HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-132 04/16/1990R~SOIUt101"1 ~®. 90-132 NC.s.
of the City of Petaluma, California
1
2 RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A MITIGATED
3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CEQA FOR THE CREATION
4 OF FAIRWAY MEADOWS SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON ELY BLVD.
S BETWEEN ADOBE CREEK AND LAKEVILLE SQUARE APARTMENTS,
6 AP N0.017-040-SO
7
8
9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended issuance of a Mitigated Negative
10 Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for a proposal
11 to create a 41-lot residential subdivision on Ely Boulevard between Adobe Creek and
12 Lakeville Square Apartments; and
13
14 WHEREAS, an initial study which noted potential traffic, noise, and grading impacts as
1S well as impacts to the fish spawning and creek habitat in Adobe Creek has been prepared
16 for the project by the Community Development Department; and
17
18 WHEREAS, the results of this study have indicated that conditional approval of this
19 project will not trigger any significant adverse environmental impacts; and
20
21 WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that a mitigated
22 negative declaration be issued on the above project;
23
24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the issuance of said Mitigated Negative
2S Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act is hereby approved,
26 based upon the following findings:
27
28 1. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to degrade the
29 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
30 species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
31 threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the habitat of a fish or
32 wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
33 levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
34 restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
3S examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
36
37 2. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to achieve short-
38 term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals.
Reso. 90-132 N.C.S.
iz~,. N~ ...............1.............. n.cs.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
3. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
5. The project is consistent with and further promotes the objectives, goals, and
policies of the General Plan.
resoFwyM /council-1
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
~ ,.
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~~iI~X~iI€~Il) meeting ~ f°
on the ..1.0_tll ............. day of ...---...~p.ri.1............---.....................-, 19..9Q., by the ~~ ..
following vote:
¢ity Att rney
AYES: Tencer, Woolsey, Cavanagh, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: Balshaw
ABSENT: Dav ' s Y
ATTES'T' : ... ...... . .. .. ........... ............ ~ ...................................-. -....-- . .
City Clerk Mayor
Council File.....--~°--........-°•---......
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No . ........................
Reso. 90-132 N:CN.~.s.