HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 95-281 N.C.S. 11/06/1995 1ZES~LLJ'I'IC~TV IvC~. ~~_28~ 1~.C.S.
®f the City ®f Petals, Calif®a
TRAFFIC IlVIPACT FEES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 8, 1996
REPEAL RESOLUTION 91-45 NCS
WHEREAS, on January 22, 1991, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1837 NCS which
added Chapter .11.80 Traffic Impact Fee on Development to the Petaluma Municipal Code and,
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 11.80.050(J) provides that the Net Peak Hour Trip
Rate for each Land Use Category shall be established by resolution of the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 11.80.050 provides that the rate of the Traffic
impact Fee shall be calculated in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 11.80.050
and shall be established by a resolution adopted by the City Council and effective 60 days after
adoption; and
WHEREAS, On October 16 and on November 6, 1995, the City Council held a duly
noticed public meeting and hearing.., respectively, to consider testimony and correspondence from
members of the public and staff:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Petaluma
resolves as follows:
1. The findings, determinations and analyses (Exhibits A - E) are approved and adopted.
2. The "Net P.M. Peak Hour Trip Rates" and "Traffic Impact Fee" rates for Land Use
Categories, as shown in Exhibit F, are established.
3. This resolution shall be effective in 60 days (January 8, 1996).
4. Resolution 91-45 NCS is repealed.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (a~ae~xQ~a meeting fO~'
on the ....~6.th day of .............I~I~uemk~e~........................, 19..9.5., by the ~
reso\r-impact following vote;
City Attorney
AYES: Maguire, Read, Barlas, Vice Mayor Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hamilton, S -
r
ATTEST :
City erk Mayor
eovs~ Fie...
cn tows Reg. Na.....9:5.-281....... N.e.s.
.a .
1 EXI~BIT A
2
3
4 The City' Council of the City of Petaluma 'finds and determines as follows:
5
6 .1. -The Peak Hour Trip Rates listed. in thin Resolution represent a:reasonable estimate of the
7 actual trip generation rates :for the various land use categories identified.
. 8
9 2: The Transportation Improvements:necessary to:imple_ menu. the Transportation Element of the
_
1o City Generate Plan-,and to reduce the adverse impacts caused. by the increased traffic volume
1'1 generated~by;future growth are those; improvements;identified` in the City General Plan, the
12 Economic' and Planning Systems Study;, and. other ;documents referenced therein. The need for
' 13 these Transportation Improvements is directly related'to the~types of development anticipated in
14 .the areas covered :by the various.Land Use Categories:
15
16 3, The ,total costs .necessary :to construct or~,provide the Transportation Improvements .for all
17 development (not including;frontage improvements expected to be:required pursuant to the City's
18 Building,. Zoning;and'°Subdivisiori Qrdinances), are estmated.to equal the sum of $75,837,4.18. Of
19 . these costs, $26;796;034 will benefit existing development (Exhibit B).
20 ~ '
21 4. At the present. time, there. is identified- $28;948,704: in :other funds that will be availableto pay
22 for'the,transportation.improvement"costs benefiting new development. The net transportation
23 improvement costs ao be funded from-fees is estimated at $20;092;581 (Exhibit C).
24
25 5. The estimated ;peals hour trip; rates from 1990 :to 2005 are 63,790 of which 31,735 (49.7%) are
26 ~ attributable to residential growth and 32;056 (50:3%) are attributable to non=.residential growth
27 (Exhibit D):
28
29 6. The percentage of.growth by,resideritial ornon-residential trips is.~applied to the transportation
3o improvement costs `attributed. to :new development: The other fund credits are subtracted to
• ,
31 generate a~n'et transportation cost of $14,230,663 for residential growth and $5,862,017 non-
32 residential growth (Exhibit E).
33
34 . 7. The number of. additional. residential units is estimated_to'be 4;757 and the increase of non-
35 resdentiate square footage is estimated to be{4,4Q8,924::
36
37 8. The nettransportation cost is, divided by the ,units, of,growth tg result in a traffic impact fee for
38 a PM: peak,, hour trip 'of $2,992 for residential. development per unit. and $1,330 for non-
,39 residential development per 1„OOO square -feet. (Exhibit E).
40
41 9: The .revenues from the raffic impact fee"s will be used to `pay for the transportation
42 improvements necessitated 'by new' development:
'Reno , ~'S-ag ~ ?yGs
C'IT~ ®F' PETALU2VIA
TRA]F~'IC 1VIITIGATI9~1~1 SEE ANAIJI'SIS
PR®JE~CTEI~ PR®JE.CT C®~STS ANI9 ALI.,®CATIt1r~
C®ISTS ~AS~IS - ~'~'95 T® F~99 CIP
ESTIMATED PERCENT ALLOCATED COSTS ALLOCATED
PROJECT TO DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT IMPROVEMENT COST .EXISTING NEW EXISTING NEW
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS 4,115,000 87°,/0 13% 3,565,000 550,000
F30DEGA AVENUE -NO,. WEBSTER TO CITY LIMITS 1,540,000 10°,/0 90% 154,000 1,386,000
CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 5,532,000 52°,/0 48% 2,852,500 2,679,5Q0
~ CORONA RD-.INDUSTRIAL AVE &PBN INTERSECTION IMPR 1,500;000 10°,/0 90% 150;000 1,350,000
~p 1?. D ST / LAKEVILLE RAILROAD CROSSING 1,000,000 20°,% 80% 2t~0,000 800,000
E. WASHINGTON/PAYRAN INTERSECTION IAdPV 250,000 50°,/0 50% 125,000 125,000
' HIGHWAY 116 IMPROVEMENTS 10,979,700 27°,/0 73% 2,930,000 ~ 8,049,700
L,Ak:EVILLE ST WIDENING -WASFI TO D 472,000 10°,/0 30% 330,400 141,600.
CiP MAGNOLIA AVENUE WIDENING PHASE I 500,000 10°./0 90% 50,000 450,000
~ MEDIAN INSTALLATION- MAJOR ARTERIALS 450,000 50% 50% 225,000 225;000
~ NO MCDCIWELLiWASHING'PON INTERSECTION 4,700,000 21°,/0 79% 999,972 3,700,028'
Z OLD REDWOOD HWY OVERCROSSITJG 12,815,718 60°,!0 40% 7,737,105 5,078,6:13
OL'D`REDWOOD HwPYlWILL.O~TBROOK BRIDGE 2,325,000 50°,/0 50% 1,162,500 1,162,500
PBN%OL:D REDWOOD H4~'Y RAMP IMP 1,458,000 38°,/0 62% 549,000 909,000
F.AINIER OVERCROSSING/IiVTERCHANGE 26;700,000 20°,/o SO% 5,390,556 21,309,444
SONOMA MTN PARKWAY TO NO MCDOWELL 1,500,000 25°,/0 75% 375,000 1,125,000
TOTALS 75,837418 35°~o b5% 26,796,1134 49,041,384
' i
H
~bd
'i
CITY OF PETALUMA
TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE ANALYSIS
NET PROJECT COST FROlbI TRAFFIC NTIGATION FEE
PROJECT COSTS PROJECT CREDITS FOR PRIOR FEES i\ZT AMOUNT TO
ALLOCATED TO COLLECTED, LE5S EXPF;NDITURES A>~D BE RAISED BY
NEW DEV'ELOPVIE\T OTHER SOLRCES OF FL"\~S TRAFFIC AfPACT % OF % OF
Prior Feea~Ekpenditures Other Sources of Funds FEES O\ FEE TOTAL
PROJECT IlvIPROVEMENT' Residential Comme_ciaL` Residential Corunerciall NEW DEVELOPivIENT PROJECT
Industrial Industrial
92.1% 7.9°io
ALTER~iATIVETR:~tiSPORTATIONPROJECTS SS0,000 SSQ,000 2.74% 13%
BODEGA AVENUE -NO. WEBSTER TO CITY LIIVIITS 1,386,000 426,471 36,581 922,947 4.59% 60%
CITY\NIDETRAFFICSYSTEMLMPROVEYfENTS 2,679,500 -1'74,911 -40,736 ~ 162,000 3,033,147 15.10% SS%
CORONA RD- INDUSTRL4L, AVE & PBN INTERSECTION LMER ],350,000 1,350,000 6.72% 90%
E. D ST / LAICEVII,LE RAILR0.4D CROSSING 800,000 195,772 16,793 58'7,435 2.92% 59%
~ E. WASHINGTONIPAYRAN' P_VTERSECTION IMPV 125,000 125,000 0.62% 50%
V1 HIGHRTAY 116 LMPROVEMENTS 8,049,700 -23,060 -1,978 6,576,700 1,398,038 6.96% 13%
Q LAKEVILLESTWIDENING-WASHTOD 141,600 13Q,~-°14 11,186 0 0.00% 0%
MAGNOLIA AVENLB WIDE2vIIQG PHASE I 45Q,000 366,929 31,474 51,597 0.2b% 10%
MEDL'1N INSTALLATION- MAJOR ARTERIALS 225,000 225,000 1.12% 50%
NO MCDOWELL/WASHINGTON NTERSECTION 3,70Q,028 900,899 77,276 1,300,000 1,421,853 7.08% 30%
~ OLD REDWOOD HWY OVERCROSSLNG 5,078,613 1,547,085 132,703 3,398,824 1692% 27%
OLD REDWOOD HWYlWILLOWBROOKBRIDGE 1,163,SC0 Y,162,500 5.79% 50%
PBN/ULD REDWOOD HWY RAMP LMP 909,000 594,000 215,000 1.07% 15%
Z RAINIER OVERCROSSING/1N'PERCHANGE 21,309,444 1,283,672 110,109 5,813,366 9,575,959 4,52ti,33II 22.53% 17%
n SONOMA MTN PARKWAY TO NO MCDOWELL 1,125,000 ll,125,000 5;60% 7S%
TOTALS 49,041,384 4,353,271 373,408 5,813,366 18,408,659 20,092,681 100.00% 26%
H
C'1
. i.
-
EXf-IIBIT D
G~1'~ Q~ P~T~~~M~
'T1~A~~I~ 1ViI'~IGAT~®I~T FEE AI~i~I.YSIS
TRIP ~E~TE~A'1'IQ1~T ~Y T~'P~ ~ 49L~ T~ 2®OS
i7PI)ATED P~~ 7A1~[J~RX 1.995
TRIP GENERATION RATES FROM
TRIP TYPE CITY TRAFFIC MODEL
P. M. PEAL{ HOUR TR1PS TOTAL TRiP RESIDENT WORK/OTHER
' INCREASES RELATED RELATED'
1990 2005 TRIPS TRIPS
INBOUND TO YFT'AI,tJMA
FROM HOME TO WORK (lliBW 34,029 41,713 7,684 7,684.
FROM HOME TO OTHER (II~BN 20,217 25,481 5,264 5,264
FROM W012K TO WORK (IIv'HB' 19,365 23,007 3,642 3,642
73,611 90,201 16,590 - 16,590
OU'I730UND PROM PETf1LUMA
FROM HOME TO WORK (OI-I13C~ 56,930 76,244 19,3 L4 19,31.4
FROM HOME TO OTHER {OH}32 32,794 33,035 241 241
FROM WORK T'O WORK (ONHE 15,121 20,142 5,021 5,021
104,845 129,421 24,576 19,555 5,021.
IN`1-ERNAL TO PETALUMA
FROM I-IOIVIE TO WORK (PH33Vt 26,349 32,232 5,883 5,883
F1ZOM HOME TO O"I'FIER (PHBr 56,024 68,617 12,593 6,297 6,297
FROM WORK TO WORK (PNHB 22,092 26,240 4,148 4,1.48
104,465 127,089 22,624 12,180 10,445
. ~eso . ~i 5- a ~ ( NC~S
EXHIBIT E
~"IZ'~' I'~TAI.LTI~A
SUlVIlYIAIZ~' ®F T~F'~'I~ NI~TI~ATI®N SEE Cr~~I.T~,ATI®N
~R~~~~cT c:'®s~rs
'L'OY'AL ES'i'IMAT'ED COSTS OF' PROJF,CTS $75,837,418
"I'O IMI'L1MENT GENERAL PLt1N POLICIES
PORTION TO BE FUNDED FROM EXISTING $26,796,034
AMOUN'1"i'O BE FUNDED EKOM TRAFFIC $49,041.,384
MITIGA'PION FEES'LO NEW DEVELOPMENT
'FED ('a LCIELA'i'I®N,BY S®l!RC'F,
R£SIDENT'IAL COMM1:iRCIAL,, 'I'O'I'ALS
OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL
PROJLCFF;D TRAFFIC GENLRA'LION IMPACT 49.7% 50.3% 100.0°/u
BY SO[JRCE
ALLOCATION OF PROJECT COSTS TO BE $24,397,301 $24,644,084 $49,041,384
FUNDED FROM NEW DEVELOPIVtEN'1'
LESS CREDITS FOR PREVIOLiSL,Y COLLECTED ($10,1.66,637} ($18,782,066) ($28,948,704)
I~ EES AND O'1'IIER SOURCES OF FUNDING
NET AMOUNT'f0 BE FUNDED BY NF,W $14,230,663 $5,862,017 $20,092,681
DEVF,LOYMEN'I' THROIJGH'I'I2AFFIC MIT FEES
DIVIDE NET AMOUNT ABOVE 13X YRO.IECTF_,p 4,757 4,408,924.
DEVELOPMENT FROM 1995 TO GENERAL, PLAN (Residental Units) (Sq. Feet of Commeroixl,
BUILDOUT Office and Industrial)
- ~eso . q 5 - a$ I ~ GS
• EXIIIBIT F
~~I~Y P'ETAL,~TIVIA
'TI~FFIC 1VII'TIGA'TIOlT FEE ANAL~'SIS
TRAFFIC 1VIITIGATI®N
FEE
' P.M. PEAK HOUR FEE
'NET TRIP MEASURING RESIDENTIAL- $2;992
TYPE OF LAND USE RATE FACTOR CO~fM/INDUS- $1,330
RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY=OR DUPLEX 1.005 PER DWELLING UNIT $3,007
MULTI-FAMILY (3+ UNITS) 0.63 PER,DWELLING UNIT $1,885
MANUFACTURED"HOME 0.559 PER DWELLING UNIT $1,672
SENIOR HOUSING 0:4 PER DWELY.TNG UNIT $1,197
ASSESSORYDWELLING 0.63 PER,DWELLINGUNIT $1,885
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Fee at 1,000 squaze feet Per sq ft
• COMMERCIAL
MOTEL/HOTEL 0.645 PER~ROOM $858
OTHER RETAIL 1.869 PER 1;000 SF $2,485 $ 2.48
OFFICES
ALL OFFICE USES 1.97 PER 1,000 SF $2,619 $ 2.62
INDUSTRIAL
ALL INDUSTRIAL USERS (1) -0.749 PER 1;000 SF $996 $ 1.00
MINI STORAGE 0.029 PER 1,000 SF $39 $ 0.04
1) Includes manufaotucui -and warehouse; a of uses.
~eso. 9s-a~~ acs