The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 7543 N.C.S. 10/04/1976.. :. MLH :;mi. 9-15 7'6 olution RESOLUT•ION.•'APPROVING TENTATIVE .SUBDIUIS':'IQN MAP OF HOLIDAY VISI] ESTATES INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN ---= -. ,, - - -�_x�_OXll:. .. -----------and Jam --r12 - es.L, H SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN _. -----------=-------Jack- W . -Cavanagh , Jr_._------ -------------- _----------------- at l a 6 Reg_u.lar.-- --_- Meeting of the City Council of the City of, Petaluma, on the ---- _ -.._..4th . daY o£ tQbez---------- ----- -- WHEREAS, 'Robert "Bernstein . & Royal •E_arla as owner (s) and, Subdivider(s) lis/have filed w.t'h this Council a tentative map propos'- in'g ropos;i_ng to subdivide landw ,; hin this City to be t , ' known ;as Holiday View Estates -d have paid all r'.eqred.filing fees; and; an' ui WHEREAS, :the, City Engineer,, the Director of Planning, the Sonoma County Water Agency., and th'e:,Plannkng Commission have examined and re:: viewed'the same .as req;uired.by Flaw ,and a1L reports, . recommendations, and comments thereon, have been forwa`r,ded 't,0` `and considered by this Council .at its meeting,, held on October 4;;, 1'97'6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE`IT. RESOLVED that this hereby finds as follows 1. The prop,o'sed. subdivision, togeth-er wi,th provisions for its design and improvement, is, consistent with the deneral.Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general 'land: uses;; and programs specified in said General Plan .3. The site is phy-sica`lly suitable ' for,, the 'type of develop- ment proposed.' 4. The site is ,,physrca,lly suitable for th,e; proposed density of development.. 5. The design of ,the Subdivision 'and the proposed improvements 7 e „substantial environmental.; damage, and no sub-, cause therefor will not cin ur ' `w" - stantial or avoidablej y 111 occur -t fish .or wildlife or -their habitat. The, de , sign of the Subdivisio 6. Thn 'and the type'of'mprovements will not cause .serious public health problems. 7'. �Th°e 'design of the- S•ubdivi,sion acid the type.. of .improvements proposed, will.not- confli-cq t with easements,' ac uired by the'' public at g through, or use of 'property with=in the proposed'sub- 1_ar e, .for „I;acce s . divisor. he d seharg p p, d subdivision into 8, T e of, waste from the ro ose" `h .g. community .sewer system will not "result in violation of, L e existir the exstin g requirements prescribed by the Regional "Water Quality Control Board. IT t ., , f " - I -' —l'- • - I :Ike ' - -, „- 4 COU IL FILE 75,43- 7 .• '�I - - .. - RE3-'IVO. , _G ..., i,. a Iq� oa¢"" x11, 1' R V a f-� s 'f r IT FURTHER, RE'S ED bars -'on the in • n s et forth ; BE U Q LVED, ..a 9 above,• that the albove "'referred to tentatl�e map be, and the same..°.is IZereb,y, 'approved aubject to thle' cori'dirtions set forth in Exhibits "B" a'id G"attached hereto; and inc'orporate'd herein as if' fully set , forth',d „ „. f I. SII'.. .. '• - Y I p wer aril authority conferred upon ;this :Council ,by the, Charter of ,said . under the' o City:_ I hereby certify that° he foregoing Resolution wa y p.1. y d re Marl introduced, and adopted b the Cou s dul an« 4 t ,y Y h � � ncil of; ''of-P-e'ta'lunia oris the _________ ____ _______---------------------- Y. __..... -._ day of.. October. 19jll by^'the'following'votesi _ y s AYES: Councilmen Cavana h Harbe'r.son,; e,i, P'erry, g Hilligo -s, Nlatt a'nd Ma, or Pnutnam G' ' NOES`: None ABSENT Councilman Br-unner. a ,T- ATTEST': ,.I Mayo d . ,City4Cler-k FORWCA.9'.7/74 ,. , ..., ,-._ - - 1. The req irements the City Engineer shal'l,be co lied with as stated in his Vetter. 2.. All utilities shall be placed underground and public utility easements shall be indicated as per the requirements of the City Engineer. 3. The tentative map and allseparately indicated custom designed homes to be constructed shall show, -on individual plot plans, the proposed single- family building layouts includirig,grade and pad elevations and existing and adjusted contours concerning the appropriate grade cuts and fill as may be necessary for each lot. 4. A 6 -foot high solid fence or embankment shall be constructed along the rear and side lot, .lines of :each proposed custom designed home which borders on or has.'back.-on treatment to adjacent residential uses or the private'street/driveway-of another property. -,Such appropriate screening designations shall, be'subject-to City Building Department approval. A `. barrier shall.also be installed along the fence line separating Lot 9 from the lots to..the'south to preventrunaway automobiles from going into the lots to the south. 5.�; The location of all isolated trees with.a trunk diameter of four.inches �ater within tli or are e boundaries of the subdiv 's, on, shall be designated on the Tentative Map'(Subdivis on Ordinance.Section'22.4.611). 6. Landscaping and irrigation plans for..the "bulb" island of-the'Elm:Court- cul -sac (6,239 sq, ft,.) shall be submitted to the City's Planning and Pub=_L Works Departments for review and approval ,prior to final map • _ submittal. In addition, tle.island should be reduced in size to facili- tare on -street parking. 7. T'_-= divider and individual property owners shall comply with Subsec- %.7.700 of the Petaluma Subdivision,Ordinance pertaining to tree requirements•, as well as with all other landscaping requirements asS___ated with the residential lots. 8. Fo_-_b-divisions containing less than:50 lots the subdivider shall pay a dec____ion fee for park and recreation purposes equal in value to the app_cpriate percentage of 1-1/2 acres per 100 lots, or 5 percent of the total land area in the subdivision,. whichever is greater (Subdivision Ord=inance Section,22_.7.1301.3). Calculation .5/ of total land area in subdivision: A.P. #66-412740 cash value: .$20.,000 A.P. #G67-432741 cash value: $15,5,00 Total Cash Value: $35,500 ($35,500 - 5%) _ $1.,775 (dedication fee) 9. All proposed lots as shown on the tentative map shall be designated in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, except as herein modified., roaxr -�' —T. r ' 7 " rte" --� .•.�,;RI... �' e , C ,,.,,,.,,,� ='� 10.. All streets shown within the boundaries of the tentative map shall be improved in accordance'with„City standards as required by the City Engineer, including all street name signs, stop signs, etc. 11. All street names as indicated. on the subdivision, mapare strictly tentative names subject to checking and revision by the City Building Department. 12.- All public improvements •and easements shown will be subject to future, review -when the improvement,plans are submitted'to the.City for approval. 13. Fire Department standards and requirements shall be, .met for all aspects of the development subject to approval by the Fire Department. 14. At least thirty .(3Q) days prior.to the recording of any final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit_ to the Planning Commission the following documents which shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the total project as defined will be developed .and maintained in accordance with the intent and purposes.of the development: a. The documents to convey title_ b. The covenants, conditions and restrictions to be recorded. 15. All other applicable provisions of the City's Ordinances must be met. E �b9 I CITY OF PETALUIN✓s.A., California, POST AND ENGLISH STREETS 94952 u TELEPHONE (707) 753-2613 August 9, 1976 Petaluma Planning;tommission City Hall Petaluma, California 94'952 Attention: Ronald F.. lull, Planning Director Gentlemen: Subject Tentative Map.' �Holi'day View Estates. Section 22:4.902 of the SubdivisionEngineer ordinance specifies that the City g o l prepare a written report -of recommendations �. on the Tentative 'Tlap in relation to the . Public Improve�,ent requirements of the,.,Subdvision Ordinance and the provisions of the 1-iap Act. C01yriENTS AND RECD i+ 1NDATI'CNS ON THE TENTATIVE EMAP The water system is not capable of providing service above Contour 180' at adequate pressure. Topographically a portion of this.development is located above Contour 180'. In order to provide service to this localized island of Pressure Zone 3, line within Pressure Zone 2_ of the water system, it will be necessary for the developer to construct some corm of localized pressure boosting. The specific design.fo-r pressure boosting systeras could be finalized at the improvement- plan stage. I recommend that the: 'Planning Corr nission conditionally approve the Tentative %iap.subj'ect to its being corrected to comply with the above comment. Very.truly yours; DAVID A. YMNG CitX Engineer By THOi1AS S. HP.RGIS Assistant City Engineer DAY:TSF:mb cc: City Manager Planning Dir. CE/ACE/CEA/riles EXI H -SIT C