Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 11/07/2011 4.A A .8.t II'V # Y s1 • tr /8 5'a DATE: November 7, 2011 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: John C. Brown, City Manag- SUBJECT: Ordinance. Amending Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, Garbage and Rubbish • Disposal by Amending Section 8.16.060, Temporary Contracts, Adding Section 8.16.065, Award of Franchises without Competitive Bidding, Amending Section 8.16.070, Award of Franchises with Competitive Bidding and Amending Section 8.16.080, Renewal of Competitively Bid Contract. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council introduce and adopt the attached Ordinance Amending Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, Garbage and Rubbish Disposal by Adding Section 8.16.065, Award of Franchises without Competitive Bidding, and Amending Section 8.16.060, Temporary Contracts, Section 8.16.070, Award of Franchises with Competitive Bidding and 8.16.080, Renewal of Competitively Bid Contract. BACKGROUND The City currently contracts with Petaluma Refuse & Recycling, Inc., an affiliate of The Ratto Group of Companies, Inc. ("PR&R") for exclusive solid waste hauling franchise services covering all waste collection, hauling and disposal services in the City, except debris box services and as otherwise permitted by Chapter 8.16 of the Municipal Code. The City Council approved assignment of the prior competitively bid contract with Greenwaste to PR &R by Ordinance No. 2361 N.C.S., on January 4, 2010. The current ten year contract is in its sixth year, and expires on June 30, 2016. In conversations with City staff, PR &R has indicated a strong interest in increasing the length of its franchise term and would, in exchange, provide benefits to the , City that are not available under the current agreement. This is consistent with similar actions "the Ratto Group of Companies has taken in the recent past with several other Marin and Sonoma County jurisdictions' which have extended the lengths of franchises in those jurisdictions for periods from 10 to 20 years, in exchange for financial incentives. Section 51 of'the City Charter, however, prohibits renewal of an existing franchise prior to one year before its expiration. In. addition, Petaluma Municipal Code, Chapter 8.16, currently requires a competitive bidding process for the award of an exclusive garbage collection and Agend Review City Attorney Finance Director City Manager disposal franchise. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code would add Section 8.16.065 and provide an alternate process for anon- competitive award of the refuse franchise for a period of fifteen years or less. Text amendments are also suggested to Sections 8.16.060, Temporary Contracts to clarify that provision, to Section 8.16.070, Permanent Contracts (currently requiring competitive bidding) and 8.16.080, Renewal of Contract, to accommodate the new alternative award process and to conform the text of the latter sections with City Charter requirements. The maximum period for a contract awarded by competitive bid is increased from thirteen years to fifteen years to match the new Section 8.16.065. These changes would permit the City to terminate the existing franchise agreement and enter into a new, more beneficial, fifteen -year franchise. This new franchise, including an entirely new franchise agreement, would not constitute "renewal" of the existing franchise prohibited by City Charter Section 51. DISCUSSION PR &R has indicated interest in extending the term of their existing franchise. This would provide them greater financial certainty for planning purposes and when making equipment purchases and other capital investments in their business. This certainty is of value to PR &R, and for that certainty the firm has offered financial and programmatic incentives that are of greater benefit to the City than those which are received under the existing franchise. In part these incentives include increasing the amount of the franchise fees paid to the City, without passing that cost on to ratepayers. They may also include increasing the amounts paid by the franchisee to offset its vehicle impact to City streets and could, if the City Council is interested, include a food waste composting program for Petaluma customers. This would be a cost item, and would require the City to direct green and food waste to the Redwood Landfill where this program is currently operating. Benefits to the City might also include a small write down of tipping fee costs at Redwood Landfill, which would not be passed on the Petaluma customers. In addition, a revised contract would allow the City to strengthen franchise language related to indemnifying the City from landfill closure and post closure costs at any landfill to which PR &R may direct any portion of the City's waste stream, and would allow the City to exercise control over delivery to those locations. It would also allow the City to revise and simplify rate adjustment methodology, and to incorporate diversion requirements expressed in new federal and State legislation. The Council will note these benefits are discussed as possibilities, rather than as specific deal points. This is indicative that negotiations are still ongoing with PR &R, and agreement on the set °of'deal points thatwould be recommended to the Council has not been reached. Before these negotiations can be completed, however, legislative obstacles to providing PR &R with a new franchise will need to be removed. As discussed in the background section, the City Charter precludes an extension of the existing franchise for four more years. If the City is to receive the benefit of extending the franchise with PR &R now, however, the old agreement will need to be terminated and a new franchise agreement would need to be executed. The franchise agreement allows the City to terminate the existing franchise before the term is concluded. To insure continuity of service, however, the City would need another operator and, under the current delivery model, another franchise would need to be granted. Pursuant to'the Municipal Code provisions cited in the Background section of this report, new franchises are currently subject to a competitive bidding process. The Ratto Group provides residential collection services throughout Sonoma County. As such, it's questionable whether a competitive bidding process will net any other companies capable of meeting the City's needs and criteria that would be willing and able to operate in the area Further, PR &R has indicated its offer is not made in contemplation of a competitive bidding process; its offer to provide additional benefits is contingent on treatment as a sole source for the purposes of granting a new franchise. If the City is to take advantage of" this opportunity, revision of the municipal code to allow the granting of a franchise, for up to 15 years, without competitive bidding, is necessary. Accordingly, the attached legislative changes are recommended for your consideration and approval. At this time, the policy choice to allow for the granting of a new franchise without competitive bidding is all that is before your Council. Should you agree to this legislative change, the policy choices attendant to a new solid waste hauling franchise would be brought back to you once the deal points have been negotiated. The Municipal Code changes are required to be made by ordinance, with separate meetings for introduction and adoption, plus a 30 day period after adoption before the changes to the Code are effective. Accordingly, any modification to allow anon - competitive process will not be effective until December 21, 2011 if introduced November 7 and adopted November 21. Charter §46 requires that franchises be approved by ordinance, and Charter §51 requires that an ordinance approving a franchise have 30 days between introduction and adoption, meaning that a subsequent ordinance approving termination of the existing franchise and award of anew franchise to PR &R would not be effective until approximately mid- March, 2012 at the earliest. FINANCIAL IMPACTS The full financial benefit of the recommended course of action will depend on the final deal points of a new franchise agreement At a minimum, however, providing PR &R with 15 years of financial certainty will increase, at the company's cost and not to be passed on to the customer, franchise fees paid to the City. As a point of reference, discussions are in the five percent range, which could result in approximately $500,000 per year for each year of the franchise period. A full listing of all benefits, including their monetary value, if any, will, based on Council approval of this item, be discussed with Council in the future. ATTAC- HMENTS 1. Draft Ordinance 2 Redlined version of Kraft Ordinance, showing changes proposed. ® Items listed below are large in volume and are not attached to this report, but may be viewed in the City Clerk's office. 1. Franchise Agreement between the City of Petaluma and Greenwaste Recovery, Inc. for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials and Yard Trimming Services, dated September 13, 2005, with First Amendment effective October 28, 2009, and Second Amendment, dated March 1, 2010. ' I EFFECTIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO N.C.S. OF ORDINANCE Introduced by Seconded by ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 8.16 OF THE PETALUMA MUNICIPAL GARBAGE AND RUBBISH DISPOSAL AMENDING SECTION 8.16.060, TEMPORARY CONTRACTS; ADDING SECTION 8.16.065, AWARD OF FRANCHISES WITHOUT COMPETITIVE BIDDING; AMENDING SECTION 8.16.070, AWARD OF FRANCHISES WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING; AND AMENDING SECTION 8.16.080, RENEWAL OF COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma Charter establishes certain requirements for the award of city franchises, in Charter sections 46, 51 and 75; and WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma Municipal Code, Chapter 8.16, establishes procedures for awarding garbage and rubbish disposal franchises; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said requirements of the City Charter and Municipal Code, the City currently contracts with Petaluma Refuse & Recycling, Inc.,, an affiliate of The Ratto Group of Companies, Inc. ( "PR &R ") for exclusive solid waste hauling franchise services covering all collection, hauling and disposal services in the City, except debris box services, and as otherwise permitted in. Chapter 8.16 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, PR &R is in year six of the current ten year contract, which expires on June 30, 2016; and WHEREAS, Section 51 of the City Charter prohibits renewal of a franchise prior to one year before its expiration; and WHEREAS, neither Section 51 nor other provisions of the City Charter or Chapter 8.16 prohibit termination of a franchise and issuance of a new franchise upon voluntary agreement of the parties; and WHEREAS, Petaluma. Municipal Code, Section 8.16.070 currently requires a competitive bidding process for the award of a perrnanent.exclusive franchise for the removal and disposal of garbage and rubbish, other than for non - exclusive debris box franchises pursuant to Section 8.16.115; and WHEREAS, PR &R has proposed a new exclusive waste franchise agreement with revised terms that will provide financial and programmatic benefits to the City greater than the terms of the existing exclusive franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, PR&R's offer to negotiate the provision of additional benefits is contingent upon the City's ability to voluntarily terminate the existing exclusive franchise and grant a new franchise for a fifteen period without putting the franchise out to competitive bid; and • WHEREAS, the City Council may in its discretion modify the provisions of Chapter 8.16 to permit award of an exclusive franchise without competitive bidding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 8.16.060, entitled "Temporary contracts" of Chapter 8.16, "Garbage and Rubbish Disposal," of the Petaluma Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 8.16.060 Temporary contracts. The city council may, by resolution, based upon findings that preservation of the public health, safety and welfare so require, enter into a contract for the collection and disposal of garbage and rubbish for a contract -period of not more than six months without competitive bidding upon such terms, with respect to payments to the city therefore and other terms, as the city council may approve. This section is intended to satisfy the requirement in Section 46 of the city charter that award of franchises be taken by ordinance, unless the council takes action pursuant to , a general law of the state, and to authorize by ordinance temporary contracts for and disposal of garbage and rubbish. Preservation of the public health, safety and welfare may be deemed to require a temporary contract pursuant to this section when introduction of an ordinance and passage 30 or more days later, followed by elapse of a 30 day referendum period before the ordinance takes effect, pursuant to Section 51 of the city charter, would result in a lack of authorized garbage and rubbish collection services in the city of seven consecutive calendar days or more. (Ord. 173 NCS §8: prior § 13.7.) Section 2. Section 8.16.065, entitled "Award of franchises without competitive bidding" of Chapter 8.16, "Garbage and Rubbish Disposal," of the Petaluma Municipal Code is added to Chapter 8.16 to read as follows: 8.16.065 — Award of franchises without competitive bidding. The city council may, by ordinance adopted in accordance with Sections 46, 51 and 75 of the city charter, and based upon findings that the benefits to the public of doing so outweigh the potential benefits to the public of following the competitive bidding procedure in Section 8,16.070, enter into a franchise agreement without a competitive bidding process for the exclusive right, as the official garbage and rubbish collector of the city, to collect and dispose of garbage and rubbish within the city in accordance with the provisions of this chapter for a period not to exceed fifteen years, subject to the rights of holders of permits granted by the city council pursuant to Section 8.16.120 and the rights of non - exclusive debris box franchisees pursuant to section 8.16.115. Section 3. Section 8.16.070; entitled "Permanent contracts" of Chapter 8.16, "Garbage and Rubbish Disposal," of the Petaluma Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 8.16.070 Award of franchises with competitive bidding. The city council may, by ordinance adopted in accordance with Sections 46, .51 and 75 of the city charter, and pursuant to the following procedure, enter into !a franchise agreement for a term not to exceed fifteen years for the removal and disposal of garbage and rubbish. The city council shall adopt a resolution directing the city clerk to cause a notice to be published in the official newspaper of the city by two insertions therein not less than five days apart, the last of which shall not be less than twenty days before the time fixed for opening the bids, inviting sealed bids for a contract for the exclusive right, as the official garbage and rubbish collector of the city, to collect and:dispose of garbage and rubbish within the city in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the specifications and' requirements; set forth in the resolution, subject to the rights of holders of permits granted by the city council, and the rights of non - exclusive debris box franchisees pursuant to section 8.16.115. The resolution and notice to bidders shall specify: A. The time fixed for receiving and opening the bids; B. Each bid shall be accompanied by a cashier's check, in the sum of fifty thousand dollars or such other amount, or in such other form, as;may be required by the city council, which sum shall be forfeited by the bidder to whom the contract is awarded, as liquidated and unascertainable damages to the city, if thereafter the bidder fails or refuses to enter into a contract within thirty days after receiving notice of the award; C. Each bid shall specify the amount the bidder will pay the city monthly, as consideration for the contract; D. The council may reject any and all bids, including the highest bid, if it determines that, because of experience, financial responsibility or reputation or some other factor, the acceptance of a lower bid is for the best interest of the city; E. The bidder shall agree to perform and comply with and be bound by all terms, conditions and provisions required by this chapter and the other specifications set forth in or referred to by the resolution and notice. By its resolution calling for bids, the city council shall prescribe such additional terms and conditions to be included in the contract to be awarded for the collection and disposal of garbage and rubbish, as it shall determine, and require that the same be set forth in the notice to bidders, or filed with the city clerk and referred to in the notice as being available for examination by prospective bidders. (Ord. 2140 NCS §1, 2002: Ord. 173 NCS §9: prior code § 13.8.) Section 4. Section 8.16.080, entitled "Renewal of contract" of Chapter 8.16, "Garbage and Rubbish Disposal," of the Petaluma Municipal Code is.amended to read as follows: 8.16.080 Renewal of competitively bid contract. Subject to Section 46, 51 and 75 of the city charter, the city shall have the right to renew any contract entered into pursuant to the competitive bidding procedures described in Section 8.16.070 of this chapter with the person who then holds a contract for the removal and disposal of garbage and rubbish, for periods not to exceed ten years for each renewal; provided, however, that the contractor shall file a written request for such renewal of contract not less than two years prior to the expiration of the termination of the contract existing at the time of giving such notice. The city council shall also have the right, by resolution, to waive the requirement that the notice of request for renewal be filed with the city within the two -.year period. (Ord. 562 NCS' §1: prior code § 13.9.) Section 5. The City Council finds that adoption of this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA "), because it is not a "project" for CEQA purposes as defined in Public Resources Code Section.21065 and Sections 15060(c)(3) and 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the Code of Regulations); adoption of this ordinance has no potential for causing a direct physical change or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause; phrase or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid by a court of competent 1 jurisdiction or preempted by state legislation, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective ,ofthe fact that any one or more of said provisions be declared - unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid. Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption by the Petaluma City Council. Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish or post this ordinance or a synopsis for the period and in the manner provided by the City Charter-and any other applicable law. INTRODUCED and order posted/published this day of , 2011. ADOPTED this day of 2011 . by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: David Glass, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Claire Cooper, City Clerk Eric Danly, City Attorney