Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 93-99 04/26/1993;~ F~esolntion No. 93-99 N ~.s. 1 of the City of Petaluma, California 2 3 4 RESOLUTION ADOPTING 5 TIDE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL. IIVIPROVEIVIENT PLAN 6 FOR DRAINAGE IIlIIPROVEIVIENTS AND 7 FY 1992-93 AND 1993-1994 BUDGET 8 9 10 WhIEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and submitted to the City 11 Council a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Drainage Improvements for 12 the period from FY 1992-93 to BY 1996-97; and, 13 14 WIIEREAS, the City Council. has reviewed the Five Year Capital 15 Improvement Plan which identifies the Capital Projects for each year; and , 16 17 WI~EIZEAS, the Plan includes an annual budget to implement the Plan and 18 the City Council has reviewed the FY 1992-93 and FY 1993-94 Capital 19 Improvement Budget of the Plan; and, 20 21 NOW, TI-IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council that: 22 23 1. The Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Drainage 24 Improvements from FY 1992-93 to FY 1996-97 is hereby 25 adopted subject to the following: 26 27 A. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the 28 Drainage Five Year Capital Improvement Plan conforms 29 to, furthers the interests of, and helps implement the 30 goals, objectives and programs of the General Plan, 31 Res. No.......93-9..7.......... N.C.S. :~ 1 2. The amounts for each project are set forth in said Plan and 2 summarized in the attached Exhibit A. 3 4 3. The FY 1992-93 and FY 1993-94 Capital Improvement Budget 5 for Drainage Improvements is hereby adopted in the amounts 6 for each project as set forth in said Plan and summarized in the 7 attached Exhibit A. 8 9 4. After the above findings and approvals are completed, the Plan 10 is to be filed with the City Clerk. 11 12 13 9397DCIP Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (~G1€~~meeti~ng.P-,•°- "-farm on the ....26th.--......... day of .........April ........................................ 19.93.., by `the following vote: .. ............. ••-----.....-.......... City A,torney AYES.: Nelson, Barlas, Read, Shea, Hamilton, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTES'T': .-----•---•• ---- . . . . ... ....... ..................................... .~ City Clerl~~'P~~ ~` ~,~~~ Ma} Council File--••--°- .......................... CA 10-85 Rcs. No. .........~.3.'~.9....... N.C.S. DRAFT APRIL 19, 1993 CI'T'Y OF PETALUA~A CAPITAL I11~PROVEIVIENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 1993-1997 I)ItAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ••~ ~2 . ~~ Capital •Improvement Plan FY 93=97 Drainage Improvement SOURCES (IN $000) PRIOR FUND YEARS FY 92-93 FY 93-94 FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 T01'AL Storm Drainage Mit Fees 832.0 223.0 1,402.0 414:0 62.0 62:0 2,995.0 SCWA Zone 2A Assessments 4,000.0 4,000.0 State Water Resources 2,000.0 x,000.0 Corp of Engineers 726.0 320.0 165.0 2,974.0 815.0 .5,000.0 Petaluma Comm Dev Commission .197.0 998.0 1,195.0 PCDC Tax Allocation Bonds 5,000.0 5',000.0 Water Pollution Control Fund 145.0 48.0 319.0 ~ 511.0 Undetermined Source ~,OS1.0 x,051.0 TOTAL SOURCES 1,558.0 687.0 .1,812.0 4,386.0 14,247.0 62.0 22,752.0 FUNDED PROJECTS (IN $000) PRIOR CITY PROJECTS YEARS FY 92-93 EY 93-94 FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 TOTAL Pa e 1, Storm Drain Imp. 13.0 48.0 65.0 62.0 62.0 250.0 3 2.Payran Reach Imp. 1,558.0 646.0 1,536.0 4,251.0 14,185.0 22,176.0 S 3.Channel Clean-McDowell/C orona 228.0 228.0 7 4.Dike Repair/River Dredge 28.0 70.0 98:0 9 PROJECT TOTALS 1,558.0 687.0 1,812.0 4,386.0 14,247.0 62.0 22,752.0 SONDMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY PROJECTS IN PETALUA~A (ZONE 2A) Estimated Estimated Projects Funded by. SCWA Year $ Pa e SCWA-1: Wilson/Lakeville Conduit-Phase III FY 93-94 100.0 FC-72 SCWA-2; Mt View Ave Conduit FY 93-94 490.0 FC-74 SCWA-3: Laurel St Conduit FY 93-94 185.0 FC-76 Total of.FundediSCWA Projects 775.0 Proiects Recommended'by City for Funding by SCWA For details, see City ST6rm Drain Improvements Project, Page 3. SCWA•-4: Madison-Payran to Edith :FY 93-97 80.0 3 SCWA-5: "C" Street-4th to 6th ~ FY 93-97 69.0 3 SCWA-6: Sth Street - H to I Streets FY 93-97 29.0 3 SCWA-7: Belle View,Avenue FY 93-97 42.0 3 SCWA-8: Lindberg Lane FY 93-97 100.0 3 Total Of Projects To Be Recommended For Funding By Scwa ` 320.0 ` Cost figures not included in City S Year CIP ~~~®° Drainage Improvements Capital Improvement Plan FY 93-97 CITY PROJECT 1. Storm Drain Improvements 2. Payran Reach Improvements 3. Channel Clean -McDowell/Corona 4. Dike Repair/River Dredging SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY PROJECTS IN PETALUMA (ZONE 2A1 Funded bX SCWA SCWA-1: Wilson/Lakeville Conduit-Phase III SCWA-2: Mt. View Ave. Conduit SCWA-3: Laurel St. Conduit Recommended For Fundit}g By SCWA (For Details see City Storm Drain Improvement Project, Pg 3) SCWA-4: Madison-Payran to Edith SCWA-5: "C" Street-4th to 6th Streets SCWA-6: 5th Street-H to I Streets SCWA-7: Belle View Avenue SCWA-8: Lindberg Lane RE~~. ~~ m~ 9 N C S . -,. ~ 2 ~~ _.~~ vital Improvement Plan FY~:93-97 Drainanr~ovetnents STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS #9746 ' PROJECT SCOPE This project will_expand the existing storm drain;collection system and alleviate local street flooding- by adding or improving inlets to existing storm.drain systems, or installing small area storm drain systems. PROJECT LOCATIOAI FY 92-9 1. Flood Alert System.- Upgrade flood alert system hardware and software at Police Dispatch and add a stream gauge in Willow Brook at or near Old Redwood Highway where'stream overflows it's banks. FY 93-94 2. Petaluma. Blvd. at McNear Buildingand at "B" Street - Modify.drainage under pedestrian ramp near the.McNear building and replace~storm:d'rain inlet ai:Petaluma Blvd. and"B".Street. 3. Second.Street and "E"-Street -Replace four.existing storm drain inlets at intersection. 4. Hopper Street S(~orm -Drain - Insta11;200 feet of 15 inch storm drain along Hopper Street from City Corporation Yard to the Petaluma River near Wilson Street. Anew flat gate would be installed.at:the River. FY 94-95 5. Kresky Way at_Williams Drive, Murry Dr-ive,. Reynolds Drive and Stuart .Drive -Replace seven inadequate sco.cm drain inlets. 6. "F" Street from Petaluma Blvd: to$th Street -Replace twelve inadequate storm drain inlets: OTHER PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR SONOti1A COUNTY WATER AGENCY FUNDING (FY 93-97) AND CONSTRUCTION [t is recommended that the following projects be submitted to the citizens,committee of the Sonoma:County Water Agency forfunding and construction. These projects are large enough to be considered°an area flooding problem. The schedule and cost of these projects~are not included in the City's 5-year CIP. SCWA-42 Madison Street between Pavran Street and,Edith Street - Insta11900 feet of 18 inch storm drain down Madison Street from Payran Street to Edith,Street; install three storm drain inlets at. Payran Street and two inlets at Vallejo Street. SCWA-S: "C" Sfr•eet between 4th Street•_to.6th Street- Insta11800 feet of 18 inch storm drain from 6th to 7th Street, and install four storm drain inlets`at 6th and "C" Streets. SCWA-6: 5th Street between "H" and "I" Streets - Insta11:320 feet of 18 inch storm drain from.the south side of "I"Street to'`H" Street, connecting to an existing 60 inch drain in "H" Street. Install two storm drain inlets at "I" and 5th Street. A-7: Belle View Ave. Mid Blocky -Replace 600 feet of 15 inch deteriorated storm drain. SCWA-8` Lindberg Lane -Proposed Lindberg Lane improvements. assessment.district. _t STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR PROJECT SOURCES YEARS FY 92-93 FY 93-94 FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 'TO'TAL Storm Drain Mit Fees 13.0 48.0 65.0 62.0 62.0 250.0 TOTAL 13.0 48.0 65.0 62.0 62.0 250.0 USES Admin/Eng/Insp - 3.0 S.0 S.0 S.0 S.0 23.0 Plan/Design S.0 S.0 S.0 S.0 20.0 Land Acquisition Improvements 10.0 33.0 48.0 45.0 45.0 181.0 Contingency S.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 26.0 TOTAL 13.0 48.0 65.0 62.0 62.0 250.0 `~~.`' ~; ~ ~ 4 DES®. ~ ~ ~ ®9 9 N C S Capital Tmnrovement Plan FY 93-97 . Drainage Lmorovement~ PAYRAN REACH IMPROVEMENTS #9724 PROJEC'T`SCOPE The Corps of Engineer's feasibility study analyzed two a ternatiue projects. Of the two alternatives, the LocahyPreferred Plan (LPP) is be'i g considered at this tune. It provides a 100-.year level of ,protection under existi g conditions and a 40-year level of protection for fu-tune General Plan conditions with full development and upstream channel improve-meets. This plan consists of 3,700 feet of widened channel comprised of 663 feet of U-channel with sheet pile sides and a 95-foot wide earthen bottom from the spur line railroad bridge to the main line railroad bridge and.3,03'7 feet.of trapezoidal ear~tfienieharinel with 1 on 2 side slopes upstream to about 35O feet upstream of the confluence with Lynch Creek. Bottom widths vary. from 45 feet to 70 feet and about 1.,900 feet of a ten-foot wide bench will be constructed on fhe east side of the channel. Floodwalls will be constructed ups ream of Edith Street, including,nearly -1.,000 feet up the sides of Washington. Creek. The floodwalls will generally,be under 4 feet in height. Drainage behind the. floodwalls will be conveyed to the river through outlet pipes with flap gates and two small pumping plants. Structures overt a river willl be removed and replaced. The total project costs includes,in addition to the Corps design and construction cost of 3-15-93', the following tasks: Task. Est. Cost 'Corps Design/Construction Cost Estimate 19,633,500 Feasibility Study 1,864,000 City S aff Admin 5.67,000 Copeland S't. Emergency=Sewer Crossing 11 Total Project Cost Estimate X22.176.000 The National Economical Development Plan (NED), which is not being considered at this time, provides a 1S year level of protection under existing conditions. It`would also provide for' a 40 year level of protection for future General Plan conditions with full development and upstream channel improvements. This project will be funded by the Corgis of. Engineers, State Department of Water Resources, Zone 2A Special District and City redevelopment and flood mitigation fees. PdtOJECT L®CATIOAI Petaluma River upstream of tfie Washington St. Bridge to approximately Lynch Creek. RE~Oa 9 ~3 _m 9 9 N H S ' ~~ fir. ~ ... ~~~ ~ C~~ • L,. .L SOURCES AND USES (IN 5000) PAYRAN REACH IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR PROJECT ~I SOURCES YEARS FY 92-93 FY 93-94 FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 TOTAL Storm Drain Mit 832.0 182.0 1,126.0 279.0 2,419.0 SCWA Zone 2A Assmts 4,000.0 4,000.0 State Water Resources 2,000.0 2,000.0 Corps of Engineers 726.0 320.0 165.0 2,974.0 815.0 5,000.0 Pet Comm Dev Comm 197.0 998.0 1,195.0 PCDC Tax Alloc Bonds 5,000.0 5,000.0 Water Poll Cont Fund 145.0 48.0 319.0 511.0 Undetermined Source 2,051.1 2,051.1 TOTAL 1,558.0 646.0 1,536.0 4,251.0 14,185.0 22,176.0 USES Admin/Eng/Insp City Costs x@5.0 69.0 49.0 100.0 244.0 567.0 Corps of Engineers 210.0 716.0 926.0 Plan/Design Feasibility Study 1,452.0 240.0 172.0 1,864.0 Corps of Engineers 1.0 226.0 706.0 126.0 1,059.0 Land Acquisition 400.0 4,025.0 4,425.0 Improvements 93.0 11,494.0 11,587.0 Contingency 19.0 1,731.0 1,750.0 TOTAL 1,558.0 646.0 1,536.0 4,251.0 14,185.0 27,176.0 ' 99 ~..d o~ ~', f: •, 6 Drainage Improvements Capital Improvement Plan FY 93-97 CHANNEL CLEANING - 1VIcDOWELL/CORONA PF~OJECT SCOPE The No. McDowell/Corona Are::a is drained by three. main channels. Orre parallels the northeast side of Highway 101 (2,900 feet); one parallels Corona Road :(1,600 fee ); and the third runs along the Northwestern Pacific.Ralro.ad tracks (2,600 feet). All three ar;e in need of cleaning to remove debris, silo and overgrown weeds m the channel. Because of the buildup of silt and vegetation in the channel along the railroad tracks, a parking lot of a neaibyb`us'iness flooded during January's rains.. Once the channels are cleaned,ithey will be offered to the Sonoma County Water Agency for maintenance. P~~OJECT LOCATIOAI The three drainage channels ar~~, located in the McDowell Blvd. No/Corona Road area. ~-.,rt~ e_>~p ~~ JLIiirJ~®e aJ l'J d ~/ y ~ V Capital Improve:rne~nt .Plan FY 93-97 Draina~nrovements DIKE REPAIR/RIVER DREDGING PROJECT SCOPE In September of lastyear (1992),'the Corps of Engineers dredged the Petaluma River. This work'will occur again in approxi=mately four years. The Corps. pays the cost to dredge and pumpp the dredged ma"terial to the City's dispo-sal ponds. To do the dredging work, the Corp issues their own contract (approximately $600,000 in 1992.) to a contractor. The City pays the cost to ready and maintain the dikes around the disposal ponds. In many locations a-round the pond, there are two dikes: the outer main dike and an interior dike used to protect the outer dike from the wave action of the water in the pond. Before the next round of dredging occurs, the mainand interior dikes-.need to be restored to their original design h'ei~ghts. Staff. proposes to repair the dikes in conjunction with the construction of the Shollenberger Park in 1994-95. The new park wall. be constructing an asphalt road. on a portion of the bond's dike (3,5:00 feet) that paralleys Adobe Creek, in order to provide handicap access to a fishing pier on the Petaluma River. The remaining portion of dike (7;,000 feet) willbe repaired through 'the Dike Repair/River Dredging Project. PROJECT I.OCATIOIV Petaluma River from the City limits south of Highway 101 to.East Washington Street Bridge. 9 ~~~~0 9 3 ~° 9 9 ~ C~ Drainage Improvements Capital Improvement Plan FY 93-97 SOURCES AND USES (IN 5000) DIRE REPAIR/RIVER D REDGING PRIOR ~ PROJECT SOURCES YEARS FY 92-93 FY 93-94 FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 TOTAL Storm Drain tint 28.0 70.0 98.0 TOTAL 28.0 70.0 98.0 USES Admin/Eng/Insp ~ 4.0 3.0 7.0 Plan/Design 20.0 6.0 26.0 Land Acquisition Improvements 4.0 55.0 59.0 Contingency 6.0 6.0 TOTAL 28.0 70.0 98.0 ~~s®o 9 3- 9 9 N C S to DRAFT APRIL 19, 1993 SONOIVIA COUNTY ~A/ATER AGENCY FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS FOR PETALUMA (ZONE 2A) CAPITAL INIPROVENIENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 1993-1997 DRAINAGE IA~PROVEIVIENTS ~~s®.~~ ®~~ NCS.. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 2A (PETALIII~I RIVER) ZONE 2A DESCRIPTION Flood Control Zone 2A is the watershed area in Sonoma County that drains into and includes the Petaluma River, with the exception of the most southerly portion of the area consisting primarily of reclaimed tidelands. ZONE 2A OBJECTIVES Flood Control Zone 2A was created to reduce the frequency of flooding within the zone through construction. of adequate facilities to safely handle projected storm flows. SCHEDULING OF PROJECTS ' An appointed citizens' committee meets several times each year to make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding priorities in the scheduling and construction of drainage facilities within the zone. Each proposed project is evaluated using criteria covering historical flooding problems, areas and .number of people benefitted, alternate funding available, special safety and health factors, coordination with other public projects, and environmental concerns. Projects normally proceed on schedule unless interrupted by one of higher priority or urgency. ~'" ~-~" as'~~~` ~~~®. 9 3 9 9 N~ Flood Control Zone 2A Page 2 CHANGES FROM PRIOR PLANS An addition from the previous CIP is the Petaluma River Channel Improvements project. There are also some minor timing cYfanges to accommodate projects of a higher- priority or change. in scope of certain projects. slt/zone2a.des 5/21/92 ® g 9 ~~ ~~~~. g 3 ~C-69 •I CATER AGSxcY FLOOD coNTROL ~ol+~ ZA PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY tyyl/y3 through 199b/97 _;,,i; FUND NAME/SOURCE `:S-YEAR,, PLAN 'ESTIMATED PROJECTED ~~ . .. TOTAL COST 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 Federal ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 0 0 0 0 0 0 .County (General Fund) Total County 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zones 4,77,5,000 775,000 0 0 4,000,000 0 Total Noa - County 4,775,000 775,000 0 0 4,000,000 0 TOTAL FUNDING 4, 775, 000 775, 000 0 0 4, 000, 000 0 slt\zone2a.fun 5/19/ 2 RES~o 9 3 ®9 9 N~ S .~ a ~ t~ ~ . ~ ~ i 1AATER ~~E~~I Z ~ 5 .> . PLOD CO~DTROL SO~dE ZA PROJECT ~~EBPENDITORE BQYrIMARY 1992 93 throu h 1996 97 PR JECT T 5-REAR PLAN' PROJECT$D O ITLE >.ESTIMATED TOTAL (COST 19;92./93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 S. Wilson/Lakeville Conduit-Ph se III -~ 100,000 100,000- 0 0 0 (o, Mt View Ave Conduit 490,000 490,000 0 0 0 ~ .Laurel St Conduit A. 185y000 185,.000 0 0 0 Petaluma River Channel Improvements 4'000,000 0 0 0 4,000,000 TOTALB 4' 775 .000 775 000 __ 0 0 4,000,000 ~~ ~ V PJ O i .Jto ~ ~J G. Lv CAE C~ t ~ G I T"`-( S `r fZ C I P - SEE " P A`f 2A~J ~. EP-GH I M Pf2 OJ C M E7JTs ~~ P_ S~ . t~ ca e t~ c.C~ 'mil ~ t. ~' s .~ 1 1996/97 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TITLE: Wilson/Lakeville LOCATION CODE AND PROJECT NO.: N/A CIP INDEX NO.: 688390- Conduit - Phase III DEPARTMENT/AGENCY: Water Agency DATE PREPARED: April 27, 1992 AGENCY FACIL TY: Ar.nr. nR T.A[7ATTAN: Patal„mn .:.ri. S-YEAR PLAN'': PROJECTED FUNDING SOURCE ESTIMATED TOTAL. COST 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 ... ~ ~ GI ~.K.d. ~ ............................................................................»..».....»..................... State .»County ................................ ...........»....»........».......».....»........._... `?: '~ General Fund ...................lother.).....».......».......». .....»Zone, 2A .......»..»»». 00 '00 00 0 0 0 0 other TOTALB D®scriptioa: This project consists of installation of approximately 1,100 linear feet of storm drain ranging in size from 18 to 42 inches in diameter, plus appurtenant facilities along Jefferson and Vallejo Streets in Petaluma. Justifications ,This is the final phase of the Wilson/Lakeville Project designed to correct drainage deficiencies from the Fairgrounds to Lakeville Highway. A developer is required to build this project as part of the development permit. A portion of the work is through proposed low income housing, to be supported by Zone 2A funds (up to $100,000) as a contribution to-the City of Petaluma for flood control improvements. Schedule and R®latioa to Other Proj®cte: This phase of the overall project will outlet into the Phase II portion completed in 1991. This project is scheduled for construction in fiscal year 1992/93. Land or Right-of-Way Coaaid®rations: The project ie entirely within City streets. n~ ~-- REST. 9 3- 9 9 N C$ -~~~~ ,// g -~n~5 .yea ~a -d(r1~5 c a~; ~~~, ~~ .= ~ O Z ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ s ~~ 7~ ~q.. ~, ~_~ ti ~°~-•. o ~. ~ o. o ~: C~ yr a • A a a ~~\ ~W 3Mp0 ~0~ z 0 N Z n D r m ~~ \~ ~~`~ ~~~ .y ~~ 0 L~ ~ . r R~ D ,~ ~ m ~ „ ®~( G r ~J ~ m EAST " CT. s~~ ~0 rr ~~'~~'Z G~ . R d ~, , ~. \<n L iq S tiiti c ti /~ ST n /~ ~~, '~. ~ c:u. -~Y i -~~ ~~ i , i~ ~i ~~ ~r ~ ~ ~/ .,. ~ ~i .. / :~" ~~i. ~ i ~ a ~' K ~ ; / ~ ,~; ,~ o ~d i~9a/~3-~~~~/~~ ~,T~a~ ~~a~c~e c~~~Ta~ i~~~ ~t p~OS~cT ROJECT TITLE: Mountain View Ave. LOCATION CODE AND PROJECT NO.: N/A CIP INDEX NO.: 688408-7224 Conduit DEPARTMENT/AGENCY: Water Agency DATE PREPARED: May 6, 1992 AGENCY FACILITY: wr.nc nu T.rv+nmma. oetst....,~ S-YEAR. PLAN PROJECTED FUNDING SOURCE .ESTIMATED`: TOTAL.. COST: 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 ...~~d~.K.~7,1 ..................................................................._.......................................... State Count ...............Y.. ..................................................................................... .._..... General Fund .............._...lother.)............................................Zone 2A ~: 490' 000' 490 000 0 0 0 0 other TOTRI,B Descriptions This project consists of installation of approximately 2,000 linear feet of storm drain ranging in size from 18 inches to _54 inches in diameter plus appurtenant facilities along Mountain View Avenue in Petaluma. Justification: The existing drainage is inadequate and causes frequent flooding. The project is a high priority of the Zone 2A Advisory Committee. Schedule and Relation to Other Projects: This project ie scheduled for construction in fiscal year 1992/93, the second of three phases planned for construction. The project will connect to the existing Mountain View Avenue Conduit Phase I, constructed by the Agency in 1984, and outlet into the Petaluma River. Land or Right-of-Way Considerations: The project ie within existing city streets and an encroachment permit is required. :lt\zone2. F_J - ® D ~.E~®. 9 3- 9 9 N C B N J PETAtUM,q RLVER ~ =, O ~~ qC0 ~~ • :. ., ~ ~ ` /: ~_ o Coo /./ / ~~ o\~ \ N (A ~ ` n , `~ R ..., W ~. ~ Z ~ ~ C ~ q-. SOUTH 6"~ -- r'z_ o. O T,y ST~ O 0~, c o yRgNE ,.q ~p a, qv. ~ ~ 0~~ ~ ~ c N AM1; 9 ' 1 \ ~~ ~-y~ MISSION DR. •,;: •; •~ p'> ~ , ~ OQ Q 3^110;: ~ `-'~__ ~- ~` 1 ~ (,,till M O ~ •yq„N3lJMO0b'3W ~.,. ~•;'~. r •' ~ ~ J - F ~ ~1 ~ C _ ~~~ ~ 1 •; •1~M NOON3lJ• .q .~ ,~ "CJ ~ •, i . ~ r ~~ . , / _ ., ^'} - ~<j O .///ate AM doNl~-0~. •' ~:.," 1~ ~ ~~ ~\'i ., J1I1 ~j •0. n n - ~G ~~ oQo p ~ D }. _ i , , u ~ ~, •~ ~ ~~ ,,,~ `fir C; ~ : d a 3N ~w _ r - , ,. \ ~ ~\ ~ `` ,~ ,• '~(~, ,. r'a'w[ " ~ - w •"' ~ ~ , ii ~ -r ~ ~.`~ ~`,, .\ .- , • -- • ~ ~ :. , ' ~, • ) M ` .. \\ a ~' ~~ o O t='' ~• ,o~ '~ c ; \ \\. 1\ ice;,. .$'. i 11 p .\ ~ •r \~ \ \ assn/s3-a9s~/~7 ~,TaR AG~~c~e cAhIT~L Y~~RO gaT PLAx PYtO.TECT PROJECT TITLE: Laurel Street Conduit LOCATION COpE AND PROJECT NO.: N/A CIP INDEX NO.: 688408-7280 DEPARTMENT/AGENCY: Water Agency DATE PREPARED: May 6, 1992 AGENCY FACILITY: wr.nc nu r.nrnTTna. ~o*fli,,..,~ ' ~5-YEAR: PLAN:'.- PROJECTED FUNDING SOURCE -.ESTIMATED •:.TOTAL`COST.: 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 State .. CountY .................. General Fund ...................~other.~............................................Zone 2A ...... 185 000 85 000 0 0 0 0 other TOT~iLB Descriptions Design and construction of approximately 800 linear feet of 30-inch diameter storm drain in the vicinity of Cherry Street, Laurel Street, and Cindy Lane in Petaluma. Justification: This is a priority project of the Zone 2A Advisory Committee. The existing ditch is totally inadequate to handle flows from the upstream watershed, and two urban intersections frequently flood. Sch®dule and Relation to Oth®r Proj®ctsaa This project is scheduled for construction in fiscal year 1992/93. This project is part of the Petaluma River Watershed Master Drainage Plan. The proposed conduit will outlet into the Agency's existing Cherry-Magnolia Conduit. Land or Right-of-Way Coasid®ratioasa Approximately 1/3 acre of private property easement will be required. ® ~ S®. 9 3 ®9 9 (~ NCS ~ o~ 0 1`1 0 ~' e• , i O ~~ o _., 5~ ~~ ~PG~O ..I ©~ ~, ~f9 so /~, o r~ ~ 0.1 ~ r O a~ 0 r 0. `ae O )~ /~ l ~ PROPOSED CONDUIT •~2 F ^ S. ~G~ Sl O as ~ O 'as ~• ~ ~ T v~ {NE RAY VA~~EY ~ ~ N U ~ c ' ~ W e ~ m ~6 ~ ~ P1RK J I^ ~~ ~y V~ ~ O ~ij G~~O ~ ~ ~~~ 1, A' ~m ~ ~ ~ 8T ~ ~~ C ' 9 O t O 81 2 ~ ~1 / l/ ~ y 4 ~ ° 3~ - ~ w ~®. 9 3- 9 9 N C S LAUREL STREET CONDUIT ~o~ o / is Y D O O ~ alY y ~ oo°o 0000. o '~FhT O Q O o~ wl 0 ^. ~\v 8Y ^ ~' O +f << F H .~ 'Yz ~ lY I o 0 '96 ee ~ < '102 O O aY! O O /;~ r