Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7687 N.C.S. 03/07/1977a u ,!`solution No .7b$ 7 , I' c RESOLUTION. DEDENYING'APPEAL RAYW E;,BOQ,D SHO,PPING CENTER RE USE PERMIT IN CED U BY COU atter ` � Fred V M ,, TROD .` ` � , NCILIv1AN. -, -- - _ - - -...........nd . SECAN -----------------------William ................. Perry---..........................................r..:at:'a lar ONDED BY _ L e u .. g y ...........................g.:.. I R � a Meeting of the Cit Co,!Council of,,th' , -7th larchCif of Petalmon the a °o -_---------------------------------- '197 ...... WHEREA'S`.,; on',No>vember" 2.3, 1976, the Rlann.ing Commission ' approved a 'condi- io:nal use permit, for°.the B'aywo.o:d Shopping _.'- . il_y.:�' y and , y pP and, Ba. awood Dri.�e; ter to be constructed ;at Perr Laned'decisi' Q6 n, , WHEREAS , , a. times a ea r om sa- on was filed; and:,, g �JHEREA � or ,Yi'eari,n b°e fore �ths Counc_1 ' � l 9.7 7, on ,f ' e i ° on March 7, at whichat'' e ma ime Mrs.=: ,Srusan.: Berg and .Mr . Den-n_is L. Bryant ap•pear,ed on behalf of ,the appeal" and'presented tes;ti'- mo"ri;y ari:d ev-den ce ; :and; WuEREAS., at, sa id hea"ring this Council. received pertinent reports "and" testimony from. -staff; and,)" W IE -REAS, th.: s Co;uneil c.onsi,dered. a'la testimony and ex- i- is gyp -resented to it at that dti-me, NOVy. THEREFORE,, "BE-; ,ITRESOLVED, ',that this ,Count-il hereby finds .as' follows` 1.. The ro. osed sho in; ten ' � ter, wil• ' - p p` .,IPP; � g re_ 1 con=form._ to the qu r.ements and. ihten't ;af this ordinance,,;: the General Plan, and the Environmental Design Plan in tha-t the "subject area has been -Ion -g, set aside. for ,.commercial development. p pp g r conforms with, the" require ­ propose g Ordinance m_erits2of the'°',Zonlosed sho 1n,; the ,,General,. Plan, and the Environ- cente mental (Design Phan, in' th'a�t• •it° is liprncirpa lly designed to serve the neighbarhoodiri which` it is loca'te�d'. 3. The proposed' u,s,& will not constitute= a nuisiance . 4. Th.e, p:ropo,sed. use will not' be .detrimental to the public wOl;f;are a ' COUNCIL F,IL� 11 y n. II• 1 I ' } ,I u, •', - . ,tip.. ,I • I n r I Ir �i 1p,Y a BE `IT' FURTHER RESOLVED 'tYa't the ,appeal from 'tlie: decision ' � -, .,; — • of .t'he Planning: Commslsio'n to ` is'sue a;'' use ;permit fo"r the pro = posed use ils., ;h`ere'by denied•, '•.and the Planning Commission' s decision, is affi'r=med, - BE 1IT FURTHER RESOLVED that ,tlhe ;use ;permit for' the 'pro- posed use is Y.g .3 t toy.the° at no hereb ranted sub ec condition th g-, � L ted .in f ing � � r appof t_he y�houp r 1 sate g been furthe t y ,• ro�.ed . b •the ch buildin has�truc ron ite buildin will be: cons, D site des n 'rev I II .center, ungi su �.r , ewe committee l• II I • F^ 1 y u , , under the power and authority conferred 'upon this Council by1: the Charter =of said City , a + oin Resolution was: dul and re Marl int a -,ce tify that therforeg g y g y rodueed and t ado te, y u I hereb rdi ti1 e 7th p y he Council of the Crty of Petaluma on the, 1p i_- p qday of March 1 11977'b the fol , g� tl _ y lowtn otes ty AYES:, _. g a�► Y. a:yor : Councilmen Cavana h ?attei°jRerr amd Vice M �Brsunner .: s NOES,. Councilman Ha-rberson, Councilm"aii Hll" oss=andJ:Ma or `Putnam ABSENT' g Y ATTEST r, tl" Mayorti I � � � City Clerk aUri e e FORMICA 817/7A" •� li , s - I. - { " f 1� YU 4 tl µ r r �° G..�,FrYla a