The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 90-198 N.C.S. 06/18/1990Resolu�ti.on No. 90-198 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California 1 A RESOLUTION OI? PRELIMI'NA.RY APPROVAL OF 2 ENGINEER'S -'REPORT FOR 3 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 4 { 5 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 6 7 WHEREAS, the City Council of Petaluma did adopt that certain 8 Resolution , Describing Improvements and Directing Preparation of Engineer's 9 Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91 and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act 10 of 1972, for the Landscape Assessment Districts, in said City,listed in Exhibit A 11 attached hereto, and did refer the proposed improvements to the Engineer of 12 Work, and did therein direct said Engineer of Work prepare and file with City 13 Clerk of said City a report on each district, in writing, all as therein more 14 particularly described, under and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 15 1972. 16 17 WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work prepared and filed with the City Clerk 18 of said City reports on each district, in writing as called for in said Resolution and 19 under a pursuant to said Act, which reports have been presented to this Council 20 for consideration; and 21 22 WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered each report and each and 23 every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said reports is sufficient, 24 and that neither said reports, nor any part thereof should be modified in any 25 respect; _ 26 27 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Petaluma, County of 28 Sonoma as follows: 29 30 1. That the plans and specifications for the existing improvements within 31 the assessment districts listed in Exhibit A or within any zone thereof, contained 32 in said report for each district, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 33 34 2. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and 35 expenses of said improvements, maintenance and servicing thereof, and of the 36 incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports, be, and 37 each.of them are hereby, preliminarily approved. 38 39 3. That the diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the assessment 40 districts referred to and described in said Resolution and also the boundaries of 41 any zones therein and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within 42 said districts as such lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's maps 43 for the fiscal year to which the report for each district applies, each of which lot or 44 parcel of land has been given a separate number upon said diagram, as contained 45 in said reports, be, and it is hereby preliminarily approved. Hcs. N.... _90-.1.98 .. N.C.S. 1 2 4. That the proposed assessment of the total amount of the estimated costs 3 and expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several parcels of land in 4 each district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such 5 parcels, respectively, from said improvements including the maintenance or 6 servicing, or both thereof, and of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in 7 said reports, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved. 8 9 5. That said reports shall stand as the Engineer's Report for each to individual District as listed in exhibit A for the purpose of all subsequent 11 proceedings to be had pursuant to said Resolution . Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adja1umml�x fleffi8l) meeting . on the ....1f1 h........... day of ................. J.uite.................................. 19.9.0.., by the following vote: City Attor ey AYES: Tencer, Woolsey, Cavanagh, Davis, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: 0 ABSENT: Balshaw ATTEST: ' Cit erk Mayor CA 10-85 Council File ..1_-........p...pp.................... Res, No..... 90.7.198 ....... N.C.S. f 1 4. Notice is hereby given that Monday, July 16, 1990 at the hour of 7:00 PM, 2 in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 11 3 English Street, Petaluma; California, be and the same are hereby appointed and 4 fixed as the -time and place for a hearing by this Council on the question of the levy 5 and collection of the proposed assessments for each District for the construction 6 or installation of said improvements, includin&-the maintenance and servicing, or 7 both, thereof, and when and where it will consider all ,statements and all written s protests made or filed by any interested person at or before the conclusion of said- 9 hearing, against s.ai,d improvements, the boundaries of each assessment district 10 and any zone therein, the proposed diagram or the proposed assessments, to the 11 Engineer's estimate of the cost thereof, and when and where it will consider and 12 finally act upon the Engineer's Report for each District. 13 14 5. The City Clerk of said City, is hereby directed to give notice of said 15 hearing by causing a copy of this resolution to be published once in a newspaper of 16 general circulation circulated in said City, and by conspicuously posting a copy 17 thereof upon the official bulletin board customarily used•by the Council for the 18 posting of notices, said posting and publication to be had and completed at least .19 ten (1.0) days prior to the date of hearing specified herein. 20 21 6. The Director of Finance said City is hereby designated as the person to 22 answer inquiries regarding any. protest proceedings. to be had herein, and may be 23 contacted during reggular office hours at the Petaluma City Hall, 1.1 English Street, 24 Petaluma, CA 94952, or by cafling 707-778-4352. Under the, power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting onthe .......................... day of ........... _...................................... ......... 19......... by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Approved as to form .......... ..............Cit....A ...ttor....ne....y ........ - A ATTEST Ci ty. City. Clerk Mayor Cb�mcit Filn.._...._._._.........__ CA IO-Si IW%. Na .............................. N.U.S. CITY OF PETALUMA LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS FISCAL YEAR 199:0-91 ., . .EXHIBITA 1. Casa Del Oro 2 Casa Del Oro Annexation 1; Jos-ette Court 3. Casa Del Oro:Annexation 3, Sycamore Heights. 4: ' Spring Meadows V S. She.lter Hills Village 6. Anna's Meadows 7. Village Meadows 8. Village East III 9. Meadow Park 1, 29 & 3 10. Adobe Creek 1 11. St. James Estates 1 & 2 CITY OF PETALUMA, LANDS'CAPE:ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 1 EXHIBIT B LCASA DEL ORO The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements consisting of plantmaterials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, located in the public areas shown'as Casa Del Oro Subdivision, Units 3,4,5,& 6 as shown on thtAssessment diagram,for Casa Del Oro Landscape Assessment District. ' 2.�ASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION NO. 1.. JOSETTE COURT The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of Parcel Map 220,' consisting of plant, rn-aterials, trees, ground cover, .irrigation systems, located in the public areas shown as Josette-Court as shown on the Assessment Diagram for Casa Del Oro Annexation No. 1, Josette Court Landscape Assessment District. 3.CASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION'NO. 3. SYCAMORE HEIGHTS The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of "Sycamore Heights Su6d11v.ision;" consistin$,of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, and streetlights located in the public areas shown as "White Oak Circle and White.Oak Way" as shown on the Assessment Diagram for "Casa Del Oro Annexation No. 3, Sycamore Heights Landscape Assessment District". 4.SPRING MEADOWS V The maintenance of all.the public -landscaping improvements as a part of "Spring Meadows Unit No. 5" Subd-ivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways and fences located in the public areas:shown as. Park Sites, Garfield -Drive, Appaloosa Court, and Persimmon -Court as shown on, the Assessment Diagram for "Spring Meadows Landscape Assessment D.istrict." 5.SHELTER HILLS'VI.LLAGE The .mainie:nance of all the Public landscaping improvements as part of "Shelter Hills Village",Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways audiences located in the public areas shown' as "Garfield Drive, Augustine Circle; Tarragon Court, Meadowview Drive, Gregory Court; Cantebury Court, Rosemary Court, and Parcel A" as shown of the Assessment Diagram for "Shelter Hills Village Landscape Assessment District." CITY .OF P.ETALUMA LANDSCAPE ASSESS M"E`NT' DISTRICTS FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 E`XHIBIT 13 (CONTINUED) 6.ANNA'S MEADOWS The maintenance of, all the public landscaping improvements as part of "Anna's Meadows" Subdivision, consisting of pplant materials, trees,, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways, and fences located in the public areas (not includingrmedian islands'and tot lot Parcel C) shown as,"South McDowell Blvd, Casa Grande Road, Henry Way, Daniel Drive, Wieling Way,, and ,Parcels A & B" as -shown on the Assessment Diagram for- "Anna's Meadows Landscape Assessment' District". 7.VILLA,GE MEADOWS The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of "Village Meadows Unit N.o. 1." Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees,.ground-cover, irrigation systems, pathways; and fences located iri the public areas shown as Parcels A & B, Clary Way, Acadia Drive, Flanigan Way, Baranof Drive, Culpepper Drive, and Maria Drive as shown on .the Assessment Diagram for "Village Meadows Landscape Assessment District". &VILLAGE EAST NO. III The maintenance.of: all the public Ian dscapi,ng improvements as,part of Village East No. 3': Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways, and fences lcated in the public, areas,shown as "Garfield Driv.e,:J;aaege;r Lane, Marabou Court, Sheldrake: Lane, Starling Court, Vireo Court, and Wren Lane" as shown on the Assessment Diagram for "Village.East No. 3 Landscape Assessment District". 9..MEADOW PARK UNITS NO. L 2. & 3 The maintenance of all the public landscaping imlrovements as part of "Meadow Park'Unit'Nos. 1,2'& 3" Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover,,. irrigation systems, pathways, and fences located in the public areas shown as follows: Meadow Park Unit 1-"Wood Sorrel Drive,. Yarberry Drive, Garrett Way Jason Court East, Jason Court West, Winton Drive, Abercrombie Way and Parc.e_ls A, B, C, & D". . Meadow Park -Unit 2 (Annexation No 1)-"Allegheny Court, Dupree Court., Dupree Way, Maria Drive, Yarberry Drive, Jaynes Drive, and Batchelder -Way" Meadow Park Unit (Annexation Now -"Abercrombie Way, Megan Court, MacMahan Drive and Stillson Drive." These are shown on the Assessment Diagram for "Meadow Park Units No. 1, 2, & 3 Landscape Assessment.District." PG 2 ;i CITY OF PETALU, MA - LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 EXHIBIT B (CONTINUED) 10.ADO&E CREEK UNIT 1 The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of "Adobe Creek Golf and Country Club, Unit No. .l" Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground- cover,. irrigation systems, pathways, and fences located in the public areas shown as''Ely Blvd. So., Spanish Bay Court, Birnham Wood Court, Arrowhead Court Sugarloaf Court, Horseshoe Bay Court, and Princeville Court". as shown on the Assessment Diagram for "Adobe.Creek Unit 1 Landscape Assessment District". 1 LST. JAMES ESTATES UNITS 1 & 2. The maintenance of ,all the public landscaping improvements as part of "St. James Estates Units .1 & 2" Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation,systems, pathwa s, and fences located in the ,public areas shown as "East .Madison St.., Blvd., St. James Way and St James Court" as shown on the Assessment Diagram for "St. James Estates Units 1 & 2 Landscape Assessment District PG 3 ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA.DE'L OR'O LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA Prepared by: Thomas Hargis, City Engineer Submitted': June.18, 1990 'LLANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT -CASA DEL ORO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. Dated.: , 1990-Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment. Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on. the day.of , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA IM I HEREBY CERTIFY that the' enclosed Eng-ineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of'Petaluma California, on the day of , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that, the enclosed Engineer's Re.p.ort, together with Assessment. and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor -of' the County of Sonoma on the day of , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City�Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENG.INEER'S' REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT . CASA DEL ORO LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 -Thomas Hargrs,'City Engineer and Engineer of Work for Casa DeI Oro -Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution No. N.C.S.,. pursuant to Section"225185. of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements which are the subject of this report -are- briefly descrilied'as follows: The maintenance of all.the public landscaping improvements consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, located in the.publicareas shown on the Assessment Diagram as "Casa Del Oro Landscape Assesment District" LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA DEL-OR,O CITY OF P'ETAL.UMA EXHIBIT A PLAN'S AND SPECIFICATIONS, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT -ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA. DEL ORO . CITY OF PETALUMA EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DIST,RI'CT' COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE 52,272 SQlIARE,FEET INCLUDING MAINTAINED 8 PLANTER ISLANDS TYPE -OF LANDSCAPING TO 97 TREES; SHRUBS; BARK BE MAINTAINED AND GROUND COVER; AUTO- MATIC DRIP IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE COSTS MAINTENANCE SERVICES $3,024 . SUPPLIES 100 UTILITIES (ELECTRIC AND VATER) 250 IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS 0 ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS $3,374 INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.15%') $8 CITY`ADMINISTRATION (15%) _ 506 .BOND'000NSEL (FORMATION) 0 ENGINEER' OF WORK (FORMATION) 0 ESTIMATED -INCIDENTAL COSTS, $514 T6TA1 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE IN FY.1990-9,1 $3,88B ADJUSTMENTS --------------------------------------- PRIOR YEAR (SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT (,$5,323) 'DEVELOPER 'CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION,.. $0 RESERVE FOR DELQ,,CASH FLOW, .REPAIRS $11,900: RE__BATE OF'EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OUHERS 3,020 AMOUNT NEEDED"_70 BE -ASSESSED IN F-Y 1.990-9I. $3:j485' NUMBER OF PARCELS TO.BE ASSESSED 151 ESTIMATED TOTAL,FY 1990-91 ;COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED $2L 08 ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO REBATE IN FY.90-91 _=====s===ssssaassssaaassaassaasaassassese===:==:=-s=-:-=ss=s=::=-___ $20.V0 A LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA DEL ORO FY 1990-91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSSE'SSMIINTS The estimate of the total maintenance- costs peryear were estimated and incidental administrative expenses added to yield a total annual cost. This c.ost was then prorated equally to .the 151 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENG'INEER'•S REPORT "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT CAS_ A DEL O.RO ASSESSMENTDI'STRI;CT CITY. OF P.ETALUMA (1,972 ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL: YEAR 19.90-91 ------------------ TYPE 200 . " PARCEL NUMBER 1 MAP PAGE PAR CK1 ASMNT, TOTAL 1 XXX XXX XX X.I NO, ASSESSMENT I --------------- I ------_----------- 017 311 1: 0 1 1 I 23.08 1 017`311 2 8 j 2 23..0& 1. 017- 311' 3. 6 1 3 13.08 1 017 311 "4 4 1 4 23.08 1 017 311 5 1 .I 5 23.68 1 017 311 6 -3 J 6 23.00 1 017 311" 7 •7 I 7 23.08 1 017 311 8 5 1 8 23.08 1 017 31`1 9' 3 '1 9 23.08 1 017•311 10 1 1 10. 23-..08 1 • 017 311 11 ,9 1. 1.1 13.08 I 017 311 '12 7 1 11 23.,08 1 017 311 '13 5 I 13 23.08 1 017 311 14 3 1 14 23.08 1 017 311 15 0. 1 15 23.. 08 1 017-311 16 8'1 16 231.08 f 017 31'1 17 6 1; 17 23,08 1 - 617 311 18'. 4 '1 10 13.08 1 017 311 19 2 ,1 19 13.08 1 "017 31.1 20 0 1 .20 23.08 1 017 311 21 8 1 21 23.06' 1, 017 31'1. 11' 6 1 22 .13.08 1 017 311 23. 4 1 23 13..08. 1 017 311' 24 2 24 23..08 1 .1 017 311 15 11 25 23.00 1 r '017 311 _2& 7 1 26. 23.08 1 017 311 27 5 1. 27 23.08 1 017' 311 18 3 ,I 18 13.08 1 017 311 19 1 1 -19 23.08 1 017 311 30 9. 1 30 23.08 1 017 311 3,1 7 1 31 23...08 1 017 311. 32 5 32 23.08 1 017 312 1 8 I 33 13.08 1 '017 312 2 6 1 34 23:.,08 I '017 311 3 4,1 35 13.08 I 017 312 4 1 1 36 23.08 1 017 312 5 .9 1 37 23.08 .I 017 312 6 1 1 38 23.08 017 312 7 5 1 39' 23.08 1 017 312 8 3 f 40 23.0.8 1 017 312 9 1 1 41 23.08 1 E CITY OF PETACUMA 1972 ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST OF -PARCELS TO .BE ASSESSED IN FY DISTRICT NAME CASA DEL ORO YEAR 1990-9,1 ------------------ TYPE 200 PARCEL NUMBER MAP'PAGE PAR CKI ASMNT TOTAL I XXX XXX XX X I NO. ASSESSMENT I - ---------------I O17 312 10 9 1. ------------------{ 42 13.08 ,1 017 .31:2 11 7 I 43 23.08 1' 017 312' 1t 5 1 44 2-3.08 1 017 312 13 3 i 45' 13 ,,08 1 017` 312 14 1, 1 46 13,.`08 1 DO 312 15 8 1 47 23.08 1' 017 31Z 16 6 I 48, 23.,08 1 017 ;3,12 17 •4 { 49 23.08 { 017312 18 2'1 50 23,08 1 017 '312 19 0 I 51 23.08 1° 017 31,2 20' 8 I 52 23,08 1 017.�312 .21 6' 1 53 23,,08 1 017 313 1 6 I 54 23.08 1 017 313 2, 4 1 55 23,•08 1 011313 3 2 I 56 23.:08 1' 017 313 4, 0 1 57 23.08 1 017' 313 , 5. 7 I 58 23.08 1 017 313 6 5 1 59 '13.,08 017 '313 -7 3.1 6 10 23.08. 1 617'313 8 1 1 61` 23.A8 017 313 9 9 I 62 23, '00 1. 017 '313 10 7 I 63 23.08 017 313 11 5 1 •64 23,,,'08 1 017 313, 12- 3 { 65 231.108- { 017 313 13 1 66 13.08 1 017 313 14 9 1 67 23.08 "1 017 313 15 6 1 68 23.09 1 017 313 16 4 I 69 23,08 1 . 017 313..17 I 70 23,08 1 017 '313 .18 I 71 23,48 1 017, 313- 19 1 72 . 23,.08 1 017 313 . 20 1 73 23.08 1 017 313 21 1 74 23.08 1 017 313 22 i 75 23..08 1 017 313 23 I 76 23,.08 1 017 313 24 1 77• 13. 08 1 017 313 25. I 78 23.08 1 017 313 26 1 79 23.08 1 017 313 27 I 80 23..;08 1 017 313 18 1 81 :23,.08 1 017 313 29 1 82 mu 1 u t CITY OF PETALUMA 197.2:ACT LANDSCAPE 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST OF 'PARCELS TO 8E ASSESSED 'IN FY DISTRI'CT'NAME CASA DEL ORD YEAR 1990-91 ------------------ TYPE 200 PARCEL NUMBER I I MAP RAGE PAR CK] ' ASMNT TOTAL 1 XXX'XXX XX A I NO. ASSESSMENT I =--------------- --------- --------- i 017 3.13 30 j 83 , '23.18 1 011. 313 . 31 I' 84 23.18 1 017 313 .32 1 85' 23.08' I O17 314 1 4. 1 86 23..08 .I. 017 314 1 1.1 87 2.3'. 08 1 617 314 3 0 1 '80 231..08 I 017 314 4 8 1, OT 23..08' ,) 017 314 5 5 1 90 23.'08 1 017 3.14 6 3 1 91, 23 48 1 017 314 7 l 1 91 23'. Do I O17 31:4 8 9 93 23-.08, 1 017 314 9 7, 1 94 23, 08' 1 017 314 10 5 1 45; 23.08, 1. 017 314 11 3 1 96 23.08. 1 017 314 12. 1 1 97 23:00. 1 017 3.14 13 9 1 98 23.68 1 DO 314 14 1 1 99. 23.08 1 017' 314- 16 2- 1 100 13.;08 1 60314-17 0I 101 23.08'I '417,314 18 8 1 102 23,08 I 017 314 9 6 1 -103 23.-.08'1 017 314 20 4 1 164. 23..08 1 017 314,7 21 2 1 105 13.08 1 017 31'4. 22 0 1 106 23.08 1 .017 314 23 8. 1. 107 23;.08 1 017314 14 4 1 1,09 23.08 1 017 314 25 1 1 109 ;D,,..08 1 017.314 '26° 1 1 .110 23,18 1 . 0.17 314. 27 9 1 Ill �23.08 1 017 31'4` 28, 7 1 112 23:08 1; 017 314, 19 5 1, 113 23,08 1' 017 320 1, -1 1 114 23.,08 'I 017 ,310 .2 9 1 -115. 23.08 .1 017 320 3' 7 1 116 21.08 1 . 017 320 4 5 1 117 23. 08 1'. 017 320 5 2 1 118 23,.08 1 01-7 320 6 . 0. 1 1'19 23:'08 I 017 '320 . 7 °1 1 120 211.09 1 �017 320 8 • '6 1 121 . 23,, 08 1 017 3'20 9- 4.1 122 23.,08 I 017 330 10 2 1 123 23 AS: I 0 C-I.TTY .OF° PETALUMA , 1972: ACT LANDSCAPE -ASSESSMENT D,ISTRIC_T LIST OF PARCELS TO BEyASSESSED IN FY DISTRICT NAME CASA DEL ORD "YEAR 1990-91 ------------------ TYPE 200 PARCEL NUMBER I I MAP PAGE 'PAR CKI ASMNT TOTAL I, XXX XXX 'X-X X I NO. ASSESSMENT 1 ----=----------1-------------=----1 O17 320 11 0 I 124 23.08 '017 ,320' 12 8 1 125 23.08 1 017 320 13 6 1 126 23.08 .1 017 320 14 4 1 .127 23.'08 1 017 320 15 1 1 128 23,08,1 017 320 16 9 1 129 23.08 1 017 320 17 7 1 130 231.08 1 017 320 18 5 1 131 23,_08,1 017 320 19 3 ;1 132 23.08 1 011 320' 20 1" 1 133 23.08 1 017 320 21. 9 I 134 23.08 1 017 320 12 7 1 135 23.08 -1 017'320 23'. 5 1 136 23.08 I 617 320 24, 3 1 137 23.08 1 017 320, 25 0 1 138 23.08 1 017 320 26 8 1 139 23.08 1 . 017 320 27' 6 (. 140 23.08. 1 017 320 28 4 1 '141 23.08 1 017 320 19 2 1 .142 23.08 1 017 320. 30 0° 1 143 231.08 1 017 320 31 8 1 144 23.08 1 017 3,20 32. 6 1 145 .23;08 1 017 320 33 4 1 146 23,08 1 ,017 320 34 . 1 .) .IV 23..08 1 017 320. 35' 9 1 148 23...08 017 320 36; 7 1 149 13,,08 1 017. 320 38 3.1 150 Z3,08 1 O17 320 39 1 I' 151 23.08 1 COUNT 151 1 3,4'85,08 CASA DEL. ORO SUBDIVISION - UNIT No..5 6c. IGAujv*1.1903 et. -ITS p9S. ZF.29 r4.*' RATE AREA 025 .3-033 JrA 033 -, :.$a AW Wm J--025 8 42 8 25, t 24 4' 25 is a 27 I 20 29 't 30-% •51 1 5? 2 55 a J11 3 55, g 56 2 'tim sam. --U.RL— -ALIL—. v CA -iLE RAN,CHEHO -1 IS/9 O O O O.' O O O �.x O O O/ OO 3 .O_ , O14 8 /5' 1 12. /1 8 10 X = 7 5 4 16 -to Irl V 16 27 20 n 30 if 32 Cc if J0 I 19 ze j? 2-4 L -14 NOM T HIS'MAPNAS PREPARED FOR AS< SE!iSMBT.PURPOSESWNLY. NO LA ILJTY S A'Si-UMEO FOR THE, ACCURACV'OF THE 0A.T-.,k OEUMEATED HEREON. .4ssivssor's moipb* 17RV--f2 S0170Ma-,'C0a1i Calik Y, P"Oto — 17-32 0 Mevsod II r 22 - 83 :39 .' - - � ael..•4..� M1e....a.i.Llda.1 I,LI,I II L: IV. W! a141Wui• m. ,mmnn uz a= u,w .+s.., a . nn n u i nm i iu . .. ".,.- _ ' - CASA' DEL ORO SUBD/V/S/ON - uNI r No.'s 3,4 E 6 rax RATE- 4REA /7 _ 3/ C NIf No. 3- Ree. 25 :une,19d5 Bi.373 P9s. 10, $1, 3 — 025 u 7Uf �No. 4-Re[. !6JuIf,1985 BY. 373 Pqs. 4�,46 04ir,No. 6- Rea 16Aujas1,19d5 Sit. 375 Pas. 19, So • ., - ,, • • f= -' " No 4 No.6 1" r C1I - J - 9 •a =•, 27 �' IB i 29a 3 !/ ?9 25 !O q 3 !?- `3/ �, 37 I , 1B U 26 I 27 a �9 i29 ; 30 sl �/ ;I JA.�: 29 ! Y 2, IZ6 I'3 �� 24 72 Z2 �' �../O •.i' i7 ! !6 3J l� lJ 9 9 I /O // ---- — 2Z /9 16 14 132 No'3 :lvs !O Q : I 17 !Z `!J `, 34 !3 J6, 31 I !B I !9 �g IO, �41 / ♦ No g l s 3 �/ ;7• '. O i r� 10 �`r / /-'11 • " No C5 W— /4 /3• „l2 I V//" i ../O'• i "9�i , f O (� Cal /O l �\ 106 2B ?7 ?5 i ♦ I t3 t . 1/ a 10 I /9 - 'APASc � ^ � '.' ", I •a: •. ,• ., •a c •" r. ,a �ci � _1 i . •> ;!I .. e •. a I .c . I •.,. , i a`E5 c y, - `2c ; /• 2 ! I. ♦ 3 •6' 4s l .: �' g 9 g '/0 i /1 I ' 07 Assessor's Map qIr 17Pg. 3/ ' SOnOMIG County, CO1if. i — s ENGINEER'S, REPORT CASH DEL O!RO ANNEXATION NO. 1, JOSETTE.COURT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: DISTRICT "CITY OF"PETALUMA- Prepared by: Thomas,H'agis,_City Engineer LANDSCAPE AS'SESSMENTDISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA DEL ORO ANN,EXATION NO. 1, JOSETTECQURT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING� ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully &uhnifts the enclosed report as directed by the City Council., Dated: 1990 Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY, CERTIFY that..tht ene16'sed Engih!eer`&.Report, together -with Assessment An - d Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed, with me on the day of 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of, Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By THEREBY CERTIFY that the' enc-lose.d,E'n'�g.i-nlee,r's- Report, together with -d Assessment Diagram there10 attached, was approved And Assessment -an approved confirmed by the City Council of -the: -City of Petaluma California, on the day of 11990.. Patfitia-E. Bernard City Clerk City of. Petal - urna County of Sonoma, CA By LHEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed E'ngi.n'eer's Wceport,. together with Assessment and -Assessment ' m. -essmnt Di'agrathereto attached, was filed with the County Auditci'r of the County of Sonoma'on the clay."W 1990. Patricia * �ia E. Bernard City Clerk City of'Peta-luma Co'Unty of Sonoma, CA By I M_� LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENG1N'EE'R''.S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA DEL GRO ANNEXATION N.O..1,,J`OSETTIE COURT LA.NI),SCAPE' AS:SES'S:'MENT DISTRICT" LANI)SCA'P-IN,G AN-D' LI_G;HTIN:G ACT OF 1'9 1 Thomas 'Har.gis, City,Engineer and Engineer of Work for Casa Del Ofo Annexation No,.'1, Joset-te Court :Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma Cquri.ty, California., makes this report, as directed by the City Council; Resolution No. N.C.S., pursuant to.Section 22585 'of the Streets and Highways' Code (La'ndscaping and, Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements -which are the subject of this report are briefly described' as follows`: The maintenance of :all the pub,lie°land scaping improvements as pan of Parcel Map,2209 consisting of:plant materials,., trees, gro`nd cover; irr-i'gat-i°on sys,"teams, located in th', ppublic areas shown as Josette. Court ,as Shown on: the Assessment Diagr.am,for-"Casa..Del Oro An_ nekation No. 1,.Josette,Cou.r-t Land`scape Assessment 'Disirict i ° 'LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT CAS'A'DEL ORO ANNEXATION NO. 1-, JOSETTE COURT CITY OF PETALUMA EXHIB'ITA PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THOUG,'H' BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD I Z 60 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT, CASA DEL ORO ANNEXATION NO. 1, JOSETTE COURT EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRfCT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO,BE 5',600 SQUARE FEET MAINTAINED TYPE OF -LANDSCAPING TO 13 TREES; 20 SHRUBS BE -MAINTAINED MANUAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE COSTS MAINTENANCE SERVICES $720 SUPPLIES. 100' U.TILITIES•.(ELECTRIC AND WATER,) 50 IMPROUEMENTS/REPAIRS ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS g810 INCIDENTAL AND 'FORMATION COSTS . xc====a.csssz=zassaasxxzszsaxsaazasaza COUNTY COLLECTION FEE•(.151) $21 CITY;ADMINISTRATION (15,X) -131 :BOND COUNSEL (FORMAT.ION)' 0 ENGINEER OF PORK (.FORMATION) 0 ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS g•133 , TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS'FOR MAINTENANCE 'IN FY 1990-91 g.1,043. ADJUSTMENTS ------------------------ 'PRIOR YEAR (,SURPLUS) OR:OEFICIT (.01;142) DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION $0 RESERVE FOR DELQ, CASH FLOB,.,REPAIRS $700 REBATE OF EXCESS ASSESSMENTS. TO PROPERTY OWNERS 300 AMOUNT.NEEDED TO -BE, ASSESSED IN FY''1990-91 $761 =z=z====Zamazs =x====rz==a=azzz=s==az=, _ aas==x=a==== . NUMBER,DF PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED 4 'ESTIMATED TOTAL. Ft �1990-91 COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED s190.:15 =z=zz===xz=a ESTIMATED AMOUNT'TO REBATE IN FY 90-91 g15.00.27. LANDSCA-PE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEE'R'S REPORT CA -SA DEL OR'O ANN,EXATI.ON NO. 1, .IOSETTE COURT FY 1,9.90-_91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSM NTS The estimate of the total maintenance costs per year were estimated and incidental administrative expenses, added to yield a total annual costa This, cost was them prorated equally .to: the 4 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. e LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DI -STRICT CASA DEL ORO ANN.EXATUON .NO 1,; JOSETTE COURT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA (1972.ACI') ASSESSME-NT ROLL: 1912.ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENTDI STRICT LIST 0 PARCELS TO'BE ASSESSED IN FY DISTRICT NAME JOSETTE COURT (CASA k YEAR 1990-91 TYPE 210 PARCEL NUMBER I MAP PAGE PAR CK I ASMNT TOTAL I XXX• xu xx X I NO. ASSESSMENT I ---------------=1--.-----------------1 019 202 23 .3 1 l 190.25 1 019 202 24, 1' 1 1 190.25 1. 019 202 25 8 I 3 190..25 1 019 202.. 16 6.1 4 190.15 1 1 1 . ----------------I------==--=-__----I COUNT 4 761.00 1. " \PIF) 1(Nlf',e'r ,e•.,e re•1 let„ {O, f1 TO () _ ___ __ lose Il ttt 'o,"o,— . so Fs L ' \ i \ a y • 20.000 S.F 20,002 S.F. 20,610 S.F. / 45,494 S:F. 1.04 AC. so oo' L. isv-��eJ�. to' xt- _LIA S\ SLlnoc �.x° ^ a.l.:if' ne• �. to ,e b +°oo .t.ao ,ro�fta slr.w atiw • 8 A A•gOp�e'.1-04 o,a.3}' o rel•oifa-[ - 'ttl.7e - a I - lp � e • n• ta'. n' �\ - --—Mero:fYt maz• -- .-'It.,• fro.,f ,0 W.41 - -" --� 1 PbLLARO' 80 - 006212 'O.R. • e - a PG E suwr„�oaa ..c.oc s left .o �a1 \ u.c ' I .` At Cl % Y of PAReEL �.t r LA TARRY B 'MARIE JONAS At DOCUMENT NUMI e , LYING VITNIN SECTION 4, TOMNSNIP NORTN 845E ANO MERIDIAN. - 4_ MIS SITE -VTY OF PETALUMA COUNTY b y : ee�nr•t r'A�G S„3 ENGINEER'S REPORT RT CASA DELORO ANNEXATION NO, 3; SYCAMORE -HEIGHTS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA. Prepared by: .gis-, E Thomas,Har 'City ng-m-eer Submitted: June 18,,4990 LANDSCAPE DSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA DEL OROANNEXATION NO. 3, SYCAMORE HEIGHTS . LANDSCAPING ANDLIGHTWG ACT 1972 The undersigned re'spectfully,submits the enclosed report as dire.cted,by the City Council. Dated: 4990 Thomas Hargis City En ineer City of. Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the,enclose.d Engipeef's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached; was filed with me on the day,of, 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma uma' County of Sonoma, CA Bv .1 HEREBY CERTIFY t - ha.t the- enclosed 'En'gineer's Report, together with Assessment and As§essm . ent Diagram thereto attacilled',,was approved and confirmed by the City, Council of --the City of Petaluma California, on the day of 1 1906. Patri.cia'E. Bernard City., Clerk' City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY' CERTIFY .that the enclosed Engineer's Report, tokethe ' r with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with :the County Auditor -of the County of Sonoma on the . day-, of 1990. Patricia E: Bernard City Clerk City -of Petaluma Co,unty of Sonoma, CA LIM �M� LANDSCA,PE-ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S, REPORT 'ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA DE'LO ORO ANN;EXATI.OIV NO.,,3, �SYCAMOR.E HEIGHTS LANDSCAPE ASSESS'ME-NT:DISTRICT' LANDSCAPING AN.D LIGHTING ACT,OF 1972 Thomas:Hargis, City.Engineef-and Engineer of. Work:for,Casa Del Oro Annexation ,No. I, Sycamore Heights Landscape Assessment District,, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California; makes this report, as directed by..the City Council, Resolution.Nvo.. N,:C:S.,.pursuant to.S:ecti�on2258'S!of the Streets and, Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act.of 1972)}. The improvements which are the subject of thi's report are 'briefly described as follows:. The: maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as.p,art of "Sycamore Heights Subdivisio.n,, consisfir g;of plant �materrals, trees, ground cove's, irrigation. .,systems,, and street lights locate.d.in the public areas shown as "White Oak.Circle . and.W:hite Oak Way"' as shown on the Assessment Diagram fo.r "Casa'De.l-O,r.o Annexatiori No. 3, Sycamore Heights Landscape Assessment. District"'. LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT ,,'LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CASA DL°ORO ANNEXATION, NO'. 3, SYCAMORE HEIGHTS CITY OF.TETALUMA, EXHIBIT A . PLANS -AND SPECIFICATIONS, T.HOUG:HBOUND SEPARATELY, ARE . FI:L.ED AS.A PART OF THIS RECORD 3`l LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT E'NGINEEWSREPORT CASAPEL ORO ANNEXATIO1v -N-0. 3,'SYCAMOR;E_HEIGNTS EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE 2,506 SQUARE FEET IN MAINTAINED THREE I-SLAND MEWANS TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO 5 LARGE TREES; PERENNIAL BE MAINTAINED, PLANTS; BARK. GROUND COVER; AUTOMATIC DRIP 'IRRIGATION;. ------------------------------------ 22,SPECIAL STREET LIGHTS ------------- -MAINTENANCE COSTS MAINTENAH,CE.SERVICES 0,.0 SUPPLIES 100 UTILITIES (ELECTRICAND WATER) I QOO IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS 0 ESTIMATED MA'INT'ENA*NCE'COSTS $1,700 INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS . ===2zzzz=z==z ---------- COUNTY �OLLECTIOH FEE (.25%) $4 CITY ADMINISTRATION (15%) 255, -BOND COUNSEL,,(FORMATIOM)' 0 ENGINEERAF WORK ('FORMATION) 0 ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS ---------- $-259, TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTSfOR MAINTENANCE IN FY. 1990`91 ; -.$1,959 ------- ------------ ---------------------------- ADJUSTMENTS - --------- ------ --------- — PRIOR YEAR (SUQLUS)tR DEFICIT ($4,03fl DUELki CONTRIBUTION 'FOR_ FORMATION jo RESERVE FOR DELA,' CASH FLOW, REPAIRS $3,000 REBATE,OF EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY' OWNERS. 900 AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE ASSESSED IN FY 1910-91 1, 823, . Z=Zlz_=.Zzzzz=z_===== =z NUMBER OF PARCELS 10-BE ASSESSED 45 ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 1990-91 COSTS PER PARCEL. TO BE, ASSESSED ESTIMATED AMOUNT TOIEBATE :IH.FY 90791 as a a = z 2 aaa a 2 z z a c a i z i i 2 a a Z X:i= _6 a li 2 z 2 c z zz $20.00 a z azaa zz z z a Z. ZZ z Z; U LANDSCAPE, ASSESSMEENT DISTRICT,, ENGINEER'S REPORT CASA-DEL ORO ANNEXATION NO.3, SYCAMORE HEIGHTS FY 1990-91 BASIS OF ALLLOCATION ASSESSMENTS _ The estimate of the total maintenance costs per year were esktimated and incidental administrative_ expenses added to ,yield a, total annual cost. This cost was then prorated equally .to "th:e 45 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. 0 3 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENG`IN:EE'R'S' REPORT LANDS;CAPIN:G AND L'IGTI`NG DDISTRICT'CASA DEL ORO ANNEXAT.I:ON,N"0H.,3', SYCAM'ORE HEIGHT& AS'$ESS;MENT 'DI°STRICT CITY O`F:PETAL:UMA (1911ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL: MAP PAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL XXX XXX H X NO. ASSESSMENT =1 ------------ --------------- ------ 066 .620 -1 7.1 1 40.51 006 6,20 . 2 5 1 2 '40.51 A06 610, 3 3 1 3 40.51 066 620 4 1 1 4 40.51 006 620 '5 .8 1 5 4 0. 51, 006 .620 *6 -6 1 6 40.51 006 620 1 4 1 7 " 40.51 0,06 620. 8 2 ;I 8. 40.51 006 620 9 0 :1 9 40:51 O,06 620, l'0' 0 1 10 40.51 006` 620 11 6 1 11 40.51 006 620 11 4 1 12 40,.51. „ 006 620 f3 2 1 13 40.51 066 610 ,14 0 1 14 40.51 006 620. ','15 7 1 15 40:51 006 620 16 5 1 16 40,51 06 620 17.11 17 40:51 - -006 610 18 "I I - 18 40'.51 °1006. 6,20 19 9 1 1.9 40.51 006 620 20 7 1 120: 40.5.1 006, 620 11 5 '1 21 40.51 '006 620 22 3 1 27 40.51 "006 620 13 1 1 '23 40.51 00& 620 14 9 1 • 24 40..5,1 W. `620 .25 6 :I 15 40.51 906 '6.20 ,26. 4 1 2'6 40.51. '6 006 .2'0 Y , 1 1 27 40,:.51 006 620 18 O.1 28 40.51 " 006- ;620" `29 8'•'1 19 40.51 606 620 30 6 1 30 .40.51 „ 006 620. 31" 4, 1 31 ' 40.51 .006 620 32 1 1 32 40.51 0106 6,20 33 0 1 33 40.51 06 620 34 .8 1 34 40.51' 006 610 35 °5,' 1 .3.5 40.5,1,. 006 610 ,36 3 1 36 46,51 006 626 37 1' 1 37 40.51 0'06- .620 38, 9. 1 , .38 40.•,51 606 620 39 7 1 39 40..51 . '006 620 40 °5 '1 40 .40, 51 ' 606 620 41 3 i 41 40.151 006 620 42 1 I 42; 40.5,1 0,06 620 43 '9 I 43 40.51 006 620 44 7 1 44 40.51 0,06; 620 45 4. ,1 45 I 40..51 --------------------------------- COUNT 45 „ 0.00 SYCAMORE HEIGHTS TAX RATE AREA 6 e 62 REC. 9 (AC'MOER, /987 /IV MAP BA:' 404, PGS 22-26 3 - 049 REVISED r _ /7 •O, qJ0 / 19 � /9 4, P� .e, 1319 a /w Y SOLE I' . 100' ;, N® 20 .� 36 .@ _\ 6r w� o 'I -o 37 �)21 w. I 35.3, <B4 B �� v 10 to 'N o- 34�so' ,y @ 39 o t 4 y�rE 041( WAa �� © V.44_ P i• - . N- B- - $ 1ltrjt t 24 4�: �" s 4oar"'...J4t . aL4t'roe6r 2 1 a« 7 y` 1 1 1 dv rti' .4, 25 ` .rats t Bs•/0'6B'v. . ;Q .� rx64 \ ' I s't 649 �'ii• - - a•t! o . 9D.// "O t ,aw" -! \ .. Yv' 10.n gyp'a6 t ra 32 Q 4� 41 Y_ 6 6 p O6 1 1 I r•v art � 26,it n I � � N6t's' t '. .r a:o 1 W 1 1 •v a"of I' Nof�i/-v ` 31 u 4 `. " ��A SO. r >r"fit b aert * I. 'v 740 ` 1' n- �' 3/' t , tar- �. as.4t iw •e a.fa \ y; dNj,'+'a 4 w ; I -Q• I I '.. v-" v : s 2843 1 B. N Y } w �. •v D. N 4 1s •. 29 u '�60 Ilse Ji�•'�'4b' t cas •r t-40 ' t ® • ° ®`� b, +uo. 3 2 I I I 4? a 40 O 0- - O air " 'v B. fr ►,ram 'orpr o. n:ry 2 2 I I I O' I . •b6"Oy ' � I Jam. I • L q Jj. r 4.Oz.O 3.30 I ! t. fs NOTE: THIS,N!AF WAS PREPARED FOR AS- /4 .S}>�.!; .3 - ° I I I SESSILEPURPOSES ONLY LI461LITY 'Q�J�R L IS ASSJA!ED FORTH: ACCURACY OF THE E ' CA711 :INEATED HEREON. I C'QNE Assessors Mcpl Bk. 6 Pg. 62 Sonoma count Calif ,I ENGINE,ER'S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPE RR.AINTE-NANCE DI,8TRI- CITY OF PETALUMA, LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the 'enc-losed report as directed by the City Council. Dated: , 1990 Thomas Hargis City En,ggineer City of -Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the, -enclosed Enginee.r's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Qi�agram thereto attached, was filed. with me on the day of . , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of'Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA Ia I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City.Couneil.of the City of Petaluma California, on the day of . , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA M- I HEREBY CERTIFY that ,the: enclosed Engineer's. Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was, filed with.the County Auditor. of the County of. Sonoma on the day of , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard - City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA LIM � -71 "10-4 LANDS"CAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. ENOINEEIZ'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE.:MEADOWS LAN,DSCAPE,ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGilTING.,ACT OF 1972 Thomas.Harg-is, City Enggineer and Engineer of MOrk, for Village Meadows Landscape Assessment .Di'strict, City of Petaluma, Son.oma,County, California., makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution No. N.C.S., pursuant to Section 225,85 of'the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping•and Lighting Act'of 1972): The improvements which are the subject of this report,are'briefly described as follows: The:maintenance of all the public land' scapin& improvements in -"Village Meadows Unit, I" Subdivision, consisting of`"plantmat;e.r"ials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways; and fences.locate-d in`thePublic. areas shown as Parcels 'A' and 'B', Clary Way; Acadia Drive, Flanigan Way, Baranof'Drive, Culpepper Drive, and Maria Drive as shown on the Assessment Diag.ram-for "Village Meadows Landscape.Assessment District �f / LANDSCAPE ASS ESSMENT:DISTRICT ENGINEER:'S RE.PO'RT LANDSCAPE 'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT , VILLAGE MEADOWS'. CITY OF,PETAI.UMA EXHIBIT A PLANS'AND S'P.ECIPICATIONS, THO`U'G'I-I" BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE, 'FILED AS A, ;PART OF. THISRECORD LANDSCAPE -ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINE`ER'S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE 161,4 72 SQUARE FEET OF MAINTAINED GREENBELTS ANO'CREEKSIDE 2 B00 SF PLANTERS; PARK TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO 162,.250 SF PARK AREA BE MAINTAINED INCLUDES TREES, LAWN, GROUND COVER, ROCK PATHS, ----------------------------------------------------------------- SHRUBS; IRRIG MAINTENANCE COSTS ------------------------------------- MAINTENANCE SERVICES $5,400 SUPPLIES 300 UTILITIES (ELECTRIC AND WATER) 2,000 IMPROVEMENTS/REPA'IRS 0 ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS $7,760 INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS . ------------------------------------- COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.25%) _ $19 CITY ADMINISTRATION (15t) 1,155 BOND COUNSEL (FORMATION) 0 ENGINEER.OF WORK ,(FORMATION) 0 ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS $1,174 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE , IN FY -199041 $8,074 ---------- --------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENTS --------=------------------------------ PRIOR YEAR (SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT ($9,7631), DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION $0 RESERV.E'FOR DELP,:CASH FLOW, REPAIRS $7,000 REBATE OF EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS 2,290 AMOUNT NEEDED_TO BE ASSESSED „ I4 FY 1090-,911 $8, 391 NUMBER OF RRCELS TO BE ASSESSED 76 ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 199.0-91 COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED - $110,41 ESTIMATED -AMOUNT -TO- REBATE -IN-FY-90.91-------------------$30-40_ LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'.S REPORT VILLAGE MEADOWS FY 1990-91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS The estimate !of the total maintenance costs, per year were e's'iimated and incidental administrative' exp:ens'es added to yield a total annual' cost. This cos't was then, prorated equally to the 76.lots, so that each lot wiPl. share equally idihe annual landscape, maintenance expenses. LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT .E . NGUNEER"S. RIEPORT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT VILLAGE M EAD.- OW-$ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF fttALU MA (1'972 ACT) ASSESSMENT RO,LL:, PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER' MAP PAGE PARICK ASMNT TOTAL MAP, RAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL xxx xxx ---------- xx x NO. ------------------- ASSESSMENT Xxx ---------------- 'xxx X'x x NO. ASSESSMENT 149 400 ' 1 2 j 1 110.41 1.49 .400 42. 6 ------------ 42 110,41 149 '400 -2 0 2 110;41 149 400 4.3 4 4,3 110.41 149 '400 3 8 1 3 110.41 149 40 44 2 j 44 110.41 149 400 4 6 1. 4 110.41 149 400 45" 9 45 110,. 41 149 400 '15 3 1 5 110. 41 149' 400 46 7 46 110.41 149 400 6 1 110.41 149 4100 47 5, 47 110.41 fO 400'. 7- 9'1- 7 110.41 149 4,00 40 3 48 110-41 149 4'00' 8 7 1 110.41 149 400 49 1 49 14 0. 41 149 400 9' 5 9 14 0 t41 14 , 9 400 50 9 50 110.41 149. 400 tO 3 10 110.41 149 400 51 7 51 110.41 1o, 400 ll 1 j 11 1,10.41 149 400 52 5, 1 52 110% 4f 149 400"• 12 9 1�2 110.41 149 400 53 3 1 53 110.41 149 4,00 13 7 113 110.41 149 400 54 .1 1 54 110.41 .149 400 14 5, 14 110.41, 149. 400 55 8 1 55 110.41 149 400 15 '2 15 110.-41* 149• .400 56 6 1 56 110.41 149, 400' 16 .0 16- 110.41 .149 40.0' 57 4 1 57. 110.41 149 400 17 .B 17 110.41 '149 400 58 2 1 58 110.41 149 400 18 6 1e, 110.41 149 400 59 0 1 59 110.41 149 400 19 4 19 110.41 149. 460 60 8 1 60 110.41 149 440 10 2 j 20 110.41. 149 400 61 6 1 61 110.41 149 400 '21. 21 .1.10.41 149 400 62 4 1 62 110.41 149 400 22 8.1 22 1.10-.41 14.9 400. 0 Z 1. 63 110.41 149 400 23 6 1- 23 -11-0.41 149 400 64 0 1 64 110.41 149 400 24 - 4, 1 24 110,41 149 400 65 7 1 65 110.41 149 400 - 25. 4 25 .110.41 149 400 66 5 66 110.41' 149 400 .16..9 26 110.41 149 4,00 67 3 67 110.41 149. 400 27 7 1 27 110.41 149 00 .68 1 68 110.41 A 49 400 28 5 1 28 110.41 149 00 69 9 69 110.41 1 :�49 400 19 -3 1 29 110'. 41 149 :400 7 '0 7 70 110.41 149- 460. 30 1 '1 30 110,.41 1.49 460 71 5 71 110.41 .140 400 31 9- 1 31 110.41 149. 400 72 3 72 110.41 149 400. 32 7 1 32- 110.41 149 400 73 1 73 110.41 400 31 5 1 33 110.41 149 400 74 9 j 7, 4 110.41 1.49 400_ 34 3 1 34 11.0.41 1,49 400 75 6 1 75 -.110.41 149 400 .35 0 1 35 110.41 1-49 400 76 4 1 76 110.41 149 .400 36 8 1 34 110.41 ---------------- ------------ 149 400. 37 6 1 37 110,41 COUNT, 76 8,391.16, 149 400: 38 4 1 38 110.41 1149 400. 31.9 2 1 39 110.41, 149 400'.. 0 1 0 110.41 149 400 41 _8 1 41 110.41 49 09 VIL 1. AGE MEA D 6 WS ON r NO. P. V. D. REC., P rOOLIR, /W9 /,V MAR 81r. .48.9 P" 41 — 44 A `RATE RArE AREA jr - 004 3-Otl 149-40 PT14. PARCEL-O" SCALE VIOO • 7� REihSMN CATE' -IFE ESTATE 3 J •'a O !2 PARCEL 8-72 CO, Ed &ARY WAY. 3-004 $ Vi - C6. i 14 e ZO a 13 z 3 3 3a 43' . ............... ... U/ 30 ct 110 11-8 v 90.3 zz W at 27- iG A is .,00i RLqppoqL- DAME 5is 55 it 54 1. 53 1, 52 1. $1 1. So' j 44 1 140 iB 4-7 it 4s Assessorl's Mop SPA '449 Pg. 40 PLOT Submitted: June 18, 1990 ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE EAST NO. 3 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE.DISTRICT. CITY OF PETALUMA Prepared by: Thomas Hargis, City'Eng.ineer I �f % LANDSCAPEASSESSMIENT DISTRICT ENGIN`EER'S REPORT vitLAG;g EAS'T;,N'O. 3 LANDSCAPING AND ,LIG.HTING ACT' 1972 The unde_ rsigne'd resp.ectful'ly submits the enclosed report as _directed. by the City Counc'il.. „ Dated: ; .1990 Thomas Hargis, City EnginIee:r City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the.,enclose:d Engineer's Report, to,geihe with .Assessme:n:t and Assessment Diagram —thereto at,taehe:d, was filed with, me on the day of , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk `Cify of Petaluma. County of Sonoma, ;CA - By I HER CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report; together with. Assessment and -Assessment Diagram, thereto attached; was approved and: confirmed by the City Council of the City of Petalwma.Cal.ifornia, or! he day of , 199.0. T Patr".icia E. Bernard City° Clerk City.of.Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engine:er'.s Report, together with Assessment and�Assessme:nt Diagram ther.e,to attached', was filed with ,the .County Auditorof; the County of Sonoma on the day of , 1990.. Patricia E. Bernard, City Clerk City of Petaluma Co.0 y. of: Sonoma, CA By nil LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 'ENGINEER'S'RE'PORT ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE EAST -NO. 3 LANDSCAPE.ASS'ESSMEN.T DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACI'.OF 1972 Thomas Hargis,, City Engineer and Engineer of Work for Village.east No. 3" Landscape Assessment District; City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as, directed by the City Council, Resolution No. N.C.S., pursuant to Section 22585 of`the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows: The. maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of "Village East No: 3" Subdivision, consisting of plant materials; trees,. ground cover,. irrigation systems, pathways, and -fences located in the public'areas shown as "Garfield Drive., Jaeger�Lane, Marabou Court, She- ldra a Lane, Starling;Court, . Vireo Court, and Wren L"ane" as shown on the appended Assessment Diagram for "Village East No.'3 Landscape Assessment District". T LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER"S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D'IST_R'ICT VILLAGE EAST NO.3 CITY OF PETAL tjMA EXHIBIT A PLANS AN D;SPE�CIFICATIONS,THOUGH .BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD. LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE EAST NO.3 EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE 4,000 SOUAR.E FEET OF TURF - MAINTAINED 140-15 GAL. STREET TREES TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO 900 SF ISLAND MEDIANS BE MAINTAINED 17-151GAL.-TREES 90-5 GAL.. SHRUBS 12-FLATS GROUND COVER ---------------------------------------------------------------- MAINTENANCE COSTS xxsassssssaxaxaaxxssasssa:ssaasaaassa MAINTENANCE SERVICES SUPPLIES UTILITIES (ELECTRIC AND HATER) IMPROVEMENTS/,REPAIRS ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS INCIDENTAL AND'FORMATION COSTS a aaaaa:aaaasaaaaaasaaassasaasiaaasaxx COUNTY COLLECTION.FEE (.25%) CITY ADMINISTRATION (15%) BOND COUNSEL ,(FORMATION) ENGINEER OF WORK (FORMATION) ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS TOTAL ESTIMATEO'COSTS FOR. MAINTENANCE 'IN Ft 1990-91 --------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENTS --------------------------------- PRIOR YEAR,(SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION RESERVE FOR DELO, CASH`FLOV, REPAIRS REBATE OF EXCESS`.ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS AMOUNT'NEEDED TO BE`ASSESSED IN FY 1990-9I iIIai3aaa23IIIIaII3ii3333iaIIiaaIIxaaCa3aaaa3 NUMBER OF PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 1990-91 COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED eaaisaaaaasss: aa saassasisasssaaasiasisa ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO REBATE IN'FY 90-91 $960 100 300 0 $1,360 $3 204 0 0 $107 $1,567 (18,454) $0. $700 7,810 $1,623 -39-a-i3---- 71 $12,86 a saasaaissas $110.00 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT VILLAGE EAST' NO. 3 FY 1990=91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS The estimate of the total; maintenance costs per year were estimated, and incidental,adnii,nist,rative expenses added to yield a total annual.cost. This cost was thenprorated equally to. t-he 7') lots;.s`o that each lot will share equally in the nd annual:lascape maintenance expenses: 4 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING -DISTRICT VILLAGE EAST NO. I AIM'SSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA (i#72: ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL-' YEAR - 194-91 TYPE 214 .:PARCEL NUMBER MAP PAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL I xxx xxx xx x NO, ASSESSMENT ---------------- 017 360 04 11- --------- 1 72.961 0.17 36,0 05 8 1 2 2246 1. Q17 360 06 6 1 3 22.861 017. 360 07 4 1 4 22,86 1 017 360 08, 2 1 5 2Z.86 1 017 360 09 0 1 017 360, 10 8 1 7 22'.86 1 017' 360 11 6 1 1 27.86 I 017,360 12 4 1 9 22.86"1 60 40- 1 1 3, 2 1. 10 22:36 1 017 360: 14 0 1 11 22.86 1 011360! 15 7 1 12 22.86 1 017 360 16 5 1 13 22.86.1 617.360 17, 3 1 14 22.86 1 017 360 .18 1 1 15 22 i 86, 1 01,7.360 19 9 1 16 2136 1 017 20 7 1 17, o 22.86 1 .360 017 360 21 5 1 18 22.86 1 017360 12. 3 1 -19 22-86 1 017 360 23 .1 1 20 22.86 1- 017 360 24 9 1 21 Z2:06 .1 617`360 25 -.6 1 22 22.86 017 360 26 4 1 .23 2236 017360 .'27 2 1 24 22-...86 017 360 28 0 1 25 22.86 617 '360' 29 8 1 26 22.86 017 360 30 6 1 27 22.86 017 360 '31 4 1 28 -'22.86 f 017 3 60, 32 2 1 29 221. 86, 1 017' 360 33 0-1 30 22.86 1 017 360 34 8 1 31 22.86 1 017 366 35 5 1 32 22.86 1 017 360 36 3 1 33 22-.86 1 017 360 37 1 1 34 22.86 1, 017 360 38 9 1 35 22.86 1 017 360 39 7 1- 36 -22,86 1 017 360 40 5 1 37 22.86 1 017 360 41 3 1 38 22,86 1 017 360 42 1 1 39 27.86 017 360 43 9 1 46 22-36 1, 017 360 44 7 1 41 2246, 1. CITY OF PETALUMA' 1972 ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST_ OF PARCELS ,TO 'BE ,ASSESSED IN 'FY DISTRICT NAME ,VILLAGE EAST NO. 3 YEAR 199.0-91 TYPE '214. PARCEL NUMBER . 1. MAP PAGE PAR• CK. ASMNT TOTAL, 1 XXX XXX XX X.' N0: ASSESSMENT ---=------.------ 017 -360 45 I' 4 1, ------------ 42' ------ 21.86 I 017 360 46 2 1 43 22:86 I 017.36'0 47 0 1 44 22.86 1 ' 617 366 48 8 1' 45 22,: 86 1 017 360 49 6 1 46 22.86 1 017 ,360 56 4 1 47 22.86 „1 017 360 51 1 j 48 1.7.06 1 017.360 51 . 0 1 49 22.86 1 017 360 53 8 1 M. 21.86 1 01^7 360 .54 6 j 51 22'.86 1 017' 360, 55 3 1 52 . 12,.,86-1 017 360 56. 1 1 53 22.86 1 ' 917 360, 57 9 1 54 22.,86 1 017.360. 58, 7 1 55 11,.86:1 .017 360 59 5 1 56 12.86.1 . 017 340 60 3 1 57 12 3' `.. I 011 '366 61. 1 -1 58, ZN6 '1 017 �360 .62 9 1;. 59 22:86 017.360 63 7 1 60 22.86 1. 017 360 '•64 5 1 61 22.86 1 l '017 360 65 1 1 42 -22.86 1 017 360 66 0 1 63 22.86 1 017 360. '67 8 1 64 22.86' .1 017.360 68 6 'j .65 21..86 j •017""360 69 4 1 ' 66 22.86 1 017 360, 70. 1 j 67 21.86 1 017 360 71 0 1 68 22.,86 1 017 360 71 8' j 69 2236 j 017 360 73 6 1 70, 21.86 1 017 360 14 4 I 71 21.86 1 COUNT 71 1,623;06 1 VIL L AGE EAST SUBDIVISIONNo. 3 ROC. 275eptam0er,1999 8k. 424 Pgs. 2e tnr° 29 NOTE: THIS,MAP WAS PREPARED FOR AS- SESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY.'NO UAkiTY - 6 ASSUMED FOR 7HE,ACCURACY OF T4E DATA CELINEA1E0 HEPEGN. TAX RATE AREA /7 - 36 J - 0// 4/ , 47 47 st 40 _ sr J +•39 ti I a.,49 av 'Ale 4S :. 37 sa 37 a3O OR/V1i 1 53 's3 i r _63 1 64 i 63 ! cz :i Go i,51 62 6/ i 5.4 s4 60 - I' S9 s-a 53 7 • . ., ' ' �.' 5q ZtF Assessor's Mop Bk. /7 P9. 36 Sonoma County, Calif — PHOTO ENGINEER'S REPORT SPRING MEADOWS UNIT 5 LANDSCAPE, MAINTE'NA_NCE .DIST.R.ICT CITY O:F'PETALUMA Prepared by: Thomas Hargis;'City Engineer Submitted: June 18, 1,99.0 J, "LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT SPRINGA-EADOWS UNIT 5 AN D ND- LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. Dated: 1990 Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of'Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engi:rreer`s° Report, together. with Assessment and Assessment: Dia:gram'ther.et-o attach-ed-, was filed with me on the, day of - 9,1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of., Sonoma, CA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and conf itmed by the City Council: of the City of Petaluma California, on the day of 91990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk. , Ci-ty,of, Petaluma County,of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that:,the. enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment,and Assessm ' ent'Diagram. thereto attached, was filed with the .County Aluditor-of the. County of Sonoma on the day of:, 1990.- Patricia E'. Bernard' City Clerk. City of -Petaluma County of *Sonoma, CA 0 M, LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. ENGIN'EER'S REPORT ENGINEER,'S REPORT SPRING •MEADOWS .U;NIT'5 LANDSCAPE ASSE:S;S_MEN:T�DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AN_ `D LIGHITING ACT OP 1972 Thomas Hargis., City Enggineer an•d' Engi.nee,r of-Work_for Spring Meadows Unit 5 Landscape Assess rnent'District,,'City of P.etatuma., Sonoma'County, California, makes this r,eport,.as directed by the City Council, Resolution No. N:C.S., �pursuaa to, Section 225`85 .oUthe Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act. of 1972). The improvements w�hich. are the subject of this report are briefly described as, follows: The maintenance, of all the public- landscaping improvements as part of "Spring Meadows Unit 5" S'.ubdivision, consisting of plapt "materials, treeFs, ground cover, irrigation, sy,ste:m&, ,pathways; and fences located in the puhli.c areas shown as "Park Site, Garfield Drive-,. Appaloosa Court; Caulfield Lane,, Weatherby Way; Kiwi, Court and Persimmon Court", as tshown,on the appended Assessment Diagram for . Spring Meadows :Unit-5 Landscape Assessment District . ,LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEEWS REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SPRING. MEADOWS UNIT 5 CITY OF PETAL,UMA EXHIBIT A PLANS AND, SPECIFICATIONS, THOUGH ROUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THI'S RECORD LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ' EN•GINE'EWS�'REPORT ' SPRING MEADOWS UNIT 5 EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND. AREA ID BE •1,3.00 SQUARE FEET IN 9 MAINTAINED. ISLAND• MEDIANS TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO 1,OOQ SF TURF BE MAINTAINED " 3001F BARK GROUND.000ER 27 TREES; DRIP AND SPRAY IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE COSTS sxmxxsxxsssxsszaxssszazssszaassssssxa MAINTENANCE SERVICES .. $3;024 SUPPLIES 1'0,0 UTILITIES .(ELECTRIC'AND YATff) 200: IMPROUEMENTS/REPAIRS 0 ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS $3,324 INCIDENTAL.ANO FORMATION'COSTS 'nssssanmsasssssssssxsxxasesamasssxsas ' .. - COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.25k) $8 CITY ADMINISTRATION (15%).- 490 BOND. COUNSEL (FORMATION)' 0 ENGINEER OF"WORK (FORMATION)'' 0 ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS $507 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTSJOR MAINTENANCE IN FY: T990-91 $3,831 ADJUSTMENTS PRIOR. YEAR' (,SURPLUS) '.OR DEFICIT $1,335 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION $0. RESERVE FOR.DELQ, CASH FLOU,'REPAIRS $0 REBATE OF.EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OUNERS 0 AMOUNT NEEDED TO'BE ASSESSED IN FY 19,90-9I $5 166 sxaaazssszsaxasssssssxsxaaxazxsxxssxsss: axxrzzpsasa . HUMBER,OF PARCELS'TO'BE ASSESSED " 78 ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 19904I COSTS'PER•PARCEL TO'"BE.ASSESSED $66.23 " • axaaosaaaassx:aazaasaaaxaaznzsaaseaazaa sxasxazsamzs ESTIMATED' AMOUNT TO REBATE IN_FY 0-91 $0.00 'LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT . ENGINEER'S REPORT . SPRING MEADOWS UNIT 5 FY 1990-91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS The estimate of the total mai_nte.nance costs per year were estimated and incidental administ�rativ.e.expenses added to yield a total annual cost. This cost was then prorated equally to the 78 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. N m LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPING AND LI:GH,,TING DISTRICT SPRING MEADOWS UNIT.5 AS513$9, ME N.T--'DI STRICT CITY 0]F--P8TAi-U-MA(1972,ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL:_ YEAR 1919791 TYPE ---------------------- 209 PARCEL NUMBER.. MAP PAGE'PAR CK ASMNT- TOTAL XXX XXX , Xk X ---------------- NO. ------------- ASSESSMENT 1 36 501 1 -2'1 1. 66.23 1 136 -501 2 0 1- 2 66 .2.3 1 -136 501 3 8.1 3 66,.23,1 116 501'.'4 6 1 4 66.23 1 136- ' Y 501 3 J 5 66.,213 1 1 -36 541 .6 1 1 6 66.23 1 136 501 7 9 1, 7 66.23 1 .134 501 41" 7 1 8 66.211 501 9 5 1 .-136 136 50.110 3 1 10 U. 23 1 136 50.1 11 1 j, 11 66.23 1! 136' '501-12 9 1 12 66.121 f 136 501 13 7 1 13 66;23 1'. 136 , 501 14 5.1 14 66.23 1 - 136 501 15 2 1 15 66-23 1 156 5.01 16 0 1 1,6 66.23 f :136 .501 17 B 1 17 66,23 1 136 502 J .0 1 18 66.23 1 136 507 -2 8 1 19 66.23 1 136 502; 3 6 .1' 20 66,23 '1 136. 5,02 4.4 1 21 66.23 .1 1'36 W - 5 1 .1 22 66.23 1 134' 562 7 7 1 23' 66.23 1 134 502 8 5-1 24 66.23 1 U6I 502 1. 3 1 25 66.23 1 06: 502 10 1 1 26 66.23 -1 IN 502 11 0 j 2Z 66,23 1 136 502 12 7 28 '66.23 1 136 502.13 5 1 29 66*.23 -1 .136 .502 14 3 1 30 66.23 1 1'36 502 01 1 31 66.23 1 115 136. 502 16 .8 1 32 66.23 1 136 502 -17 6, 1 33 66-.23 1 436 501.18 4 1 34 66.23' 1 136 502.19 2 1 35 66,23, 1 136, 502 10 0 1 36 66,21 1 136 .502 ZI 8 1 37 -66.23 1 136 502 '22 6 1 38 66.23 1 136 502.23 4. 1 39 66.23 1 06 502t,24' 2 1 .40 46.23 1 136 502 25 9 1 41 66.23 1 a y f:. CITY OF PETALUMA 1.972 ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST, OF PARCELS TO BE ,ASSESSED 1N FY DISTRICT NAME SPRING MEADOWS 45 YEAR 1990'9,1 ----------------------- TYPE 200 PARCEL NUMBER I MAP- PAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL • 1 . . XXX XXX KX X MD. ASSESSMENT I ----------------j 136 502 16 7 I ----- -.- ------------I 42 - 66.,23 136 502 27 5 1 43 66,13 .� 136 5.02 28 3 1 44 66.23 1 136 ._502 19 ,1 I 45 66.23 136 503 1 8 -1 46 66,-23 I -.136 503 2 6 1 47 - 66.23 136 503 3 4 1 48 66.23 I ' 136 503 4 1 1 49 66.23 1 136 503 5 9 1 5.0 66,23 1 136 503 6 7 1 51 66-.23 1 136 503 1 5 1 51 .66.23 1 136 503 8 3 1 53 66..23 1 136 503' 9 1 1 54 66.23 1 IN 503 10 9 1 55 66;23 1 136 303 11 7 1 56 66.23 1. 136 503 12 5 1 57 W 23 1 136' 503 13. 3 1 58 66,23 1 136 5.03 14, 1 1 59 66.23 1 136 503 15 '8 1 60 66.23 1 136 503 16 6 1 61 66.23 1 136 503 17 4 1 61 66.23 1 .136 503 18 2 1 63 66.23 1 136 503 19 0 ,1 64 66.23 1 136 503 20 8 ) 65 66,13 1 136 503 11 6 1 66 66.23 1 136 503 22 4 1 67 66.23 1 136 503 Z3 2 1 68 66.2-3 1 136 503 14 0 1 69 66.23 1• 136 503 25 7 1 70 66.23 1 T36. 503 26 5 1 71 66'.23 1 136 503 27 3 1 71 66.23 1 136 504 1 4 1 73 66.23 1. 136 504 3 1 1 74 66..23 1" 136 504 4 0 1 75 66.23 .1- 136 504 5 7 1 76 66.23 1 136 504 6 5 1 77 66.713 1 136 504 7 3 1 78 66.23 1 ----------------I COUNT 78 -.---------------- -1 5,165.94 '1 m SPRING mrADows 'UNIT M $ TAX RATE AREA 136-$0 e/C' rr JM r, ner ru e+• Aw• Al. so 3- Off do Jil 21 Ai 64 So af_ /.-fm n -ems sr rn .A/A<[oo,w '._ CeKtf ;Y - �.M+•s,� «ate, I � Y'. � - ; I �� -f - - toIS < - got f �-. � i •� 9.O ',Oro � 6 / ' a O WMT T"ns IWVM wA AS. ^� r tt - KSSmw IOAIOS mu No umum ♦..•—•. ® .O a , '� t i .O IS ASS MIN TOEAWPXT¢' Tip ' o O,i 6 7 1 1 • aas. OMMA ROMM, t;.ulrio v�;, r Y `• i�A , •" Assessa!•J Afw _Bk Of Pf.. 50 SOnamo Cmn/J; Cofff i S—e 7 ENGINEER':;$ REPORT° SHELTER HILLS VILLAGE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA. Prepared by: Thomas Ha-rgis, City Engineer Submitted: June 18, 1990 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER.',S R-EPO.R.T SHELTER. HILLS, VILLAGE LAN'DSCAPI'NG AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned. res;pectfu°lly submits the enclosed, report as d_irectod. by, the City Council: ' Dated: 1990 Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of Petaluma - County of Sonoma,, CA By I HE_RE.B.Y CERTIFY that the e-nclosed; E'ng_in,eer's, Report, together -with Assessment arid.Assessment Diagram thereto attached; was Med'with me on the day of - , 1990'. Patric ia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that theenclosed..Engineer's Report, togetherwith Assessment and Assessment -Diagram thereto attached; was approved and confirmed by .the City Council of the City of ;Petaluma California, on the day of ,,1990. Patricia E., R',ernard City Clerk City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY.CERTIFY that -the enclosed Engineef'.s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto. attached,. was filed with the CountyAuditor of -the County of Sonoma on,the day of; ; 1990..., Patricia E. Bernard -City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA,. By LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT' ENGINEER'S REPORT EN.GINEER',S REPORT SHELTER HILL9YIL'LAG:E LANDSCAPE ASSES''S'MENT DISTRICT LANDSCA'P'ING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Thomas Hargis, City Engineer and Engineer of Work for Shelter Hills Village Landscape Assessment District; City of. Petaluma„ Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed';by the City Council, R°esolut-ion No. N.C.S., pursuant to. Section 22585 of the Streetsl and Highways Code (;Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements which are the subject of this,report are briefly described as f ollows`. The maintenance of all the public lan.ds.caping improvements as part of "Shelter Hills Village" Subdivision, co.nsisiting of plant materials,.trees, ground cover, -ir-.rigafior systems, pathways and fences located in: the public areas shown as "Garfield Drive,.Augustine Circle, Tarragon C:our,t,, Meadowview Drive, Gregory Court„Cantebury=Court, Rosemary Court, and Parcel'.A'" as shown on the appended Assessment Diagram for "Shelter Hills Village" Landscape Assessment District m LANDSCAPE ASSESSIIRENT,DISTRICT ENGINEE_R'S R-EPOR i' LANDS:CAPE; MAINTENANCE DISTRICT' SHELTER H;I_LIS VILLAGE CITY OF 'PETALIJMA EX H1131T A PLANS AN`D SPECIFICATIO,''NS,, THOUGH BOg7N;D SEPARATELY, AREr, 'FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD„ l i 0 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGlN.EER'S REPORT S14ELTER HILLS VILLAGE EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LANVAREA TO BE 3,600''SF IN 9 ISLANDS MAINTAINED 16275 GAL SHRUBS', 20-15 GA TREES, .18-FLATS IVY GROUND TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO COVER, 5 YARDS FIR BARK BE MAINTAINED 30,000 SF TURF, 172-15 GAL. TREES; 104-5 GAL, SHRUBS MAINTENANCE COSTS s saasasssassssxsssssxsssasasssssssxas MAINTENANCE SERVICES SUPPLIES UTILITIES ('ELECTRIC AND HATER) IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS. ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS INCIDENTAL.AND FORMATION COSTS ssaasssssaasanss�saaoasaaasasaaaaaaea COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.151) CITY ADMINISTRATION (151) BONO COUNSEL (FORMATION) ENGINEER'OF WORK (FORMATION') ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR -MAINTENANCE IN FY 1990-91 --------------------=------------------ ADJUSTMENTS ------------- ----------------------- P YE AR, (SURPLUS.) OR DEFICIT DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION_ RESERVE FOR OEL9., CASH FLOW, REPAIRS. REBATE- OF'EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE:A_S_SESSED IN FY 1990-9I eoxaaasaxaaassssasaasasxssssaaasssxaas= NUMBER OF PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 1990-91 COSTS PER PARCEL -TO BE ASSESSED • ssaaassasaasssaxssaaaaaasassassaxassaas $960 100 300 0 $1,360 $3 204 0 0 $207 $1,567 ($6,134) $0 $700 5,39.0 $1,523 xaaaaaaxmssa 110 $1'3.85 aaaasasaaaas ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO REBATE IN FY 90-91 $49.00 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT SHELTER RILLS VILLAGE FY 199:0-91 FASTS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS' The estimate of th'e- total mai'ntenrance costs pear year: were estimatedand incidental administrative,expenses added to -yield a total annual -cost. This,cost was then prorated e,qual`ly to the 1101:ots, so that. each lot will share equally in the,. annual landscape maintenance expenses. 20 . LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ICT ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPINGAND LIGHTING `DISTRICT - SHELTER, HILLS VILLAGE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMM A.'(1,972 ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL: - YEAR 1996-91 TYPE -------------- .212, --------- MAP PAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL Xxx xxx ':XX X NO. ASSESSMENT I -------------- m-j-------------------------I. 017 .33.0 1 0 1 1 13;35 011'I 330 2 8 1 2 13.85 017 330 3 4 1 3 -13,85:1 017' 330 4 4 1 4 13.85-1 017' 330 5 1 1 5 13,351 017 330 6 9 -1 6 13.15, 1 017 330 7.7 1 7 11.85 1' 017 3 ' 30 8 5 1 a .13iff 1 017330 9 3 1 9 0.85 1 017 530 10 1 1 11 1335 1 017 330 11 9 1 11 13.85 017 330 12 7 1 12 1185 1 017 330 13,5 1 13 13.85 1 01-7 .330 14 3 1 14 13.45 1 017 330 15 0 1 '15 13.85 1 617 330 16 8 1 .16 13.85 1 017 '330 17 6 1 17 13.85 1 .017 330 18 4 1 18 13.85 -1 617 330 19 2 1 19 13.85 1 01'7 330 20 0 1 20 13.85 1 '017 33,0 .21 8 1, 21 13,65 1 017 *330 22 6 -1 22 13.85 1 AV 530 23 4 1, 23 .13.85 1 017 330 24 2 1 24 13,851 017 330 -25 9 1 25 1LK' 1 01-7 330 26 7 1 26 13.85 1' 017 330 27 5 27 113.85 1 017' 330 -28 3 1 28 13,65- 1 017 330. 29 1 1 29 13.85 1 017 330 30 9 '1 30 13.85 1 017 - 330 31 7 1 31 13.85 1 017 330 32 5 .1 32 .13.85 1 .017 330 33 3 1 33 13.85 1 017 330 34 1 1 34 13.85 1 Q17 330 315 8 1 35 13,.85 1 017 330 36 6 1 36 13.05 .1 'O17 '350 37 4 1 37 13.85 1 017 330-,38 2 1 38 13.85, 1 017 330 39 0. 1 39 -13.85 '1 017 330 40 8 1 40 13.85 1 017 330 41 6 1 41 13.05 1 im CITY' OF PETALUMA 1972' ACT LANDSCAPE' ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST OF ,PARCELS' TORE ASSESSED, IN FY , DISTRICT NAME, SHELTEi-HILLS-VILLAGE- YER 19,90-91. . TYPE 212 MAP PAGE' PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL 1 ,X i XXX XX ,X K. ASSESSMENT ------------- ==1=------------------------ , 017' 330 .42 4 1 42 11.85 1 017 330 43 1. 1 43 13.85 1 01°7 330 44 0 j 44 13;85 1 017 330. 45-'7 11 45 13, 85 .) 017 33.0 46.,5' ;1 44 13.,85 1 0,17 330 47 3 1 47 13'.85, 017 330 48 1 j 48 13.85 '1 .017 330 49 9 1 .49 13,.85 1 017 330 50 7 1 50 13.85 1 -017 340 1 9 j 51 13.85 1 017 340. 2 7 1 51 13.85 1 011. 340, 3 5 1 ' 53 '13;85 I 017 340, 41 3 I'. 54 13.85 1 017 340 5' 0 1 55 11.85 017 340 6 8 I 5.6 13;15 1 017 340, = 7 4 . 57 13.15 A -017 340 8, 4 1 58 13.05 j 017 340 9 2 1 59 .1335 1 0U 340 10 0 '1 60 13.,85 1 O1T 340 11.8 1 61� 13,85 1 017 340 12.b.'1 62 11.85.1 017.346 .13.4, 1 63 .13.85.'1 017 340 14 1. 1 64 13.85 017 340 15 9 65 13.85 1 017 340. 16 7 1 ,. 64 13.85 '1 017 340 175 1 67 13:85 1 017 340 18.3 .1. 68 11.85 1 017 .340 .11 1 1 69 13:85 1 017 340 201 1 70 13,85 1 017 340 21 1. 1 71 13.85 1 017 340 21 5 1 ' 72 1335 1 017 340' 23' 3 1 73 13.15 1- 017 340 24 1 1 74 . 13.85 .1 017 340, .25 8 1 75 13`.85 1 017 . 340 26 6 I 76 13 85 017. 340 27' 4 ( 77' 13.85 1 017 340 `28 2 i 78 13.65 1 011 346 20. 0' j 79, 13.85 1 017 340 30 8 1 80' 13.85 1 011 340 3.16 j 81 13351 01'7 340 32.4 1 82, 11.85 1 a CITY OF PETALUMA 1972-ACT LANDSCRPE'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - LIST OF PARCELS TORE ASSESSED IN FY DISTRICT NAME SHELTER HILLS VILLAGE YEAR IY90-91 TYPE ------------------------- 212 MAP PAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL 1 - xxx ----------------1 XXX lx x N0. ASSESSMENT 017 340' 33 1 j --------- .-------- 83 ------ --1 13'.85 1 017 340 34 .0 84 13085 017 340 35:7 1 85 13.85 1' O11 340 36'5 1 86 13.85 1 017 340 37 3 1 81 13:85 1 017 340 .38 1 1 Be 13._85 1 017 3.40 3.9 9 I 89 _ 13,..85 I. 017 340 40 7 1 90 11.85 j 017 '340 41 5 ( 91 13.85 1 017 340 41 3 1 92 13.85 017 340 43- 1 1 93 13:85 1 017, 340 44 9' 1 .94 13'. 85' ,1 017 340 45 6- .1. .95 13.85 1 .017 340 46 4. 1 96 11.85 1 017 340 47 2 1 97 . 13.85 1 017 340 48•4 1 98 U.85 017 340. 49 8 1 99 13.95 617 340 50 4 1 100 13.95'1 017 340 51 4 1 .101 13.8.5 1 017 340 52 2 1 102 13.85. 1 017 340 53 0 1 103 13.85 1 017 340 54, 8- 1 104 13.85 ,1 1011 340 55 5 1 105 13.85 1 017 340 56 3 I 106 13.85 1 01.7 '340 57 1 1 107 13.85 1 017 340 58.9 1 109 13.85 1 617 340 59 7 1 109 13.85 1 017 - 340 60 5 1 110 13.85 1 --_---------- COUNT ---------------------------i 110 1,523.50 1 1 75 Z5 VI AO� I,ER; i9NlL;Oa pot 9-14 0000 SN�L; RK 06 'III , 1► 1 •. t.:J 1 � 1 � s �;�� 1 6L • V 6D 'i 3 1_ 1 1 (' 1 sr 1 � 1 1 1 1 sop, ppE�PAN� we ME 3,� jN15 �ppSES �� UµAGY OF E ,to t� NE EON to �yyNEA RAtE 0000 AR15A tAX 3"ptt »:1�6- % y nz, gi - i tf. N 4 40 ' ids41 ' `'�� . �`• s ® � , row �' ' DR - go s c a �' ' V ` 3' • • 31. toq iLVL ' sit i •r ..•'� ^ + � , , t at .�: " JAI • ,��+ ��N' �gf 1 //�+�t�.,,� � pssess°r s M�Unfy' Cent. �Notc em _ gon . SHELTER HILLS. VILLAGE J7 06 t TAX RATE AREA 3-O// 17- 33 c 1 i I I s. .f s l0 O la. ya it yr �: br :i :; t! S� t` -i is -� Ed. -4 s7 - - - - - ° /3 �_ 1 ! s �. •O a , /4 r; ♦ !i ' a 9®' Y a t7 i s u' s 1 1 I / / rt AC ub:'! Cavtr a ss a s i 10 ° O i /O is i\\. /2 • :i !a yi a.Ia Ss 'la s s7• it w'• ° 7 O'tl= ,p -a a9 a `D I. 47 J1. ® .�� QI 1 ►' ; !.4 �° 4t AS -r is !• �.... W� I ( 1 a ` •YJ G-ARx F,-0 '. L TNIS MAP WAS PREPAREO FOR AS- " RIRROSES,ONLY NO LIABILITY SZ:4ED' OR THE'ACCURACY OF THE Assessors Mop S* ,/7 P9 33 Smonio County, Calif PHOTO ENG:INEER'S REPORT MEADOW".PARK NO. 1, 2 & 3 L,ANDSCAP�E `MAINTENASYCE'DISTRItCT CITY O-P PETALU'MA Prepared'by: Thomas Hargis, City Engineer Subm-itted: June 18, 1990 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT MEADOW PARK NO., ' 1, 2,& 3 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undexsigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. Dated: 1990 Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA L-71 I HEREBY ,CERTIFY that the enclosed Erfgineer"& Report,together with Assessment and AssessmentDiagramthereto attached, was filed with me on the day of 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA .2 I HEREBYCERTIFY that the enclosed Engine er'sReport, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached,,was approved and confirmed by the City Council 'ouncil of the Ci'ty'of Petaluma California, on the day of .,1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk erk . City of County of Sonoma, CA LIM I HEREBY REBY CERTIFY that the enclosed, Engineer's Report, "together with Assessment,a'hd Ass'essmidnt.Diagram.ihereto attached, was filed With the County, Auditor of. the .County of Sonoma on the day of 91990. Patricia-E. Bernard City Clerk City of 'Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA M W LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'SREPORT ENQINEER'SREPORT MEADOW'PARK NO: 1, -2,&- 3 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Thorria - s Hairgis,,.C.ity Engineer and Engibeer:of Work for Meadow Park No. 1, 2 & 3'LandstapeAs - segs-men't District; ' Cily,of'Petal.urna, Sonoma C.punty,-Calif ornia, - a directed by City Coun 1, Resolution No. makes this report, -s it Council-, N '.C.S pursuant to- Section 225,85of the S.treets, and Highways Code (Landscaping andlighting Act.40f 1,972). The . improvements which are the subject of this, -.report are briefly described as follows: The. maintenance. of all. the public landscaping improvements ass part of "Meadow Pa I No. 1, 2 & 3" Subdivision, .consistin1ofplant m-aterials,trees%ground cover I rriga ion,systens, pathways, afd,'fences1ocate'd,intht,publicareasshown as follows Meadow Park Uni-t1,7,"Wood S-oi,rel,Dri.ve, Yarberry Drive,, Garreit.Way,. Jason Court East, Jason Court West,,. Winton Drive, Aberdr,'Ornbie Way and Parcels A; B, C, & 0. Meadow Park Unit ?, (Annexation No., IV'Allegheny Court, Dupree Court Dupree Way,, Maria, Drive, Yarbefry'Drive, J'a- nes, Drive and Batchelder'Way", Meadow: Park Unit 3 (Annexation NoM-T';Aberc'rombieVay, Megan Court, MacMahan Drive: and Sfillson Drive." These, areshownon the appended Assessment Diagram:tor ",Meadow Park Units No. 1, 2-, 4 3 Landscape Assessment District." LANDSCAPE:ASSES'SMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S, REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE .DISTRICT MEADOW PARK N0..1„2 & 3 CITY OF'PETAL=UMA EXHWh-1T A... . -PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEtR'`S REPORT MEADOW PARK NO!. 1, 2 & 3- EY 1990-91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS The- estimate. of the total maintenance costs per -year were.es:firnated; and incide.ntal.a'dminis,ttative expe'ns,es.ad'ded to yield a total annuah cost.: This cost was then prorated equally to the 177 lots; so fhat each lomill share equallyin th-e annual landscape ma,"i:ntenance expenses. LANDSCAPE Assts'ViENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S" REPORT MEADOW PA'RK'NO. 1,2 & 3 EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE 58,000 TURFS IVY GROUND PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE MAINTAINED COVEk;,177 TREES, 1195 MAINTAINED SHRUBS TYPE OF LANOSCAPING-TO MOD SF IN 5'ISLANDS. TYPE. OF LANDSCAPING -TO BE MAINTAINED AUTO IRRIGATION BE MAINTAINED MAINTENANCE COSTS - -32-3-----3------L---3----323xaL22- MAINTENANCE SERVICES SUPPLIES UTILITIES.(ELECTRIC AND-VATER) IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS COUNTY COLLECTION FEE ('.151] .CITY ADMINISTRATION (.1'5X) BONO'COUNSEI (FORMATION) ENGINEER OF'VORK (FDRMATION) ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR .MAINTENANCE IN FY 1990-91 ADJUSTMENTS 'PRIOR�-YEAR .(,SURPLUS) OR OEF;ICIT DEVELOPER'CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION RESERVE'FOR DEW, CASH FLOW, REPAIRS REBATE OF EXCESS ASSESS_M_ENTS , TO PROPERTY OVNERS AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE ASSESSED IN FY.1990-91 NUMBER OF PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 19.90-91 COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE,ASSESSED ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO'REBATE IN FY 90-91 UNDER MAINTENANCE AGREEMEN 7,800 SF TURF, 16 TREES, 617 SHRUBS, 18 PLANTERS, 2,500 SF BARK, AUTO IRRIG MAINTENANCE COSTS $8,904 s3322 3s222sx22xxsas3axax23222222xxxx MAINTEAAHCE,SERVICES $0 500 SUPPLIES 0 600 UTILITIES '(ELECTRIC AN(WATER) 0 0 IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS 0 ---------- ---------- $10,004 ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS $0 INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS $25 --3-3--------3i3----33--3-II---a-----3 COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.15X) $17 1,500 CITY ADMINISTRATION (15Xj 9.00 0 BOND COUNSEL (FORMATION) 3,000 0 ENGINEER OF HORK (FORMATION) 3,000 $1,515- ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS $6,917 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR $11,529 MAINTENANCE IN FY 1990-91 $6,917 ADJUSTMENTS ($7,117) PRIOR�YEAR (SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT $( $0 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION $( $5,000 RESERVE.FOR DELO, CASH'FLOW, REPAIRS S� REBATE OF EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OYNERS ---------- ---------- AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE ASSESSED $9,411 IN FY 1990-91 ------------ 3 ss3aaII332xa 114 xa3aaas22as2IIa3232sxaa3asxaxesx3ss2z2xs NUMBER OF PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED 51 ESTIMATED.TOTAL FY 1990-91 $75.70 s 3xaxx23s3sa CDSTS PER PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED xaa3x2axa2a33xaxass3s2x33xa2sss3s22zss3 $130.5 xxxxxxxxxxx $0.00 ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO REBATE'IN FY 90-91 $0.0� LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 'E{N:GINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT MEADOW ,PARK NO. 1, _2 & 3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALtJMA.(`1972 ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL- YEAR 139041 TYPE 208 - PARCEL -NUMBER, 1 MAP PAGE: PAR'CK ASMNT 'TOTAL 1 . XXX X_XX, ----------------I XX ,X NO. ASSESSMENT i 137 170 01 5 1 --------------------I ' 1 75.90 1 137 170 02 3 I 2 75.90 I IN 170 03 1 I 3 75.90 1 137 170 04 9.1 .4 75.90 I, 137 17.0 05 6 1 5 75,9.0 j 137 170 06 4 1 6 75.90 1 137 1,70 07 1 1 7 75.90 1 1`37 170. 08 0 1 8 75.90 1 137 17.0 09 8 1 9 7530 1 137 170 10 6 1 10 75,90 I• 137 170 11 4.1 11 75.901 137 170 11 2 1 12 75.90 j 137 170, 13 0'1 13 75.9.0 1 137 170. 14 8 1 14 75.90, "1 137 170 15 5 .I ' IT 75.90 137-170 16 3 1 16 15.90 137 170 17 1 1 17 15.90 I 137 IN 18 9 1 1B 75,.90 1 1-37 170 19. 7 1 19 75.90 137 170 20 „ 5 1 10' 75.90 1 137 170' 21 3 1 11 75.90 1 137 170' 22 1 1 22' 75.90 1 137, 170 23 9 1 13 75.90 1 137 170 14 7 1 24. 75.90 I 137 170 25 4 1 25' 75':90 1 137 170, ..26 1 1, 16 7530 1 137 170 27, 0, 1 '2 7' 75.90 1 137 17.0 28 8 j 28, 75i30 1 137 170 , 29 6 I 19 75.90 1 .137 170, '30 4 1 30 75,90 1 137 170. 31: 2 1 .. 31. 75 30 1 137 .180 01 4. 1 31 '75.9.0- 1. ' 137 180 .01. 2 1 33 75.90 1 13.7 180 '03 0 1 34 75.9,0' .137 '180 04 8 1 '35 75..9.0 1 07, 180 05 5 I 36 75.90 1 137 180 ' 66 1 1 37 75,90-1 137 :180 • , 07 1 '1 38 75.30 1 137 180 :08 ;9 :1 39 75.90 1 137 '181 19, 7 1 40 75.90, 1 137 '160' 10 5 ,1 41 `75.96 1 CITY OF PETALUMA 1972 ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST OF PARCEL TO.BE.ASSESSED INJY DISTRICT NAME •MEADOY PARK 1, 1 S 3 YEAR 1990-91 TYPE 208 PARCEL NUMBER 1 MAP PAGE PAR CK ASMNT TOTAL xxx XXX ----------------1 XX 8 NO. ASSESSMENT --------- J 137I80 11 3 1 -----------1 42 75.901 137180 'z 1 I 43 75.,901 '137 180 13' 9 1 44 7530, 1 137 1'80 14 7 1 45 75.90 1 137 180 •15 4 1 46 75,90 ,1 137 180 16 2 1 47 . 75.90 1 '137 180 17 0 1 48 75.9.0 1 137 180, 18 8 I 49 75.9.0 1,37-180 19 6 I 50 75.90 1 137 110 .20 4 I 51 75.90 1 I37 180 •21 - 2 1 . .52 75,30 1 137 1'80 ' 22 0 1 53 7530 1, 137 180 23 8 ( 54 75.90 1 137 180' 24 6 1 55 75,9.0 1 137, 180 25 3 ( 56 15.90 1 137 180 .26 1 I 57 75.90 I 137 180 27 9 1 58 75.90 1 137, 190 .01 3 1 59 , 75:9,0 1 137 190 02 1 1. 60 75.9.0 1 137 190 03 - 9 1 61 75.90 1 137 190 04 .7 I 62 75,90 137; 190 05 4 1 63 75.90 137 190 06 2 1 64 75.90 1 137 190 07 0 1 65 75.90 1 137` 190, 08 . 8 'i 66 75.90 i 137 190 .09. 6 1 67 75.90 1 137 190 10 4 1 68 75.90.1 137 190 11 2 1 .69 75 A 1 137.190_42 0 1 70 75.90 1 137,190 13 8 1 71 75.90 1 137 190 ,14 6 q 72 75.90 I I37 190 15 3-1 73 15.00 1 137 190 16 .1 1 74 75.90 1 137 1.90 17 9 1 75 75.90 1 137.190 48 7 1 76 751-.90 1 137 200 01 0 ( 77 75.90 1 137 200 02 8 1 78 75 JO 1 137 200. 03 6 1 79 75.90 1 ,137 200 - 04 4 1 80 75.90] 131 200 05' 1 1 81 75.90 1 137 200� 06 9 1 82 75 JO 1 14-Jun-90 PAGE 3 CITY. OF PETALUMA 1072'.,AC,T LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST OF PARCEL, TO BE'ASSESSED IN FY DISTRICT'NAME MEADDW 'PARK 1, 1. 6 3 YEAR 1990-91:1 TYPE 208 'PARCEL NUMBER, MAP PAGE PAR,CK ASMNT TOTAL 1 XXX , XXX XX . X NOi ASSESSMENT' .1 137 200 07 7 i 83 75,.9.0 137.200 085 1 '84 75.90 1 137 100 09 3 1 85 7530 1 137 200 10 1" 1 86, 75- 9.0 I 137 200 11 .9 1 87 15.90'1 137 100' 12 7 18 75.30 1, 137 200 13 ' 5 1- 89 75.90 1 137 200 14 3 1 90 75.,9.0 1 137 260 15: 0 j 91 75.10 1 137 200 _16 8' I 92 75.,9.0. 137. 200 17 6 ,I 93 75.90. 1 137 200 18 ' 4 1 9.4 75.30 ,1 137 200 19 2 I 95 75.:90 1 137 100 " 20" 0 j 96 " 7530 I 137 200 21 8 1 97 7.5.90 1 . 137 200 21 6.1 .98 75.90'I `137 200 23 4 1. 9.9 7-5.90 I 137 200 24 1 j -100 75,90 1 137 200 H 9 I 1`01" 15.90 I - 137.100.36 71 1'02, 75.90I 137 200 27 5 1 163. 75.90,I 137 200 28 3 1 104- 75.90,1 137 200 29 1 1 105`. 7.5.90 1 137 200 30 9 1 106• 75;.90 1 -137 .200 _31. 7 1' IV . 75.90 1 137 204 32• 5 1 1'08 75 , 90, 1 1'37 206 33 3 I 109 75.90 1 J37 200 .34 " 4 1 fil'0 75..90, 1 ' 137 .NO 35 8 j . Ill. 75.90 1 137 .200 36 6' 1. 112 7,5.,90 I 137 200 37. 4 'j 113 75-30 131 100 38 ,2..1 114' 75.90 1 137 200 .39 0 1. - 115. 75,30, 1 137,200 40. 8 1 116 75;.,90 1 . 1"37' `200 41 - 6 I .117 '75.. 90. 1 137 260 .42 4 I . 118 75.90 1• 1'37' 200 43 3 I 119 .7530 1 137 200 '44 0 1 120 13T 260 45 7 I 121 75.9.0 1 137 200 .46- 5 1 122 75:90 1 137 200 47 3 1 123 . 75.90 1' 14'-Jun-90 PAGE 4 CITY OF PETALUMA" 1972.ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LIST OF PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED IN FY DISTRICT NAME MEADOW PARK 1, 1 S 3 YEAR 1990-91 TYPE 208 PARCEL NUMBER 1 MAP PAGE PAR:CK' ASMNT TOTAL 1 XXX -------------- XXX XX X- " NO, ASSESSMENT 1 137 290 I 48 1 1 ---------- ---------- '124 I 75.90 1 137 180 32 I 130.51 1 137 180. 33 I- 130.51 1 137 180 34 1 130.51 1 137 180 35 1 130.51 1 137 186 .36 1 130.51 137 180 37 1 130.51 1 137 HO, 38 1 130.51 137 180 39 j 130.51 1 137 190 40 1 130.51 1 137 110 41 I 13.0.51 1 137 180 41 I 130..51 1 137 180 *43 j 130.51 1 137 190 44 1, 130.51 1 137 180 45 130.51 137 180 46 I 1.30.51 1 137.180 47 1 130.51 1 137 180 48 I 130.51 1 137 190 49 I 130.51 1 137 100 50 1 130.51 j 137 100 51 1 130.51 1' 137 180 51 1 130.51 1 137.180 53 1 130.51 1 137 180 54 1 130.51 1 137 180 .55 -1 130.51 1 137 180 ,56 1, 130.51 1 137 190 21 1 130.51 1 137 190 11 1 130:51 1" 137 1'90 13 1 .130.51 1 137 19,0 24 1 130.51 1 137 190 15 1 130.-51 1 137 19.0 26 1 130.51 1 137 190 21 1 130.51 1 137 190 28, 1 130.51 1 137"190 19 1 130:51 1 1317 196 30. I 130.51 1 . 137 190 31 1 .130.51 1 137 190 32. 1 130.51 1 137 190 33 1 130.51 1 137 1,90 34 1. 130.51 1 14-Jun-90 PAGE 5 CITY OF PETALUMA 1972'ACT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT' LIST`OF PARCEL,TO BE ASSESSED IN FY. DISTRICT NAME MEADOW PARK 1,:1'& 3 YEAR- 1990-91, TYPE 208 PARCEL NUMBER I MAP PAGE ,PAR CK RSMNT TOTAL I XXX XXX XX. X' NO. ASSESSMENT I 137 19.0 35 1 130.51 1 137 190. 36 1 130.51 1 137 190. '37 1 130.51 1 137 190 38 1 130..51 1 137 190 39 I - 13 0.15 1 1 137 190 40 1 130.51 1 1'37 190 41 1 130.51 1 137 .190 41 1 130.51 1 137 190 43 1 130.5.1 1 137 190 44 1' 130.-51 1, 137 190' 45 - 1 130.51 1 137, 90 46 1 130.51 1 137 190 47 1 "130.51 1 131 ---------------- 190- 48 I 1,30.51 1 - COUNT I 177 -------------------- 16', 321E.63 1 MEADOW PA RAC UN1 T NO. TAX RATE AREA 1.37-17 IREC. J/ MARG/, /989 /N M4P BA: 4/1, PGs 9-15 3- 030 I f I I I /37 ,t¢J7 a a. �.0+ Yx7w _ ,+cw pet "C.. SCALE: I'• = B0� YA'RBfRRY •q, ��. NOTE: THIS MAP wAS'PAEPAPEO FOR AS- p 1J $JoJ w.srJ SESSMEN' OuRPOSES ONE, NO 'aaBtaT', �Se t",Q It G :SSUMED FOR 'ME 'ACCUR G= Tr= tV �•,y _ e d $,y •ra.7J 3;11 DE'.,tiudE*) "EKON t44` 3 kft co, • � ao � O2 8 .` REVISED a24 ,..r�.�.la,/ � 22 33 Ptn.) 4 (N. PpL'®' PT LOT 'A' 3' � • 9..' o r•� 21 :. 2O �'S+`Ais •b 0. •�• .11 - 12 •fs� yt15 io ro'r ✓ s M �sy .� ':✓ an Oy � /9 yob 13 fy`'. I. /4 � ` ter• e 28 a a f 1® i t ;' • Z - w-aO�. r �+ 6/�' � � , O off' .�1 O • � i. d{�11� iS 2930, 'A O IS Is � M!l+,7'°/"t 1 1 N„+Jl'°,'I Mtl 1 ,`1 w♦ 0 L / E G / ' Assessor's Mop 8*. /37 PQ /7 w1N i0 N ` :° - ' I Sonomo County, C011f MEADOW PARK UNIT NO f TAX RATE AREA MW 7/ A46MV /988 '/N MAP AW. 4/1,; P65 9- /9 _ 3 -030 } � n I ` �► . ' / 0 a'!s•sra•f 1 I S-' a !a•'a!•.o.•'7' giro S. 3a' • • ��` i P o0 0; 4ssaira:eA/ L.y �' /IROr ' asaf a/.// a} a 34 J y oO w c•YOM' \' 0 57 '-,all•f/'11'I J S 37/V O. �eA R t}'' . wry, o w•fv .'54 A��S•l, 6 V 'a LOT'A` p /onO a �: '��♦ w a O ft 2/. gg tC b° C g. O a53 ga • w N! i a a � J I �1 A ! - , y '� /L r1 11PI' a!/•l�ld[ " �-R IO //t It _� ' l WWI -40 c•/rlr ' � O ' aravt a:o! : ► /Q low41. /Q a 8 48 jrO s .4a 40 $ % SCALE:' 1" • /0' P. 's _ , (F4&) s 43 /Z a e Y 76, 47. a O a 44 o C \'isss! �« a _ _ �,0�Nr BL % j noss,v _ _ NOTE: 'THI$MAP.WASPREPARED FOR ,A$- ur.d•si''oo't. : 43 /4!, X 'g ABERCROMWE SE$SMEhT PupPO$E$'''CNLY•NO L -11UTV IS ASSUMED',FOA,THE ACCURACY OF THE �' vs A /740D uae 5, alrn a.'r /rala b WAY - � , DATA DELI%EATED HEREON'jvyy am led I37- I8' REvf9ED YJ7 s. Assessor's Mop Bk 137 Pg. /7 $OnOMa County, ,Co/il I IA 1 1.111 Ill Vi 1 II II II MEADOW PARK UN/i NO. 2 TAX RATE AREA /3,7-/g REC. P® OEC"A", i9w /NNIP dk pp PSI 34-00 /a7 5-030 6 :3-03/ a s.-,r,•ta•I MAR/A r DRIVE 3-030 N!I•t/'!r•s N �>; •O •a Nf Nf - I! N •! !L!O L"� all •r/'ar'M "'83 - �'xi 1► N! a N ll�t/A•7_ •! a •! 1 ,I •! •9 ff as • 57 „ 96 $ g SS o S4 L 33 S2 $1 S0it ., 0 49 d 56 `? S9 60 `O'`/4 61 62 • 63 64 6S ,% • 66 O tl 01•C M I ♦ y. ip ID Nf : f Itl I! _ L l4.01 94 N ♦! - •! •! 41 .•! 47i If /00 a 4t R 1 '� t 1 + , I•• f PARK S/rE q O �� 1 11 1 / L � • �+ DUPREE COURT , PARCEL A , I I 3.0/ AV.. i Q l I I Q 1 4 REVISED _ •I SCALE',- 1' a 80' t 1 \ / �• e 2.Mas-20Ck 1 r IEOTE THIS IMAP WAS PRE"D FOR 'AS• SESSMENT "PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASS MEO FOR THE ACCIJAJA& dF, NE DATA DE - EATED kEREON, Assessors Aloe Bh /37 Pg./9 \ ` \ SOW~ Coanly, Co//% i / /J7 \ - DwW 2-27-89 LSL MEADOW PARK vNI r No Z MOTE: .THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR A$• NEC ZB DECEMBER. /900'/N MAP BA' 450, PGS: 34-40 SESSIMENT' PURPOSES ONLY., NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOiP'THE ACCURACY' OF THE DATA DELINEATE. HEREON- . ON m TAX RATE AREA 3-030 137-20 : 'It.O! /Or.II at°O' tl II "I! I! H I! If ♦. /If: fl 39 •° /O "I1IY/'!L_'I /!! R. !! ao — — — — — �—— . ~y' O � O` O O O �O O 3O :O� .i,1•,a'o<i e,!•30'007 4 O ' . 6 . n' 6; 'e, 9 ,. 10 R 12 $ 13. a : ®`38, 41 Ilk b :, 4' /!L. e. o� /zs, asa �i ,sa» - w as •! �aO • a !oo.�! AN a a•!f a ®3T wa. an .aa.e 42 —————— I 1' 3 o' ALLEGHENY COURT /tat° ,1 b eel._ uq ,. 8 � � 36, C ` 43 O I .e• .2 r 21. :. 20 19 18 • at° 35 44 I I — ?/ w°� � _ ° b ` 16 Is Y 14 w♦ im/! 34 //O 45 I _ %� I 4ipB 1 .0.1 . •ly , ,�� - �••,! y'rf•!. •q. .ram• a L O'/Q- If y"- 3 4' 6 O @6 II • / / \'�,�� 1f.°tA0 �°2 . Dy + ° ° !'© I! ea/!, //O .• ' I / /� f• p d � (`?Q%1 yp 'O� bo o a •$ : 3� 'g y 4T 47, r!1'!i'orr v, I L REVISED � 24 . IaE �° 26 i • '2T 28 29 30 . •O 31 'I 32 •► /10 %' 48 ♦ • —I , 1 I• I _•.► 01 qlb b V t0 ql . e i. 25 DUPREE - - WAY - - - - 1 1 Zb / SC41'- 1 ( I I Assessor's Mop Bk /37 Pg 20 Sonoma County, Co/ii. .DWN. 2-28-89 LS.L � I - .__ - _.—---...-•— I e •i apV .__.e..—,..I:L"`:_'1.i�,:C1.Jlb.�.�ctmv,•aa,..•i. i.u . .. .i. j'� ENGIN:EER'SREPORT. ANN,A'�S MEADGWS— LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA Thomas Hargis, City Engineer Submitted: June 18, 1990 'LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT ANNA'.S MEADOWS .LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City . Council. Dated:. , 1990 Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of Petaluma County :of Sonoma, CA ;Bv I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's, Report, together with Assessment and Assessment:Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of , 1990.. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of 'Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engneer''s Report, togetherwith Assessment and Assessment -Diagram, thereto attached, was approved and confirmed'by the City Council of the City of Petaluma California, on the day of , 1990. Patricia E. Rernard City, Clerk City, of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engi_neer'sReport, together with Assessment. and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the day of , 1990. Patric'i,a E. Bernard City Clerk City -of Petaluma Countylof Sonoma, CA ;A t LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DIS'I'RICT ENGINEER'S REPORT- ENGI.NEER'S REPORT ANNA'S' MEADOWS LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPIRIG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Thomas Hargis, City Engineer -and Engineer of Work for Apna's.Meadows Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council„R.esoluiion No.,- N..C.S..pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways, Code (Landscaping and -Lighring,Act .of 1972): The .improvements which, are the .subf ect of' this' report are briefly described as f ollows: The maintenance of al II the publiclandscapi�rfg im:p.royements as part of ''Anna's Meadows" Subdivision, consisting of plant-mate.tials,,,trees, ground.cover, ir.riga�tion systems, pathways, and,f:ence& located in the, public areas;(not including " median islands -.and tot lot -Parcel .C) shown as "SouthMcDowell -Boulevard, Casa Grande Road, Henry Way, Daniel IDrive,, Wieling. Way and .Parcels A & B" as shown on the appended Assessment Diagram for "Anna's Meadows" Landscape. Assessment District. `L.ANDSCAPEASSESS.MENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDS.0APE, MAINTENANCE.DISTRICT . .AN;NA'S MEADOWS,CITY OF' PETALUMA EXHI131 T A PLANS AND SPECiF'ICATIO�NS, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD • LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT XNNA'S MEADOWS : EXHIBlT B A-S'SESS°�iiEl�iT DIS:TR=I'CT_COSTS' PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE 2,500 SF TURF 'MAINTAINED 45-15 GAL, TREES 14,2'00'SF GROUND 'COVER' AREA TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO 120-15 GAL. TREES ' BE MAINTAINED' 260-5 GAL. SHRUBS 100 SF ISLAND ' S ------------------------------------------------------------ MAINTENANCE COSTS.. MAINTENANCE SERVICES SUPPLIES 2'00 UTILITIES' (ELECTRIC AND 'WATER) .1doo IMPROVEMENTS%REPAIRS 0 ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS $7,592 INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.251). 09 CITY ADMINISTRATION (15%) 1,13.9 BOND COUNSEL (FORMATION] 0 ENGINEER OF WORK (,FORMATION) 0 ESTIMATED INCIDENT.AL.COSTS $1,I58 TOTAL.ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE -IN,FY 1990-91 ----------- $8,750 .ADJUSTMENTS' PRIOR YEAR (SURPLUS.)- OR: DEFICIT DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION $0. RESERVE.FOR'DELQ,'CASH FLOW, REPAIRS $4.,300 REBATE OF EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS AMOUNT: NEEDED' TO BE ASSESSED. ''IN FY 19.90-91 NUMBER OF-PARCELS'TO BE ASSESSED 74 ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 1990-91. COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE ASSESSED $1031.73 ISTIMATED'AMOUNT'TO REBATE IN.FY, 9.0-91 $,0.00- 900 LANDSCAPE ASS`ESSMENT D-ISTRI'CT- . ENGINEER'S REPORT ANNA'S MEADOWS FY 1990-94 BASIS OF ALLOCATIONASSESSMENTS The estimate of the tota-1 maintenance costs ,per,year were estimated and in°ciden.tal administrativeexpenses added to yield a total annual cost. This cost was then prorated equally to the 74 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. LANDSCAPE ASSE-SSWiNT DISTRICT P'Nc'1NFFR'S RETORT LANDSCAPING AND LI(;HTING DISTRICT AN.NA'S -MEADOWS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PETALU MA. (19.72 ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL: PARCEL NUMBER 1 PARCEL NUMBER MAP PAGE PAR CK 1, ASMNT TOTAL 'I MAP .PAGE PAR CK I ASMNT TOTAL XXX XXX XX X I NO, ASSESSMENT I XXX XXX X.X X I N0. ASSESSMENT ---------------- 017.. 350 31 1 5 1 ------------- 31 _----I 1'03,13'1 ---------------- 017 350 13 3 ------------------- 1 13. 103'.73 017 350 32 3. 1. 32 1;03;.73 '1 '017 350 14 I 1 14 101.73 017 350 33' 1 1, 33 1:03.73 1 017 35,0 15 8 1 15 11,03.73 O11 3.50 '3.4 9 1 34 103.13 I 017 350 16 .6 1 16 103.13. . 017 350 35 6 1 35 1103.73 1 017 350 17 4 1. 17 103,,73 017 :350 36 4 1 36 101.73 1 017 350. 18 2 1 18 103.73 017 350 37 2 1 3,7 103.73 1 '0I7 350 19 0 1 19 103,73 017 35,0 38' 0 '1 . 38 103.73 j 017 350 20 8 ' 1 20 1,03.73 017 350 39 8 '1 39 103.73 1 017 350 '21 6 I 21 03,.73 017 350 40. b 1 40, 103.13 1. 017 350 21 4 j 22 1,03.73 017 35.0 41 4 1 -41 103.73 1 017 350 23 2 1 "23 1.03.73 017 .350 42 2 1 .42 103,.13 1 '017 350 24 0 1 24 103.73 Olt„35.0 43.,0 1 , 43 163.73 1 017 350 25 7 1 15 16333 ' 017 350 44. 8 1 44 103.73 1 017 350 16 5 1 16; 1'03,7.3 Olt 350 45 5 I 45' 101.73'1 O17 350 27 3 'I 27 103'.13 017' 350 46 3 1 46, 103.73`1: 017 350 28 -1 1 28 1:03'.13 017 350 47 1 1 47 103.73 1, 017 350 29 9 1 29 10Y,73 017 350, 48 9 1 48 103.73 I' 017 35.0 30 7 1 30 101,73 017 350 49 7 1 49 1.03.,73 1 017 .-3,50 61 2 1 ,61 103,73 „017 350 50 5 1 50 103.73 1 017 35,0 62 0 1 62' 103,33 017 350 51 3 1 5.1 103::.73 1 017 350, 63 8 1 63 103:13 017 350 52 1 1 52 '103:73 1 017 350 64 6 1 64 103.73 017 350 .53' 9 1 53 103.73 1' 017' 356 65 3 1 65 •101.73 017 350 •54 7., 1 54. 103:73 j 017 350 661 1 1 66 103.33 017 350 55' 4 1 55 103'.73, 017' 350 67 9 1 67 103,73. 017 350" 56 2 1 '56 103.73 1 .017� 350 68' 7 1 68, 10333 017 350 57 0 1 57 163,13) 017 350 69 5 1. 69 103,73 017 350 58 8. - ( 58 Y03.7 1- 017 350 70 -3 1 70 • 1.03- 73 017 350 59 6 1' 59 103.73 1 017 356 11 1 1 74 . 103.73 017 350 60 4 1 60 10333 j 017 350 72, 9 1 72 10333. 00 356 1 8 1 1 16333' 1 017 35,0 73' 7 1 73 . 103.73 017 350 1 6 I 1 103.73 1 017 350 74 5 1. 74 103,73 017. 350 3 4 is 3 103.71 1 -------- 017 350 4' 2 °I. 4 103.73 j COUNT 74 " 7,676.01 017 350 5 9 1 5' 103.73, j 017 350 6 7 1 6 103.73 '1 017 '350 7 5 i„ -7 103..'73 'I OI'7 350 8, 3 1 8 103.73 j -.017 350 9; '1 1 .9 10313 1 017 350 10 -.9 1 -10 103.73. 1 017 ,350 11 7 I 11 103.73 j -017 350 12 5 1 12 103..73 j w I ANNA�5 MEADOWS SUBrAx RATE AREA DIVISION 5-0" Rw. 20 S0911mber, 1959 a&. 424 P90. 7 Ib" 12 Q � !� � i X own Zt, an. 4-1 i A n46 @4 a t 7 8 Oae MOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR 1 SESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY Is ASSUMED MR THE ACCURACY -OF THE '%TA DELINEATED HEREON. NNW" PAM& C P4 VA Review is IF 16 17 Assessor's MOP 55 Sonoma covat&CA PHOTO— ENGINEE°R'S REPORT ADOBE -CREEK GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB. UNIT 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALU'MA LAN.DSCAPEASSESS.MENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT ADOBE CREEK GOLF & COUNTRY .CLUB, UNIT 1 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. Dated:. , 1990 Thomas Hargis City Engineer City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTI'FY that the enclosed E_nginee r's Report, together with Assessment' and Assessment Diagram.theretto.attached, was filed with me on the day of , 1990. 1 Patricia E. Bernard' City Clerk - - City of Petaluma County of. Sonoma, CA. M I HEREBY'CERTIFY that, the enclosed Engineer's Report, together wirth Assessment and Assessment, Diagram thereto. attached, Was:a"pQroved and confirmed by the City Council of the City -of Petaluma California, on the day of Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed' Engineer's Report, together with Assessment=and.Assessment Di°agram.thereto attached, was filed,with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the day of . 9.1990. Patricia:E: Bernard City Clerk City -of Petaluma - County of Sonoma, CA 10G LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER''S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT ADOBE CREEK GO�L.F & COUNTRY CLUB UNIT 1 LAN`DSC'APE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LAN-DS'CAPIN'G.AN.D LIG:H.TING ACT'OF 1972 Thomas _Hargis, City Engineer andEn'gi.ne.er. of Work for Adobe Creek Golf &; Country Club,, Unit 1. Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes, fhis report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution .No. N.C.S., pu`r_suant to, Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code, (Landscaping and Lighting�)kct .of 1972). The improvements'whfich ar.e.the subject°of this report are briefly, described as follows: The .mai:ntenance of all' the public landscap;ing.improvements as ,part, of "Adobe Creek Golf and;Country Club, Unit 1" Subdivisron, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irri`gatio,n systems, pathways, and_fences located in the pulbic areas shown as "Ely Blvd, South,. Spanish Bay Court, Birnham Wood Court, Arrowhead: Court, Sugarloaf Court, Horseshoe Bay Court, and 'Princeville Court" as shown. on the appendedAssessment.Diagram f`o'r, Adobe Creek'Golf and. Country Club, Unit 1 Landscape Assessment District. /o/ LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENG,INEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE.DlSTRICT ADOBE CREEK GOLF &i COUNTRY .dAft, UNIT 1 CITY OF PETALUMA EXHIBIT A, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS .RECORD /oz LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINE'ER'S REPORT ADOBE CREEK GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB; UNIT 1 EX H IBIT;B A'SSESS.MAENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE` UNDER CONSTRUCTION MAINTAINED PLANT MATERIAL, GROUND- TYPE, OF LANDSC0ING TO COUEk, IRRIGATION. ,"PATHWAYS BE MAINTAINED FENCES,, MEDIAN ISLAND MAINTENANCE COSTS MAINTENANCE SERVICES $0 SUPPLIES 0 UTILITIES (ELE-CTRdC AND WATER') 0 IMPROVEMENTS%REPAIRS 0 ESTIMATEO,MAINTENANCE COSTS $0 INCIDENTAL AND FORMATION COSTS COUNTY COLLECTION FEE (.25X.). $43 CITY ADMINISTRATION '(15X) 900 BOND COUNSEL (',FORMAT,ION) 1,120,0 ENGINEER OF WORK (FORMATIONp 3;;000 . ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS $5-,143 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE IWTY 1990-91 $5,143. ADJUSTMENTS -. --------------------------------------- PRIOR YEAR '(SURPLUS] OR DEFIC°IT $_0 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR'FORMATION RESERVE FOR .DEL , CASH FLOW., REPAIRS $1,000 REBATE OF EXCESS'ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE ASSESSED IN FY 1990'-91 $1;143 NUMBER OF' PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED -53 ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 1990-9I COSTS 'PER .PARCEL TO BE ,ASSESSED- '. aasasa as saaaaa as aaa aasssasaaaaasaaaassa 421.,57' aaaaaaaaaaa s ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO REBATE,IN FY'90-,91 a aaaaaacsaoaaaaaaaaaasaasasaaa a-----__----aaa=aaeaaaasoaaaa-------- $0,00 . LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT' _ADOBE. CREEK GOLF- & COUNTRY CLUB, UNIT 1 FY 1990-91 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS The total maintenance costs per year were estima:te.d, and incidental administrative expenses added to'yield a total' annual cost. This.cos.t was then prorated equally'to the 53:1ots, so that each lot wil-1 share equally -in the annual landscape. maintenance expenses. -.-For purposes of .th'is first year's report, since the 53 lots do not yet exist in the County Assessor's records, the total assessment was levied against the two ex-isting assessor's parce,k, in proration to the.number of the futur,e.-531ots which are, located within each of the two existing,parce-ls. LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT LAN.DSCAPI:N,G A`N.D.LIG�HTING D`IS,TRIC'T ADO1B'E CREEK GOLF & .CO,UN.TRY.CL.UB,''UNIT 1 ASSESSMENTISTRICT CITY OF'PETALU.M'A ('19,72 ACT) ASSESSMENT.ROLL: PARCEL NUMBER MAP PAGE PAR' CK I ASMNT TOTAL XXX XXX ,X.X X I' NO. ASSESSMENT ----------------� _------------------ 017 050 07 1 $668.67 017 050 08 ) 2 5474.54 ---------- I --=---------_------ COUNT :2 $19'143.21 'ft.ET __ ---- �- Assessment Distri bcc-. ® Assessment Number. REMAINDERL AA29S OF NOTE;, The ,assessment p$rcels :shc✓- i-- Parcel Noes 17-050-07 6 08 -DUFFEL FINANCIAL ' 8 CON5TRYC270A, CO REFERENCE: (1) '353 HAPS,'36-39 DUFFEL F/AANC/AL 8DUFFEL F/,NANC/AL B' CONS; RUCTION CO CONSTRUCT/ON CO. - h•' � +� Q • � Vim' .� illLij %Q _Q c QSP4A'/Sh' 4RgOAHE4G SUGA-LCAF 4A� CJ(',R,r r PR,C: (' L E ' ®Lp/r ASSESSAICU'L ,'i ® ® M-1 e -r W C7l_'1 LA N L, ENGINEER'S REPORT ST. JAMES ESTATES 'UNIT'l & 2 LAN,DS'CjkPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA Thbmas Hargis, City Engineer Submitted: hiae- 1,&,, 1990 /07 LANDSCAPEASSESSMENT DISTRICT EN:GI-NEER'S REPORT K�YUK1.- ST. JA-MES ESTATES UNITS 1A 2 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as d-irected by the City Council. Dated: , 1990 Thomas,Hargis City Engineer By I HEREBY. CERTIFY that, the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk. City of Petaluma County: of Sonoma, CA I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed .Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment, Diagram thereto attached, was approved and,. confirmed by the City Council of the City of Petaluma California, on the day of . , 1990. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonorna, CA LIMA I HEREBY CERTIFY that. the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and'Assess_ment Diagram thereto attached, wasfiled with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the day of "logo. Patricia E. Bernard City Clerk City of.Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA Zak LANDSCAPE AS'SESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT :ST. JAMES ESTATES UNITS 1,& 2 LANDSCAPEAS' ' SESSMENT`DISTRICT LAND.&CAPINGIAND LIGHTING ACT,OF1.972 Thomas Hargis:, City Engin'eer and Eqi.he,er of Work for St. James E P states Unit l- &.2 Land'sca-pe Assessment -Di strict, City of PefalI:u..ma,,'So6oma County, California", makes this report, as directed by Ih e City Council,, Resolu'tioft.-No. e y N.C.S., pu',rsul ant: to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways ,Code ,(La,ndse-aping' and Lghting,Act of1972). The impTo vements which'are the;subject of this report are brief IY, described as fbilowls! The maintenance of all the''public la d n scaping i-mp rove men tsas part "St. James Estates Units & 2' Subdivision, consisting of plant materials, trees, ground cover, irrigation systems, pathways, and fences locatedin the public aces shown as "East Madison, Si.,Ely Blvd., St.' James Way :and St. Court." as &how',n'-on the appended I .�As.ses�gment, Diagram for "'St. Jaihes Estates Units 1 &_ 2''La:ndscape Assessment District. LANDSCAPE MAINTENAN'CE,DISTRICT 'ST. JAMES ESTATES, UNITS-1 & 2 CITY OF PETALUMA EXHIBIT A PLANS AND S'PECIFICATIONS, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, A -RE FILED AS A PART OF -THIS RECORD 4 v !i LANDSCAPE MAINTENAN:CE-DISTRICT ST. JAM°ES ESTATES; UNITS 1 & 2 CITY OF PET ALUMA EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS PUBLIC LAND AREA TO BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION MAINTAINED PLANT MATERIAL, GROUND TYPE OF LANDSCAPING TO COVER, IRRIGATION,.PATHNAYS DE MAINTAINED FENCES, 15 TREES ----------------------------------------------------------------- MAINTENANCE COSTS MAINTENANCE SERVICES yD SUPPLIES' p UTILITIES (ELECTRIC.AND UATE;R) 0 IMPROVEMENTS%REPAIRS 0 ---- ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS 7-7--- gp INCIDENTAL AND'FORMATION'COSTS ------------- COUNTY COLLECTION"FEE (.25xj $60, CITY ADMINISTRATION,('15%) 810 BOND,COUNSEL .(FORMATION) 1,200 ENGINEER OF PORK (FORMATION) .3,000 ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS $5,070 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE- IN FY 1990-91 ADJUSTMENTS _. PRIOR -YEAR. (SURPLUS)•OR DEFICIT $D' DEVELOPER CDNTRIBUTION FOR FORMATION RESERVE'FOR DELO,, CASH FLOW, REPAIRS $1,000 .REBATE OF EXCESS ASSESSMENTS TO PROPERTY OUNERS. AMOUNT'NEEDED TO BE ASSESSED. IN FY 1990-91 -----�-33----------3�----333-33-3-3-----------3---- V NUMBER OF PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED 19 ESTIMATED TOTAL FY 19.9,0-91 COSTS PER PARCEL TO BE .ASSESSED $56.31 ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO REBATE IN FY 90-91 $0,00 LANDSCAPING AND Ll GHTING DISTRICT ST JAMES ESTATES, UNITS 1 & " 2 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CIT'i(OP P,tlA LUMA (102 ACT) BASIS: OF ALLOCATION OF ASSESSMENTS-, The, total maintenance costs per . year were estimated -and. incidental ad mini strative expenses ad.dedd, to yield a total annual cost. This cost was then pro,e rate'd, u'ally to the 19 existing, and future lot.s:, to that- each lot will share equally in t%e annual landscape'. maintenance expenses.. Fot purposes of this first yeat'&.rep or t, each of the 4 lots in Unit 2 were assessed and the 151ots in Unit 1,� which -do' not yet exist in the County Assessor's Records were also assessed equally but were levied against the '2 existing parcels, pror-Med on the basis of the approximate number Of the '15.assessors lots each.will contain. I I Z_ LA,ND.S_CARIN'G AN,D -ES LIGHTING DISTRICT'' 'ST JAM ESTwATE3, 'U-NITS 1 & 2 A.SSE'SS49NT DlSTI2I°CT CITY OF PE'I-ALtJM'A (1972 ACT) ASSESSMENT ROLL- YEAR 1990-91 TYPE . PARCEL NUMBER I MAP"�PAGE PAR CK I ASMN,T TOTAL XXX XXX XX X I NO. ASSESSMENT - --=------------ I 007 :510 47 . I, --------_----------- 1 $112.64 007 510 48 I' 2' $732.16 149 142 22 J 3 y56.32 149 142. 23 I 4 $56,.32 149 142 24 5 $56.12 149 W 25 I 6 $56.:32 ---------------- COUNT 6 ----------------- $1,070.08 i M •� . I LAST MADISON STREET I r----I. "UNIT 211 - ' L—__J L____J L---- J L_—__J I p iri —-II'.�-----��,r-----I,-----�I r----Lr--- �Ir_-----il�----� J I 1 j�l Ii'I • I,�! '� I;,1 I;I I;; I_ I -m I} r .1 _ _ • L �., _ J.; L. — — — �', IIUl�*� '1 1" J I L — — — — J w J�MES COURT S T J A ME S W A Y _ - -1. 1 ASSESSMENT 12IAGRAM I ST. JAMES ESTATES, U.N]TS 1 � I , CITY c. .E'Gu:..G 1, i I 1 I 7--�/u•••�••IR Ol•t.[iR 9eune•ry STGT_ Ci CA L!i Sri l;G 1 I 1I •� ® """"'"` v—,, 'LANDSCAPE ------.c.,e.l.oiti... ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NYSTROM ENGINEERING • ••..yl C.ff• . C. Mf•• ..D.•)f m.t 0