Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7435 N.C.S. 06/21/1976n. MLH.mi 6-17-76' r X`� �,� ti ;�„ Resolution No 7 4 3`5 ; � r I 4' y { RESOLU,TI'ON APPROVING; AEVIiSED 'TENTATIVE SUBDIVh$0 0. ,'AAP`"''OF "WESTRIDGE sSUBDIUIS„ION UNITS 3 . & 4, w rr � I� •� t d ' i INTRODUCED B.Y COUNCILMAN - _.. __ .............................................................. iia i ____.___- Patric H' lligoss, and , _ i yid � ” d t ' I f v d [ • II N SECONDED BY COUNCILMA ______- Rober't. A ..Brunner --._-__ ,_,_ ______ at a N -- ........ g.................:Meeting of Re alar _ y Council,of the the Cit G '" ayof:kCity oPealuma,,on`tfie _-.......2'lst 1976--. on WHEREAS:, De'_ra ,H'omes , In''c,f , _ as .owner *and -s:,ubd viler ..has filed wit Ithis Council a `ten�t'ative map pr;o.pos' ng t`o revise aa t:en heretofore filed tativ, 'map h'- th this City and known. as 'Westridge Sub:division:; Un -its 3 an'd 4`, and has paid all required: :filing fees, and,, • WHE°REAS,„ the;. City Engineer, the D`rec"'tor „-of r Planning,,' the . Sonoma County Water Agency, andthe"PTanning Commission have �� ex�ainined;' and reviewed" said "'revised`. tentative map as xequired by „4 1 _ is recommendatio law and �al�l re ori` ,.r `- nsn,, ..an - comments; thereon have beenforty<arde"d to, t'h"is ,Counci11 NOW, THE'REFO'RE," BE IT `,RESOLVED that this •Council hereby -• finds as.,„'follows I i 1 That the pro ose,d s,,ubdiv-ision, p as; ,revised, together w"th provisionsfor it±'s design and, improvement,„ ,is :consistent. ,with the General Plan.: . 2, That. the' as ;:.reused, i compatible n ubdivision with the'ob' ectwes oli;cie lan p posed s J •.. P s., .ge:neral, - uses , a'nd' pro'g.rams specifi'e'd in said•" General' P1an.. ,Tha-t the;�s°i' -e .is. Phys' cahly suitable ,f;or the type°, of ” :. deve-lbpment'proposed 4 That the^ site is physically suable for `the proposerd' I density ofy deve-lopment r `' 5 That --the; dee`sgnl of th Subdizvsion, as revised., and the u` a . I pro,p_osed' improvem`enttls'therefor wil''1 not ,zc'ause„ substanti.alll erivir" „ t - tal.` dama, e, and -rio s:14bstd-nt'ial o d r �. g r avo dabl'.e ri ury.will occur onmen - .. :.. ; •, "I' � i �' r their' liabit_a;t 6. That the .ish, or wildli� desj n.of the Subdiv,siori, as revised..,, and th;e. g type, of amparovements ppwill not4 ;cause seriou's public ;health pr_ob "Mems �.0 b I'i+ �r�n. .I',- fir. -d. I _ q ,r' ,,: ..; •Io e d 1FILE I COUNCIL r •' • RE8 iNO. 7. '.That the des, gn."of the Subdil' islon, as revised, and l p p, will., no,t, conflict with ease- the ty11. pe of improvement"s ro osed men'ts, acquired _by the public at large:, fo`r .access through or use of.'propetty within ,the proposed Subdiv si'oh,. 8. That ,s „ f waste fa . the' di':cilar e' o rom, the ?proposed Sub- �d ,v slo'n' as-rev i.'sed'; • into the existing community sewer. system' '',wi11, not result in v olat` ori of thei e'xi st,, n,-•requiremerits re,- s,cr:ibed,'by the; •Region'al�'Wate'r Qual'�ty ;CoritroT Board`. BE `IT TURTHER ,RESOLVED, based .on the ,fl•riding-s set forth ,• -, above; that •the 'above," referr==e'd to revised tentative map be, and thQ,, same is hereb y, ap`p.ro,ve'd sub�'ect.•to :the ,conditions set forth'. in Exhibits A and B attached hereto, an at F d ,incorporated herein. i'I'r . under theower. and au'thont co p y n 'ferrel upon,: this, Council, by the Charter,bf, said,,�City.. ' Ppherehy certify that the foregoing Resolution wag°duly aridfregularly introduced, arid; u adopted, by the Coun d of the City�of Petaluma ori the...................... 21st , y da of June 7 6 r y '' y he following -votes „ : --- - ,.. 19= AYES: Councilmen Brunner, Harberson4, Hlligos°s, :Mattel, `Perry, ' and ,Mayor Putnam ,I ul NOES: None arqABSENT ,:�,� Coui cilin'anCavanagh" ATTEST City Clerk ;„ �r • Mayor-;O PFORMFA S 774 I. 2. 3. 4. 6.. 7. 8. Y CONDITIONS" OF APPROVAL TO' g. TENTATIVE MAP WESTRIDGE SUBDIVISION UNITS.13 AND,#4 OF,THE CITY OF PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION O ' , ��� RESOLUTION ��1 5"16 u They requirements of the•'City. °Engineer 'shall 'be complied ,with as stated in his letter.. 2. 3. all All .utilities "shall be .placedunderground" .and public'`utility easements:, shall be indicated as per the requirements of the:Ci.ty Engineer. The subdivider shall comply with Subs ect on'22.7.'700�;:of'the Petaluma Subdivison.Ordinance pertaining to .tree planting"requirements as well as lacement and,rdesin are subject to site des n review. lots, actual home all other, landsca in associated;, with the residential to P $ J' g Access to -park entrance.. ;shall be as shown .on Ejdii,b t "A". All other lots as shown on the Tentative Map: shall be .designed in accord- ancel � 1 with the, requirements• of the 'Subdivision 'Ordinance.- All Ordinance. All streets shown within the.bound'aries of the Tentative Map shall be. improved:' in accordance with City standards,as requ red by the City Engineer; including ail 'street name signs", sto sig s ' '"',etc. ten- tative names sub"ec indicated on the,subdiv sion map are strictly ten- All street names as y �. t to" checking' and . revision b the ; ,G ty Building Department. All public improvements. 'and' easements shown, will, 'be subj ect to. future review when the improvement plans are submitted td the.City for approval. The drainage, desi,'n and'iBi rovements location, easements .and sizing) shall be rovded as required by the City Engine g $ P � p q. r, Chief Building In- spector, and,- the Sonoma. County Water, Agency'. A maximum of 15.%. grade on driveways is"allowed. The final grading plans shall indicate clearly ;os,"all "lots that the y, minimum Offset ,from the break _point of the ,slope to property line shall be two (2) feet. Retaining, wallawill be required in the rear yards of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Unit'#4 so.that the'rear property lines -will not be located on the slope: Fill shall,be:�compacted and ceftified.to _9.07. of maximum'density. The following'', minimum setbacks will be re,quiredt, a: 20 -foot front yard setback. b. 5 -foot sideyard setback. c. 10 -'foot aggregate sideyard setback. d..i 4 -foot setback "from. all sideyard .toe or shoulders of slopes. e. "' "15 -foot setback, from all rear°'yard toe, and shdu 1d''ets' of sloped.''' ' �������� _ EXHIBIT nBin 4. 6.. 7. 8. Y g. all All .utilities "shall be .placedunderground" .and public'`utility easements:, shall be indicated as per the requirements of the:Ci.ty Engineer. The subdivider shall comply with Subs ect on'22.7.'700�;:of'the Petaluma Subdivison.Ordinance pertaining to .tree planting"requirements as well as lacement and,rdesin are subject to site des n review. lots, actual home all other, landsca in associated;, with the residential to P $ J' g Access to -park entrance.. ;shall be as shown .on Ejdii,b t "A". All other lots as shown on the Tentative Map: shall be .designed in accord- ancel � 1 with the, requirements• of the 'Subdivision 'Ordinance.- All Ordinance. All streets shown within the.bound'aries of the Tentative Map shall be. improved:' in accordance with City standards,as requ red by the City Engineer; including ail 'street name signs", sto sig s ' '"',etc. ten- tative names sub"ec indicated on the,subdiv sion map are strictly ten- All street names as y �. t to" checking' and . revision b the ; ,G ty Building Department. All public improvements. 'and' easements shown, will, 'be subj ect to. future review when the improvement plans are submitted td the.City for approval. The drainage, desi,'n and'iBi rovements location, easements .and sizing) shall be rovded as required by the City Engine g $ P � p q. r, Chief Building In- spector, and,- the Sonoma. County Water, Agency'. A maximum of 15.%. grade on driveways is"allowed. The final grading plans shall indicate clearly ;os,"all "lots that the y, minimum Offset ,from the break _point of the ,slope to property line shall be two (2) feet. Retaining, wallawill be required in the rear yards of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Unit'#4 so.that the'rear property lines -will not be located on the slope: Fill shall,be:�compacted and ceftified.to _9.07. of maximum'density. The following'', minimum setbacks will be re,quiredt, a: 20 -foot front yard setback. b. 5 -foot sideyard setback. c. 10 -'foot aggregate sideyard setback. d..i 4 -foot setback "from. all sideyard .toe or shoulders of slopes. e. "' "15 -foot setback, from all rear°'yard toe, and shdu 1d''ets' of sloped.''' ' �������� _ EXHIBIT nBin ISI �a^,°�"�,' 'A' �, ,jii � • The'"dimensions of the: side property lines" between":Lots" #i3 and #14 and' between #14 and #15 of Unit #4 should be corrected.. 16. The final grading plans shall indicate the plot :plan .of"homes to .be placed on Lots 1, through 4 and 10 through 16 of Un t'A. ' 17. Fire Department standards and requirements ''shall be,met f'or all aspects of the'.development subject to approval by the Fire Department. 18. Single -story residences shall be cons truc'ted, on Lots1; 2, And 16 of Unit #4 to provide additional privacy for the homes located behind these lots. 18. Rear and sideyard'"fencing,shall be, -installed along°"'the channel and other park areas and along "I" Street. In addition to 'the fencing along Street,_:guard rails ;shall be. installed along' "V, Street from the Sunny- p ction'to the existing,.guard rails installed for West- slope Road nterse ridge.Unit #1. All fencing and guard rails shall be designed and con- structed to match"those installed for Unit 11. 20. Six (6) fopt ,high'rear yard fencing shall also be installed along. the rear lot, lines of Lots „1, '2 and 16 of Unit '#4. 21. The natural `creek sites.shall be improved wfiere,necessary, to the standards of the .Sonoma County Water. Agency, and dedicated 'to.•and accepted for n" future mai-tenance by the Sonoma County Water'Agency. • 22... The proposed park", p p p be landscaped, *and, improved by the subdividerwnoaccordance awith 'landscapl g _ 'g Plannin Director and in and, irri ation, plans that °mus t be submitted to and approved by the g _ d the Recreation Director. 23. At least, thirt " (30) y ', days ays prior- to, the recgrdation- Of. any final sub- division applicant p shall • submit 'to the division map',-thePlanning Commission the, following documents which .shall demonstrate,to' the satisfaction of'the commission ,that the total •project will be developed, and 'maintained in accordance with the intent and purposes of the development: a. The documents to, convey title. b. The covenants,, conditions and restrictions to be recorded. 24. All other applicable prov sioin.s of the City's 'Ordfn.ai ces gmust be met.: 25• -City r and .Fire Chief -shall review and, approve the revised map before ntheematter.is`brought before City. Council.. CITY 0 F P E TALU M A,Calif o`rnia, PO -ST Af4D ENGLISH. S�TREETS 9.4952 TELE .1 RRONE ('707) 763-2613 - May 6; 11,'9 -7,61 Petaluma Planning C ammis.sion city Hall Petaluma, Californ=ia Attention: Frank ;Gray', Acting Planning Director 'S irb j ec t T'ent'&tive Ma'p Westridge'Subdivision Units 3 and .4 Gentlemen-. 6,f ifies that S�ectkon �t,he�,,".St.i,bd;iv,,i,siQq,I Ord1na.nc.e Spec the City Engin e e r, 'shall prepar=e a written report of recom'-- " men dat ion.s.-oxy t e* Tentat'iv'e Map, in relation to the Public Impravement R�e� t s' of. the, Sob4i,,visdon' Ordinance and 9u..i.,,temen. the provisions of -t,h&'M4P Act,,. "COMMENT AN.)-) RE'CPM-,M-.E-NDAT ION ON WESTRIDG]t SUA.D1VISION TENTATIVE''.MA I P UNITS 3 & 4"1 S e'ctt:l 0n 212 7,51Q 4'01 the Subdl;Lvisi on 10.rdinance requires that ped6t,triani ways, be constructed`constructed`not less 'than :201 in wi&th', provided' dwith fencing, landscaping and, a pavement not p r o , d d tvi less than .1 ' O�', in w"I&t--h. The wA.Llkwa.,y at the en'd of Sunshine t - v -" " "I'll-, -il Map, I Cour is so10"w1d"e" on this Tenta.t�ve recommendthatthe Planning Qommi.ss;fan conditionally approve the. to i.ts� �b,e,ing,coxre-c:ted to comply with the Sub&ivid'iom' Ordinance A.'s'' er the above commen't, Very truly yours 1--7 �. ?/ DAVIRA. YOU City Engine D mb, cc City Manger .Planning Dix'L E GEA CE ACE S EXH119:'- UT B EXHIBIT "B"