Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 92-182 07/20/1992Resolution N®. 92-182 N.C.S. 1 of the City of Petaluma, California 2 3 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 5 CITY OF PETALUMA ADOPTING THE PRIORITIZED 6 PROJECT LIST FOR THE 1993 FEDERAL 7 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (TIP) - 8 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) AND 9 CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY PROGRAM (CMAQ) 10 FUNDING AND COMMITTING THE CITY OF PETALUMA'S 11 PORTION OF PROJECT FUNDING 12 13 14 WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 15 1991, was recently enacted by the Federal government; 16 17 WI~EREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 18 1991, created the Surface Transportation Program (STP) and the 19 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program (CMAQ); and, 20 21 WHEREAS, these programs place a high priority on the maintenance of 22 the nation's existing transportation network, and the flexible use of 23 available funds; and, 24 25 WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma together with the Sonoma County 26 Transportation Authority (SCTA) have worked together cooperatively to 27 develop a priority list of projects consistent with the priorities and 28 requirements of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 29 1991, utilizing the process outlined in Exhibit "A"; and, 30 31 WHEREAS, the project list reflects priorities which include the 32 maintenance and increased efficiency of the existing transportation system, 33 congestion relief and prevention, expansion and enhancement of transit 34 services, energy conservation and the improvement of air quality; 35 36 NOW, 'T'HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the 37 City of Petaluma hereby adopts the attached Exhibit "A", City of Petaluma 38 ISTEA Project List; and, 39 R~,s. ~o......9.2.-.1..8:2... N.c.s. 1 BE IT FURTI~ER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of 2 Petaluma authorizes and commits City Traffic Mitigation Fee monies 3 together with direct project development contribution under the City's 4 control to meet the City's matching portion of project funding as shown on 5 Exhibit "A". 6 7 at93ftip Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to _.. meetin ".__"~~ form Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~[c~~l~~~i. i g" on the ----~ 4_~1~......... day of ...............71a.~,~..-......_..........._..........., 19..x.2, by the , following vote: .----~~ - ---- ------ - - - Ci~ Attorney- AYES: Read, Davis, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: None ABSENT ATTEST: CA 10-85 Woolse Sobel ___ _ _ Mai City Cler 1bEPUTY C1TY CtER~,~c~~F~~~ .................................... Res. No. ...~.~. .18.~..... N.C.S. S I I j I -"INiERIN"DISTRIBUTION' I " ,~STPJCNAq II TOTAL I I C ~ , ~ TfVtU93/94 PROJECTS ~ 0 PRIg1ITY PROJECT'DESCRIPTION STP NATCN "''TOTAL STP NATCH TOTAL- STP NATCN T01A1 - R E A-1 OVERLAY`Petalu~a Blud. N 130 :310 50D, 130: 310* S00 CRTE60RY TOTAIS - 130 .310 500 ~0~ 0 .0 '' 130 ' 310* 500 21 B-I BUS PU[L-OUTS 120'° 3D 150 120 30 150° E.Nashingtgp St Corridor 2I 6=2 BUS PUIL-OUTS 80: 20 100' 80 20• 100 Various locations - 21 B-3 `SIGNRL1lRTI0N Petaluoa 81vd S @ B St 60 90 ID0 60 40 ;100 2D B-4 SI6`NALIIATION'NcOoo~T1 @;Bayrood ; ~80 - 40 120' B0 40 .12D CATE60RY TOTRLS D 0 0 . 340 13D 410 340' 130 410 2D C-1 Slf~l[IlATION`PBN/Old Red ~CHANNELIIRTION US 101'Ramps 480 120 600 ' 480 120*~ 600 CATE6lVtY `TOTALS 0 0 ~ 0 480 ° 120 ~ 600 480 120** 600 22 D-1 SI6N8L 1~-GRADE 8 INTERCONNECT • ., 120 40 160. 120 40 160 Petalu~:'Blvd Corridor . • 22 D-2 SI6NAl'UR=~E~B INTERCONNECT •"120 40 160 120 40 160 • E:~ashingto~ St. Corridor 22 . D-3. SIGNAL; UP-~E'6 .INTERCONNECT. 90 30 120 ~ 90 30 120 . NCDo~el1 BIYd Corridor " 22 ' D=4 `SIGNAL RETIMIN6 30 10 4D `;30 10 40 . 20 D-S • SI6NALI]ATIUN,Nashington @fLY~~B1vG~~ 80 40 120 80 . ~ 40• 12q. 19 ' D-6 ~ BICYCLE ACNATION @ TRAFEIG. SIf~AI.S. - X200 50 25D 200 50 250 - L CRTE~Y ~TOTRLS I 0 0 0 I 640 210 ~ 850 I ~ 640' :210 850 , " L ~ TOTRLS ALL CATEf~lIES, I 130. 310 500 I 1460 460 ..1920 f I ~ `1590' 830 ~~ -2420' 21 .I, I ~ ~ - __ _ f PARK=RIDE LOT US101/SRII(i (Caltrans Natch~ ~ ~ • . ~ j ' .900: 100' ` 500 I I'> 400 100 - 500 IJ * 6AS~TAX~FUHDIN6 ~ - ~ ~ RL)4AININ6 FUNDIN6'T1~OU~I TRIIEFIC i~ACT~NITI6ATI0N~~FEES' . *'~'DEVELOPER"~ • C~ITRIBUTIONS ., Project Costs in $1;,'000 . EXHI BIT "A" . 2 ~~ DSO : a=a. - i,:g a. ~G s. ~ - ~. ., ~ ~ MBMO TRAFFIC ENGINEERLNG TO: Thomas S'.:Hargs ,July 10, 1992 FROM: ~ Allan G. Tilton ~/ v SUBJECT: _ISTEA Project ~ List I have received the MTC Staff recommendation for ISTEA STP/CMAQ funded projects. The regional list will be adopted by MTC at a special meeting on July 22. The City of Petaluma competed weh regionally with 6 of -the top 25 projects: These projects total $1,260,000 in new funding to the City. Two .projects, Bicycle Actuation @ Traffic Signals (D-6) and; aPark-Ride lot expansion at US 101 and Lakeville, ~ did not make the cut. ~ The following are the City projects which were submitted: 1 ~e.so ~a - I g a. ~lcs .. - _ ' CITY OF PE1~AI,UT+~A ~' ~ ISTEA PROJECTS LIST ~. S( C 0 R . E 21 21 21 20 20 22 22 22 22 20 i . i - , ~ lRTERIN DISTR16UiIg1 ~. ~ STP~CMAQ ~ ~ TOTAL ~ Tl~U 9394 PRILIEECTS PRItOtI1Y PROJECT DESCRIPTID:aI STP RRTCH TOTAL STP RATCR iOTAI STP BITCH . TOTAL A-1 = OVERLAY Petaluo~ Blyd. H ~ 130' 310 500 130 310 SDO ---- ----- ------------------------------------------- CRTE6g1Y TOTALS ---- ---------------------- 130 310 ------- 500 ------------ 0 --------- 0 ------- 0 - ------- 130 ------------ 310 ------- SDO B-1 BUS PU1L-OUTS 120 30 1S0 120 30 150 E.bashington St Corridor 6-2 BUS POLL-OUTS ~ 20~ 100 80 20 100 Various locations B-3 SIf~Al:I1ATI0H'Petalu~ Blud S @ B St 60 40 100 60 ~ 100 B-4 SI&HAI:IIATION Hdlo~elT @ Ba,~od 80 4D 120 80 40 120 CATE6~lY TOTALS 0 D 0 340 130 410 340 130 410 C-1 SI6IUU.IlATI~I PBN~OId Red , CHR~IELITATI~1 US 101 Raaps .:f 480 110 600 480 120~* 600 CATE6~IY TOTALS ~~ t :.: 0 0 0 480 120. 680 480 120 .600 D-1 SIf~AL UP=GRADE li IRTERCORRECT` . ~ ~ 120 40 -160 120 40 160 Petalu~~Bl~d Corridor D-2 SIGNAL UP-GRADE 6 IRTERCORRECT " - 120 40 160 . 120 40 1~ E.Yashington St. Corridor ~ . , . `_. D-3 SIf~AI. UP-6RAOE 8 IPtIERC~IEC>` c'~ = ~ ~ 30 120 90 30 120 X11 Bled Corridor D-4 SIf~IL RETIgII~ ~ 10 40 30 10 40 D-S SIFdiALIlRTI~ Uashington @ ELY Blyd 80 40 120 . 80 40 120 ~B-6------- -816VC1E-AETUATIBH-@-TRRFFIC-SI6RALS------- --: • ---------------•------ ------- -•----200--- ----SO--- ---2SD- -- ----288 -------SD--- ---1SD- CATE6~tY TOTALS ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 640. 210 850 640 210; 8S0 ~ TENTATIVE FUNDING CATEGORY 1) ( ~ 440 I6O 600 (~ 440 160 600 TERTATIVE'FUI~If~ A1L CATE6~IES ~ 130 310 SDD ~ 1260 410 1610 ~~ 1398 1~' .1420 ---------- - - }-PARK-RIBS-lB;-US}91f SRiI6-f Eaai;paRS-8ateh~ ----}-----------------------------}--•--=488--- ---188--- ---SBD-}}-- ----488 ------188--- ---588- CIS TAX FUHDIR6 RENAiRIN6 fUNDIN6 ifR~16N TRAFFIC `FACT HITI~ITI~I FEES ~* DEVELOPER C~IfRIBU1I~IS PR8JE6TS-HBT-FBMBEB Project Costs in $1,000 a +~~. 9a - r s a, arcs