HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 91-155 06/03/1991r
1
Res®Il.ltion No. 91-155 N C.~.
of the City of Petaluma, California
2 A RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED
3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE CREATION OF THE
4 CADER LANE INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATED ON CADER LANE
5 AND SOUTH MCDOWELL BOULEVARD, AP NO.'S 005-040-41 AND 42
6
7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Mitigated Negative
8 Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for a proposal
9 to create an eight parcel industrial park on property located at the intersection of Cader
10 Lane and South McDowell Boulevard; and
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
WHEREAS, an initial study has been prepared for the area and has been reviewed by the
Community Development Department; and
WHEREAS, the results of this study have determined that approval of this project, as
conditionally approved, will not trigger any significant adverse environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a negative
declaration be issued on the above project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Negative Declaration,
pursuant to CEQA, is hereby approved, based upon the following findings:
Findin s:
1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to degrade the
quality of the enviroriment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to achieve short-
term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals.
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable.
,~e5. No..._..._9.1.-.1.5.5... n.cs. 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
5. The project is consistent with and further promotes the objectives, goals, and
policies of the General Plan.
NDcader /council-6
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the .~ ed as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (x~l,~a($~~c~) meeting //~
on the ..3ra ................. day of ...........sl1dll~.........................._..........., 19..x.1.., by they
following vote r
City tto ney
AYES: Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Read
ATTEST : . .................... ..... '%~~,~.:~..
y Clerk
Gbuncil File .................................... '~
CA 10-85 ~ Rcs. No........9.1.-.~.5.~..... N.C.S.