HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 94-126 05/16/1994FZes®lution N®. 94-126 N C.S.
1 of the City of Petaluma, California
2
3 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
4 PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
5 AND CITY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDELINES FOR AN AMENDMENT
6 TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KINGSMILL RESIDENTIAL PUD TO
7 INCLUDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE ADDITIONAL HOMES ON LOT 20
8 OF PHASE 6, A.P. No. 136-540-044
9
10 WHEREAS, an application was made by Mr. William Wilkinson to amend the PUD
11 Development Plan to allow the development of three additional, adjacent, two story homes
12 on Lot 20 of Phase 6; and
13
14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project on
15 April 26, 1994, at which time the Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a
16 Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
17 (CEQA) and City environmental review guidelines for an amendment to the Development
18 Plan for the Kingsmill residential PUD to include the development of three additional
19 homes on Lot 20 of Phase 6;
20
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Petaluma City Council, in reference to
22 the impacts and mitigations identified in the initial study and as reflected in the
23 Commission's recommendations hereby adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for said
24 project based on the following findings, and subsequent to the following mitigation
25 measures:
26
27 Findings for a Mitigated Negative Declaration:
28
29 L An initial study has been prepared and proper notice provided in accordance with
30 CEQA and local guidelines.
31
32 2. Based upon the Initial Study and comments received, potential impacts could be
33 avoided or reduced to a level of insignificance by mitigation measures attached as
34 conditions of approval. There is no substantial evidence that the project, as
35 mitigated, would have a significant effect on the environment.
36
37 3. The project does not have potential to affect wildlife resources as defined in the
38 Fish and Game code, either individually or cumulatively and is exempt from Fish
39 and Game filing fees.
40
1
kty. ~~.....9.4-.1.26......... n~.cs.
1 Mitigation Measures (Note: the following mitigations shall be applicable to the Parcel Map
2 and subsequent development):
3
4 1. To mitigate the incremental demand for City services, the project proponent shall
5 pay a Community Facilities Development Fee. Said fee shall be calculated at time
6 of building permit issuance, and due and payable prior to issuance of a Certificate of
7 Occupancy.
8
9 2. To mitigate the incremental increase in storm water runoff, the project proponent
10 shall pay a Storm Drainage Impact fee. Said fee shall be calculated at time of
11 building permit issuance, and due and payable prior to issuance of a Certificate of
12 Occupancy.
13
14 3. To mitigate the incremental increase in demand for local school facilities, the
15 project proponent shall pay a School Facilities fee. Said fee shall be paid prior to
16 issuance of a building permit.
17
18 4. To mitigate the incremental demand on City transportation systems, the project
19 proponent shall pay a Traffic Mitigation fee. Said fee shall be calculated at time of
20 building permit issuance, and due and payable prior to issuance of a Certificate of
21 Occupancy.
22
23 5. To mitigate the incremental demand on the City's park and recreation facilities, the
24 project proponent shall pay a Park and Recreation Land Improvement fee. Said fee
25 shall be calculated at time of parcel Map approval and paid on a pro-rata basis prior
26 to issuance of a building permit for each house.
27
28 6. All grading and erosion control shall conform to the City's Erosion Control
29 Ordinance 15.76.
30
31 kingmit/hgll
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
~._..
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) i'~ri€~)Xtit~l~ meeting rm
on the .....1.~ tll..._....... day of .............~~......................................, 19.9 4.., by the
following vote: ................~.............--•--.......
City Attorney
AYES: Sobel, Barlas, Shea, Vice Mayor Read, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None / ~
/ r
ABSENT: Hamilton resigned 4/4/94) i - -
~ , ~
----',
ATTES'T': ................._............... .... ... ....~........................ ..... --=-•~•• - ----.........- ._.... ... ........... ...............---•---
ity Clerl. Mayor
Council File .................°-•--.°.-°....
CA 10-85 Res. No..........9,4-126 N.C.S. 2