and -Drainage: 3. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading and .drainage plan for review .and` approval , by City Engineering and Planning Departments prior to approval of a grading or building permit. The project grading and all site drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the City of Petaluma Engineering. Department's "Standard Specifications" and the :Sonoma County Water Agency's "Flood Control Design Criteria." The drainage plans shall include supporting calculations of storm drain and ;culvert size using acceptable engineering methods. Surface runoff shall be conveyed to an appropriate storm :drain system. All hydrologic, .hydraulic and storm drain system design shall be subject to review and approval, of the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) and the City Engineer. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mitigation Measures and Applicable 'Monitor ng of Impacts to Biological Resources during Construction: Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 6 1: The dri pline! of all trees to be preserved shall be surveyed and accurately depicted on the grading arior construction plans as sensitive areas': to. be avoided. and protected during construction. No grading, earthwork, fill, compaction, drainage or equipment shall be allowed within the dripline areas. Protective fencing shall be installed a minimum of 20- .' feet, to the extent possible, beyond the drip4ine of trees, as shown on approved plans, and verified by the Planning Department prior to issuance of'gradirig permits. 2. If encroachment within the root. zones of significant trees cannot be avoided, then a certified arborist shall be retained to provide recommendations for less - damaging construction practices and long -ierrn maintenance. An arborist report shall be prepared and submitted for approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of grading or building permits within sensitive areas. 3. The recommendations of the Tree Preservation and Mitigation Report : (February 25, 1999), prepared by Horticultural :Associates, :shall be followed. Any deviation shall require the prior approval of the, Planning Department. 4. The open space /sceni,c easement shall be documented on the Final Map. The open space /scenic easement shall be recorded On the title to property at 125 Sunnyhill Road (Lot 10), and verification of recordation shall be provided to the Planning Department prior to Final Map approval. 5. The trees located, along the northwest border of the site consisting mostly of Monterey Pines, shall be preserved. Trees to be preserved shall be shown on the Final Map. This requirement shall also be recorded on the Title to Lot 6 and verification of recordation shall be provided to. the Planning Department prior to Final Map approval. The recommendations of the Tree Preservation and Mitigation Report shall be followed during grading. NOISE Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring, of Potential' Noise Impacts Related to Construction: 1. AlLconstruction activities shall comply with the City of Petaluma Noise Element of the General Plan and the Performance Standards of the Zoning Ordinance, except that hours of construction shall be as shown in Item 2 below. 2. All construction activities 'shall be limited to 8:.00 a.m. to 5 :00 p.m. Monday through Friday;, unless special circumstances warrant additional. hours and unless a permit is first secured'from.the Planning ;Director prior to the change in hours. 'No construction shall be permitted on Saturdays, Sundays or City of Petaluma recognized legal holidays. There shall be no start up of machines or equipment prior to 8:00 a.m., Monday through Friday. There shall be. no delivery of materials or equipment prior to 7:30 a.m. or past 5 :00 p.m., Monday through Friday. There shall be no cleaning of machines or equipment and no servicing of equipment past 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The applicant's telephone number shall be made available to the Planning Department for noise complaints. Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 7 All construction equipment powered by internal combustion engines shall be .properly muffled and maintained to minimiz noise. Equipment shall be turned off when not is use. 4. Construction maintenance', storage and staging areas for construction equipment shall avoid proximity to ;residential areas to the maximum extent- practicable: Stationary construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc., shall be placed away from residential areas and /or provided with acoustical shielding. The applicant shall designate a Project Manager - with. authority to implement the mitigation measures who will be responsible for responding to any complaints from the neighborhood, prior to issuance of a building/grading permit. The 'Project Manager's telephone number shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site. The Project Manager shall determine the cause of noise complaints (e.g. starting too early, faulty muffler, etc.) and shall take prompt action to correct the problem. Residential construction shall comply with-and with the requirements of the State of California as outlined in Title 24, Part 2 of the ,State Building Code for acceptable interior and exterior noise levels. VISUAL OUALITY AND,AESTHETICS Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring: 1. A maximum of 3.5 ft. fencing shall be allowed on Lots 1 and 2 on the &nnyslope.Road frontage. Fencing' 6 ft. or higher shall not extend toward Sunnyslope Road' beyond the wall of 'the house, The front of the porch shall not be considered the wall of the house. I The stand of trees,- consisting primarily of `oaks. and redwoods,. ,located toward the top of the hill, ,sh4 be preserved through an open space /scenic easement. The easement shall be :. , documented on `the. Final Map. The -open space /scenic easement shall be-recorded on the `title to the property at 125 Sunnyhill Road (Lot 10) prior to the issuance of a building permit. . 3. The trees located along the northwest border of the site, consisting, mostly of Monterey Pines, shall lie preserved. Trees to be preserved ,shall be shown the on Final Map. This requirement shall be recorded on the, •title to Lot 6. The recommendations of the Tree Preservation and Mitigation Report (February 25, 1999) prepared by Horticultural Associates,. shall be followed during.grading. 4. House plans and landscaping plans for lots 3' -9 shall, require administrative .(staff level) site, plan and architectural review approval prior to the issuance of building permits. House plans and landscaping 'plans for lots 1 -2 shall be subject to the approval of the Site Plan and Architectural Review. Committee, prior to the issuance of building permits. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION Mitigation and Applicable Monitoring: 1. The applicant shall a Traffic Impact Miti anon • Rp pay p g Fees as required'by the Municipal Code prior to. the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 8 2. Sufficient drive' Wa y : area shall be provided for Lot 2.10 provide for turnaround of parked cars; 'no backout onto Siinnyslope Drive shall be allowed. Lot 2 shall provide for adequate driveway area to accommodate guest parking. 3. 'A public bicycle %pedestrian connection shall be provided between Sunnyslope Road and Sunnyhill Drive comprised of the proposed public street„ the public drainage easement across Lot 6 and an easement across the, westerly edge of the "Remaining Lands of B eatie." PUBLIC SERVICES/RECREA TTON Mitigation of Cumulative Impacts to Increased I)emandfor Public Facilities: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of Community Facilities Development fees to offset the impacts to .public facilities. Fees shall be calculated by the City at the time of building permit issuance and are due- and payable by the applicant prior to final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Mitigation of Cumulative Impacts to Demand Public Services Including Parks, Schools, and Public Facilities not Covered by Other Special Development Impact Fees:. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of Park �and.Recreation Land Improvements fees for any residential' subdivision or project which exceeds four dwelling units on a single parcel. These fees provide for,acquisition, development and improvement of neighborhood. • and community park and recreation facilities: Fees ,shall be calculated .by the City at the time of building - permit issuance and are due and payable by the applicant prior to final inspection or issuance of 'a Certificate of Occupancy. Mitigation of Potential Impacts: from Increased Demand. on Public Schools: For residential development projects, the applicant shall be responsible for payment of School. Facilities fees: Fees shall be calculated by the City at the time of building permit issuance and are due and. payable directly to the :school district by the applicant prior to final inspection or issuance of,a certificate of occupancy. The applicant shall provide a receipt or proof of payment .of school facilities fees to the City Building Division prior to final inspection or issuance, of a Certificate, of Occupancy. Mitigation of Impacts Related .to Increased Demand for Public Works Services: 4. Landscape, plans shall reflect use of water conserving and native plant materials (including native oaks and other species with high habitat value) land compatible irrigation system design. Landscape plans shall be included in the submittal for building permits for each lot and shall conform to City standards for street tree installation. All landscaping shall be privately maintained. Landscaping in the parkway or landscape strips shall be designated the responsibility of individual lot owners and shall be reflected by deed restriction for each applicable lot. Mitigation of Impacts Related to Increase Demand for Fire Department Services: Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 9 5. The applicant shall incorporate into the project design all applicable requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and the City of Petaluma Fire and Public Works Standard Specifications. Construction plans shall be submit_ ted for review and approval of the Fire Marshall and Building Division -prior to approval of improvement plaris or issuance of a • building permit. Improvement plans shall include the following specifications for emergency access, hydrant location, 'fire flow pressure and unit construction a. All new development shall provide adequate access - ,for emergency vehicles meeting City Standard Specifications, including minimum street widths,. all weather surface, and sufficient turn around areas, as required by-the Fire Chief. b. No combustible construction, is permitted above the foundation unless an approved all weather hard surface road is provided to within one hundred fifty feet' of the farthest point of a building or structure. C. All required fire lanes_ in which no parking is allowed shall be, designated by painting curbs red. Where no curbs exist signs approved by the Fire /Marshal .shall be installed. This applies to any - private drive or roadway 20 feet or less in width. . d Foe Department p ect involving common access or use areas, the applicant shall provide the with a notarized copy of the recorded conditions, covenants, land restrictions and/or a maintenance agreement in a form acceptable to. the City Attorney, ensuring that all fire access roads and. components of fire protection systems will be maintained, by a maintenance district, owner's association or similar legally responsible entity. e. To prevent confusion for access 'in event of emergency street names shall be submitted to "the' Planning Department for review an • d approval, prior to approval of building permits. The, name shown on the tentative subdivision map as "Rosewood Court shall be changed to avoid confusion with an existing City street of a. similar name. f. All buildings shall have addresses clearly posted at or near the main entry door with a minimum of four 4 inch letters on contrasting background and an address' locator posted at or .near the driveway entrance. Reflectorized ,numbers are acceptable. Design and location of address; directories shall be approved by the Plann ng,Department and the. Fire Marshal's office. g. Fire hydrants shall be spaced a maximum of 300 feet apart. The ,specific location and type of fire hydrants ishall be approved by the Fire Marshal's Office. No house should be further than 150 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire flows shall be provided to meet a minimum of 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 PSI or as approved by the Fire Marshall. All fire .h drants for the y project must be tested, flushed and in service prior to the commencement of combustible construction on ,the site. h. All buildings and new construction shall .provide smoke, detectors 'and fire extinguishers in, conformance with the Uniform Fire Code and City. Standard Specifications. i. All roofing material shall. meet ;standards of City of Petaluma Ordinance 1744 land • -shall have a fire rating of Class `B" or better, treated in accordance with the Unifonn,Building Code Standard 32,7. Reso. 00 =220 NCS Page 10 6. Landscape plans submitted -for administrative (staff level) site plan and architectural review shall incorporate the use of plant materials and /or design strategies to minimize maintenance. requirements and fire risk for all right-of-away landscape areas: Use of fire resistant landscaping shall be encouraged wherever possible. 7. The fire hydrant at turnout shall be located on the slightest grade possible (less than 13 percent). CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation of Potential :Impact& to Cultural Resources; Related to, Construction: Trenching for utilities and irrigation ines :shall be kept to as shallow a depth as practical to avoid disturbing potential subsurface resources. .• 2. For all construction activities, potential to uncover unknown archeological resources exist. Should any artifacts, cultural remains or potential resources be encountered during construction activities, work 'in the area of the ,find shall cease and the construction e, Director- of Planning. Archaeological features include artifacts of stone, shell no* bone, or other natural materials. Associations of artifacts such as hearths, house floors and dumps. Historic artifacts potentially include all by- products of human land. use greater than 50 years of age. Human burials, if encountered, require the notification of the County Coroner in addition to the monitoring archaeologist. The City shall consult with a qualified cultural resource specialist, to evaluate the find. If the suspected- remains are determined to be potentially significant, all work in the vicinity shall be halted until mitigation measures are incorporated into the design, or removal of the resource has been, accomplished in accordance with recommendations by the archaeologist. The Applicant shall comply with all -mitigation recommendations of the archeologist prior to ' commending work in the vicinity of the archeological finds. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated. with consulting cultural resource specialist. ]IMPLEMENTATION:. The ;applicant shall incorporate all applicable code -provisions and required mitigation measures and conditions into the, design and improvement plans and specifications for the project. 0 2. The applicant shall notify all employees, contractors and agents involved in the project implementation of the mitigation measures and conditions applicable to the project and shall ensure `compliance with such.measures and conditions. The applicant shall also notify all assigns and transfers of the same., CONSTRUCTION MEASURES: The applicant shall designate a project manager with authority to implement all mitigation measures , and conditions of .approval and provide the project manager's name, address, Reso. 00 -220. NCS Page 11 and phone number to the City prior to issuance. of any grading, building, or construction permit. 2. Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on the building or grading permits,and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. • 3. City inspectors shall ensure that construction activities occur consistent with the approved plans and conditions of approval. 4. If deemed a ppropriate contractor, , pp a g p ion y ty conference with the construction cit a pplicant and shall agencies to : evi'ew the mitigation measures and conditions of approval prior to issuance of grading and building permits. Under the power and authority conferred upon this ,Council by the Charter'of said City. REFERENCE: CE. I hereby certify the fore oin Resolution introduced e Decemherd by the y �Y g g was introduced and adopfe � Council of the City of Petaluma at %a Regular g n, 21, 20Ci Approved ast 11 by the following vote, form. ;; AYES: Cader - Thompson, Keller, Maguire, Hamilton, Mayor-'Thompson City Attorney NOES: None ABSENT: Healy Vice Mayor'Torliatt ATTEST: 4� •=f City Clerk Jayodr V Reso. 00 -220 NCS Page 12 resolution No. 00 -221 N.C.S. 0 1 of the City of Petaluma, California 2 3 4 APPROVING- TIDE TENTATIVE SUI DrVISION NUX 5 AND ADOPTING PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6 FOR RIDGE VIEW SIGHTS, 7 APN 019- 201 -006 & 025 8 9 10 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Tentative 11 Subdivision Map; PUD Development 'Standards, and Mitigated Negative Declaration, on June 22, 12 1999, after giving notice of said1earing in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by 13 Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended; and 14 15 WHEREAS, at the end of the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend 16 that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the project; and 17 18 WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on the, proposed project on August 16th, 19 August 23 November 15 1999, and May 15, 2000 and additional deliberations following the 20 close of the public hearing on November 20. and December 1.1, 2000 after giving notice of said 21 hearing, in the. manner, for the period, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as 2 amended; and 0 23 24 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Tentative Subdivision Map, and in accordance 25 with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, finds: 26 27 1. That the Tentative 'Subdivision :Map; as conditioned, is consistent with the provisions of 28 Title 20; Subdivisi "ons, of the, Municipal Code including but not limited to, providing the 29 required information for processing and approving - the map, providing for public 30 improvements and infrastructure, creating buildable lots, and providing access to public 31 streets. 32 33 2. That the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned, is consistent with the provisions of 34 the California Subdivision Map Act, providing the required information for the processing 35 of map applications, and providing for the required improvements, dedications, and 36 easements. 37 38 3. That the proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvements, 39 will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The proposed project is 40 consistent with the 'General Plan land use designation of Suburban Residential, 0.6 to 2.0 41 dwelling units per acre, which applies to lands away from the. urban core with varying lot 42 sizes. The General Plan land use designation is consistent with the PUD zoning 0 3 designation. 4 Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 1 I 2 4. That the site is physically suitable for the density and the type of development proposed. • 3 The project is consistent with the development allotment of 10 lots for the site, established 4 by Resolution No. 91 -152 N.C.S., adopted by the City Council in - June, 1991, for the 5 Sunnyslope area. 6 7 5, That reasonable public ,access on public roads is provided for the proposed lots by the 8 construction of a new road, which will align with Smith Drive. 9 10 6. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements. will not cause 11 substantial environmental damage, and that no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to 12 fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project will' include an "open space scenic easement" 13 to ensure the preservation of a stand of mature trees at the north end of the project site 14 (on Lots 5, 6, and 10), and will comply with the recommendations of the Tree 15 Preservation and Mitigation Report; prepared by Horticultural Associates, February 25, 16 1999. 17 18 7. That the City Council has determined that the addition of a bicycle /pedestrian connection 19 between Sunnyslope Road and Sunnyhll Drive across the proposed subdivision and the 20 "Remaining Lands of Beatie" will result in the project being consistent with Goal 2 of the 21 Petaluma General Plan Transportation Element to "improve safety on all streets" and Goal 22 4 to "reduce dependence on the auto by integrating, to the extent feasible, alternative 23 transportation modes as a fundamental component of the City's transportation system ", as 24 well as with Program 30 of the Petaluma General Plan Transportation Element to • 25 "develop and implement a system of off- -road ,bike paths "; Program 31 to "expand and 26 improve bicycle routes and connect them to each other and to major destinations "; 27 Program 33 which requires "new development and redevelopment to include bicycle 28 routes and parking facilities "; and Policy 14.2 of the Community Character 'Element 29 req4ii7ilg "new 'development to include pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and 3 0 through the site to connect existing and /or planned Citywide pedestrian and /or bicycle 31 networks:" 32 33 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed PUD .Development Standards, as 34 shown in the attached "Exhibit' A," and in accordance with the' recommendation of the Planning 35 Commission, finds 36 37 1. That the PUD Development 'Standards are consistent with the R -1 -20 000 zoning district 38 standards, as amended or revised, and will provide for quality in design of house plans, 39 landscaping, and site plans. 40 41 2. That the plan for the proposed, development is compatible with the area and that the 42, variation in lot size; width, and depth is consistent with the intent of Resolution No. 91- 43 152 N. C.S. which allows the Planning Commission and City Council to alter the. minimum 44 parcel size and lot dimensions in order to promote the most environmentally sensitive and Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 2 I land efficient lotting patterns; and that this, will be ,achieved by clustering the houses 2 towards the lower elevations of the site and preserving significant trees. 3 4 3. That the proposed project has complied with the requirements of CEQA through the -5 preparation and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project, 6 which. addresses the potential environmental impacts associated with its 'development, and 7 that no further environmental analysis is necessary. 8 ' 9 NOW, TREREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Petaluma does 10 hereby approve the Tentative Subdivision Map and adopt the PUD Development Standards for 11 theRidge View Heights, APN 019 - 201 -006 and 025, subject to the following Conditions of 12 Approval, as revised or modified: 13 14 Conditions of Approval 15 16 From the Planning. Department: 17 18 1. Approval is granted for the project in accordance with the Tentative Subdivision Map 19 submitted to the 'Planning Department, dated March .l, 1999 (revised), project narrative, 20 and proposed PUD Development Standards, as conditioned and /or revised. 21 22 2. Unless otherwise addressed within the PUD Development Standards, all applicable 23 provisions of the - Zoning Ordinance, Site Plazi and Architectural Review Committee * 4 Design Guidelines and Procedures, and the Municipal Code shall apply. 25 26 3. In accordance with the provisions of the Petaluma Municipal Code, the applicant shall pay 27 City Special. Development Fees, 'at time 'of building permit application or as otherwise 28 required by the Municipal community clud , but i det ed to, the following: sewer � al Code including but not limit 29 connection, water velopment, storm drain impact, 30 parks and recreation, school facilities in -li'eu housing, and traffic mitigation fees. 31 32 4. The P UD ,Development - Standards shall ' be amended to. reflect the following: Hours of 33 construction shall be limited to the hours of 8,: a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through 34 Friday, unless special circumstances warrant additional hours and unless a permit is first 35 secured from the Planning Director prior to the change in hours, No construction shall be p ;Saturday, Sunday or legal holidays. There. shall be no start up of machines 37 or equ prne t prior 'to '8:00 a.m., Monday through Friday. There shall be no delivery of materials' e quipment prior to 7:00 a.m, or past 5.00 p.m.,, Monday through Friday. 39 There hall be no cleaning of machines or equipment and no servicing of equipment past 40 6 :00 p.m., Monday`through Friday. 41 42 5. House plans a n d landscaping plans for Lots 1 and 2 shall be subject to the approval of the 43 Site Plan ,arid Architectural Review Committee (SPARC) ,prior to the submittal for 44 building permits'.. ;Plans for Lots 3 -9 shall be subject to administrative design review. 40 - Plans 'shall' be consistent with the PUD Development Standards for Ridge View Heights, Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 3 I the soils reports prepared, by Giblin- Associates (July 3, 1991 and, as amended March 5, 2 1'999), and the Tree Preservation and Mitigation Report, prepared by Horticultural 3 Associates (February 25, 19.99). Plans shall include color and material samples. 4 5 6. A maximum of 42 inch high fencing; shall be allowed on Lots 1 and 2 on the Sunnyslope 6 Road frontage. Fencing, 6 ft. or higher shall.not extend toward Sunnyslope Road beyond 7 the wall of the house. The front of the porch shall not be considered the wall of the house. 8 Fencing shall be shown on landscape plans,submitted for SPARC approval. 9 10 7. Lot 2 shall 'front on Sunnyslope Road. Plans submitted for SPARC approval shall reflect 11 the following: sufficient driveway iarea for Lot 2' to allow fort arnaroprid of parked cars; 12 no; backout_ onto Sunnyslope Road shall be allowed; Lot 2 shall also provide for adequate 13 driveway area to accommodate guest ,parking: 14 15 8. The Grant of Private Open Space Scenic Easement shall be revised to include the 16 following provisions 17 18 a. No trees shall be removed, other than fruit trees, without prior City approval; 19 20- b The provision regarding, open wire fencing shall be revised to delete the reference 21 to wood:fencing and to read as follows`., 22 23 "Open wire fencing (_with wood posts and cap optional) is the only fencing 24 .allowed adjacent to or inside the open space scenic easement." 25 26 9. The Grant of Private Open ;Space Scenic Easement shall be recorded on the, title to Lots 5, 27 6, and 1.0 by the applicant. A copy of ,the recorded .document shall be provided to the 29 Planning Dep:artment'prior to the issuance of any building permits for any of the lots. 29 30 10. A11..mitigafon measures outlined in the Initial Study for Ridge View Heights, and all 31 applicable mitigation measures adopted with the Proposed ,Sunnyslope .Assessment 32 District and Annexation E21 accepted by the City Council in 1991, shall apply. 33 34 1.1. For projects involving improvements on existing._ streets or substantial construction traffic 35 and heavy equipment, the applicant shall provide a Traffic Control Plan, for review and 36 approval. ofihe City's Traffic Engineer, prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, 37 At least one-lane of traffic in each. direction shall be; maintained at all times through the 38 construction period, uriless a tem. porary detour plan is submitted and approved the City 39 Traffic Engineer. Heavy construction, traffic and haul trucks shall avoid school zones 40 between school arrival a.nd' departures times. 41 42 12. During non- working hours, open trenches and construction. hazards shall be provided with 43 signage, flashers, and barricades approved by the Street Superintendent to warn oncoming 44 motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians of potential safety hazards. 45: Reso 00 -221 NCS Page 4 13. All road surfaces shall be restored to pre - project conditions -after completion of any 2 project- related utility installation activities, All trench pavement restoration within •..3. e asphalt streets ,shall receive a. slurry seal. - _]f the trench cut is within the parking a strip, then only the parking strip needs a slurry seal. Otherwise, half the street shall 5 receive a slurry seal. 6 7 14. Any pedestrian access through and /or adjacent to the project site shall remain s unobstruct ed during project construction or an alternate route established as approved by 9 the Police Chief and City Engineer 10 11 15. The ,applicant shall incorporate .,street .lights. along all public right -of -ways in the project 12 design to conform to the City standard spacing and illumination requirements. The street 13 lights shall have standard metal fixtures: The applicant shall provide verification that all 14 lights meet PG &E's LS2 rating system, prior to City acceptance of improvements. 15 16 16. The applicants /developers shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or any of its i7 boards, commissions, .agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or 18 proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to 19 attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of the ,project when such claim or action is 20 brought within the time period provided for in applicable State and/or local statutes. The 21 City shall ' promptly notify the applicants /developers of any such claim, action, or 22 proceeding. The City shall, coordinate in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition 23 shall prohibit the City, from participating in a defense of any claim, action, or proceeding if �4 the City bears its own attorrney's fees and cost's, and the City defends the action in good 25 faith. 26 27 17. An access easement shall 'be recorded on the title to'Lot 9 providing driveway access from 2s the new street to the Lake property. The easement shall be shown on the Final Map and 29 recorded on the title to Lot 9. Final location of the driveway access shall be subject to the 30' approval -of the Planning Department. A copy ofthe.r.ecorded document shall be provided 31 to the Planning Department prior. to the issuance of any building permits for any of the 32 lots. 33 34 18. The Tentative Map shall be limited to a maximum density of 10 single- family dwelling 35 units. Remainder parcel shall not be further divided. 36 37 119. A City standard sidewalk on Sunnyslope Road, with a crosswalk at the intersection of 38 Rosewood Court and Smith Drive, shall be required in accordance with standard 39 Engineering condition. The 'addition of the crosswalk shall be subject to the review and 40 approval -of the City Traffic Committee. 4.1 42 20. Retaining walls up to five feet shall be allowed as indicated in the PUD Development 43 Standards, subject to taffreview and approval. 44 � Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 5 1 21. A bicycle /pedestrian, path shall be provided between Sunnyslope Road and Sunnyhill 2 Drive. Said path shall include the following components: the proposed public street to be 3 constructed as part of the subdivision; the proposed •public drainage easement on Lot 6; 4 and an, easement to 'be dedicated along the westerly edge -of the "Remaining Lands of 5 Beatie" in the general location shown on attached Exhibit "B". The proposed drainage. 6 easement on Lot 6 shall be dedicated at. a sufficient width 'to accommodate a 7 bicycle /pedestrian path consistent with City standards and this portion of'the path shall be 8 constructed as part of the other required .public improvements of the subdivision. Prior to 9 approval of the final map, the property owner of`the "Remaining Lands of 'B'eatie" shall 10 make an irrevocable offer of dedication of an easement for that portion of the 11 bicycle /pedestrian path on the "Remaining Lands -of Beatie''. The City shall not exercise 12 said. offer of d'edicat'ion until such time as the ownership of the property transfers from the 13 current owner (Dr. and Mrs. Jerome Beatie) or their - heirs. The final map shall include the 14 location and design of the entire bicycle /pedestrian path, including suitable, convenient 15 access to and from Sunnyhill Drive on the north and the proposed public street on the 16 south, subject to the review and approval of the City's Bicycle Advisory Committee. 17 18 19 22. The applicant /developer shall pay the following estimated Development Impact Fees: 20 21 ® Sewer Connection: $`2,550 /unit 22 e `Water Connection: Contact Water Field Office at 7784392 23 ® Community Facilities: $ 863.50 /unit (except Lot 10) 24 • Storm Drain: $ 4.62:60 /unit (except Lot 10) 25 • Parks and' Recreation: $ ` 3 ; 974 /unit (except Lot 10) 26 ® School Facilities; Contact School District at 778 -4621 27 ® In -lieu Housing: $ 2,400 /unit. (except Lot 10) (collected at escrow) 28 a Traffic Mitigation: $ 3,,,007 /unit (except Lot 10) 29 ® Digitized Data: $ '100 ($10 /10t) 30 31 From the Engineering Department 32 33 1. Frontage Improvements. 34 35 a. Frontage improvements shall be required: as indicated along Sunnyslope Road 36 including the. construction of along the parcel frontage as ,shown on 37 tentative map. .Any- existing portions of broken or damaged curb and gutter shall 38 be removed_ and replaced. Note that the existing six foot wide concrete gutter pan 39 acting gas a bike lane shall be, continued across the entrance to Rosewood Court 40 and a standard valley gutter must be formed. 41 42 b_ Streetlights shall be required along the frontage according to current street 'light 43 standards-and must be approved by the Traffic Engineer. 44 45 c. Right -of -way dedication shall be required as indicated along Sunnyslope Road. Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 6 1 z r 3 4 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 �4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 0 d. Overhead utilities along the frontage of this project and traversing the site shall be placed underground. Undergrounding shall be continued. to the nearest poles off - site in both directions along Sunnyslope Road. e. Signing and striping shall conform to City standards. 2. Grading. a. Provide an'applicable grading plan indicating the grading for each lot, cut and fill calculations, and drainage patterns for each lot. Pad elevations, spot elevations and:slopes "shall be shown on the map. b: - An erosion control plan shall be prepared. C. Any existing `structures above or below ground that are abandoned or not needed shall: removed. 'Structures shall include, but not be limited o, fences, retaining walls, pipes, debris, 'septic systems, etc. 3. Streets. a. Rosewood Court', shall be 32 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb with parking allowed on both sides of street. The cul -de -sac design shall the cul -de -sac along both sides g requirements. Sidewalk shall : extend to the end of accommodate fire truck turning of the street. Standard curb and gutter shall be constructed. 4. Site Drainage'and .Storm Drains. a. Lot -to -lot surface :drainage is- not allowed unless collected at property lines with a drop inlet ._storm drain system. Private storm drain systems shall require easements and recorded maintenance agreements. Concentrated surface drainage shall not be .allowed over sidewalks or curbs but shall' be directed to the public street with sidewalk underdrains. Those swales exceeding 8 percent slope shall have permanent erosion protection. b. All ;site drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed in conformance Wit h the minimum requirements of the Sonoma County Water Agency Flood Control Design:Criteria and shall be subject to review and approval of the Sonoma County Water Agency prior to Final Map approval. C. The_ proposed public storm drain must be located in the paved portion of Rosewood Court. Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 . 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 d. The developer shall comply with the Petaluma Municipal Code Section, 2036.010 and 20.36.020 which requires the developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in Chapter 17.30) on construction in all sections of the City of Petaluma. e. Prior to construction, the applicant shall obtain coverage under the State of California General National Pollutant Discharge Elirrination System (NPDES) Permit for construction activities (General Permit) and develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) subject to review .and approval by the City and Regional Water Quality Control Board. 5. Site Sanitary Sewer and Water Systems. a. This project shall utilities the= existing, sanitary sewer, storm drain, and water main stubs located along the , parcel frontage. The developer shall reimburse the City for the cost of providing utility stubs as determined by the Engineering Department.. Note that any additional service connections necessary along Sunnyslope Road (i.e.' gas, electric, cable TV, etc.) shall be bored and jacked rather than trenched to 'conform to the "no cut' policy along the aforementioned road. b. Fire flow and fire suppression systems must be approved by the Fire Marshal's office. Water pressure calculations shall be required this development verifying the system adequacy for fire flows and .domestic service. This item shall be verified concurrent with improvement plan review. C. The proposed water, and sanitary sewer service to the existing residence shall be provided from . Sunnyhill Drive. d. All existing public "improvements located in the adjacent streets, including sanitary sewer, storm drain, and water mains, shall be shown on the plans.. e. Lot 2 shall have a sanitary sewer lateral connection to the proposed sanitary sewer main in rosewood Court. 6. Final Map. a. Show all existing or 'proposed easements that are within the boundary of this subdivision. b. Provide documentation of any existing off -site easements (public or private) that are to be used by this subdivision. C. Provide the necessary ' easements for public or private water, sanitary sewer, and storm drain facilities. r Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page °8 1 d. Provide the necessary. easements for private'or public access. 3 e. Prepare the necessary private roadway, sanitary sewer, water line, and storm drain 4 maintenance agreements for recordation with the parcel map. These agreements 5 shall also .specify the timing -and maintenance and be in a form acceptable to City 6 staff. 7 8 f. The dedication of easements shall be shown on the parcel map or a separate 9 documents from the responsible parry. 10 11 g. Recorded map information and sources must be provided for all adjoining streets 12 and parcels. In addition, the centerline distances between monuments, bearings 13 and distances, proposed monuments to be set, and ties, from the centerline to the 14 existing right, of way must be shown on the map to locate the property corners. 15 16 h. Provide a `ten foot wide :public utility easement (PETE) adjacent to the public right 17 of way if required by PG & E. 18 19 20 7. General Conditions. 21 22 a. The developer shall keep the existing public streets clean that are used for access 23 to the site during construction. &4 25 b. The developer shall *prepare improvement plans and a final map, pay applicable 26 fees, and submit the required reports and /or documents according to the latest City 27 codes ordinances, resolutions, policies; and standards. 28 29 From the Fire Department 30 31 1.1 The fire hydrant at turnout should be located on the slightest grade possible (away from 32 the 13 percent grade). 33 34 From the Building Division 35 36 1. Grading must be certified when completed to indicate compliance with approved plans and 37 will be required for occupancy. 38 39 2. Certify finished flood elevation before occupancy. 40 41 3. -Where ground slopes greater than 1 on 10, foundation shall be stepped per Uniform 42 Building `Code 1 43 44 4. Soils with expansion index greater than 20 requires special design foundation per Uniform 5 Building Code 1803.2. Reso. 00 -221 NCS Page 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .23 24 25 26 27 28 29 5. All retaining walls .shall meet the requirements of the 1994 UBC, and _shall. comply with • Petaluma Standards Ordinance No. 1727/1988. 6. All roofing , shall be T" rated or better per Ordinance No. 1744/1988. 7. Indicate all utilities on site plan. S. Driveway gradient shall comply with Ordinance No. 1533/1982. 9. Responsible party to sign plans. 10. Submit soils report to verify foundation design. 11. Indicate group occupancy, type of construction, square footage. 12. Plans must; show compliance with 1 UBC, UPC, UMC, and 1993 .NEC. Plans must also .show compliance with current Title 24 .Energy Conservation and /or Disabled Access Requirements. 13. Provide structural calculations for all non design items. 14. Detail all drainage swales. From the Public Works Department 1. All. storm drain systems that do not drain City streets shall be privately maintained. Under the power and: authority conferred upon this Council by the: Charter of said City. REFERENCE: Thereby certify the foregoing; Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of,Petaluma atA Regular meeting on; December 21, 2000 Approved as to by the following vote: form ' City Attorney AYES: Cader- Thompson, .Keller, Maguire, Hamilton, Mayor Thompson NOES: None ABSENT: Healy, Vice Mayor Torliatt ATTEST: — 4,1 11 � 0, , y °Clerk Reso. 00 -22'1 NCS i Mayor Page 10 Resolution No. 2001 -044 N.C.S. 2 of the City of Petaluma, California 5 AMENDING RESOLUTION 00 -220 N.C.S. AND RESOLUTION 0.0 -221 N.C.S. 6 DELETING THE RESPECTIVE FINDINGS, MITIGATION MEASURE AND 7 CONDITION'OFAPPROVAL IN SUPPORT OF REQUIRING THE DEDICATION AND 8 CONSTRUCTION OF A BICYCLE/PEDE.STRIAN PATH .FROM.SUNNYSLOPE ROAD 9 TO SUNNYHILL D_RIVE'AS,PART OF THE APPROVAL OF THE RIDGEVIEW 10 HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION (APN 019 -201 -006 & 025) 11 „12 13 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Tentative 14 Subdivision Map, PUD Development Standards, and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 15 proposed Ridgeview Heights Subdivision, on June 22,,• 1999; and 1.6 17 WHEREAS, at the end of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend 18 that the City Council adopt °a1VIitgated Negative Declaration and,approve the project; and 19 20 WHEREAS, the City Council held. public hearings on the proposed project on August 16th, 21 August 23 November 15, 1999, and May 15, 2000 and additional deliberations following the 22 close of the public hearing on November 20 and December 11, '2000 : after giving notice of said 23 hearing, in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., 0 as amended; and 26 WHEREAS, on December 21, 2000, the City Council, by a vote of 5 -0 (with 2 absent), 27 approved Resolution 00 -220 N.C.S. adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation 28 Monitoring Report for the Ridgeview Heights Tentative Map and PUD Development Standards 29 and by the same vote approved Resolution 00 -221 N.C.S. approving the Tentative Map and PUD 30 Development Standards for Ridgeview Heights; and 31 32 WHEREAS, Resolution 00 =220 N.C.S. contained a finding (Finding No. 8) and a 33 Transportation/Circulation mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure No. 3) in support of .34 requiring a bicycle /pedestrian path across the proposed subdivision and the "remaining lands of 35 Beatie" (the property owner and subdivider); and 36 37 WHEREAS, Resolution 00 -221 N.C.S. contained a finding (Finding No. 7) and a condition of 38 approval (Planning Department Condition of Approval No. 21) requiring a bicycle /pedestrian 39 path across the proposed subdivision and the "remaining lands of Beatie" and 40 41 WHEREAS, , on January 16 2001, the City Council, by a vote of 4 -3, approved a motion to 42 reconsider its decision approve Resolutions 00 -220 N.C.S. and 00 =221 N.C.S.; and 43 44 WHEREAS, on February, 20, 2 the City Council, following a .duly noticed public hearing, 45 by a vote of 4 -3, approved a motion to; delete the requirement of the bicycle /pedestrian path across the,Ridgeview Heights subdivision and the "remaining lands of Beatie". Reso. 2001 -044 NCS Page 1 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that that City Council of the City of Petaluma 2 hereby amends Resolution 00 -220 N.C.S. and deletes the following provisions of said 3 Resolution: 4 5 Findings 6 7 8. That based on the evidence in the record presented during the 'course of the public 8 hearings before the City 'Council, the City Council has determined that the proposed 9 development will have traffic traffic safety and air quality ;impacts resulting from 10 anticipated vehicle trips on' the' local road system and has determined that a 11 bicycle /pedestrian connection between Sunnyslope Road and Sunnyhill Drive will 12 mitigate those impacts to a level that is less than significant. Said evidence of potenti al 13 environmental impacts includes: 14 a) The average single - family household generates 10 vehicle trips, per, day,. or 90 15 potential trips per day' for the proposed 9 -lot subdivision. ( Institute of 16 Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 6 th Edition 1997) 17 b) Most daily vehicle trips are.,less than five miles in length and as a result generate 18 far more air pollution than trips in excess of five miles ('California Air Resources 1.9 Board, "Land Use Air Quality Linkage ", 19.97; p.2) 20 c) Each one - percent reduction in vehicle trips can result in a two to. four- percent. 21 reduction in air pollution 'emissions (Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 22 ".Quantifying the Benefits of Non- Motorized Transport", 1999, p.4); 23 d) A lack of safe, 'convenient bicycle /pedestrian connections between neighborhoods 24 and schools, shopping, parks and other facilities "thwart attempts to increase 25 walking and bicycling and force pedestrians . and bicyclists onto arterial .and, 26 collector streets" (Petaluma Bicycle Plan, p. 5), increasing the potential for 27 conflicts with motor vehicles and the potential for accidents. 28 29 Transportation /Circulation Miti'gatiom 30 31 3. A public bicycle /pedestrian connection shall be provided between ; S,unny$lope Road and 32 Sunnyhill Drive comprised of the proposed public street„ the public drainage easement 3.3 across Lot 6 and an easement across the westerly edge of the "Remaining Lands of 34 Beatie." 35 36 BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED that the City Council hereby amends Resolution 00 -221 37 N.C.S. and - deletes "the following of said Resolution: 38 39 Findings 40 41 7. That the City Council has determined that the addition of a bicycle/pedestrian connection 42 between Sunnyslope Road and Sunnyhill Drive across the proposed subdivision and the 43 "Remaining Lands of'Beat e`will resultnn the project being consistent with Goal 2 of 44 the Petaluma General,Plan Transportation Element to "improve safety on all streets" and 45 Goal 4 to "reduce dependence . on the 'auto by integrating, to the extent feasible, 46 alternative transportation modes as a fundamental component of the City's transportation 47 system ", as well as with Program 30 of the Petaluma General Plan Transportation 48 Element to "develop and. implement a system of off -road bike ,paths "; Program 31 to 49 "expand and improve bicycle routes and connect them to each other and to major 50 destinations "; Program 33 which requires "new development and redevelopment to 0 91 Reso,2001- 044NCS Page 2 a 6 7 '8 9 10 11 12. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R 6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 L 7 49 , 50 ATTEST: 51 City Cleric include bicycle routes and parking facilities "; and Policy 14.2 of the Community Character Element requiring "new development to include pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and through the site to connect existing and/or planned Citywide pedestrian and/or bicycle networks." Planning De Condition_ Approval 21. A bicycle/pedestrian path shall be provided between Sunnyslope Road and Sunnyhill Drive. Said path shall include the following components: the proposed public street to be constructed as.part of the subdivision; the proposed public drainage easement on Lot 6; and an easement to be dedicated along the westerly edge of the "Remaining Lands of Beatie" in the general location shown on attached Exhibit "B ". The proposed drainage easement on Lot 6 shall be dedicated at a ,sufficient width to accommodate a bicycle /pedestrian path consistent, with City standards and this portion of the path shall. be constructed as part of the other required public improvements of the subdivision. Prior to approval of the final map, the property owner of the "Remaining Lands of Beatie shall make an irrevocable offer of dedication of .an easement for that portion of the bicycle /pedestrian path on the "Remaining Lands of Beatie". The City shall not exercise said offer" of dedication until such time as the ownership of the property" 'transfers from the current owner ,(Dr. and Mrs. Jerome Beatie) or their heirs. The final map shall include the location and design of the entire bicycle /pedestrian path, including suitable, convenient access to and from Sunnyhill Drive on the north and the proposed public street on the south, subject to the review and approval of the City's Bicycle Advisory Committee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all other findings, mitigation ° measures and conditions of approval found in Resolutions 00 -220 N.C.S. and 00 -221 N.C.S., respectively, shall remain in full force and effect as stated. ide thelpowe andautho conferred upon this, Council'by the Charter of said thereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on February 20, 200`1 by the.following vote: AYES:. O'Brien, Healy; Moynihan, Mayor Thompson NOES: Torliatt Maguire, Vice Mayor Thompson Approved as t�o`'�, ney —�- . City Attorney- 4 E.1ark Tho ABSENT: None Reso. 2001 -044 NCS Page 3