The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 7410 N.C.S. 06/07/1976y tesolution No. RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISZON MAP OF S &; M CONSTRUCTION (PACHECO), INTRODUCEDBY COUNCILMAN--- ................. Jr ------------------------------------------------------ - - M Patricia Hillioss ,SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN--- -- -- - . ------.............................. .at a Regular ....Meeting of the,Cit Coundl of the Cityof Petaluma, on the --7 7th, day ,of --------•-•- ------ June ------------------------------------------------------------ WHEREAS,,, -1 Par -„ham ;G & M 0m_gG -�riv� J—pn �, as owner(s) and Subdivider (s) . has/have filed with this Council- a tentative map. proposing to, subdivide: land within this 'City to be known as The Pacheco E, b �kyi, sin'n and have paid all re- q .. g and,, uired.filin .fees;; , WHEREAS, th`e City Engineer,, :the Director ,of .Planning, the Sonoma County Water Agency,, and the P'laiinng Commisson-have examined and reviewedth'e`8ame as required by law, and all reports, recommen- dations, and. comments `ther.eon,have been 'forwarded to this' Council; NOW., THEREEORE, BE IT RES'OL'VED that this, -Council. hereby f inds as ' follows,; 1. That, -the proposed subdivision, together witIh pro visions for its design, and.. improvement., is consistent with the General Pian. 2. --That- the:: proposed subdi;vis on� is . compatible with the objectives,'policies- general.land uses, and programs specified in :said General Plan. 3. That the °site is physically' suitable for the. type of development proposed'. 4. That the`site is physically, suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the Subdivision and. the proposed improvements tHerefor, wi11 not cause substantial environmental. damage, and no;sub'stantial or avoidable,injury will occur to fish, ,or "wildlife 'or their Yiabitat;. 6. That the design: of the, S:ubdvision and the type of. iMp rovemen is will not cause serious public health problems., 7, Th • � � _.� �-� at° the design of the Subdivision ajrd_., the ::"type-:: of improvements ;proposed, -will not corif lict with. easements, acquired by the public 'at large:, for .access through oruse; of property within he proposed S,ubdiyison. . 8.. That the discharge of waste, from the proposed Subdi- vision into the :eXisting community sewer tsyst.em; will not result in violation:. of the,- existing req ,.uirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.` BE IT FURTIHER RESOLVED, based on- the' findings set forth above, that - the above referred to tentative map be, and the sameis hereby, approved subject. to the conditions :se.t forth in EXhibit(s) A & B': "attached hereto and. 'incorporated herein.. under the power,and authority conferred_ upon this Council:by thee. Charter of said City. Thereby certify that the, foregoing=Resoliition v✓asAuly and regularly.' introduced and adopted by 'the -Council of the City- of"Petaluma on, the ,_.. 7th day of ..-- --- June _ 19_26 ........ :by_ahe:foilowiK9 .votes: s: AYES: Councilmen `Brunner, Cavanagh., Harbers,on,, Hilligoss,, Mattei, Perry., -'and 'Mayor Putnam NOES':; ,None ABSENT None A.r• u ,ty Clerk ` .. Mayor- PLANNING COMfISSIONFCONDITIONS OF APP.ROvAL EOR THE PACHECO SUBDIVISION, TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTIQN N0. 12-76.,:MAY 4, 1976 ; 1. A one-foot,non= w � \ O16 • 14. Six (6) foot high board fencing shall be provided on the rear lot lines of every lot; the. fencing shall be zubj,ec,t to the approval of ding, In'spec'tor. the `P'lanrting Director and the Chief 'Buil 15. Ln ordance with Section 22.:7.1303A of 'the Subdivision Ordinance, acc the subdivider shall, pay- a fee Torpark :and recreational purposes equal in value to, the appropriate percentage of one and one-half (l- er one hundred (100) lots or `five (5) percent of the 1/2) acres p._ neater. The fee total lAnd `ar.ea in .the subdivision whichever is g shall be based on. the average -appraised market value -of the undeveloped land 'in the subd` V-1sipri as determined most recently by the County Assessor. Assessor's Parcel No,. Average Appraised Market Value of Land 8-510-19 $ 3.,700 8-510-30 14,900 •8-510-31 8,000 8,000 8-510-45 5,000 8-510-46 16,000 8-510-47' $55,600 r O .05 x $6-5-01 The subdivider must submit to the Planning Commission a request that 16. a private street, be approved to provide access to. Lots 4 and 5. A private street agreement shall be submitted which provides for owner- ship and maintenance of the private street and the liability for taxes thereon. 17. All other applicable provisions of the City'',s Ordinances must be met. FILED juN 71976 MARJORIE J. WILSON CITY CLERK Ra:LU 1858" ' CITY OF PETALUMA,. California' POST AND,EN'GLLS.H STREET=S '94952 TELEPHONE (707) 763-2613 April 30., 19 Petaluma Planning Commis+sion City Hall Petaluma, CA 9.4952 FILL0 Mini 'l iu�h MARJORIE J. WILSON CITY Ci -r-41\ Attention: Frank Gray, Acting Planning Director Gentlemen: Re: -Ten'ta'tive 'M,.p Pacheco Subdivision Section 22.4:902 of the Subdivision 'Ordinance specifies that the City En,g;ineer shall pxrep,are a written report of recommendations. on the tentative 'map,, in relation to the public improvement requirements of the subdivision ordinance and the provisions of the Map Act. COMMENTS & RECOMMENDAT,1ONS ON, THE' TENTATIVEMAP 1. The Tentative -Map does not conform to Section 22.4.500 vicinity sake=t,ch; in `that' the--a'rea map .shown on the Tentative Ma'p does not conform to the requirements for a vicinity sketch; i.e.., "A vicinity sketch at a scale of 1000- feet or more to the inch .,shall be drawn on the Tentative Map. - it shall show the st-r`eet and tract lines and names and numbers of all "existing subdivisions, and the ou°dine of acreage parcels , o�f land, adjacent to the proposed tract". 2. The Tentative Ma.p is'non-conforming with Section 22.4.604. The map do'e:s-`not contain'a statement that it was prepared with the permission of the record owners 3. The map dores'not contain a graphic scale as required by Section .22.4.605. 4. The map ;d-o;e,s not contain a sufficient description to define the location and boundaries of the proposed su.b- E X H I B I T "B" Petaluma, P,la.nning tCommssion R'e Tentative Map Pacheco S,dbdiv Page 2 Ap r,il 304 1976 division a:s regalAr-eZ by Sesction 22.4.606; i.e., distances and bearings should be shown, for the exterior boundaries. Al.so Section 22.4.300 r-equires that the boundaries of the Tentative Map shall 'be certified as to accuracy by a registered civil engineer or li.c':ensed land surveyor. ` 5. The Tentative Map does not show the area of each lot to the nearest 100,sq.f't. as required by Section 22.4.620. 6. A. typical. half -street section for the public improvements on Grant Avenue has not besen shown. The proposed location - of undergr-ound elec=tric and gas utilities has .not been shown. The construction cross-s,ectlon of the private street. access to. Lots 4 and 5"has not been shown.__ All are required by Section 22.4.624. In addition, the Tenta-tive Map does not clearly show the follow- ing items discussed and requested by the :Subdivision Committee at the preliminary map review conference with the subdivider: 1.- The Tentative Map ;does, not .c Lear'ly 'reT 1 e c t the requirement of a 1 -foot non access ea"s.emen;t alo.n;g the entire length of Kelly Lane. The map should show in detail the length of Kelly Lane and should show graphically the entire length of the non-access..stri`p. 2. The grading plans should show the proposed grading contours. I recommend that the 'Planning Commission conditionally approve the Tentative Map subject to its being, core-ec-ted to. comply with the subdivision .ordinance as 'pet th-e above comments. Very truly yours, DAY: h David A. Young cc:City Ma-nager. CityEngineer "Planning Dir../'CE/ ACE/ CEA/'gi;ies