Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6330 N.C.S. 06/18/1973 4401 `RESOLUTION NO. 633;0 N.C. S.. RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE: CITY OF PETALUMA DECLARING CANVASS OF RETURNS AND RESULTS OF REGU- LAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN' SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN . -19E: WHEREAS, by proceedings heretofore duly had and taken, the Regular Municipal, Election was held in the City` of Petaluma (herein- after called the "City" ) on. June 12 , 1973 ; and WHEREAS, said Regular Municipal Election was held on said . date in accordance with law, and the votes thereat received and can- vassed, and the returns thereof ascertained, determined and declared in all respects as required by law; NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED, by the. Council of the City of - Petaluma as 'follows:: (1) The City Clerk of the City be,, and she is, hereby in- structed to enter this resolution on the minutes of this Council as a statement of the result of said election. (2) The total number of ballots cast in the City at said Regular Municipal Election was ,5,64,9 ballots; 1„434 ballots were cast outside. the City, and 37 ballots were spoiled' and not counted, for a total of 7, 083 ballots. (3) The list of candidates nominated for the offices here- inafter set forth to be filled at said Regular Municipal Election and the names= of the candidates which were set forth in the petitions as- sembled' and filed with the City Clerk, as required by law, and the number .of votes; cast in favor of each of the candidates was as follows.: -1- eta � e JGS ‘33o fi • Votes for Vbtes fOr Candi- Votes for Candi dates by Candi- dates by late-"Ab-. - List of Names' dates at Absentee sentee Office of Candidates Total Precincts Ballots Ballots it MAYOR HELEN PUTNAM. 2956' 2'86.9 84 , 3 (-4-year) WILLIAM A. PERRY„ JR. 2603 209 104 0 COUNCILMAN ROBERT A. BRUNNER 2640 2529 108 3 (4. year) FRED V. MATTEI .3392 3267 125 0 JAMES L. 'HARBERSON 3545 3441 101 3 CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD 953 923 30 0 M. PATRICIA HILLSGOSS 2489 2420 67 2 SUSAN D. LATHAM 600 587 13 0- PAUL .J. McCARTHY 553 539 14 0 MYREL A. MOSS 530 507 23 0 P . J. SULLIVAN 1123 1707:8 44 1 • SCHOOL DIRECTOR WESLEY W., EBERT 3458 3339 116 3 (4-year) BYRON K. !'BARNEY!': FAUSS 2097 2019 77 1 ROBERT D, McFAR.LAND 2003 19.37 64 2 MICHAEL P. ROSEN 1136 1104 32 0 LAWRENCE .A. SAUNDERS 2675 2583 91 1 MARY G. SHEARER 3892 3774 116 2 (4) The number of VOtes Oast in each precinct for each candidate was as follows : • -2- -N . • • . f H n I r: 6 w m V m, N a U) N r Z n y 1 z 0 r . H H ' ' H y N W r o m H. w U3 N 1O W HELEN PUTNAM r m r w "� w m m w o H a r r r r do m m m in m; , v r w o o WILLIAM A. PERRY, JR. U1 m N m Fe, v. w w O • ii; .. to t0 r0 w 01 W m H H H o ROBERT A. BRUNNER r v a m U1 vi 0 m t0 H r r H. H H H H H I-' r W H H W p N 0 a w N' :co FRED V. MATTEI W -U1 t0 , ,w, m j W 1.0 m N m- of r r H -'.r H r 1--H NJ m w r w N 0 10 v r. N JAMES L. HARBERSON U1 0) Ut N. . 'm CJ U1 v v N' a aP N N N H a -N W a a NJ r v m m - a o - .In , 0 a NJ th CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD r r r r m 0u v- . m m o o H v - A0 • o H r ' a . m • H ' w v N v W M. - PATRICIA HILLIGOSS r -r H NJ : IN W H NJ N H '.H u N ' a w W w w - N H An w SUSAN D. LATHAM r- N H H N . `r N H N I- 'CO o • v , w . IQ w N 0 N r v . PAUL J . McCARTHY- r r r W. ' H' H H H N H Ni !' w m w - o • H • H N m 0 v H MYREL A. MOSS • N ' N. - W W N co W N W W r ii=; N N N r w to m w to- m. P. J. SULLIVAN H H H I?-' H H H Fes' r I r w H W AD 0 -H W m P. r v N, w no . r m ' ,p H N .m 1v WESLEY W. EBERT m 01 v v to m .v v v m m BYRON K. "BARNEY" FAUSS v CO w H 01 r w m W w v to u1 to m 01 m in . a m 01 m ROBERT D. McFARLAND a r 0 w' N t0 01 H • . N W W'. N - N ' a a 0 W U1. a pF , '4 w: 10' Ui r 0 • o Ass w o r ?'1CHAEL P . ROSEN r H. H w si m. rn rn m CO CO a o: o LAWRENCE P.. SAUNDERS Ao 0 • CT P a Ul H Oa 0 0 w H n r r 'r r j_.' `r,. H F,-'. H :r r' W w 0 w r ,ia m ' W As MARY G.. SHEARER N ,H !co t0 - 10 Ul to 0 - O 3- \ • le r .1:,.: • • hi n $1 'N, N :Ni. N' H ':H H H H H H 7, N; H O to au m UI a U) N) n 0 1 1 H a m co V Ol a m 0 UI O', V to of o 'H to P to 0 o H co HELEM PUTNAM V1.: m to CO m 'N a a V a: U7 o. co C. to m V w o o to N WILLIAM A. PERRY, JR. c a UI ' V V .V U7 UI UI UI c) UI' H w H co ut u7 m m t a a UI ROBERT A. BRUNNER orn �V to a) w N C. rn 0 o ao. 1-1 H o H • M w v. a=d. u H w FRED V. MATTEI H 'w.<+ to .. N tto w � �` o M N w' ' -JAMES L. HARBERSON N N W N 'w N N Y N 'W N o u a 0 to w o to a o' CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD w of to o Ot. a a w Uf _ 0 aT to 1 0 o rn M . N U 0 W 0 0 M. PATRICIA HILLIGOSS H / o N . H o Ut to NJ H t i SUSAN D. LATHAM • H H N) N 1-".r H H H H H N o m N a o. W H a a N N PAUL J. MCCARTHY m N a N NJ o o to rn W a, 'MYREL A. MOSS N N Ut a N H 'W. N W H. N . w H o CO • w V H H to to P. J. SULLIVAN H H Ut to 0 to CO m J m rn o .V V H co co to a• w N H a o WESLEY W. EBERT a • a to o N w H a w N M. ' '. 0 o w a N BYRON K. "BARNEY" FAUSS w of of UI a N a W a a W CO 0 V o a W a to m o '.a ROBERT D. McFARLAND H N U) a a H 'H N IN a N to m a, to co to CO N Cn w N -MICHAEL P. ROSEN vi m W m J UI a a o\ m N o w a o -m ' v H o H w LAWRENCE A. SAUNDERS H H H H M O W P. V m of of V o co o o H co H a'. N m 0 N „MARY G. SHEARER . _ -4- 1;- til n' U W W w'. N) 'N '.) N IV [J :N F-1 W: IV !-, o. 'tD CO V CI lP . W 0 1 » z o i. H. r F. 1b 'r o a a 'a 0 Un w V N 0 0 w to 0 V a N a. m HELEN PUTNAM m a U1 a V'. U1 to w to , 01 a 0D co -a rn tP r N W m WILLIAM A. PERRY, JR. V tT " cm (J1 - _.a al .m 4 N V al In N w .a N W w r o V ROBERT A. BRUNNER H H o t0 co_. 0 a IJ 00''. , a W 1.0 lit o Ol a w 'a , N a • to r ' N N .FRED V. MATTEI H H r r r H w N w w N w tn r . . w • N JAMES L. HARBERSON W w N of u a v tri1 CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD V V as V a CO cl. 0 a W V a C) w w to co to V r a N _ . M. PATRICIA HILLIGOSS N 'r N H .r r N r 'H H H. 0 o Un cn. r, H 40 W w SUSAN D. LATHAM H N H r.• H N. Fs N • m N 0 o W - al o W co N PAUL J. McCARTHY N H. { H H! . _. a to m a 0 o Co w w w to MYREL A. MOSS In W .(J r. •Iv W W H a i H • o, a H N. to :v r N 4o In 0 P. J. SULLIVAN r' r N o go k+ Un to o m to a r u WESLEY W. EBERT a . P (-0 W • a r W �I N r rn 1 ' N j W Co 0 • o (4 W , .N BYRON K. "BARNEY"FAUSS• ,-4, V W ; w w co a .w to N H m ko u w N a a a N o; 'ROBERT D. McFARLAND .. w w N W r CO V W .. N 7V ' ;a 0 Co o o N al r c) • t aj MICHAEL P . ROSEN r 0 V a m w V ., LAWRENCE A. SAUNDERS ..•� N In V 01 N CO V, U1 'Ui 61 N .H H r r H N H 0 J 0). W • F.' V a O. m .N 'w to to w. 'v: in w to wo. m MARY G. SHEARER. -5- . a, of - - -"' - .s- : . ... •_ - ,.. -._. _—...=r.- ...�.._• _`-:•___.,..._-. --._.�_ �,. • ro 0 a .P a .L. 'W W 1.0 w' W W H W N) H 0 \O' CO V, Oi 0 I• Z n ' z 0 • m w m H 0 H HELEN PUTNAM .1 . °J .a WILLIAM A. PERRY, JR. ,n rn w v tri • ROBERT A. BRUNNER � m rn • ' `r to FRED V. MATTEI H no w m °°• ,V -'JAMES L. HARBERSON 9 H N H cli A ' �'' CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD b, v 0 w "' _" M. PATRICIA HILLIGOSS H N H A t N SUSAN D. LATHAM r N i" • >1'' - PAUL J. McCARTHY N F ° . ' ° �' O° ' 'MYREL A. MOSS W ' W N O1 to P. J. SULLIVAN co N co. in a. m m co' W. '1° a CO N' - CO °' v , 65 WESLEY- W. EBERT N Y • N H H H 0' W IN .P H » co t" ° --4. m. rn t BYRON K. "BARNEY" FAUSS .N NI ' N H H' N N' O1 tO aP "', °- O1 `' ••‘..,3 , O ` ' m H ROBERT D. McFARLAND 0 :R U+ H N. to W H N H W H fk.O ° CO O1 ho MICHAEL. P. 'ROSEN CJ 'N N Y H W U1, 01 'tO UI \n .w w m. o w u N o LAWRENCE A. SAUNDERS H 1-0 0 U1' N Na. .t. to -O O V co: N •N) u W ON. W ll' • MARY G.: SHEARER .6.-; . • • N N .lD a Ca 'a -0P .a .A 1-1 N F' O l0 CO V Ol N. A H z n z 0 HELEN PUTNAM WILLIAM A. PERRY, JR. ROBERT A. BRUNNER . FRED V. MATTEI JAMES L. HARBERSON CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD M: PATRICIA HILLIGOSS SUSAN D. LATHAM • PAUL J. McCARTHY MYREL A. MOSS P. J. SULLIVAN 0 Y t�ii rn� w N w o W t o WESLEY W. EBERT rn o rn o o w w - BYRON K. "BARNEY" FAUSS µ b . � CO- NJ. N 'w 0 to , ROBERT M. McFARLAND N v Si N rn or to w in MICHAEL P. ROSEN N w rn w- t' to r o" LAWRENCE A. SAUNDERS au � w m trc s o a wN. MARY G. SHEARER. -7'- r - _ • • • • • . s 1-3 < 1-3 > s < i a < s tri 8 oicr, s0 2, j_IC2,: 'wed idC.). 8 - i 23'23; ,:, t., ›, ti t91, Pi > 2 i . 2::›1 n to' t-iZt-iu) t' Ztiu) 17, cmt-i H 1-3 07 01 2 ,,, (.,.., 0 • . s • H 1-3 2 1-3 . 1-3 tli cn H. 2 Pi < n I- .3 1-1 ' tri ,8 1-4) 11 0 HZ 0 .3 z •tt 1-3 • < 2 n tt LI n < 2 o .3 1-3 0 o LI .3 n H 1-3 tll < I-I < H ' - Li 0 1-3 1-3 k< 1-3' til •2 NJ 1.3 t..) to to 1/4.0 CO 1/4.0 01 01 oo, o..‘ crt co cn C11/4 'V te• . • a V HELEN PUTNAM to to iv to . cp. rn r a a, r o 0 0 to . 0 to w a 1.0 w a . WILLIAM A. PERRY, JR. to 1...) NJ N.3 IT a /--1 ln C. H a. a:, H N7 A H o 0 r W o H ROBERT A. BRUNNER • r• w to w w w r Iv C1/41 H 1/4.0 1/40 11/47 al Co to to •h..) cii. ‘:-...1 N.) (T1 FRED V. MATTEI w w to w tn th r a tn r a- 'in' s Et . a , 0 JAMES L. HARBERSON (ii a (n . - W W o W .' 1/46 I.' 01 tri LO to F-1 01 6 cAs us -0 „ , . CLARENCE F. HILGEFORD i.., tV N IV !e .# co al LC. to CO ON ID ID I'D P '. ' tO M. PATRICIA HILLIGOSS cr$ C. 0 a .1-! oo . fl 40 Ilh! a SUSAN D. LATHAM . t . cif th ' 6 2 cm - •• . H • , tri I-1 to 1.11 i--, to H '9I '1'9° . P 4=. , . PAUL J. McCARTHY ; I : . • tn ifi -' i-7! •t , 1-Fi 6 • ' (-4 . w na 0 0 w hi Ka . - . 0 04 S - *3 o to MYREL A. MOSS , • , H ' . 1 " • r ''',' r , , H H i . , , • 1-'. ".. 0 I-1 N 1‘., .4. 17.3 to 14:. H • . : - 1-0 0,1 b3 . L-1 01 , ' P. J. .SULLIVAN r w • w' tn o • r a 0' Lu to Ul H' 133 H ;I=; 'H LII N. it:. to :1-, cp oper kgD to W H. to WESLEY W. EBERT th a . a 0 H. 0 01 w w H W 1/4.17 V H. W H CO to co H '7-4 •‘-..t oo rto to H. al ,49:„. BYRON K. "BARNEY" FAUSS N • ' • 2,3 • ‘, F, Iv •a a - a 0 - 1 tO• A:- W H NO ; no 31S I-. , ROBERT D. McFARLAND o 1/4-4 th Iv (-A3 cri ';.--1 H P . " , ij : IT? H 6 0 0 DO H N.7 Cl/74 1/41t! :1;j ei, hi 41=1... H (.71 L., to MICHAEL P . ROSEN . , NJ ..•;,... ., ' -.*1--• ". ,p IL tO • •••4 ...lo CO• H 1-3- . ... • '.• . , . ,.. . • of) t. ln ' v LAWRENCE A. SAUNDERS • a CO w a 01 to '1/40 W H V. 00 CO Crl as NI (0 H V Ul •ils too Ch MARY G: SHEARER 7•.:- ■:-..;v ..,,.,-,,N-adi N) 0 9 0 NJ CO .1i 0 NO CO -8- • (5). That, Helen, `Putnam, Robert A.; Brunner; Fred 'V. Mattel, James L. Harberson , Wesl`ey'W`. Ebert, Lawrence A ;Saunders and Mary G_. Shearer received the' highest rnüthbe of votes cast for the office for which each was a candidate and said, persons were thereby elected to said office for the term hereinabove set forth, and the City Clerk is hereby author- ized to administer thereto the Oath of Office prescribed in the Consti- tution of the 'State of California. (6) At said Regular' Municipal Election the following Measure was submitted to the electors of the City and the number of votes given in the City for and against, said measure (incl uding absentee votes) was as follows : Total Total Yes No Vote Vote MEASURE Al, City of Petaluma Measure The City Council of the 'City of Petaluma has adopted a policy controlling resi- dential growth to a maximum of five ec?Up Go hundred (500) residential units per year through 1977 and now asks if you 6,>a approve of this policy. 4444 953 (7) The number of votes' cast in each precinct for and against said measure was as follows:' \ti MEASURE .A Precinct Yes No Precinct Yes No 1 150 42 9 135 34 2 14''0 4.2 10 119 43 3 197 4'7 11 158 33 4 150 46' 12 99 13 5 124 41 13 123 25 • 6 151 47 14 87 24 7 114 20. 15 71 24 8 15.4 3L 16, 92 19 -9- X Precinct Yes No' Precinct Yes: No 1T 71 .2'5 27 145 13 18 81 43 28 143 29 )' 19 115 34 29 73 9 0 147 2:3 3'0 81 20 21. 119 12 31 123 26 22 81 18 32 155 16 23 83 14 33 152 17 24 143 21 34 94 10 25 61 7 35 153 19 26 78 21 36 115 17 Yes No Total Precinct. Vote 4284 925 Absentee Vote . 157 • 28 • Absentee Vote (Late) 3 0 TOTAL VOTE 4444 953 (8) All absent voter ballots have been duly received and canvassed in time, form and manner as required by law, and the result of the absentee vote for and against said measure submitted at said Regular Municipal Elec- tion is as set forth above. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1'8t11 day of June, 1973 , by the following vote : AYES : COUNCILMEN BRUNNER, CAVANAGH, JR. , CLECAK,. iDALY, MATTEI, PERRY, JR. , and. MAYOR PUTNAM ROES :. NONE • ABSENT: NONE Mayor ATTEST: ?,�/,, f,, City -lerk • r, -10- Cd Copy 1 ' ` PETALUf'1A CITY PLANNING COMMISSION i . H H1 t i R lCi r t °> RESOLUTION NO, 8-73 LILLIAN NOMMSEN CITY CLERK ,.; • - E PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL/-04SF© At FOR THE TENTATIVE MAP OF GREENBRIAR UN-I NO. 2 INTRODUG D (COMMISST,Q NER ' � l '�_�JC� 1i�� and SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER I Pi_Qax,�hl_. m,"Al_ at a special meeting of the Petalur ' City Planning Commission held on the 22ndday of,_ i May , 1973, at the hour c -'7 :30 o'clock pm: , in the Cc,ncri Chambers, City Hall, Petaluma, California. WHEREAS , Qantas Development Corporation as owner and subdivider, haslhuo,e filed with the City 'Planning Commission 20 copies of a • tentative map and statement of the proposed subdivision of land within the City to be known as Greenbriar Unit No. 2 _ and has/have paid a filing fee as required by Resolution No. 6199 N.C.S. ; and WHEREAS, the•-Director'ef Public Works and the Director of Community Development have examined said map and have made written reports to the Planning Commission that the same does' .conform t.o the requirements of Ordinance No. 1046 N.C..S, , the said reports are hereby approved :'and their recommendations and conditions are incorporated herein as though fill; set forth; and - - WHEREAS , the Sonoma County: Water Agency has made its report concerning the above sub• division and its recommendations and conditions are incorporated herein as though fully set forth; and WHEREAS , this Commission has found that an Environmental Impact Report/negative 1 declaration has been flied and found in order ; NOW, THEREFORE., BE- IT RESOLVED that said tentative map be and the same is hereby recommended for approval to the City Council , subject to the following conditions: 1) The Tentative Map, Exhibit "A" , attached hereto. . 2) Conditions of ,approval as approved by the Planning Commission on May 22 , 19734 to include the City. Engineer ' s letter dated May 4 , 1973 , are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" . . • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs the Secretary to trans mit the .tentative map, the reports f;iied, and this resolution as its recommendation of this Commission to approve the tentative map. • * * * * * * * * * , I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted by the Petaluma City P-Iaan ng Commission of the City of Petaluma on the 22nd day of i May , 1973 , by the following vote: AYES: Comm. Bond, Daly, . Waters, Popp, Hood NOES: None . " ABSENT': . Comm.. 'Balsh'aw, Schmelz f" J Attest : V Chai n ?` PL-5-4/73 ' u r , >.0$■ 7 • Ail • GREENBRIAR UNIT t2 CONDITIONS" QF APPROVAL AS, APPROVED BY THE. PLANNING COMMISSION QN MAX 12 , 19n 1 . All pUblic improvements and easements shown on the Tentative -Map :will be subject to future, review when the improvement plans are submitted to: the City for approval, 2 . All streets and other public improvements within the subdivision shall be designed and constructed in accordance, with the requirements and standards of the' City Engineer. 3. The subdivider shall be required to complete all the conditions of approval as outlined, in the City Engineer's letter to the Planning COMmissioh dated May 4 , JOi. 4- All street names as indicated on the subdivision map are strictly tentative names subject to checking and review by the Department of ommunity Development. 54. The development Of the subdivision shall be phased to conform with the schedule as shown on the Tentative :Map and accompanying plot plan marked Exhibit "A" on file with the Petaluma Department of Community Development. Q. All storm drainage iMproveMents. shall be 'designed and constructed in accordance with the Sonoma County Water Agency flood control standards and regulations, And approved by the City Engineer- The Washington Creek Channel •right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Sonotha County Water Agency for their acceptance' and maintenance. 7. Complete improvement plans shall be provided for the individual water services' and sahitafy seWer serViceat6 each parcel , and where parcels, are Served by private streets:, utility easements Shall be dedicated to 'the public for future maintenance, 8. The subdivider shall submit a development Plan for approval by the Planning COMmitsien in acCordance with SeetiOn 22. 7. 300 of the Sub- division Ordinance to create private streets serving the multi-family lots shown on the Tentative' Map. 9 .- At least thirty (31()) days prior to the recordation of any final sub- division map, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Commission the, following docuMehtstch Shall defflonStrate to the satisfaction of the COmmission. that the total project Wili .be deVeloped and main- tained in accordance with the Intent and purposes of this proposed development-: a. The documents to convey: title. n. The covenants , conditions , and restrictions to be recorded. The management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the !owners- of the lots within the project to be owned in common ownership. These documents shall -be: recorded at the same time that thdsubdiiziaion map is recorded. EXHIBIT "B" 11/ GREENBRIAR UNIT' i2 CONDITIONS' OF APPROVAL, AS1 AP2RONED B Y' TIIE. PLANNING 'COMMISSION ON MAY .22 , 1973 :10 . A::management company,- with the unquali"fled right to assess the owners; of the 'individual -lots for reasonable maintenance, cost shall be established and continuously maintained for those parcels of land which will be owned, in common. The management company shall have the right to lien .the lots of <the owners. through default in the payment of their assess- ments . Such lien ,shall not be subordinate to .any .encumberance other than the first deed 'of trust' provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for Value.. 11. All lots as shown on the Tentative Map shall• be designed and constructed in accordance with the, requirements of. Zoning, Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S . with no exceptions , unless el"sewhere provided .in these conditions of approval. _ 12 . The subdivider- shall be required to design. and, construct the bridge structures across the :Washington Creek flood control channel on the extension of McKenzie Ave, and McGregor Ave. at the -dreek juncture.. 13. The Final Map and development shall be geared to the incremental phasing of the residential units, approved for construction by the 'City Council ' s r resid'ential development control ,allotment system. An allotment of. multi-family units 'was; approved by the Council for the 1973-74 con- struction year. 14 . The -subdivider shall be required; to enter into an agreement with the City of Petaluma fo"r the right-of-way ,and improvements on the extension of Park Lane, and McGregor Ave. southerly from. Park Lane as shown on Exhibit "A" of the Tentative 'Map. 15. A complete landscaping plan and grading plan shall b.e ,submitted, together with the improvement plans for each incremental unit of the Tentative 'Map to be °constructed, for final approval by the Department of Community Development. 16 . Prior to the approval,of any subdivision, units of the development (Final Subdivision Maps) a P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) shall be approved and adopted by the City Council,. 17. There shall be, a width sufficient for a l=inear park along Washington Creek to be determined by the City Council according to the advice -Of. the Parks ie Recreation Committee. EXHIBIT "B" -2- :.eICEPORTr -TO,: City Council Jun 18 , 1973E FROM: Planning taff ��� 1 f/3 Ale- g LILLIAN NO MMSEN SUBJECT: Addendum Report for' Qantas ':Tentative Map on -aPAiltERK Washington -Creek in ,Greenbriar, Unit No.. 2 . Tn the .joint study session held,ron June 13,1973 With the Planning Commission and the Recreation, Music,and Parks Commission the subject of a linear park along Washington Creek adjacent' to Greenbriar Unit . No 2 was .discussed in relationship to the conditions of approval of th'e Tentative Map. The folloting points should be considered in dealing with this matter,. General Considerations : 1. Condition No.- ,17 of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for Greenbrier Unit Nod 2 ,as approved by the Planning Commission s tates, "there shall, .be a width sufficient for a linear park along Washington Creek to be determined by the City Council according to the advice of the Parks 'and Recreation Committee. " 2 . The Recreation,, Music and Parks Commission in their meeting on June .13, 1973 recommended,. that ''"'a 30 ' wide linear park as indicated on the E.D.P. ,be dedicated by Qantas Development; along the eastern property line, continuing along the Washington Creek , which will include meandering ,pedestrian paths and separated bicycle lanes , and landscaping_ CA precise. development plan shall be submitted by the developer to the Recreation Commission , the Planning Commission and the City Council for approval;: and, construction of these facilities shall occur before acceptance by the City. " .3:... The Environmental Design Plan shows a linear park along Washington Creek. 4.. The Staff Report to the Residential. Development Evaluation Board dated October 24 , 1972. 'indicated concern over the lack of provisions for hiking and bicycle trails along Washington Creek. 5 . Minutes of the Residential Development Evaluation Board' s meeting of November 11, 1972 indicated that Mr,, Jon Joslyn, representing Qantas Development Corporation, .sta"ted that no bike trails were pro- posed. along the Creek because of, a possible traffic hazard along the bridges. He added that the developer was willing to discuss possible areas for, bike trails and expressed a desire to work with the Sonoma County Flood Control Agency to turn its 10 ' creek channel , usually paved in concrete , into bike' trails. 6 . A 10 ' • landscaped easement has been dedicated along Washington Creek from East Washington. Street to the Qantas property behind the Washington Square Shopping Center. 7. The 'Sonoma County Water 'Agenby indicates that gates could be opened up for trails use along the north side. of the channel (opposite the subject ;property) from Ely Road to McKenzie Avenue at such time as ' • the channel crossing is constructed. • S 'Addeniun Report for Qantas Tentative Map on Linear Park along Washington Creek in Greenbriar„Unit No. 2,, June :1&, 1973 8,. The S'onoma. County Water. Agency has control of a strip of land which is approximately 9 ' wide len the Qantas side of the Channel.. This land would normally be used' by the Agency to construct 'a cutoff ditch, and the remainder would be landscaped!. However, the Agency has advised us that much of, this land has eroded, and this 9 ' strip may be needed to restructure the bank. Therefore , this property cannot be made available for recreationa l uses. 9.. The Recreation Commission has indicated that the 30 ' width is desirable to accommodate 10 ' wide bicycle path and a separate 4 ' wide hiking trail with landscaping on either side. Recommendation: In view of the designation of a. linear park along Washington Creek in the Environmental ' Design Plan,, and in view of the several references to said park made during the proceedings of the Residential Development Evaluation Board, the staff recommends that this park be ,developed in accordance with the aforementioned recommendations: of the Recreation, Music and Parks Commission. This recommendation does not affect the other Conditions of Approval of this Tentative Map:: • -2- 8 F \ • n'[ CITY OF PE ALUM A ,. California Po S T -.gND 'ENGLISH STREETS 9.196- - TELEPHONE (707) 763-2613 May 4, 1973 City of Petaluma P=lanning Commission Attn: Mr.. William McGiver-n. Planning Director City Hail Petaluma, California Dear Sir: Tentative Map, - Greenbriar Unit #2 Section 22 . 4. 902 ,Of the Subdivision Ordinance specifies that the City Engineer shall prepare a written report of recommendations on the tentative map in relation to the public 'improvement requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and the provisions of the Map Act. COMMENTS & .RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING "STREETS" The bridges across' the Sonoma County Water Agency channel at Maria Drive (McKenzie) and McGregor Avenue must be constructed by the subdivider.. The City presently holds funds in trust contributed by previous developers on the northside of the channel that are held for the purpose of defraying a portion of this subdivider' s costs in constructing the bridges . The trust funds originally represented 1/2 the estimated cost of the bridges , however, inflation in the intervening years has no doubt taken its < toll. 0 With regard to the public street improvements upon and bordering the City of Petaluma Park property, the sub- divider should contact the City Manager" and work out an agreement for the right-of-way and improvements on the extension of Park lane and McGregor, southerly from Park Lane. This agreement must ultimately be, satisfactory to And approved by the City Council.. v. 1777 r7 n w 1 Al 1 . , .3 Petaluma Planning Commission Re: Tentative Map - Greenbruar Unit #2 Page 2 May 4, 1973 . Section 22 . 4". 629 requires the subdivider show on the tentative tap the boundaries of the units of the develop- ment, if units are contemplated. Although unit boundaries are not shown, it is my understanding, from previous conversations With the subdivider, that unit phasing is • planned. - Park Lane and McGregor Avenue from Park Lane southerly should be constructed under the initial unit of this development whether this first -unit is the P.U.D. along McKenzie or the single family residences along McGregor,. ' 1. COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING "DRAINAGE" • The existing pipe drainage system offsite and downstream southerly from the proposed development has a limited hydraulic capacity. A sufficient acreage of the proposed development must be back drained to the Sonoma County Water •Agency drainage channel in order to guarantee that the existing downstream offsite drainage system will not be overloaded; i . ec , the developer' s engineer must submit hydraulic caldUlations to the Sonoma County Water Agency and the City Engineer proving that the proposed drainage design does not overload the existing offsite downstream drainage system. Section 22. 4, 617 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires any proposed drainage easements to be shown on the tentative map. The easements for the public owned and maintained portion of the drainage system, back draining to the Sonoma . County Water Agency channel northwest of McKenzie should be shown on the tentative map. The privately owned and maintained portion of the drainage system should be shown as such on the tentative map. GRADING PLAN The tentative map , as submitted by the developer, does not contain a grading plan which is required under Sectiod 22.4. 610 of the Subdivision Ordinance. SANITARY SEWER. • The question as to whether the :sanitary sewer system within a P.U,D. is to be privately maintained or pubficly maintained rn 3 5- • cee CZ . Ma• , ■ - • • Petaluma Planning Commission Re ; Tentative Map - Greenbrier Unit #2' Page 3 May 4, 1973 has not been answered as far as this development is concerned. The developer ' s tentative, map indicates a sanitary sewer system through the P.U.D. ; however, he does not . shoW a public sanitary sewer easement. If the , . sanitary sewer serving the P.U. D. and through the P.U.D. A 0 iS to be privately maintained, then the tentative map as submitted rUld not have to show a public sewer easement. However, i it is the subdivider ' s intention to request that the City maintain the sanitary sewer through the P. U.'D. devele-pment, then the tentative map should indicate a public sewer easeMent. MISCELLANEOUS The tentative map is required by Section 22 .4, 609 of the Subdivision Ordinance to call out the closest City bench ' . . • mark and its elevation. The tentative map as submitted does not have this bench mark information. -Very truly yours , :67/4A6rt - David A. Young 7 Director of Public Works and City Engineer DAY:h cc: Planning Dir. DPW/Piles . , . • REPORT TO.: Planning emission • May 18, 1973 J . FROM Director :Of CCmmunity Development SUBJECT: Tentative Map - Greenbrier 'Unit 4.2 ,Qantas Development Corporation Section 22, 4.901 of the Subdivision. Ordinencerequires that the Planning . Director prepare a written report on the conformity of the Tentative 'Map to the provisions of the General Plan, the Environmental Design Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and all other applicable requirements of this and all other ordinances and regulations of the City of Petaluma, in keeping with ordinance requirements , the City of Petaluma Subdivision Committee met with the developer, Qantas Development Corporation, and dis- cussed the submittal of a? preliminary map.; As a result of that meeting, many items were discussed which have been either incorporated into the Tentative Map or are proposed: as conditions of approval of the Tentative Map. The Subdivision. Committee recommends approval of. the Tentative Map with the following conditions : 1. All public improvements and easements shown on the Tentative Map will be subject to future review when the improvement plans are submitted to the City for approval. 2. 411 streets and other public improvements -within the subdivision shall be designed and, constructed in accordance with the requirements and standards of the City 'Engineer,. 3. The subdivider shall be required to complete all the conditions of approval as outlined in the City Engineer's letter to the Planning Commission dated May 4,,, 1973 . 4. All street names as indicated on the subdivision map are strictly tentative names subject to Checking ,and ;review by the Department of Community Develcpment. 5. The development 'of the subdivision shall be phased to conform with the schedule as shown on. the Tentative Map and: accompanying plot plan marked Exhibit "k" on file With the Petaluma Department Of Community Development. 6. All storm drainage improvements shall be designed and, constructed in accordance with the Sonoma County Water Agency flood control standards and regulations and approved by the Ci-tp Engineer, The Washington Creek channel right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Sonoma County Water Agency fOr their acceptance and maintenance. • 7 . Complete. improvement, .plans shall; be provided f'or the individual water services and sanitary sewer services to each parcel, and where parcels are served by private streets, utility easements shall be dedicated to the public for .future maintenance. Tentative' Map - Greer*iar Unit #'2•,, May 18 , 197341/ • 8.,, The subdivider shall submit a development plan for approval by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 22 . 7.300 of the Sub divis on, Ordinance to create private streets serving-the. multi-family lots shown On they Tentative Map. 9 . At least thirty (30) .days prior to the recordation of any final sub- division map, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Commission the following documents which shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the total project. will be developed and maintained in accordance with the. intent and purposes. of this proposed development: a. The documents to, convey title . b. The covenants ; conditions , and restrictions to be recorded. c. The management ,and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the lots within the project to be owned in common ownership. These documents shall be recorded at the same time that the subdivision map is ;recorded. 10. A management company ;with the unqualified right to assess the owners ,of the individual lots for reasonable maintenance cost shall be established and continuously maintained for those parcels. of land which, will be owned in common. The management 'company shall have the right to lien the lots of the owners through default in the payment of their assess- ments . Such lien shall not be subordinate: to any encumberance other than the first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value. 11. All lots as shown on the Tentative Map shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. with no exceptions , unless elsewhere provided; in these conditions of approval. 12 . The subdivider shall he required to design and construct the bridge structures across the Washington Creek flood control channel on the extension of McKenzie ,Ave. and McGregor Ave. at, the creek juncture. 13 . The Final Map and development shall be geared to the incremental phasing of the residential units approved for construction by the City Council' s residential development control allotment system. An allotment of multi-family units was approved by the Council for the 1973-74 construe tion year. 14 . The subdivider shall be 'required to enter into an agreement with the City of Petaluma for the right-of-way and ,improvements on the extension Of Park Lane -and McGregor' Ave. southerly from Park Lane as "shown on Exhibit "'A" of the Tentative Map. -2- • 'Tentative Map Greeriar Unit #2, May 18 , 197110, . 15. A complete landscaping plan and, grading. plan shall be submitted , together with the improvement plans for each incremental unit of the Tentative; Map to be' constructed, for final approval by the Departmen,t ,of' CoMMUnity "Development.. 16 . Prior to the approval of any subdivision units of the development (Final Subdivision 'Maps) a P. U.D. (Planned Unit Development) shall be approved and adopted by the City Council. • • Petaluma City PlannilCommi ssioa. I a Lny r • r -40 ve, .,070 • ' Y • , - 47# V ti4 =t1W ,readb the .staff. Theapplicant' questionedgthe public improvements te4uired- end: Was' InfOrmed by the staff he would have to check with the city Engineer. for tha-epecific reqUirementier- , Comm:' Hood' questionedthe 25 foot turn arbund/, back around space into the _carport- and staff ±hfbrtledf huh it Would' be changed tbT26 .feet. Comm. Bond made :the motion to approVe ,the site design with conditions as cited and Comm. Hood seconded the motion,. rAYES 5 NOES 0 ABSENT 3 • _ , . . , . QANTAS DEVELOPMENT .. Mr. ; McGiVern,gavethe staff report and reminded the CORPORATION Commission that the City% Counoil .had set'the 'density. REZONING' 28-73: for this developMentat&945units per adrei-andthat the ,E112 had been the time the PCD-waa approved and had been accepted by the City Council. The Planning staff recommended Approval of the PUD as submitted-. ' - The Public, Hearing was- opened And comments -requested from the audience. No, questions:Weke raised and the . • applicant stated he had nothing to add, butyas available for Comments. , . , Comte Daly asked if the office building portion and single-family units were to go in at this time ancithe aPplicant ,informed :him they Were not The staff further explained to the ,Commiseibn, that,anly-the' multi-fan-ilk-Units in accordance-withthW allotment as approVad-bythe city Councilfwere-togo-in'attthia , • 11 - , • time, and that developMeht of' units andithalremainder of the multi-family units would dependent upon a future allocation quota:- The applicant informed the commission that plane were ,being • coordinated for the office building phase , but were not definite as yet. Comm. Daly made the,MotiOn -to ePProve thelrequested PUD -rezoning and Comm. Waters seconded the nation . AYES 5 NOES 0 ABSENT 2 • _ • GREENBRIAR UNITi#25) Qantas Development CorporatioWs Tentative Map for the TENTATIVE.: MAR: proposed Greenbriarkit 42 Planned CommanitY • Oevelopmewt 'located onthe; doutheast .sida of Washington_ Square -Shopping CenterandficDowell Park, extending easterly along Washington Creek to McGregor Avenue was considered. -4- Alk '27.. Petaluma City PlanniSCommission Minutes, May 2•1973 ! = • The land, used .encompaseed •by, the area of the Tentative Map were explained by Mr. ModiVern, who also read the conditions of approval as listed in the report of, the Director of Community Development to the Planning Commission. ' ,He. informed the Commis- non that with regard to item #15 cOncerningIand- soaping that these plans could go back before the Commiesiop• or .couid be taken care, of by the Planning Department, whichever the Commission chose to 'do Chairman Popp asked if the ;applicant understood the cohditions .br had anything to: add:. . Mr, Jon. Joslyn , Qantas Development Corporation, presented.. a Concept of the land uses and a model of the Propooed landscaping to the CommisSion. He added that • they took exception to the following conditions of aPproval. - 1. Plans had been preSented for 60-foot lots;;..'not 65footas requested by the conditions .of approval for the single-family units, however, he stated the 15-that sideyard restrictions would be maintained if they would be allowed to retain the 60-foot lots as proposed..: . . 2 . They were prepared to pay half the cost of construction for' the two bridges and understood . that money on deposit from previous developers Was to be utilied, and 'requested that the City pay 1/4 of the cost • 3• It was nOt possible to extend Park Lane down to McGregor in the first phase' of develOpMent. The applicant was informed thatthequeetith-Ofthe ..; bridge construction and the timing of Park'Lane would have to be referred to the City bouncik:as:itWas a . question of economics and the Planning!" ComrdeeiOn could not act ,sonthat-Matter, but;Could'Oniratate - . the actual Conditions required. for the:entire- sub diYis,iorF. . The applicant was asked how much the- bridgee-Would cost and replied that it would be $35, 000 each and that $8 ,500 was on deposit•for one bridge and $104750 for the other. Mk. W.Neel stated there, would be adequate 4ScessahilitY for reeidents . of the multi-family units proposed and that extending Park -Mane-through on the first atage ,of' development would only create-,traffic: from the Achootarea. With regard to the ,60-,foot lots, the applicant Was advised that neither the,Stbdivision' ComMitteemor the Planning staff could approve anything contrary to the Subdivision Ordinance or the Zoning Ordinence,fi The Planning Commission '-could make an exception by determining that the .proPosed lots couldbe0juatifiably . . -5 Petaluma City Planni.Comnfission Minutes,, May AP' 1973 - • . lessened in•width; howeVer, the developer would have to give justification for this variance from the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Joslyn stated he would like to make such a request at this time. Mr. Bob O'Neal, Young America Homes , stated he understood the Subdivision Ordinance had approved the 60-foot lot size during their meeting and the entire development had been geared accordingly. He added if they had realized that 65-foot Jots would have to be adhered to they -would have not planned such a large area for the multi-family portion of the pro- ject and that to change the lot size now would mean starting all over with their .plans.. The applicant further brought . out that there were a 'total of 33 60- foot lots, the narrowest of which was 155 feet' deep, and the smallest i lot being 6 , 900 sq ft. , and that the 15-foot sideyard, restriction would be maintained. . Because of hie. abience from this meeting,. Comm'. Balshaw had written a memo, to the Planning Commission' informing- them that the City Bikeways, Committee and the Consultant performing the study had indicated a possible bike-.trail through thiS property. A great deal of, discussion followed regarding this sub- ject and a -possible solution in determining-what • Conditions to place on the developer to insure the inclusion of the bike trail. Mr. O'Neel ,stated he • should have been .advised before this date that ia bike trail, would be required and Mr,. Joslyn added that to wait until a determination had been made by the City Bikeways Committee as to where the trail would be could create a delay and Very possible revision of the - entire (plan. Mr. McGivern advised the deVeloper that the Planning Commission had the -right to look at the Tentative Map . to see if there were _ inconsistencies aryl-if they felt something else was needed they had the right and • obligation to;.incorporate it into the map.- Comm. Hood .advised` the developer that on the E.D.P. a linear parkz-,±s' shoWn'' and it was not included on the Tentative Map,..• :'Mr.' Joslyn replied that it was his understanding .that the Residential. Development Evaluatioh.Bba,rdlthad determined-It was not feasible to put the,bike.,..trairthron4h. this *development when--they had considete.dtthe.proieat ' He therefore -asked for approval of .thet.TentativeMap Jae. 'shOh without, the. trail and suggastdd'Utilizingr the land on the easterly side, of the channel' which" Was already dedicated to the • public . Comm 'Bond reitanded' the -applicant that he was committed to the E.D.P. which required - a linear park, and could therefore accommodate a bike trail, • 'Petaluma City Plann%'Commission Minutes, May 2. 1973 • and that the .E_D..R. had been adopted long before the developer had begun, his plans. Mr. O'Neel finally cenceded that they: would put in. a 10 foot ease- • ment but he still felt the bridge would be dangerous . Comm. Daly fert ,it was Snot fair to hold the developer back until the City' Bikeways Committee determined exactly where the bike trail would be and felt the City Council should -Make a determination on this matter,. Mr ;McGivern toad the Commission that such action may require the matter to come back before the Commission and further delay the project. Comm. Bond made, the ;motion to add Condition... #17 as follows : "There,..shall' be a width sufficient for a linear, park a lon.g:.,Wa'shington Creek to be determined by the City Council according to the advice of the Barks and. Recreation Committee. " Comm. Hood seconded the motion. AYES 5 NOES .. 0 ABSENT 2 Dic.ussion returned, to the decision of the 60-foot lots and whether• to grant a modification to the requirements.•of.dthe Subdivision Ordinance. The staff •advised..th'.at-the Commission had to determine if the 5..0-footSots were Of a sufficient width •to provide access.$o .the rear of the lot. The applicant stated that ' the 15-foot sideyard restric- tion's would be' maintained upon making the findings as prescribet'hb Subdivision Ordinance. Comm. Daly made :the 'motion to grant this modification for 60-foot lots for the single-family units as part of the Tentative Map and Comm. Waters seconded the motion.: AYES 5 NOES. . '0" ABSENT 2 Comm. Waters..made' the 'motion to accept the Tentative Map with the 1.7 condit .`ons as cited and Comm. Bond seconded'' the motion . AYE'S 5 NOES' _:0 ABSENT 2 Comm.. Daly wished to' make it part of the record that he had voted .."Aye;'-` .however, he did;not wish to take a stand at this time on Conditions #2 , #3 and #17. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting' adjourned at 1.1 : 00 P.M. Chairman Attest: Secretary -7- - , •• , -;;• f. IV A 4, /7/171 011 SUTTER STREET . • 4,6, P / (... ..7 ,.. ocV • Z •( / 0 ,er;•-- . , 2 Jr.', MARIA DR '-7 - ---t- cRINELL A DR .1------------ , 3 ' Pr o .e r i'v K510((:1 \ P / CREEK I N . 1 Fri \ ,, . , s . — PARK LN 4 P*PsK 1 < .1/ ce _ .4 2 ■.! .... 1 5 G.NooL cc a u Q . I r So .MC DoWE i_ L BLVD il 1 . • • • Copy - PETALUMA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ,NO. 9-73 Introduced by .Commissioner Seconded by Commissioner R. E. Daly M. S ., Waters RESOLUTION. Of FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION BY -THE PETALUMA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 'WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF Qantas Development Corporation FOR A MODIFICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE 1046 N.C .S. BE IT RESOLVED that the 'planning Commission finds that on the 22nd day of May, 1973, a request, for a modification of the provisions of Subdivision Ordinance No 1046 N.C.S. was made 'by Qantas Development Corporation who requested the modification With respect to the property known as and located at the southeast side of Washington SquarerShopping Center and McDowell Park in the City of Petaluma, consisting oft the following: Reduction in required lot width from 65 feet to 60 feet for Lots 12 through 29 , 44 through 52 , 55 ,57, 59 , 61 and 63- aS shown on the Tentative Map of Greenbrier Unit No. 2 Subdivision, Said modification -requested in person by the subdivider at the hearing on the subject subdivision .on the 22nd day of May,, 1973 , in the Council Chambers .at the City Hall, Petaluma, California, at the hour of 7 : 30 o' clock p.,m. , and after the conclusion thereof the Planning Commission finds : (''1) That there ,are peculiar and unusual conditions inherent in the property in question sufficient to cause a hardship, and that such conditions are not common to all or most-of the properties in the immediate area. (2) That such modification is necessary for the preservation and en- joyment of 'substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and in the vicinity, and that the modification, if granted, would not Constitut e a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors. (-3) That the authorizing of such variance shall not be of substantial detriment to adjacent 'property, and will not materially impair the purposes of Ordinance No. 1046 N.C.S. or. the public interest. Ih_ereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted by the Petaluma City Planning Commission of the City of, Petaluma on the 22nd day .of. May,. 1973 , by the, following vote : AYES: Comm. Bond, Daly, Hood, Popp, Waters NOES : None ABSENT': Comm. BalshaW', Schmelz Attestc, Wm. ,C. :MCG Vern Lest"er .3,; Popp Chairman .1 4 T, Sl 1 4. .. W • S .F. t v, $ t„ rim od _•_ • sr "fir. " ..Council ,modifications{ tozGreenbria.r: Subdt;r, Uni•t.•#2 ,, tentative map as recommended; by ,tthe Plani'ing Commission - with, 17 t condii n os . ' • - 1. ;;That:the' dedication of a.;3.0 foot::wider;linear,°-park';along the Wash- • ington. Creek.•Flood Channel abutting, ••the' Gre.enbri:ar Sribd: Unit :#2 development ,as recommended- by the Parks and•Recreation : ; Commission- be changed• •to a_,ded-ication of•, a, 20 foot width .;linear: ^ park•. That 'the carports• abutting the :strip be able:`to aintain mr • ;f -• . a 0 .-foot setback. . .> . . 2 That the, provisions';°for •landscaping and development of' the: 20 :foot `, 11near';park strip 'w ll 'berachieved• by the, City1 through .the 13/ark ., arid Recreation fees' required of• the developer; by Section, '.22„ 7 1300• of Subdivision n Ordinance #.'104:6 ';NCS?.+. 3 . That, during the first phase of development,, '_McKenzie Avenue.,and ` the portion';of• Park Lane .abutting Phase I shall he constructed.. Furthermo`re,; if 50a or :more 'iof" the+rcomm ercial 'off ye, building - complex, north ofiMcKenzre' Avenue is developed, or" Phase: II or :'Phase ;III of `the Tentative; SSap as •submitted .is developed ,._then Park • . Lane, shall 1bCcompletelyi constructed as per the City Engineer's • :report;;- i e: ,• across the €rontage •ofPhase, II southerly to; its: ' • connection with the existing Par ` k Lane:ptincludi- - the :Intersection' < . r _ '°.with,McGregor' `Avenue, as well as,�MCGregor _AVenue '�sr`constructi'on., between its i.n_ ter4section with Park Lane •:ands-.the exsting' ,McGregor ' • ` k w 4 " 'Avenue D Scho , i : per„ the City Engineer' s recom; Anendfation on ,hiss tentative, map letter? to the Plann ngsCommis?ion'r EXHIBIT ,"C" That the developer;.;reserves the;. right,'to bring the matter of s the equity -the, cost of""the9 'construction of"the' br�.dge ,structures'-° :, ,J, . back,. to,' the City „Counci: at a subsequent time; i e;. the.;conditions'- . c , , regarding the bridges, Last.-stated in the Planning Comm fission' s, •„ recommendat onto the_ City Council still stand With no, modifrcation' by the :City;Council.;; except that the developer requests •that ,he , , be permitted;to ask`•the Council' to,review ttie' funding of - the bridges ' • at-a "laterwd'ate, with 'the-expectation that the Coune il may "authorize additional` Ci�tyfparticipat°ion an (the 'Oahe'truction' cost: ' HOwever, • < it is° stressed -that,- at° this `time,• no commitment .has been'" made . by the'City .Council, to this effect: • • • • - - - - .. • • • J • - 1 V , . ^