HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-193 06/18/1990r
:.'~
Resolution N®. 90-193 N C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
1
2
3 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4 FOR CADER FARMS, A 29.7 ACRE PROJECT OF 124 DETACHED
5 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES LOCATED ON SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY
6 AT RAINIER AVENUE (AP NO.'S 136-120-05, 18, 21-23)
7
8 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. iso3 N.C.S., the project site was rezoned to Planned
9 Unit Development (PUD); and
10
11 WHEREAS, by action taken on May 8, 1990, the Planning Commission considered and
12 forwarded a recommendation to the City Council on the Unit Development Plan for 124
13 single-family homes; and
14
15 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental
16 Quality Act Guidelines and Section 15083 have been satisfied through the preparation and
17 certification of the Corona/Ely Specific P1an.Environmental Impact Report in which the
18 anticipated specific impacts have been adequately identified and mitigated through the
19 adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the proposed Cader Farms
20 project.
21
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the unit development plan for Cader
23 Farms is hereby approved pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance 1072 N.C.S.,
24 as amended; and,
25
26 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following
27 findings:
28
29 1. That the development plan as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the
30 land, and a better physical environment that would. be possible under any single
31 zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
32 2. That the plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and
33 organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in
34 relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and
35 that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
36 compatibility.
~~5. vo......9p.-.1.9.3...... h.cs. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2i
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
3. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site will be protected through the
implementation of tree preservation conditions of approval, and that adequate
available pubic and private sl.~~.c~~s aye c'esignate;i cn the Unit De.velapmE~rt'~Jan.
4. That the development of tl~e sut~ject property, in the manner proposed by the
applicant and cor;ditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent
and spirit of the coning regulations of the City of Petaluta and with the Petaluma
General Plan.
S. That the PUD District is proposed on property which. has a suitable relationship to
one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway and Rainier Avenue) to
carry any additional traffic generated by the development.
BE IT FUR'1?HER RESOLVED that the City Council approves the unit development plan
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to SPARC review, the PUD Unit Development Plan shall be amended to:
a. Provide street tree planting strips between back of curb and sidewalk on all
streets.
b. Modification of unit layout where adjacent to existing mature, healthy tree(s)
to provide for and protect the health of the trees, as recommended by a
professional arborist selected by the City, prior to Final Map approval. Cost
shall be borne by the applicant.
c. Modify unit layout pattern to provide a greater variet~~ in front and side yard
setbacks, subject to review by the Planning Commission prior to SPARC
review.
2. PUD Development Standards shall be developed, subject to staff review and
approval prior to Final Map, to include provisions for governing the following:
a. Maximum lot coverage for principal dwellings and accessory uses and
structures, definition of specific minimum setbacks, per unit type if
appropriate.
b. Identification of options and/or restrictions applicable to homeowner's for
construction of either building additions, permitted detached accessory
structures or associated improvements (decks, patios, spas, etc.).
Structural additions are permitted, and shall be contained within the building
envelope, as defined within this PUD and set forth on the approved unit
2
Reso. 90-193 N.C.S.
1 development plan and subdivision map. Design shall be in keeping with the
2 approved PUD development plan, to staff review and approval prior to
3 issuance of a development permit.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Accessory structures shall be permitted, subject to development standards,
prepared by the developer and subject to SPARC review and approval, prior
to Final Map approval.
Accessory units shall be permitted, pursuant to applicable regulations within
the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.
d. Standards for height, location and design of fencing, as well as maintenance
and replacement provisions to conform to the approved PUD plan.
Proposed fence detail shall be enhanced through the incorporation of special
accent features (e.g., substantial corner posts with decorative caps, lattice
height addition, etc.), subject to SPARC review and approval.
e. Allowance for partial or full garage conversion, replacement of off-street
covered parking.
f. Rebuilding and/or replacement of residential structures shall conform to the
approved unit development plan.
3. Project CC&R's, if prepared and recorded for this project, shall include reference to
the PUD Development Standards, subject to staff review and approval prior to Final
Map approval.
4. All aspects of the proposed development plan and tentative map are subject to
review by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee prior to submission of
a Final Map for checking and approval including, but not limited to: architecture,
public and private landscaping, hardscape surface treatments (delineation of
bikeway and crosswalks), irrigation and fencing. Particular emphasis shall be placed
on SPARC review of the following:
a. Unit architecture shall be diversified to include a more articulated difference
between Plans 3 and 4 (height, mass, roof angle and plane).
b. Designation of a 10% unit to provide substantial diversity in architecture
from the proposed five plans. This may be achieved by substitution of either
Plan 3 or 4 with a completely new unit, subject to review and approval of
Planning Commission prior to SPARC review.
Reso. 90-193 N.C.S.
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
5.
c. Landscape plan to provide appropriate street tree species, increasing
planting frequency to a minimum spacing of 20'-30', toward developing a
linear tree-lined appearance, augmented by accent tree clusters.
d. Distinct lighting fixtures per the Corona/Ely Specific Plan. Note: A conflict
in recommended conditions of approval exists between community
development and engineering departments pertaining to street lighting
fixture design details. Alternative ways to address the Specific Plan and
operating and maintenance concerns is being pursued by staff.
e. Development standards for approving structural. additions and accessory
structures.
f. Compliance with recommended conditions of approval:
1. Lighted numbers shall be provided for each residential unit.
2. Securing devices shall be placed on windows and sliding glass doors.
3. Dead bolt locks shall be provided on all solid wooden doors.
g. Provision of a solid 6' wood fence for side and rear yards as illustrated on the
conditionally approved unit development plan. Fence design shall be
enhanced through use of decorative post and cap at corners or other means.
Fences shall tie back to structure, with one side gate, per the approved plan.
h. Enforcement of Corona/Ely Specific Plan minimum structure height and
setback standards for properties abutting Sonoma Mountain Parkway.
i. Provision of intersection "chokers" to all extent possible.
j. Resubmission of architectural and lot layout plans to Planning Commission is
required prior to SPARC review.
The following requirements of the Chief Building Inspector shall be met prior to
issuance of development permits:
a. Grading must be certified when completed to indicate compliance with
approved plans and will be required for occupancy.
b. Soils with expansion index greater than 20 requires special design foundation
per Uniform Building Code 2904(b).
c. Show site drainage and grading elevations.
d, Indicate all utilities on site plan.
e. Verify utilities are adequate for building (i.e., size of water, electrical and gas
service and size of sewer).
f. Responsible party to sign plans.
g. Submit soils report to verify foundation design.
h. Any structures removed must be done with demolition permit.
Reso. 90-193 N.C.S. 4
'. .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
i. Any wells abandoned must be done under permit from Sonoma County
Health Department.
6. Construction traffic shall be limited to use of Sonoma Mountain Parkway, Rainier
Avenue for access the project site.
7. Hours of construction activity on the Cader Farms site shall be limited to the hours
of 7 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday (non-holiday).
8. School buildings and parking shall not be located within the Urban Separator (per
the Corona/Ely Specific Plan). School structures may be placed within the Urban
Separator, for a temporary period of timing, while construction on the permanent
site occurs, subject to City Council authorization. Placement of temporary
structures shall not preclude development of a continuous pathway along the urban
separator.
PUDcader /council-3
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (E~j~li3~~1) meeting ~`
on the ....~$_t;kl.-•---•-•-- day of .......................I.uz1e............................, 19.~Q_., by the
following vote:
ity Attorney
AYES: Tencer, Woolsey, Cavanagh, Davis, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: ~
ABSENT: Balshaw ~
ATTEST: .. ~~L~~L•• -~.-~ ................................. ....._.
ity Clerk Mayc_
Council File ....................................
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No........9~,-,1,9.~.... N.C.S.
5
0