HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-166 05/21/1990
resolution No. 90-166 N,C,s,
of the City of Petaluma, California
DENYING 1991 ALLOCATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a growth management system by Ordinance
1716 N.C.S. (Chapter 17.26 of the Petaluma Municipal. Code) establishing the procedure
for granting or denying allocations on a yearly basis; and
WHEREAS, interested developers have filed Notice of Intent to Develop forms in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.26 and these, in combination with other
allocation obligations created and anticipated by the action of the City Council, comprise
the total number of allocation requests for 1991; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the denial of allocations is not a project pursuant to
Section 1578 of California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, no environmental
action is necessary at this time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council denies 1991 allocations
to those projects as described below:
1. Graylawn Subdivision; Baccala/Hudson for Lucy Webb
2. Pacific Way Subdivision, Mogel Engineering for John Barella
3. Village at Southpoint, Stephens Properties
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council makes the following findings in
support of its denying of 1991 allocations:
Findings
1. The City Council has considered 1991 Development Objectives as well as other
allotment commitments in determining which projects would receive or be denied
1991 allotments.
2. The Graylawn Place Subdivision is exempt from the Residential Growth
Management System pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.26.030(H), Exemption,
Definitions, Residential Growth Management System Ordinance.
3. The Pacific Way Subdivision 1991 allocation application Notice of Intent to Develop
was not complete until Apri12, 1990, one full working day past the deadline for 1991
allocation applications.
Reso. 90-166 N.C.S.
Res..vo ..............1............... rv.cs.
1 4. The Village at Southpoint proposal is inconsistent with the General Plan land use
2 and zoning of the property.
3 5. Without the North McDowell Road Assessment District in place and roadway
4 improvements associated with the assessment district, there is not reasonable
5 certainty that the existing circulation system can accommodate the Village at
6 Southpoint project proposal as described by the application for 1991 allotments.
7 6. Until an environmental impact report is completed, it is uncertain if the existing and
8 projected public services will be adequate to support the Village at Southpoint
9 proposal.
10
11
12 alldeny/council3
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregaing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~~jX~f#~~4~~Special) meeting ~
on the ..-..-21.~ t.-....... day of .....................X11.~?..............................., 19...~Q, by the
following vote: •---•-;,.... ----•'---- ----------------
'ity Attorney
AYES: Tencer, Woolsey, Cavanagh, Balshaw, Davis, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
.NOES: 0
ABSENT:. 0
ATTEST: ~._....... ' : ! . ...................:......... -. ..................
City Clerk
Mayor
/`.
~.
Gbuncil File ..................................
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No....9.0r...~(j.(3......... N.C.S.