HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6303 N.C.S. 05/21/1973 Resolution No 6303 N.C. S.
‘744!RESOLUTION UPHOLDING. THE APPEAL OF DONALD E . WAITE
FROM AN ADVERSE DECISION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION RELATING TO SITE DESIGN
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMA - 0 . AND SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN ' f .j 3) 'y "'1 t A Regular' Meeting
of the City Council of the Citgof Petaluma bn, the 21st day of
May , 1973 .
WHER.EAS , 'Donald E. Waite did oh April 17 , 1973 ,
present a site design for review by the Planning Commission
relating to the construction of a 977 square foot office
building at 4211 Petalutha Boulevard North ,, And
WHEREAS%;. the Planning Commission denied approval
"without prejudice" .and with the comment and clarification
that the appellant could resubmit to the Planning Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the appeal of
Donald E. Waite is hereby upheld subject to the provisos
that the existing non-conforming uses on the premises at 421
Petaluma Boulevard North not be expanded in any way and that
all the conditions of the staff report, dated April 12 , 1973 ,
be fully complied with.
** ** ** ** **
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was duly- and regularly introduced and adopted
by the Council of the City of Petaluma on the
' 21st day of May ., 1973 , by the following vote :
AYES : COUNCILMEN BRUNNER, CAVANAGH, JR. , CLECAK, DALY, MATTEI ,
PERRY, JR. , and MAYOR PUTNAM.
NOES : NONE.
ABSENT : NONE . P ; L=
'ayor
ATTEST: . . . /;„r J7dd i.
-City Clerk(
• ,'ionald Waite - Site C ign , April 12 , 197.3
•
•
. building. The front yard setback area should be planted to present
an attractive landscaped appearance for this main traffic route
through the City .
9 . The Fire Chief states the existing fire hydrant at Petaluma Blvd.. North
and Kent Street may have to be set back from its present location.
10 . The City Engineer states new curb, gutter and sidewalk must be con-
structed per City standards , and a plan must be submitted showing
the proposed top of curb elevations to verify acceptable street
drainage.
Analysis and Review
The existing uses on the site are non-conforming and further development is
not possible until the non-conforming aspects are corrected or removed.
The staff therefore recommends that the Planning Commission act without
prejudice not to approve the proposed site design.
-3-
•