HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 91-351 12/02/1991i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
FZesoluti®Cl No. 91-351 N C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE PUD UNIT
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTHPOINT BUSINESS PARK
(AP NOS.048-080-21, 30, 31, 32; 007-401-11, 12, 14,
15, 16, 27, 31, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, AND 42)
WHEREAS, the project site was rezoned to Planned Unit Development/Flood Plain
Combining (PUD/FP-C) by Ordinance No. 1875; and
WHEREAS, by action taken on October 29, 1991, the Planning Commission considered
and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to conditionally approve the PUD
Unit Development Plan for SouthPoint Business Park; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and the
adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration by Resolution No.91-345.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby conditionally
approves the Unit Development Plan for the Southpoint Business Park pursuant to Section
19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance 1072 N.C.S., as amended based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
Findm~s
1. The proposed PUD will result in a more desirable use of land and a better physical
environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination
of zoning districts by permitting necessary accessory commercial uses in close
proximity to the industrial park uses.
2. The circulation pattern and traffic impacts of the proposed Planned Unit
Development have been reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer who has determined
that the project will have no impact on the level of service at adjacent thoroughfares
and that said thoroughfares are adequate to carry additional traffic generated by the
development.
3. The plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and
organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in
relation to adjacent properties.
4. The approved Design Guidelines limit building coverage to 50%, and require 20' or
25' landscaped setbacks along the streets. A master landscape plan has been
approved for the site. Through these established standards, the scemc qualities of
the site, will be protected and adequate open spaces will be provided.
1
Res. N~........91-351...... c.c.s.
a~~-b a.
5. The development is in general conformity with the General Plan Land Use,
Community Health and Safety and Community Character Chapters.
6. Public necessity, convenience, and general welfare clearly permit the adoption of
the proposed amendment by permitting a more viable and efficient mix of uses for
the business park.
Conditions:
1. The master plan for the Southpoint Business Park shall be put into the form of PUD
standards and shall be amended to include the permitted uses, including the
requirement that no more that 20% of the floor area be devoted to retail and/or
office uses, based on the projected maximum build-out of 347,000 square feet
subject to approval by Planning staff.
2. The PUD Standards shall be modified to include No.'s 9, 10 and 11 as conditionally
permitted uses subject to a minor use permit.
3. Uses numbers 9 and 11 in the PUD Standards shall be modified to indicate that
these uses shall only be permitted as uses incidental to the industrial park.
4. Changes in use shall be reviewed by staff for compliance with the Parking
Standards.
5. Any exceptions to the Southpoint Business Park design guidelines shall be subject to
approval by Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee.
sppudres/dd1/12/24/91
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and. adopted by the--''~-app feed as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~l~gq~~l) meeting f!w
on the ..-.2Lld .............. day of ...........D-e.oe~lbe-~ •--......................, 19..9.1., by the ~..___-_
following vote: "
ity Attorney
AYES: Read, Davis, Cavanagh, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Nlayor Hilligoss
NOES: None /~
ABSENT: N ne G /,
ATTEST : ... ... .................... ......... ... ..................... ',Y~-~~
City Clerk Mayor
Council File .................................... 2
CA 10'85 Res. No...........9.):.-53..cJ..1.. N.C.S.