Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 95-242 09/05/1995 ' Resolution No. 9s-24~, N.C.S. of the Cite of Petaluma, California CERTIFYING, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PETALUMA RIVER PAYRAN REACH FLOOD CONTROL llVLPROVEMENT PROJECT 1 WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma's General Plan has historically identified the need for 2 flood control improvements to increase protection for the existing and projected population, and 3 accommodate 100 year storm runoff so as to meet the community health and safety, economic 4 development, housing and land use goals and objectives stated in the General Plan; and 5 6 WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma's 1987 General Plan call for implementation of the 7 "most reasonable, sensitive, and effective proposal(s) of the Sonoma County Water Agency 8 Master Drainage Plan in order to mitigate the 100 year flood"; and 9 10 WHEREAS, a Section 205 Initial Appraisal Report and Section 205 Reconnaissance 11 Report, Flood Control Improvement, Petaluma River, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, 12 California were prepared by the U:S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1986 and 1988 respectively. 13 Said reports evaluated the extent of flooding problems, justifiable Federal interests and structural 14 and non-structural alternatives for further study; and 15 16 WHEREAS, non-structural alternatives of flood proofing floodplain evacuation and 17 flood insurance/flood warning and emergency evacuation were evaluated; and 18 19 WHEREAS, structural alternatives, as identified in the Sonoma County Water Agency 20 Master Drainage Plan, including flood control damsibypass and alternative channel 21 modifications were evaluated;. and 22 23 WHEREAS, through the efforts of the City and the Corps of Engineers, it has been 24 determined that increasing channel capacity is the most teasonable, sensitive and effective 25 method of providing for the 100 year flood capacity in the Payran Reach to meet goals, 26 objectives and policies of the General Plan; and ie~,. No, ..95-24'J,,..._.. n~cs Page 1 of 9 2 WHEREAS, an initial environmental evaluation was completed by the Corps of 3 Engineers staff with the Reconnaissance Report in 1988 and a Notice of Intent to Prepare a 4 Feasibility Study and an Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report was 5 published and distributed to all responsible Federal and trustee agencies involved in the project 6 and to the State Clearinghouse in 1989; and 7 8 WHEREAS, the City and Corps of Engineers staff hosted a public scoping and 9 information meeting in 1989 plus subsequent informational meetings at the City Council; and 10 Il WHEREAS, the City and the Corps of Engineers staff participated in numerous 12 interagency consultation meetings with representatives from State and Federal regulatory 13 agencies to solicit input for the environmental review and project design; and 14 15 WHEREAS, alternative projects were described thoroughly in the Detailed Project 16 Report including its Appendices A-F and project plans prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of 17 Engineers published in November, 1994. 18 19 WHEREAS, a Draft EIR/EIS was prepared by the Corps of Engineers for the project and 20 completed in November, 1994 which evaluated the project alternatives; "l0 year protection", 21 "25 year protection", "40 year protection", plus the no project alternative. The Draft EIR/EIS 22 was distributed to all responsible, trustee and Federal agencies involved in the project and to the 23 State and regional clearing houses. A Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR was published in 24 a local newspaper and mailed to residents and property owners in the areas potentially affected 25 and to all interested parties who requested such notice; and 26 27 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission in July, 1994 for 28 consideration of public comments on the Draft EIR/EIS, at which time, all individuals, groups, 29 and agencies who desired to comment, were given the opportunity to speak and/or submit 30 written comments as required by the City of Petaluma's Environmental Review Guidelines; and 31 Reso. 95-241.NCS Page 2 of 4 1 WHEREAS:.after said public hearing by `the Planning Commission, the Commission 2 recommended•that:ffi"e City Council approve and oertify the final Environmental Impact Report 3 subject to provision of responses to comments and' any additional information as may be 4 requested by the City Council; and 5 6 WHEREAS, in August, 1994; the City Council held a,public hearing to solicit input on 7 the Draft Environmental .Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement; at which time, all 8 individuals, groups, and agencies who desired to comment, were given the opportunity to speak 9 and/or submit written comments as required; and. 10 11 WHEREAS, a Response to Coinments/Fihal EIR/EIS document was prepared by the 12 Corps of Engineers which responded to the comments raised. during the Planning Commission 13 and City Council public hearings and was circulated to interested parties and to responsible, 14 trustee and Federal agencies shortly after it was published in March, 1995; and 15 16 WHEREAS, comments from Federal agencies were received on the Final EIR/EIS 17 regarding potential for cumulative and growth inducing impacts; and 18 1'9 WHEREAS, the City attended an interagency meeting to respond to those comments and 20 a written summary was prepared thafaddressed the concerns; and 21 22 WHEREAS; a Notice of Availability of. the Response to Comments/Fina] EIR7EIS 23 document, including a Notice of the Public. Hearing. scheduled before the City Council was 24 published in a local newspaper and mailed in July, 1995 to residents and property owners in the 25 areas potentially affected and to all interested parties and commenting agencies; and 26 27 WHEREAS, the City Council, as the decision making body, held a publiahearing on the 28 project and provided opportunity for'comment on the Response to Comments and Final EIR/EIS 29 on August 21, 1995 and September 5, I995 30 31 Reso. 95-241,NCS Page 3 of 4 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Couaci] reviewed and 2 considered the Final EIR/EIS and hereby certifies, approves, and adopts the Final Environmental 3 Impact Report document and makes the following findings: 4 5 1. Based on the foregoing facts, the Final Environmental Impact Report has been 6 completed in' compliance with the intent and requirements of the California 7 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA guidelines, and the City of 8 Petaluma Environmental Review Guidelines. 9 10 2. The above referenced document, which constitutes the Final EIR was presented to 11 the City Counci] and considered along with both written and oral comments 12 received during public review of the project and environmental documents. 13 14 3. The Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City of Petaluma and IS represents an adequate documentation of the environmental implications of and 16 possible mitigation measures for the proposed project for use in decision-making. l7 Undet the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Councll of the City of. Petaluma at.a (Regular) 1) meeting ~f(~o`rm on the ..._Sth.--...----... day of .......September 19.9.`a..., by the -,`~!.K'''. following vote: 1 City Atkorney AYES: HAMILTON, STOMPE, MAGUIRE, READ, BARLAS, VICE MAYOR SHEA, MAYOR HILLIGOSS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONMED' ~~/I ~ ' ATTEST: --.~I~C~.CEP~----.. \__.wl,.~. - p( Q'J ,ty Clerk /d03 O7 Mayar Council File/ ce io-ns k~s..ma.........9.5-~49...mrs. Page 4 of 4