Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 93-192 07/19/1993' ' ,~ • 1 \~is~ll.,~t~®n N®. 93-192 N C.~. : 1 of the City of Petaluma, California 2 3 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 5 THE CORONA CLUB .RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, A 40 LOT RESIDENTIAL 6 SUBDIVISION ON A 10.96 ACRE PORTION OF THE .14.85 ACRE COLABIANCHI 7 PARCEL LOCATED OFF SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY AT CORONA ROAD 8 IN THE CORONA ELY SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, (APN: 137-060-77) 9 10 WHEREAS, the project site has been rezoned to Planned Unit District by Ordinance No. 11 93-1931; and 12 13 WHEREAS, by action taken on June 8, 1993, the Planning Commission considered and 14 forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to conditionally approve a Planned Unit 15 Development Plan for the Corona Club residential project; and 16 17 WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the requirements of the California 18 Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation and Certification 19 of an Environmental Impact Report for the Corona Ely Specific Plan (Certified, approved 20 and adopted by Resolution No. 89-122 N.C.S.) and pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA 21 guidelines, no further environmental review is necessary. 22 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby conditionally 24 approves the Planned Unit Development Plan as shown in the Character Studies received 25 on December 21, 1992, the Site Study/Land Use Plan and. Lot Type Designations received 26 on May 13th, 1993; the Tentative Map/Lot Configuration Plan, Grading Plan, Utility Plan 27 and Preliminary Landscape Plan received on December 21st, 1992 and the written PUD 28 standards received on Ma~ 24th, 1993; all on file in the City of Petaluma Planning 29 Department, pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance 1072 N.C.S., as amended 30 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 31 Res'. No.....9311.92........ n.cs. 1 Findings: 2 3 1. The development plan as conditioned results in a more desirable use of the land and 4 abetter physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning 5 district by providing the opportunity for small detached units of a unique style. 6 7 Z. The plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and 8 organized arrangement of buildings which are appropriate in relation to nearby 9 properties and PUD plan will be reviewed by SPARC to insure compatibility. 10 11 3. The development of the Colabianchi property in the manner proposed by the 12 applicant, and as conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public 13 welfare, will be in the best interest of the City, and will be in keeping with the 14 general intent and spirit of the Corona Ely Specific Plan, the Zoning Regulations 15 and the General Plan of the City of Petaluma. 16 17 4. The circulation pattern of the proposed PUD has been reviewed in the context of 18 the development of the adjacent Liberty Farms and Sonoma Parkway Company 19 properties, and has been designed to have a compatible relationship to the adjacent 20 circulation patterns. Cumulative traffic impacts from the development of the 21 Corona Ely area have been addressed and mitigated through the implementation of 22 the Corona/Ely Specific Plan. 23 24 5. The proposed project has complied with the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 25 Section 15182 of the Guidelines, through preparation and certification of the EIR 26 for the Corona/Ely Specific Plan on May 1st, 1989 (Resolution No. 89-123), which 93-192 NCS 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 addressed the potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the Colabianchi Parcel, and no further environmental analysis is necessary. PUD Conditions: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of an arborist report which shall include: a) A map of all existing trees (12" or greater in diameter), their driplines, diameter and species, using the Tentative Subdivision Map grading plan or final grading plan as a base map; b) An evaluation of the value and health of each existing tree from a visual as well as biological standpoint; c) Identification of the monetary value of each tree worthy of retention; d) An evaluation of the impacts of the proposed plan on each tree; e) Recommended changes which could be made to the plan to reduce impacts on the trees and save as many trees as possible; f) Recommended tree preservation guidelines to be employed during the construction phase. 2. The project arborist shall be under contract with the City of Petaluma to prepare the arborist's report at the expense of the project applicant. 3. The arborist's report shall be submitted for review by SPARC prior to Final Map approval. SPARC shall determine which trees are to be saved based on the arborist's report. Reso. 93-192 NCS 3 1 4. The applicant shall submit a bond to the City of Petaluma prior to the 2 commencement of any construction on the site for the value of all trees determined 3 by SPARC as worthy of retention. The bond amount for each tree shall be forfeited 4 to the City of Petaluma if trees are damaged in any way during the construction 5 process. The amount of this bond is to be determined by SPARC upon the 6 recommendation of the project arborist based on the value of the tree. If any 7 portion of the bond is forfeited to the City the money shall be used by the City to 8 purchase and plant replacement trees, in addition to trees proposed on the 9 approved planting plan, within the Corona Club Project and/or the Corona Ely 10 Specific Plan area. 11 12 5. The tree preservation guidelines shall be considered conditions of project approval. 13 Violations of these guidelines shall result in a forfeiture of all, or a portion of the 14 tree bond, at the discretion of the Planning Director. 15 16 6. It will be the responsibility of each builder to install the street trees and planter strip 17 plantings and irrigation in front of their homes in accordance with the approved 18 landscaping plan. The individual landscaping plans will be subject to approval 19 through the administrative SPARC process and must be installed or bonded for 20 prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for that unit. 21 22 7. All lots which may be left undeveloped for any period of time shall be seeded with a 23 wild flower and/or grass mix until construction begins. Any temporary fencing 24 installed on these lots must be consistent with the setback and design requirements 25 of the Planned Unit Development Plan. 26 Reso. 93-192 NCS 4 1 8. The individual lot owners shall be responsible for keeping the sites litter free and 2 for any maintenance which maybe needed on these lots. 3 4 9. No long-term outdoor storage of building materials will be permitted on the 5 undeveloped lots prior to the issuance of building permits for a specific lot or group 6 of lots or prior to commencement of construction on those lots. 7 8 10. A master fencing plan with construction details shall be submitted for review by 9 SPARC prior to construction of any fencing. Perimeter fencing (other than the 10 soundwall adjacent to Sonoma Mountain Parkway) is not required except as 11 specified in the written PUD standards, but any fencing proposed must be installed 12 in compliance with the master fencing plan. 13 14 11. As required by the adopted Corona Ely Specific Plan Mitigation Measures, the 15 Public right-of-way landscaping shall be maintained by an "LAD" (Landscape 16 Assessment District). The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with 17 establishing the LAD. The owner shall enter into an agreement (to be recorded 18 with the Final Map) with the City which authorizes the establishment of the LAD. 19 The LAD will include the privacy wall, landscaping, irrigation and sidewalks within 20 the public right-of-way along Sonoma Mountain Parkway, the landscaping proposed 21 at the entrance to Elisabetta Drive, the landscape areas in the public right-of way at 22 the corner of Elisabetta and Mauro Court, the landscaping and sidewalks within the 23 emergency vehicle access area at the end of Mauro Court, and all the street trees. 24 The LAD will not include other landscaping within the planter strips or the 25 irrigation for the planter strip. The LAD landscaping and irrigation along Sonoma 26 Mountain Parkway, at the entrance to Elizabetta Drive, at the corner of Mauro and 27 Elizabetta and in the emergency vehicle access area will be inspected and Reso. 93-192 NCS 5 1 considered for acceptance by the LAD one year after installation even if all interior 2 street trees have not been installed. The individual street trees will become the 3 responsibility of the LAD after they are established (approximately one year after 4 installation). During the first year maintenance of the street tree shall be the 5 responsibility of the individual builder/owner. 6 7 12. Architectural drawings for individual homes or groups of homes shall be subject to 8 administrative SPARC review to determine compliance with the adopted Planned 9 Unit Development Plan. Any proposed development of one or more lots which 10 would, in the opinion of the Planning Director, deviate from the intent of the 11 adopted PUD Plan would require an amendment to the Planned Unit Development 12 Plan. 13 14 13. The PUD Plan will be subject to review by SPARC with emphasis on the following: 15 a) retention of existing trees 16 b) written PUD standards 17 c) master fencing plan 18 d) strength of the written PUD standards and their ability to direct the nature of 19 the development 20 21 14. The written PUD standards shall be amended as follows prior to submittal for 22 approval by SPARC: 23 a) The permitted and conditional uses on Lot 40 shall be specified in the 24 written standards, subject to approval by the Planning Director. The uses 25 shall be similar to those uses permitted in the "R-1" zoning district with some 26 exceptions for the continuation or expansion of existing uses, similar to uses Reso. 93-192 NCS 6 '~ a s t 1 permitted in the "A" zoning district, such as the housing of domestic farm 2 animals. 3 b) The permitted uses (including second units or duplexes on Lots 6, 12 and 17) 4 and conditional uses permitted on all lots shall be specified in the written 5 standards, subject to approval by the Planning Director. The uses shall be 6 similar to those uses permitted in the "R-1" zoning district. 7 c) Specific setbacks and height restrictions for Lot 40 shall be included in the 8 written PUD standards subject to approval by the Planning Director. These 9 standards shall be similar to those required in the "A" zoning district. 10 11 15. Within 60 days after approval of the PUD Plan by SPARC the applicant shall be 12 responsible for resubmitting reproducible copies of the final PUD plan and a final 13 copy of the written Planned Unit Development standards to the City of Petaluma 14 Planning Department. 15 16 crclbpdr/ddb Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the ,---A roved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~~;) meeting on the ....a-~t~-..---...... day of .................J.lll~--................................, 19-.~~., by the following vote: ......... j- _:-.--• - ---- - - - City Attorney AYES: Nelson, Sobel, Hamilton, Shea, Vice Mayor Read, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: None ABSENT: B rlas - ./~. ATTEST: ---.L~~R~~~~-fi.4.-'.....-- •• ........... .... ... .................. . City Clerk Mayor Council File ....... ......................... cn io-as Hes. N~.........:.9.3~-.,1.92... n.cs.