Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 93-301 11/15/1993•~ Resolution No. 93-301 N ~,~, 1 of the City of Petaluma, California 2 3 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT N0.2 TO THE PUD DEVELOPMENT 4 PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MOUNTAIN VALLEY 5 SUBDIVISION PHASES 2A AND 3 (MOUNTAIN VALLEY VILLAS), LOCATED 6 EAST OF SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY AT RAINIER CIRCLE, 7 AP NO'S. 136-120-60,61,78 8 9 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1807 N.C.S., Assessors Parcel .Numbers 13b-120-60,61,78 10 (formerly a portion of AP No. 136-120-15) were rezoned to Planned Unit Development 11 (PUD); and, 12 N cs. 13 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 90-242 the PUD Unit Development Plan for Mountain 14 Valley Subdivision was approved; and, 15 N.C s 16 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 93-274 the PUD Development Plan was amended to 17 permit development of 70 detached single family homes on 7.03 acres; and 18 19 WHEREAS, an application for a second Amendment to the PUD Development Plan and 20 Development Standards affecting phases 2A and 3 was filed by Mountain Valley Partners; 21 and, 22 23 WHEREAS, by action taken on October 26, 1993, the Planning Commission considered 24 and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council on the proposed second Amendment 25 to the Development Plan, to allow creation of commonly owned parking and driveway 26 parcels, and minor amendment to the minimum. setback standards for the cluster unit 27 portion of the project; and, 28 29 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental 30 Quality Act have been satisfied for this project through preparation and certification of the 31 Corona/Ely Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, and that the project will conform 32 to the Corona/Ely Specific Plan, and is therefore exempt from further environmental 33 review pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines; 34 35 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the 36 following findings: 37 38 Res. No..........9~J.-.3.0.1.... N.C.S. Findings for PUD Amendment No. 2: 1. The amended development plan as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning districts. 2. The amended plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings which are appropriate in relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects, and adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure compatibility. 3. The natural and scenic qualities of the site will be protected through the implementation of conditions of approval pertaining to landscape areas and adequate available public and private spaces are designated on the Unit Development Plan. 4. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant and conditioned by the City,. will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma General Plan. 5. The development is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway) to carry any additional traffic generated by the development. 6. The use of a private court and common driveways as proposed for cluster units contributes to a more efficient use of land than would be possible through use of standard public streets, and enforcement of conditions of approval and applicable provisions in the project CC&R's will ensure that the development will function adequately as designed. 7. This project has complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) through preparation and certification of the Corona/Ely Specific Plan EIR, and is exempt from further review, based upon Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines, consistency with the Corona/Ely Specific Plan. 2 Reso. 93-301 NCS 1 8. The creation of common area parcels for driveways and parking within the cluster 2 unit portion of the project will provide a more appropriate mechanism for 3 addressing maintenance and liability issues than can be achieved through individual 4 ownership of these areas. 5 6 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proposed Amendment No. 2 to phases 2A and 3 7 of the Mountain Valley Subdivision PUD Unit Development Plan and Development 8 Standards (to be known as Mountain Valley Villas Subdivision) as referred by the Planning 9 Commission and presented at the November 15, 1993 meeting of this Council is hereby 10 approved pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, 11 subject to the following conditions: 12 13 Conditions for PUD Amendment 2: 14 1. Except as herein amended, all previously adopted conditions of approval for the 15 Mountain Valley Subdivision shall remain in full force and effect. 16 17 2. PUD Development Standards shall be amended prior to application for Final Map 18 to incorporate the following revisions: 19 20 a. For plans 1 and 2, a minimum side and rear yard setback of 3' shall be 21 maintained adjacent to all property lines for the primary residence, except 22 where the residential lot abuts common driveway areas. No setback for the 23 primary residence shall be required along a common property line shared 24 with a common area parcel created for driveway purposes, provided a 3' non- 25 buildable easement is established within the common area parcel adjacent to 26 any portion of a building wall abutting the common parcel. No portion of the 27 building (including eaves, chimneys, and other architectural elements) shall 2$ be permitted to extend across property lines. Eaves, chimneys, and other 29 architectural elements shall not encroach more than 12" into the required 3' 30 setback area. 31 32 b. A minimum street frontage setback of 5' from property line shall be 33 maintained for plans 1 and 2. Deeper setbacks shall be maintained where 34 feasible. 35 Reso. 93-301 NCS 3 1 c. No accessory structures shall be permitted outside private fenced areas for 2 plans 1 and 2 except as permitted by the Homeowners Association. 3 Accessory structures exceeding 6' in height shall maintain a 3' minimum 4 setback from property lines and/or private yard fencing for plans 1 and 2. 5 No minimum setback shall be required for accessory structures 6' or less in 6 height, except as regulated by the Uniform Building Code. 7 8 d. Accessory structures for plans 3, 4, and 5 shall meet Zoning Ordinance 9 provisions for setbacks and lot coverage. 10 11 3. The PUD Development Plan shall be amended prior to application for Final Map 12 to incorporate the following revisions and corrections: 13 14 a. Units for plans 1 and 2 shall be relocated to meet minimum setbacks as 15 established under condition 2 above. The PUD Development Plan and 16 Tentative Map shall be amended to reflect any required property line 17 relocations to accommodate setback requirements, and revised dimensions. 18 19 b. Property lines for the common areas shall be redrawn to incorporate all open 20 parking stalls within the common driveway areas for plans 1 and 2. Common 21 area parcels shall be identified through the use of numbers or letters. 22 23 mvvreso3/tp7 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~id~o~i~e~i~meeti~yng-'" on the ..-....1.51'11-.-.-..... day of .............~Q3Z~Inl~~r......................-, 19.;x.3.., by the following vote: .-.---- --- --- --- ------------------- C y'Att ney AYES: Nelson, Barlas, Shea, Vice Mayor Read, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: None ABSL'NT: bel, /~ ATTEST: .. -- ---• ........... ..........~-v~..----..-...................... City Clerk CA 10-85 Council Fi(l]e-°--- r-11•---------------°---.... Res. No. ...~.~-~~1i 1.......... N.C.S.