Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 91-303 10/07/1991:, ~f'SOl~tl®h Nom. 91-303 N ~.~. 1 of the City of Petaluma, California 2 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 3 KINGSMILL SUBDIVISION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 4 A CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, 5 SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY AND CASTLE DRIVE, 6 PORTION OF AP NO. 136-120-11 7 8 9 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1828 N.C.S., Assessor's Parcel Number 136-120-11 was 10 rezoned to PUD (Planned Unit District); and 11 12 WHEREAS, Condition 6.g. of Resolution No. 90-365 approving the Kingsmill Subdivision 13 Unit Development Plan required a PUD amendment prior to development of the church 14 site; and 15 16 WHEREAS, application was subsequently made by Truman Whorton, on behalf of the 17 Church of Christ, to amend the Kingsmill PUD Development Plan to allow construction of 18 a church and associated site improvements; and 19 20 WHEREAS, by action taken on August 27, 1991, subsequent to a public hearing on this 21 matter, the Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the proposed 22 amendment in said Planned Unit District; and 23 24 WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared pursuant to the California 25 Environmental Quality Act was adopted by the City Council (Resolution No. 26 91-302 N.C.S.) on ~ 0~7~91 , as recommended by the Planning Commission; 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the amended unit development plan on 29 file in the Office of Planning (File REZ91006) is hereby approved pursuant to Section 19A- 30 504 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. as amended; and 31 32 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts findings of the 33 Planning Commission as its findings as stated hereinafter: 34 35 Findin s: 36 1. The amended development plan, as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of 37 the land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single 38 zoning district or combination of zoning districts. lies. ~~....9:1-30.3......... rr.c.s. 1 1 2. The amended development plan, as conditioned, presents a unified and organized 2 arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to 3 adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and that adequate 4 landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure compatibility. 5 3. The natural and scenic qualities of the site will be protected through the 6 implementation of tree preservation conditions of approval, and that adequate 7 available public and private spaces are designated on the amended Unit 8 Development Plan. 9 4. The development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the applicant 10 and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in 11 the best interests of the City, and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit 12 of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma General 13 Plan. 14 5. The PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to one 15 or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway) to carry any additional traffic 16 generated by the development. 17 18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the findings set forth above, that the City 19 Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Kingsmill Subdivision Development Plan, 20 subject to conditions set forth below: 21 22 Conditions: 23 1. Development of the proposed 3.9 acre church site shall be limited to the following 24 uses: 25 a. Principal and accessory uses as shown on the development plan: 26 primary church building 27 social hall 28 two single-family residences 29 b. Conditional uses permitted in the northeast corner of the site: All principal 30 and conditionally permitted uses identified under the R-1 Zoning District. 31 2. Parking shall be provided for each of the proposed uses in conformance with Zoning 32 Ordinance Standards. 33 3. All proposed buildings shall conform to relevant provisions contained in the 34 Corona/Ely Specific Plan, including restrictions on height and setback along the 35 Sonoma Mountain Parkway frontage, architectural quality, location of parking, and 36 designation of the site as a Gateway. Specific Development Standards (i.e., height, 2 Reso. 91-303 N.C.S. 1 setback, lot coverage, etc.) shall not be required. Rather, each building shall be 2 reviewed in context of the surrounding development for architectural and site design 3 compatibility. 4 4. A parcel map shall be recorded prior to issuance of development permits for this 5 site to achieve the following: 6 a. A separate legal parcel shall be created for the church site. 7 b. Right-of-way and public utility easements shall be dedicated as deemed 8 necessary by City staff along the Sonoma Mountain Parkway and Windmill 9 Lane street frontages of the site. 10 c. An agreement providing for cross-access and maintenance of the shared 11 driveway along Sonoma Mountain Parkway shall be executed and recorded 12 by the owners of the church site and the McDowell property located directly 13 to the south, subject to .staff review and approval. 14 d. Parcel B (the narrow strip of land between the church property and Castle 15 Drive) created by Phase I Final. Map for Kingsmill Subdivision shall be 16 merged with the church property. 17 5. Prior to application for SPARC review, a study of the site shall be conducted for 18 archaeological sensitivity/significance. Cost of archaeological study shall be borne 19 by the project proponent, with selection of consultant to staff approval. 20 6. Each phase of this project shall be subject to Site Plan and Architectural Review 21 with emphasis placed on the following issues: 22 a. Proposed architecture for the primary church building shall be modified to 23 offer additional interest warranted by the Gateway status of the site and 24 improved design linkage with the rural elements fostered within the 25 Kingsmill high-amenity area. Consideration should be given to the massing 26 and siting of the large buildings to insure preservation of vistas/corridors to 27 Sonoma Mountains. 28 b. Architecture for all future buildings proposed shall be reviewed for 29 compatibility in context of surrounding development. 30 c. Landscaping shall be provided along street frontages in conformance with 31 the Sonoma Mountain Parkway Master Landscape Plan and the Kingsmill 32 Subdivision Master Landscape Plan. 33 d. A landscape plan for on-site landscape areas shall be developed. Plans shall 34 include provisions for interim landscaping in undeveloped (future phase) 35 areas. Existing trees shall be preserved and incorporated into the plan. Reso. 91-303 N.C.S. 3 1 e. Noise attenuating features shall be incorporated into construction plans to 2 reduce traffic noise impacts to acceptable levels as determined; by staff for 3 buildings located along Sonoma Mountain Parkway. 4 f. Windmill relocation and preservation in accordance with the Corona/Ely 5 Specific Plan. 6 7. The following requirements of the City Engineer shall be met: 7 a. Excavation permit shall be obtained prior to all work within the public right- g of-way. 9 b. Positive lot drainage to the public streets shall be provided. 10 c. Minimum 30' driveway width to be provided at street on Castle Drive. 11 8. Property owner shall participate in the Sonoma Mountain Parkway Benefit 12 Assessment District. 13 9. Any outdoor advertising signs shall be submitted for review and approval of SPARC 14 or the Community Development Department. All signs must conform to the Zoning 15 Ordinance and be compatible with the building and surroundings. 16 10. This project shall be subject to imposition of all applicable special development 17 fees. 18 11. Property owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to provide for 19 annexation of this property to the Kingsmill Subdivision landscape Assessment 20 District. 21 12. This project shall be subject to imposition of a. Specific Plan Fee to defray the cost 22 of preparation, adoption, and administration of the Corona/Ely Specific Plan. The 23 fee shall be based on a pro-rata share of benefit costs as determined by the City in 24 accordance with California Government Code Section 65456(a). 25 26 PUDkings /council-7 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (A~jxid~Ya~i'~~ meeting' on the .------7-th........_.. day of ....................QG.kQI?~T:....................., 19...~.~., by the' following vote: ........f .-....---. Citr~ torney AYES: Read, Davis, Cavanagh, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Nlayor Woolsey /f NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor illigoss .~ ATTEST : ............... - .. .. , --.-.-.._..-....-.......... ~~~~~:'Y'Yy)-...............................-..-...-..-:..........~.. City Cl~~ ` Mayo Vice Mayor Co,mcil File-°---°-°-.-......-~----.-...... 4 CA 10-85 ~ Res. No......91-`~~`~.._... N.C.S.