HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7996 N.C.S. 11/28/1977 7'996.
Ssolution No.
A RESOLUTION DENYING APPEALS FROM THE DETERMINATION •
OF .POINTS FOR ;DEVELOPMENTS PROPOSED BY THE CITIZENS'
COMMITTEE, .PURSUANT TO THE INTERIM :'RES,IDENTIAL ESUAL- e
UATION'CONTROL SYSTEM FOR THE 1978 -79 CONSTRUCTION'
YEAR
. (fi t, d T 3 5' rpu •
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN G. Roland Bond and
• '
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN elen Putnam
CILMAN at a
Adjourned Meeting of the City Council of the,
City. of Petaluma., .on the ........ _ .... .... of of December 19 7 7
WHEREAS, appeals. were 'taken from the deci"s'ion: 'of the
Citizens' Committee appointed pursuant' to the Interim Resi-
dential - Development Evaluation Sy stem ass follows:
' Project. Un'its Re-
, No. Development. quested
East - Single- family; available established quotas: 160
12.69 Pa'r Place: `Subdivisiori
Qantas Development, corporation 100
12.70 Tanglewood Subdivision., Atkinson Property
Lucy. H. Webb -. 101
12.73 Casa' del Oro,, Summit Building Corporation 75
12:74 Petaluma Villas:,, M. L . S ;. Devel:opment Corp. 28
East - Multi- ,,,,Fami1, avai,lable 'e'stabl.ished.quotas: 10:0
12.71 ,Meadowoo•d Subdivis'iori
Duffel /Petaluma Partners • 100
West - Single - Family, a "vailable" . es'tab -fished quotas: 100
12.78 'McNear Manor, Scenic Land Properties; Inc. 55
12.79 'Reynaud SUbdi'vision,,L. Reynaud 22
12.81 .Co,tntry. Club Estates •
Evans, Evans Targon & Hsi 52
West - Multi- Family, available :estab'lished quotas 90
12-.76 Keokuk Meadows, G]al Wil airs ' 82
12.77 . Cherry H 11 Milt Forman' 32
12.82 Country Club E
- Evans, Evan's,. Targon & Hsi 60
and, I
VdITEREAS', a'
ppeals were. heard' at an adjourned .meeting o °f th'e
City. Council on ;November 28, 19'77, and set for final determina
tioh at an adjourn ed.,meeting ' on .December 1, 1977,
NOT^l, 'THEREFORE ", BE' IT RESOLVED that; the 'Council hereby finds
as follows
. `COUNCIL'FU 580 78.-79
1,. Each appeal:.,`cons,idered.' was; 'timely filed •an•d p •
heard before the Council . , ,
2 . Each ap . „ .
p
el'lant or ' a r thereof was heard
on • the matter of • the ,appeal•.,
- 3. Extensive , documentary e.v=iden:ce., both�:subniitt;ed by .
a el1ant• and' level ^,''o e'd b st' w',., t`o each a ' e. was
1�I?: P �y aff,. relating �p al
consi,dered..
4. The Co,uncil has ,carefull=y, examined.- ‘said
t�. ;each appeal., ;
8. There was.' n•o - abuse Of dis cr.etion shown in the determina
tion by' the Citizens Committee in awardin to the develop
ments; .which are the subject of the appeals.
6 There was • no •showing' th'at . 'the C 'ti'zen's.' Commi•ttee.. failed
t:o _ consi'der the matters raised on appeal-, or that_ the determina
tions of the Citizens' Comm•ittee were not supported�':by 'substantia_l
K
evidence ..
• 7. Substantial' evidence 'was present upon which the City
Council could ;b -i
ase ts 'determinafion of points in each of the
categories : reviewed:: •
BE IT FURTHER ;RESOLVED that based upon the foregoing find -, .
i each of .the appeals ought to be, and,is DENIED.. ,
•
•
•
•
•
•
.r
, under the o� wer and authorit y conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City
. �
I h certify that-: the, foregoing- Resolution was duly, and regularly introduced and .. •
'adopted by',tl e Council of the City of P.e`taluma .on the' 7 s
D ecember 77- ,
;day. of ' ; , � X1'9 by 'the . f ollowiri votes:
AYES: ;Councilm'en ,Bond, Harbersoh • 14llig"oss•, and Mayor - Putnam -
NOES • Councilman Cavanagh •
,
ABSENT Councilmen Balshaw and Perry,
0 City Clerk , `_/ Mayor