Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6934 N.C.S. 04/21/1975 5 30 lesolution No. .= 6� 3' N C : L - - H' •�m'i 75 RESOLUTION RE,.. APPEALJ OF 'BURTON ENGINEERS REGARDING CON . , �• DITIONS OF APPROVAL OF THE LA • CUMBRE- PETALUMA ;PARCEL MAP '" , INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN, .William ,A., Perry Jr. -i _ and SECONDED 1BY'COUNCILMAN - Fred V . Ma•tf e at, a Regular'. `Meeting of the City Council of the. 2 l's t 9 . Apr 1 'C'ity of Petaluma, on, the day of: 1' 75 WHEREAS, the "appeal on H .ah'i's he ar;n g came on regularly before the City Council on April 2h, 1.975', after all :required, notices were given and received; :and, WHEREAS,, evidence and testimony wore pr resented by Burton Engineers for the ,app:licants and .b.y -the staff. of .the City of Petaluma; •` and, during the- :cr' .,� WHEREAS, du g ous � „ g '. Joe Burton, Appear- e Of `the; . hearin , Mr ,a ear- - „ ing for appli .modified hs appeal and agreed. to:• make "B" Street the primary access' to the s.ubjeCt, : p,ar';Cel if necessary; and, WHEREAS., after - hearing" and carefu_lly c.onsidering the eviderice ,presented: at ;said: hearing, thi . .. , City Council 'h as ,concluded that the relief .requested by fhe applicant. 'shdUld :be denied in, part and granted . ..in- part. NOW, THEREFORE, this Cdundil finds •anl• r:eSolve's as follows l.. The 'parcel map submitted. on 'behalf of ; La Cumbre- Petaluma,. ' encompasses ,:app,roximately 144 acres„ ,located. to the south of Hill,c:rest Hospital on Hayes Lane,. 2;. Forty ; - fo;ur acres of said property are, within the City Limits ,and 100 ,acres Aare without the Ci Limits. 3, La Cumbre Petaluma' h°a. ,s ubmted to . -the Co:urn o.f ' Sonoma p p ; p ' the City a arcel m:a ' to s,, lit the: 10:0': ac without Limits into two 55-are lots. La !Cumbre Petaluma proposes 'to split the 44 acres insxi:de the Cit=y Limits irit_ot two 22 -a.cre lotsy., 5 The subject property will be deve_loped within the fore- seeable ; future to the' densit shown, o seeable y , n the General Plan of: the "City of Petaluma;: • 6'i; - Development o f the !snub jeCt property, both within and w fhout." :the- :Cit. . Limit, to:the density described above will cre traffic flow: and,.,traffic volume to ; a degree • that pre "sent access via Hayes?. Lane would.: be i nadequate. - • • • '7 Development of the•.s,ubject parcel;,as . described above both in and without.• the City L' • e �. • , , with- % y , mits,,,wduld regure major ' ' ar.teri.al, .an:d' •'collector streets: 8 The :nature 'arid size of Hayes ,L'ane `is mot' ; for use as an •arterial or collect or s t t; for the proposed project. ' ee • . 9. , .-Access from •t'he sub,Iect. area xto "'B °' Str "D" Street. and: - ,, "'_Wes:tern Aven=ue" is. necessary to carry traffic generated , by ;fut:urg l &velapment • Of the subject parcel .WHGEREFORE this ,Council approVe's the subject parcel map subject to the followin;g_conditions • • he future; develo ment ,o;f the subject ro erty s hould, be, vi; P _ A The' main access or •t : p, p � _ a , "D','' .Street,, Wes��te,rn, Avenue • and "B" • ''Street,; '.arteri•al. >an_d collector streets: rathher than Hayes . Lane ;. a minor street. abutting the exis;ting. Hillcre'st. Hospi- tal and Crestview Convalescent Ho'spital.: B: No development s:hall be permittedi on Lot' Two as' shown on • the- sub e'ct parcel map without developed access to "B Street througk Lot No *One,, • C. Floating easements' for right 'way satisfactory y to the • City Engineer.. shall be rovided on each and, every parcel • • Ct p • as ', shown_ on, the parcel map, said' easements t'o run to • the benefit of each and every lot which may be .;produced by ,• future subdivision . D. „-Principle access • to "the subject property shall be via "B" Street;- however, .future, subdivision • in the area ,shall be • subject to efforts by the present ^or then • existing owners • • of the subject parcels to,. provide, access .via "D '' Stre'et Western Avenue .' • • • • under th e power y • • and authont {conferred'• upon this Council by'the C harter`of said "City;. I hereby certif ahe fore oin .Resolution was andregul`arly introduced and, :y that g g ado ted b t C ouncil l of the • City of Petaluma,,on the 21st • :'dayof -r Aril - - ........ P9, -.,: , by'the following votes:"• ' AYES:; Counc ilmen .Brunner, Matted, • and `,Perry. • NOES': •Councilman Cavanagh and. Mayor Putnam • • ABSENT •Co=uncilmen Daly •and Harber son. • • � �f • ATTEST - _- ty'C k� y Ci ler e- 1�b7WCla„�t�ai.�C " ~ ��-• •Mayor, FORM,CA 9 7174 / /'