HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 91-370 12/16/1991
.;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I~eSOlutlOn NO. _y1=3~o N C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
AI'I'1ZOVING FOURTH EXTENSION OF 1989 ALI.OTIVIENTS
FOIE TWIN CREEKS SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma has adopted a Residential Growth Management System
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Twin Creeks Subdivision was granted 65 - 1989 allotments pursuant to the
Residential Growth Management System Ordinance on June 20th, 1988 at a public
meeting by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.26.070(F) of the Residential Growth Management System
Ordinance (Chapter 17.26 of the Municipal Code) establishes a deadline of December 31st
of the year said allotments are granted for, as the date by which certain projects must have
either an approved tentative map or have been through preliminary review and have had
their project application deemed complete by the Community Development Department;
and
18
19 WHEREAS, Section 17.26.070(G) of the Residential Growth Management System
20 Ordinance requires projects subject to the growth management system to have completed
21 approval of all related documents on or before December 31st of the year for which the
22 allotments have been granted or said allotments shall be forfeited; and
23
24 WHEREAS, with appropriate findings the City Council may extend the December 31st
25 deadline for projects approval and forfeiture of allotments; and
26
27 WHEREAS, failing to meet the deadline of December 31, 1989, to have a completed,
28 approved project, Twin Creeks 1989 allotments became subject to forfeiture, pursuant to
29 the .Residential Growth Management System; and
30
31 WHEREAS, on December 11, 1989, the Council extended a1165 - 1989 allotments granted
32 to Twin Creeks to June 30, 1990; and on June 18, 1990 extended 50 allotments to
33 December 31, 1990; and
34
35 WHEREAS, on June 4, 1990, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report
36 for Twin Creeks, but denied the project due to being inconsistent with the General Plan,
37 substantial environmental impacts identified by the EIR and flooding problems identified
38 by the Army Corps of Engineers; and
91-3'~ 0
...
Res. No...:.~.. .._..~.` .............. N.C.S.
1
2 WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a revised project in August of 1990 and it was
3 determined that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was necessary to
4 address the impacts of the revised project; and
5
6 WHEREAS, the tentative map submitted utilized only 43 of the 50 allotments granted; and
7
8 WHEREAS, the City Council extended 43 of the 1989 allotments until December 31, 1991;
9
10 WHEREAS, the project was deemed complete in February of 1991; and
11
12 WHEREAS, attempts to coordinate with the Army Corp of Engineers flood control project
13 and several critical comments received on the SEIR after the close of the public comment
14 period have delayed the processing of the SEIR and tentative map; and
15
16 WHEREAS, the FSEIR has been completed and reviewed by the Planning Commission
17 and is scheduled to be acted upon by the City Council at the January 6, 1992 meeting; and
18
19 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby extends the
20 forfeiture deadline of December 31, 1991 to January 31, 1992 for 43 1989 allotments
21 granted to Twin Creeks based on the following finding:
22 1. Attempts to coordinate with the Army Corps flood control project and the receipt of
23 several important comments late in the comment period and after the close of the
24 comment period have delayed the processing of the SEIR and held up action by the
25 City Council on the Tentative Map application for the Twin Creeks Subdivision.
26
27
28
29 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
3Q2EFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
31 twincrks / COllT~bi~icil of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (iX~a~~it~~$~c~) meeting ~ form
on the __.~__l.~.xll..... day of ........I?~C~nber _--~ .:...................... 19.1., by the
following vote: . ...........................
City Attorney
AYES: Read, Davis, _ Nelson, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor liilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: ~d nagh, Sobel
ATTEST : ............... ....... ...... . .................
~1~r~91`Y C~.~€~
f. -~
_ ~ a 4
M---
....... .-- -.. d----------------------------~------------.---------------- ..-------...----------
P.
Mayor
Gbuncil File- .... -
~:7,-~~ 0 ----~..--......
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No. - -- .. N.C.S.