HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 8533 N.C.S. 05/07/1979PLK::,mi 5-8-79
8,533
Resolution No ............ ........................ N. C. -S.
RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE ACTI -,N OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION
AND DENYING ARPEAL,�O:F ROYAL PROPER,TIES',, INC. WITHOUT PREJU-
DICE AND DENYING REZON'I-NG TO .R 1-;6,5oa' 0'F AP NQS 8=488-24
8-488-25, 8 488-26 AN: 488.=27:
INTRODUCED BYCOUNCILMAN.................. obert Daly . and
-
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN._......... ................... William .A Perry, Jr.
------------ ......------ --------------------------------------------- ..at a
REGULAR. Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Petaluma, on the ........................... 7th day of -:...............y :. ].9..'.9
WHEREAS, the Petaluma City Planning Commission on April 3, 1979, did
deny the application of -Royal Properties, Inc. to reclassify AP Nos. 8-480-24,
8-480-25, 8-480-26 and 8-480-27 to 'R-1-6,500. `by its Resolution No. Z879; and,
WHEREAS, the applicant made timely ap'pea.l to the City Council pursuant
to the provisions of Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended; and,
WHEREAS, the matter was duly -noticed and regularly heard and a public
hearing was conducted on May 7, 1-979 and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council' considered the record
submitted by the Planning Commission as well as documentary and testimonial.
evidence presented by the applicant, the -city staff and other interested parties,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council.does hereby find after
considering all the.evidence submitted in the case that the.applicant's'appli-
cation as, submitted should not be granted, in that the application cannot be
shown -to be consis-tent,with the developing character of the neighborhood at
this time.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based upon the foregoing, the appeal of Royal
Properties, Inc. .from the action ofthe Planning Commission in Resolution No.
Z879 ought to be denied., and the action of the Planning Commission ought to be
upheld, denying approval to the application for R-1-6,500 zoning as submitted
by the applicant..
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the denial, of said appeal shall be without pre-
judice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution:was duly and regularly introduced and
adopted by the Council of the City of Petaluma 0n, the7-th ........ .........................._..
day _of... -••--••---••May-•--- ---------- --------------- ---------- 19 7......_••--..... by the following votes:
AYES: Councilmen '.Balshaw, Bond, Cavanagh',,,, Daly, Harberson;,. Perry
and Mayor.,Ailligoss
NOES:. None
ABSENT: lone
ATTEST:
ty Clerk 8533 N.
-w MP; re 12 9, 1—