HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7511 N.C.S. 09/07/1976NlLH
olution No N C �S !; :� a °•
7 51' l •
°I,
E�R`NNGL'A
RESOLUTION RE APPEAL, O,F .GQLTERMA=,
Z,IANp! HAi'�ISEN FROM
DEC'I'SION,',OF, ,THE PLANNING DIRECTOR; REGARDIN.G,' ,COMPLIANCE'_ OF
• GHSIGNTP E WITH' THE ENVROi4MENTAL DE---
P"ROPOSAL,•AT "F°' AND ET HH'
_ � '
. Fred V Mattel
INTRODUCED ^BY CO.UNCILIv1AN . ' ..__... - .. _ and
(�
'SE ONDED BY
i
COUNCILMAN' - ---- - r c a I 1q0 _.. =at a'
r. iill ss
M 'Pat i
Regular - Y he
-------------- -------- ...._,.. . . ----
g
... 'Meetin of --------
the it Council o �.t„
City =of Petaluma, on the , = ..-'7th . . :day of -------- ....-----Sep temb_ex-------------------- . 19 7 6
WHEREAS, the',,P,lanning Dir-:ecto:r is :ch'arged by the Residential
Development Control System to i"term ne whether .particular- pro-
ronmental
posals conform to' _--h-e;.Env g
+-Desi n :Plan; and, WHEREAS!,. the, Planning: 'i s detr
t h - —
• er � and Hr a etYiens.outhea'sthe pro
-
o
- rec ok 1 '
oral of Goltermann G°lazi h
arisen for
p t 'corner
F a't L,i hth_ Street does not conform with ,the E
of "'" g; riveronmental
7-
pesign Plan, ,anal,
WHEREAS,: ' Goltermann, Glazier and H
,ans4ft'have appealed said,
determination and:-the''..matter bias came on regularly before this.
Council afto".
giving,- i of :ce as":: require'd„ and
WHEREAS- the'° Planning' Dir°ector h'as presented 'h'is'` report to •.
pP p Y h '4
thisCouncil and the a 1- cant's have r:es,Qnte, 'test mon ,and' ar ,u
Merits. through; their rep res'entative,,: Mr Richa',rd- Lie'b,
NOW;' Tr EREFO.RE, ,St' I'T' RES'OLVE'D tha , t'h1.s',L Council .hereby ,finds f
as follows .
1. Thew°,proposed';deve lopm'ent'-would, improve the balance
_ P ;g n family units in., the '
. between a artments and sin le: ,
City of Petaluma' as r'e wired by the Environmental
Design Plan.
2.. The proposed development �represents.a,logical infilling
as o owed t. ,,..._ p g. P
pp Y`Jf , ,o an" undesirable lea fro, development into u,
en°
undeveloped sections , a stated; goal ' of the Environmental
De.s'gn Plan:
There are adequate utilit- es `aynd .s
3° erv.ces and -r.oadw,ay,s
-for Y'the .<proposed' development;: <a t tkca1 eon81d:erat:iori,
under the Env_ iron_mental, Design Plan.
. „ � , A i ti, a. , i,•. it ' S � ° • 11 i �. I .
u
' •..• Y, it ` '' I,I
$50 127-74
r
,
- •1
-
T
4. The propps.al is.consistent with t`Yie.flexible approach r
set forth iri the, Envirbnmental pesigh-, Plan given the
need fo°r senior citizen housing i�rf, Petaluma; the charac
"r ter 'of -t�Fie surrounding neighborhood, ,and the relatively
lowintens, ty of use characterized'+by senior citizen
`
holus'ing..'
p� q
`5. The f act,is •o` �
if, this appeal are unique '.and no: precedent
is likel' t_o be created which- P" y ' h, will have widespread '
effect,
BE IT FURTHE'_R "RE;SOLVED that based°w on ,the f"indings .set forth
above this Council hereby determines thdt, the proposed develop-
ment conforms. to,l the Environmental; ,De:sigrr ;Plan.;,,, 'and',.the Planning
I..Director is lzereby�,ordered to incl:ud'e"said' propos:al,, for 'con'sidera-
tion of residential, development allotment :units for" the, 1973-°1978
construction year:
under thepow, au•thohty•eonferred.upon 'this•Council by the Charter ,of said .City.
Iherb ertify" thnd reg
ularly introduced andatthe;fore oin Resolution was dul a '
adopted by the Council of''ihe City tof 'Petaluma• ,on the,
7th
--
day Of. __::..... September .- 1`9'-7 6` , 1?Y he following votes:
-:.
f AYES:. Councilmen Caverna h Har'bera.on; Hill'goss.-- Ma
- g- ttei•,, Perry;
F and Mayor.Putnam
NOES; Councilman -„Brunner
ABSENT Non -
, ATTEST -
II II.
if 4111 .
FoF M 6A'S 7/74",.'d, I
� d,k u