HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7804 N.C.S. 06/20/1977fo
lution No. 7 804, N G. <c
`
RE S O I
NORTH SAPj
MAP OF
NG TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
UTIO N FRANCIS � � '
,. - NDU ,T;RI L; PA #2 SUBD;I�-
'> C O BAY I S A �RK ,
VI51,0N
T -r - - ---Wil-1-iam A Perry; - Jr--= •------- - =--•-- . .......... an.
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN _
-----------------------------,J------ft-e---'s...;..'L Harbers_on•--•-• ..-.-at a
E�'D BY„,COUN,CILMA- _ _ _,-
•.
SEGO --
Reqular , - - --Meeting of the City. Council of the
------------------------------------------
Cit of Pe iria o
ta4u 20th, ................. .--•--June ------•..- .-.:_:
y n the ;_ day of... -
t
WHEREAS ,RD W,ILLIAMS
RICHA a s'• owner (s) and •' ,
Subdiv” d with
^ / - _ �,h this, .Council .a tentative map propos-
-
ider s) has have file
�.
i,rnL to' �St day d�e .hand within 'this' City tq be�.,known as, North San: Francisco Bay
Subtvisall
ion and have paid all r . e
' + • eq.ure.d. fill ng fees; .and,
"
'WHE'REAS,the Ci t, y''°'Engineer, the Director f; ,pPlanning, they Sonoma
�
Coupty'Water Agency, and, the Planning Commi'ss,ion have'examined and'.re-
ie'wed the' same°^ as ,Ire pu red;'by, law and ,all -reports, recommendations .
and comments 'the ereon have been forwarded, to :and consae"red by this
Council at,. -its, meeting held on.
June, .2:0,,, 1'977
NOW, .,.THE^BEFORE, BE LT RESOLVE
D, that this Coun`c-1 hereby finds
.41
1 as follows:.
1 The proposed subdivis'ionj together`with•provision s for; its
design. and 'improvement ,is ;consistent°with the,'General Plan.
p bdivis :on is, c,ompatible with the object°ives,-
Z. The pr.o osed��su
olicss:-genes w pro; rams s ecifi
a"1 hand uses, and' g p ed' in said Genes"al
P'lan.
' r ry
3. The site ,is physi,c:a11, suitable for the type of develop- ,
ment ,proposed.,
4: The site s•phys..callpsuitable for 'the -.'p'r'oposed density
of development.
5. The d'esti 'n of the 'Subdi.v -s nd ;the ropo'sedlmprovemen,ts•
t ill not c' substantial environmental, damage; and; no s'ub=
therefor w' ause
•
stantial or avoidable; ii�ury will ,occur,.to fish or wildlife or. their
habitat
6. The desi: e
gri of the Subdvi ion and: the type of improvements
I I will not cause serious : pub1K;c h,ealth,, problems,, ,
7. . ' The "des.igri of the'' Subdvis,iori and, ;the type of improvements
proposed will
I „s° flict„ with easements, a'eq,ur-:ed by the public- `at. '
n riot. 'con ,
large, fOr. access tlhr--ough or use of p,ro.perty within the nropo,sed ;s:ub
division
arge"of waste. from 'the pro osed s..
e di s c h."
8 T;r - ,e p , ubdivsi on into .
the,ex- sti-ng community,,sewer system :wil no'.t result in violation o1
they. exi.st'ing requirementsp_r,escribed by, the Re i:ona1 `Wate'r Quality
CB'o°ard
i
i
COUNCIL FILE !'
/Q"/ �t
RES N06'
,BE IT'FURTHER RkSOLVED, based on the findings set forth
;above, that ;the !above ref:elrredto-,tentative map (Exhibit "A")'
be, and the same is hereb y, approved subject to the conditions
set forth in Exhibits "B" and, "C�" attached hereto and inco;r po-r-
ated herein as if -fully set forth,save that in lieu of dedi-
cation recited in Exhibit "B"', the developer shall execute an
irrevocable ofle-r-of 'd,e�aidatibn pursuant to GbVernrrfent Code
Section 7050, -in a formappro v ed by the City Attorney.
under the power and authority conferred, upon this Council y
b the. Char -ter, of said City.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and
adopted by the CbunciPetaluma"of the City of Petaluma on the, -------- -------- '2 Oth
---------------------------------
day ofjjqne .... .............. ....... the. votes:
. ................................... 19�_77 ...... by' the
.
AYES: 'Councilmen Brunner, Cavanagh,Ha-rbetson, Mattei,
Perry, and Mayor Putnam
NOES: None
ABSENT Councilman ft'll1ligo's's
ATTEST -
t 'Cl'erk Mayor
FORM:CA3;7/74
a
Z
c
US,- 3l3aV'
_
s
1S' Ab JZl.Va
'
m
•
x
Q.
a:
Ll
.. 1. -.
LL
1 4 it -
� -. .. � - � _
•�'�.
Y
US,- 3l3aV'
_
1S' Ab JZl.Va
Ll
.. 1. -.
LL
1 4 it -
� -. .. � - � _
•�'�.
REPORT TO: Planning Comm ssi.on June 3:, 1977
PROM: Planning Department
Williams North San Francis
SUBJECT: Richardco B
Will ( ay-Ind'ustr-ial Park,Un,t Two)
E. I. Q.- Evaluation & Tentative, Subdivision Map Review of a Proposed. -
Twenty -Eight- Lot Industrial Subdivision -to -be Located on North
McDowell Boulevard' and Transport Way'
LEGAL STItU : iTheonformand, ubdivision is a project under the C.E.Q.A. guide-
lines.' e, with the General Plan designation of Transitional,,.
the.E.D.P. designation of;.Industrial and the Zoning'Map designation of Light
Industrial for the area.
GENERAL INFORMATION.*
1. Land Use = The site is 'currently being used -for agricultural purposes,. It
is surrounded. by UnitOne-of the North San Francisco Bay ;Industrial Park
to the north, Candlewood,Mobile Home Park and Park Place Subdivision to
the east, agricultural 'land to the south and the° U'.'&..101 .Freeway to the
west.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Site Characteristics ,..= `site is' nearly, square'shap:ed, ,flat, covers
twenty-four acres, contains several mature trees; and has no outstanding
physical features.
Siting - All proposed' lots are adequate in 'length; width, area and config-
uration-.
Landscaping.- No landscaping is proposed at this, time.
Internal Circulation; &'-Access - A convenien-C-interna„1 circulation system
is proposed. Ac&essl to the: -site is` provided via North McDowell Blvd. and
Transport Way: .
The .Environmental Design'Plan indicates a second'priority parkway extend-
ing from the west under the `Freeway and through the subject site. The
General, Plan al -so: calls°'
f`or a thoroughfare' in the vicinity. However, both
Plans are undergoing revisions that will change,' the alignment of the
thoroughfare and interchange:' for the area indicated north of -the Site.
The,appl'icant,has not .indicated a thoroughfare,in this area.
COMMENTS ,BY REVIEWING AGENCIES: Plan's have been referred to thei following
departments °and agencies for review and comment`.: 'City Engineer, Fire. Chief,
Chief Building Inspector,, Sonoma. County Water Agency, Pacific Teleplone,`Paci-
fic Gas and Electric Company, Northwestern Pfi
acic Ra•ilro,ad, Marin/Sonoma
Mosquito Abatement, CALTRANS and State Lands Division. All remarks have been
integrated into the -remainder of the report.'
PUBLIC INPUT: 'Notice of ,public hearing was published ;in the .Argus Courier on
Ma 28 1977. No y ;' comments have been receded from the, general public.
E.I.Q. EVALUATION & RECOMMEN'DA,TION:: The following environmental impacts are
expected, to result ult from the', proposed subdivision^:
Page 2 .
1.,
Depending on the type: of future ,uses';, an unspecified,'degree o_f.ar quality'
deteroraton`would be created by a combination of industrial and veh-
cula•r -Pollution. .emissions..:
This deer
Z. An additional t__wenty--four acres of agricultural land would b.e. depleted.
ease,.coupled.tiwt•th the. development. of any other recen ly approved
subdivisions and industrial sites -in Petaluma will have, an impact on the
remaining„ agricultural bland 'in the .City,
3. The noise, level of the immed`ia;te area and', .the, Nor h. McDowell Blvd: vic-
pty would `be increased by the additional auto mobile,.and truck traffic and
...industrial ;machinery.
4.. Development of the.subdi•vi'siom would4 create both new jobs and a demand for
more housing,•
S. Increased automobile .and..truck traffic would be generated on North'.McDowell
Blvd. 'and in the surrounding vicinity.:
6. The'Tentative Ma does not =•
Map provide for the parkway "which is designated for
the site on the E.D.; P. This particular aspect.is of critical importance
in light of the, ,potential future need for an•additional arterial linking.
the valley with,other 'sectors of the City.As a condition ,of Tentative
Subdivision. Map approval, the City Engineer is recommend'in& that a 50•to
110 foot wide right-of-way'be dedicated to the City along the southern,
boundary, 'of' the site to accommodate a .future on-ramp, onto. the Freeway.
7. Additional fire and
police protection will be required to serve the
subdivision.
8. A substantial increase in the demand upon existing sources of energy could
be necessitated depending.on the nature of future..uses.
9:'The site is; located within 1,000 feet of the Tolay Earthquake fault line,
as established..by the Hillcrest Hospital R.I.R.
10. Inownfo nration regarding the impact of development on the water•system is not.
k.
In light of the above consideratons,'th'e' staff recommends that the Commission ;
direct •the Planning Director tore 'are •and
P P post a Negative Declaration based.
on the following findings:
1. Air quality .and noise concerns shall ;be addressed on an individual' -de
velopment basis.
2. The reduction of. agricultural land will, be minimal.
j.. The increased demand for police -and 'fire protection,, water and, energy will
;. be consideredon• an, individual development basis. _ -
F
R:
Page 3 .
y G. Future traffic
- i mp'acts,will be mitigated by the ;requirement (attached) by
the City Engineer that the 'applicant provide a right-of-way extending
Along the southern boundary, of the site to be used, for future access to
the Freeway.
5. All new structures, in the proposed industrial park 'will be built in accord-
ance with soils and geologic survey recommendations,which must be provided
at the time buildings 'are proposed.
TENTATIVE MAP RECOMMENDATION;;
The staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval of the Tentative
Subdivision. Map, to the City,.°Council based- on. the. following findings:. .
1. The proposed subdivision (with required modifications), together with
provisions for its. design and improvement, is consistent with the General
Plan.
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies,
general land uses;, and. 'programs specified in said General Plan.
3;.. The site is physically,suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
5. The design`of the Subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore will
not cause `substantial'environmental damage., and: no substantial or avoid-
able injury will occur to .fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause
serious public healtl,problems.
7. The design of the.Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed will
not conflict with easements, acquired by the public a -t large, for access.
through or use of°property within the proposed subdivision.
8. The discharge of was,t,e from the proposed subdivision into the existing
community sewer system will not result in violation of the existing re-
quirements.prescrib°ed"by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The staff f,urther recommends approval of the Tentative Map subject to the
following :conditions,,:,,,-
1.
conditions,,:1. The applicant; shall .comply with all requirements outlined in the letter
from the City -Engineer (attached').
2. Grading and drainage design shall be in conformance with the Flood Control:.
Design Criteria provided by the Sonoma County Water Agency..
3. All utilit-ies shall -"be placed underground within the P.:U.E.
r
Pade
4
4,
dile street. names indicated on .the Tentative Subdivis'ori :t.P are subject to .>
review and revision by the Police Department and the•Chief 'Building In-
spector;.r
5.
P ri or to recordation of, the Final Subdivision 'Nap the applicant shall
submit the following documents; to the Planning Department;:
A. Documents to convey title.
B."Covenants, conditions;, restrictions and master, plan `to be recorded.
b;.,
Theowner' shall provide a source of water at the time of issuance of`
bu ldinnP,,E it s' n accordance'with Ordinance #1233 �t.C.S. -and -subj'ect to
approval by the Director of Water Utility Operations as to: water quality
and quantity.
7'.
All trees proposed, to be removed' shall be approved by tle,_ Planning ll'irec-
tot prior to; the issuance of a .final. Subdivision Map, • Grading Permit or `
Building Permit. -..
8.
The app'lican't shall comply with ;all other applicable _;City r-egalatiofts,. = �.
WAYNE
P. -SMUSSEV RONALD F. .I'IALL",
Proj.ect, Coordinator. Planning director