HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 8463 N.C.S. 02/20/1979u ..,,'Resolutign No 8 4.6 3 'N CA;
RESOL
UTLON' APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBD'IVISI,ON MAP' OF
CRFEKSI'DE..OA -S .SUBDI:VLSLON'
No:. 2
PhK cmi 2'-14-F79
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN------ ---- --- - ---- ........ J01,M1 L ,. BALS.Hffi9 -=- ----, and
SECONDED BY COUNCILLMAN------... ROBERT'E DALY ::at a
- -- REGULAR - Meeting of the City Council 'of the
City of Petaluma, on the .... '20th FEBRUARY'
WHE-REAS., . -
Lawren de • Jonas as owner(s) and
'
Subdivider (s), has/have filed with this Counc':l .a tentative map propos-
ing to subdivide land within this City to be known as CREEKSIDE OAKS
S'.iandiyision #2' i and have paid, all required filing fees; and,
• . WHEREAS the ;City Engineer, the 'Dir.ecto;r of Planning, the Sonoma
County Water Agency, and the Planning Commission have examined and re-
viewed the same as, re aired b law and all r6ports, • q - y" p- ,s, recommendations,
and comments, thereon. have been forwarded to, and considered'by this
Council at its meeting ,h,eld on February 2,0 -1979 ,
NOW-THEREFORE,""BE IT RESOLVED that th-i
s Council hereby finds
as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together 'kth provisions for its
design and improveme'n't, is', consistent with the General Plan.
2. The propo'sed•subdivision,is compatible, with the .objectives,
policies, general land uses,,,and programs specified in said General
Plan.
3. The site is physically suitable. for . the type o,f develop-
ment proposed.
� . 4. The -site is physically suitable f
or' the` proposed density
of development.
5. The, de -sign of:: the. Subdivision and thre proposed improvements
therefor. will not "cause substantial environmental damage, and no sub-
s.tAntal or avoidable in ,j:ury will occur to fish or wildlife or their
habitat.
6. The . desi;gn of .'the -Subdivision, and th?e type of improvements
will.no
t cause,, serlo,us 'public health p:roblem's .
T. The des °gn orf. the Subdivision and the- type of improvements,
proposed will, noti conflict with easem,ents.,• ac.,quired by the public at
large, for access through or use of property within the proposed sub-.
divisioYl.
8. The d'sclha_rge of 'waste from the p.ropo'sed subdivision into
the existing community sewer system. will not result in violation of
-I�existing re°.-.
p the qurrements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
COUNCIL FILL
� -• - iiEB. ;NO. -
Fi
..
BE -•.IT FURTHER RESOLVED,: based' on the. findings set
,.
forth above, -'t -hat th-e, _abgve.-referred'-to tentative Map (Exhibit'
"A"')' be,. arnd the same 1s 'hereby approved, Subject,. to -the -`con-
ditions ,set `forth: in' Exhibit B attached: he-reto and incorporated
herein as, i.f, fully set forth.
under-, the power and authorit c.nferred, upon this Council by the Charter of ' said City.
,,
I hereby certify 'that fgregoing -Resolution, was';duly' and regularly introduced and -'
adopted by, the Council, of the City of Petaluina on .the ----- 2 �_th
day of.: .: ek2: _ y _.,,.;----•-----•----........... 119:..,_79,--._, by the following. votes;:
AYES:
Co un c ilinen B,alshaw, Bond, Cavanagh, Daly, Rarbers'on,, Perry and
NLayor., Hi i oss.
None.
ABSENT ;
N I, N
..
ATTEST,
City'C erk couN :IL iPruE: Mayor.
FORM; CA 3 774
-
:
J'
��
i
X11 ., � �: V'li [ i. i
I I. illi ' �
,
.� � V• � 1� I
t .
i
'
,5.
t w �
J t,
x I
4 _
' 1
fi .i 7
y
t .
1i i M m Im
Ilh
-
IW n
♦
Ga. .
I • �'�
i '�
:
- I: �''I
I
u. it .. ,.
Y 3
IN ti"I
c '
i
le
I x
HIB cy.
m ,II .
x
'• f x _
w
0
O
�
C.
V
S•.sm 1. i... fq. 1 ..
a x'I � 4 �v�. �.�.. ` ,: . ,m I.. m,:
n V 9 ��I� Y. , _. I^ x ... �-
.. I � � .:'1.": 4F n.VL. .�• . 5��:..
CDI
i
r
IJONAS
ANr.
LE - a i
F -71
,
rD
ro 177AT
i
I .is
'1
STREET
:
J'
��
i
X11 ., � �: V'li [ i. i
I I. illi ' �
,
.� � V• � 1� I
t .
i
'
,5.
t w �
J t,
x I
�
' 1
fi .i 7
y
t .
L ti
Y 3
IN ti"I
c '
i
I x
��
i
X11 ., � �: V'li [ i. i
I I. illi ' �
,
.� � V• � 1� I
i
'
x I
�
�rW
HIB cy.
m ,II .
x
'• f x _
�"
'.
S•.sm 1. i... fq. 1 ..
a x'I � 4 �v�. �.�.. ` ,: . ,m I.. m,:
n V 9 ��I� Y. , _. I^ x ... �-
.. I � � .:'1.": 4F n.VL. .�• . 5��:..
CREEKSIDE OAKS UNIT NO. 2 SUBDIVISION = TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
CONDITIONS_
1. 'Development shall be withheld until con'struct'ion of downstream
improvements in Thompson Creek, a 'plannedAy the Sonoma County,
Water Agency, is commenced b.y the award,.of a contract for said
2. Pr,i.or to the `Tentative. Map submission and' approval. by the City
Council, the deve".lopcT shall degonstr.lt'e khat- Lot •.15 has the
capacity to provide <a buil-ding envelope that has setbacks as
required by the CiLy Zoning OrdAnonce for' P} e R-1-20,000 Zoning
District and the Sonoma County. titer Agency far ge•tbacks from
natural waterways. l.f it is detor..minedtAt Alae building envelope
is insu-ff-iKent' for a single, family res'i•d'ential structure, a portion
of Lot 1.5 will be combined with L'ot 14•and'a portion -will be combined
with Lot 16 prior to City Council action on Qe Tentative Map.
3. Compliance with the re.quireme;nts of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal,
Chief Building Inspector, and applicable City ordinances.
4. Ail drainage'imorovemen't plans must he approved by the Sonoma County
[dater Agency prior to final map approval.
5. Compliance with. Subsection 22.7.70Q of the Pe'uluma Subdivision
Ordinance pe'rtainiAg to one street tree per lot.
6. All utilities shall be placed in 'the ground within public utility
easements which An be. indicated .on the final map.
7. In accordance with the,Subdivision Ordinance, the subdivider shall
pay the required in lieu pads •ded',i'cat ion tee to be computed. and
submitted.for payment prior to re.cordati.dn K the final map.
8. • Pursuant, to Finding No.. 3 above of the Negative Pecl.aration, should
constructi_on.unearth any buried archaeological''material.s work will
he temporarily 'halted in the vicinity of the find or finds and a
qualified archeologist wil.l. he c,onsulfed to evaluate the materials
and suggest mitigation measures for their protection.
9. At Least 30 days, prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant
shall submit a co y of: the covenants-, conditions and restrictions to
be recorded to the Planning Director fox review and approval..
10. All existing trees with a trunk diamter. of 6" or more shall be
retained.
11. Individual building plans will be reviewed. for energy conservation
c'f°fW, fgncdn'g, and security prov'is:ions,
MOMENT