HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6320 N.C.S. 06/18/1973 . ,.- EER:ma b715—.,7 J. ‘,--
. , .
1 .tesolution No 6320 N.C.S. 1 i
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE:EMPLOYMENT OF
ROBERT T. ANDERSON OF THE.,,LAW- FIRM OF ORIGINAL
STURGIS, DEN-DULK, DOUGLASS & 'ANDERSON,
AS COUNSEL IN THE CASE OF CONSTRUCTION
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY
ET AL v. CITY OF PETALUMA,
.. ,,9 -.) -; ) --i
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN c= :12:-.45-_45:-:< --:-<2.,..1.---,- - -/:\
At Meeting of
the City Council of the City of Petaluma onthe lath day of June A Regular
zawAdMated
19 73
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Robert T. Anderson of the law firm of Sturgis,
Den-Dulk , Douglass & Anderson is hereby employed to act as Counsel in
the case of the Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County et
al •v. City of Petaluma, under the terms and conditions of his letter
of March 1 , 1973 .
under the power and.authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
Seconded by "
712F COUNCILMEN VOTE
Cr 04_.C .. I Ayes Noes Absent
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and Councilman Robert A. Brunner X- _
regularly introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of " John W. Cavanagh, Jr X
Petaluma, on the 18th day of Jun 19 73, by X
the following vote: / " Richard W. Clecak
(SEAL) ... ._ 1. ..fie.-d4ITI4A1- 71:G. -1_,) " Robert E. Daly X
M or of the City of Petaluma " Fred V. Mattel X
,
di, ,-
-, / " William A. Perry, Jr. X
AtteetcfLr_.E/C.41,-;. /117/017111----r-=—C-61-v----''
( /Th City Cleric Mayor Helen Putnam _X
/ 6 (II ,-1-.)-6
r _
LAW OFFICES OF
STURGIS. DEN-DULK. DOUGLASS 8 ANDERSON EUGENE K.STURGIS
1322 WEBSTER STREET JOHN D. DEN-DULK
WILLIAM D. DOUGLASS
OAKLAND. CALIFORNIA 94612 ROBERT T. ANDERSON
///1 TELEPHONE 893-8150 EDWIN N..NESS
AREA CODE-415
ROBERT BRUNSELL
r �
March 1, 1973
Mr. Edouard E. Robert
Attorney at Law
P. 0 . Box 2156
Petaluma, California 94952
Dear Ed :
Thank you for your letter of February 27 , 1973, in-
dicating that our understanding is the same with respect to
the payment of my -fees in the event that a sale of the Tahoe
property may ultimately be consummated.
With respect to acting as associate counsel in any
suit that may be filed against. the City of Petaluma chal-
lenging its growth limitation policies , before agreeing to
act in that capacity I would like to have copies of all
ordinances , resolutions and other documents of the City
pertaining to such growth limitation policies . If Bernstein
of Oakland is going to represent the plaintiff in any such
action, it undoubtedly will be the Associated Home Builders .
At one time Al, Lewis had asked if I would be interested
in representing the City of Livermore in its case involving
the initiative ordinance which was later declared invalid by
the court and I advised him that I would not because I did
not believe that there was any legal basis for the initiative
ordinance they had adopted in the city of Livermore. However,
from our brief discussion regarding the Petaluma situation,
it is my understanding that it may be entirely different and
I might very well be interested in handling the case.
The basis upon which I would be willing to represent
the City is as follows : A retainer in the sum of $1, 500 . 00
and all services rendered in the matter at the rate of $60. 00
per hour in addition to the aforesaid retainer, and reimburse-
ment for all out-of-pocket expenses . If such a fee arrangement
� .
Mr. Edouard E. Robert -2- March 1, 1973
would appear to be satisfactory, will you please forward to
me the information concerning the City of Petaluma situa-
tion so that I can advise you if I am interested in handling
the matter.
Best personal regards .
Sincerely,
STURGIS , DEN-DUL&, DOUGLASS & ANDERSON
Robert T. Anderson
RTA.: fem