The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 8411 N.C.S. 01/02/1979PLK:mi 11-29_78- Resolution =78 esolu RCA. , ,. tion No ...---� ��.�,.. .._.N, . C: S. ' RESOLUTION APPROVING ;TEN,TATIVE , SUBDIVI'S.I,ON MAP -0`F SPRING MEADOWS "# 1 S'LTSE IV1,S'ION. INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN_ -.-: ---. ................................ SECONDED BY ,COUNCILMAN'..---- . -- ".......Ga__.;k�S JaAJV.D QI p....................................................... at a --- -•-- .. •------ ULAR; •-------•-••.............. Meeting of-the City Council of the City of Petaluma; !on the . 2nd, day pf.........January.......-----• -•--•------...-•..............................•---........., 19_71 WFIEREASy Mr-Raj.,l G mp1any as owner(s) and SiAbdivider (s),, .has/have filed with this Council a. tentative map propos- ing Vo subdivide, land within. this City' to, be known as SPRING MEADOWS- tisubd vis on and h'a,�e paid all, required filing fees; and, WHEREAS; the .City Engineer, the.,D,il,,rectbr of Planning, the Sonoma County Water `Agency, and 'the Planning' Commission have examined and re- viewed re y reports, recommendations, viewe.. e sa req b law and all and comments there on have been f,orwarded to an-d considered by this _- � 1978 Councilat it"s meeting. ld on December 18 he . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Council hereby finds as follows: 1. The propps-ld subdivision;together with ,provisions for its design,, and improvement., is, consistent-,with t'he,,.General. Plan. 2. ' The proposes:' ,s-ub:division 'is compatibl'e' with the objectives, policies,,, general land'b'ses., and programs specified in said General 'Plan. 3.. The site is phys-cally suitable f'o'r the 'type of develop- ment proposed 4 The .si..te is . '- physically suitable for the proposed density of development.. The desi, n of vision an'd, the proposed improvements 5• g the Subdi therefor,w ll not 'cause&tb.stantial ,environmental damage and no sub- stantial or avoidable in will occur to , fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. The _design- of the Subdivision and,•'the type" of. impro='ements „., will not .cause serious pub•l.c health. problems„ 7.. The` design of the Subdivision° and the type of improvements pro,pq:s;ed '-wi'll not-cllli,ct. with easements, acquired by the public at large-, fo'r access through or use of'property within the proposed sub- di-vision, ,8. The, dislharge, waste from the propo:sed:•.s.ubdivis�:on into c. o' f the existing„ community sewer s_ysatem. w1--11 not result in violation of- the existing requirements prescribed by the-'Reg'ona`1 Water Quality Cont'roa mBoard. - 0?0bNCIL ETLE i. RES. NO: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the findings set forth above, that the above referred to tentative map (Exhibit "A") be, and the same is hereby; approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibits "B" and "C" attached hereto and incor- porated herein as if fully -set forth. under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by -the Charter of said City. I hereby certify that the foregoingResolution was duly and regularly, introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of Petaluma on the ........ ................................. day of........... Xl.11xY.....................................1 19...7.9........, by the following votes: AYES: Councilmen Balshaw, Bond, Cavanagh, Harberson, Perry and Mayor Hilligoss. NOES: None . ABSENT Non ATTEST-. City Clerk .. FORM CA 9 7/7. CCG UNCAL FILE REB. NO. EXE ISIT A gas SPRING ,NLAllUWS 111 SUBDIViSON CONDITIONS - REU.ISEb 1. The applicant shall comply with al -1 rec,omm,endat ons ,outlined by the City En•gi'neer in the attac'hed' lette:r,with the fol'low- ing, modification.: °The first; sentence' 6f Condition, ,ill' sh'ou'ld be reworded" to read,:, An, irrevocable offer to ded-ica.teGar'fie'ld Drive across the subject property shall be made with:the alignment unspecified. 2. The has tract shall be given ,a different name because the word "'Alderwood" ady, been used for a subdivision in the City (Sec. 20.15.070). 'All lots shall be given a lot number. The,"To.tal Number of Lots" shall be. corrected: The proposed "greenbelt," strip .shall be corrected to" read urban! sepa'r.ator. The width of all, adjacent streets shall be. indicated (Sec,. 2&.16.130). The "pr'oposed zoning" statement shall be modified from "P.,U.D." .to R-1-6,500. 3. Arabian Way s1A11 be deleted, the portion of Clydesdale Way abutting lot numbers 36^,, 37 and 38.shall be extended straight to Ely Blvd. South, and the su�rrodnding lots shall be realigned accordingly. Tentative Map fees 'shall be adjusted if the resultant number of lots is different 'fiom tta,t proposed. 4. Unless otherwise approved through modif,icat.ion to the Subdivision Ordin nc,e:, al -1. lots shall conform with Sections 6-600, 24-301, and 24- 302 of the Zoning Ordinance. No lot shall'have a width of less than sixty-five (6.&) feet at the building setback (Sec. 2.0.28.060). No lot shall have a front yar.d setback of less than twenty (20) feet. 5.. Typical Sect'ion'A-A shall be modified''to indicate the use of rock lining .in the "low flowI channel" (bottom, of creek .center) . Channel design shall be subj.ect'to review and .approval by the Sonoma County Water Agency. 6. Trees to be located in the landscaped channel sh°al.l not be planted in the 100 year flood plain. The landscape ch'a'nnel and mini park irrigation plans shall be.sub'ject to review and approval.by the Superintendent of Public Works. 7. The "proposed bike path shall be paved with asphalt and shall measure eight (8) feet in -width.- Bike path design shall be subject 'to ap- proval by the Public Works Superintendent. 8. Fencing to.be located in the channel next to Ely Blvd. ,shall consist of,five (5) inch diameter stained posts connected with`wi,re cables. F.enci-iq shall root exceed three (3) feet six '(6) inches in height. A locking removeable post shall he supplied in the fence to allow access of maintenance vehicles on each side of the channel. Any modifications to ff`encing design s}iall be subject to approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 9. Fire hydr'ants`of specified capacity shall be installed in locations noted on Exhibit - A (Fire Marshal). CONDITIONS {.Cont.) 10. Grading and drainage design shall 6'0 prepared iri conformance with the Flood Control a of tCriteria Design "he'Sonoma County Water Agency. , 11: The applicant .shall 'submit to the, Community Development Director the covenants, co,nd'tions,, and restrictions to be' recorded to demonstrate to the sa'tisfac'tion .of the Director that the total project will be developed and maintained in accordance with"th`e intent and purposes of the development. 12. The type of street lighting standards to he used shall be subject to approval, by :the City Council prior to installation,. 13. Plans shall be modified to indicate only ninety--two (92) buildable lots for conskstancy with the.applicant'sprevious.:allotment award, 14. A twenty (20) foot wide access easement sha l 6e extended to the urban separator 'from Garaietd Drive in a.manner deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director. 15. Lot No. 10 shall' be supplied with electric a'nd, water service. . 16. All required- modif:ical.ions shall be made prior to Tentative Map sub-. mittal to'the City Council. 17. The applicant shall comply with all other applicable City Codes and regulations. 4�TAUp�g '(J . C I,TY O F PETA,L L1.1vi A;, Cali f orn d POST AND ENGLISHSTREETS 949.52' • TELEPHONE (707) 763-2613 November 20, ,1.978 Petaluma •Planning,;Commisson 'Ci-ty° Hall. : Petaluma, CA 94952 Attention: Frarik: B. Gray, ,Direc.t'or of Community Deve`lopmen't rDear'Sir: , Re; Tentative Map.'Entltled "Revised Tentative,Map, Aiderwood Subdivision Unit No. 2" . . I' - :Section 20,.16.420 of, 'the' City Code specifies. that 't`hi City''Eng -neer shall prepare a written report of recommendations on the T,eiita;tive,.Map in relation. provisions of the, State Map!Act., d-_nance and the public im rovement r'e uirements of the Subdl.visioOr n 1. a•rfi - " ,. to the Shehte"r Hills Subdivision which is presently the entire property 'We recommend that G eld Drive be dedicated acr under .construction. 2.' We. recommend that additional width on Ely $1vd..-South be dedicated to Provide a left turn lane at the Caulfield Lane intersetton. 3,. This., map does ,not,,, conform to Section 20;.-1.6.030 of the City Code in that the boundaries of the Tentative.Map" have. not been ce"rtif;ed as to accuracy by ' a re istered c vil,en ineer or' licensed l registered g and suu rveyor. • 4. Thls map:do,es not comply to„Section 20°.„16.230 of the City Code in that the .existing easement -s 'recent- granted across- the nor-thweste�rly edge of the ” - - ..property are riot shown. 5. A'oijty'.a.ccess easement should be offered fo'r dedication between Garfield . Drive and”. the 3.3 acre parcel which is oaf"fe'r•e`d .f6r de'd cat -ion• Very ..truly yours:, David A. Young - City Engi"neer ! DAY/p;f cc. CE , File R