HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-224 07/02/1990r ~ '
resolution No. 90-224 N ~.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED REPORT AND ASSESSMENT
AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
NORTH MCDOWELL BOULEVARD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 17
The City Council of the City of Petaluma resolves:
This Council has taken a series of actions preliminary to
ordering the improvement in North McDowell Boulevard Assessment
District No. 17, City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, California,
and now makes the following findings and orders:
1. The Council adopted a map showing the boundaries of
the land benefited by the proposed improvement. A copy of the
boundary map was filed in the office of the County Recorder of the
County of Sonoma in the Book of Maps of Assessment and Community
Facilities Districts.
2. The Council adopted its Resolution of Intention to
order the improvement described therein under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913, and directed Nystrom Engineering Corp., as
the Engineer of Work for the assessment district, to prepare the
report required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code.
The improvement is generally described as follows:
The construction of streets, including clearing, grading,
subbase, base, pavement, curbs and gutter, median island,
and driveways; sidewalks; traffic signals; storm drainage
facilities; sanitary sewers and appurtenances; domestic
water services and fire hydrants; street lights and
relocation of existing underground utilities; all with
necessary appurtenances; together with the acquisition of
all necessary interests in real property.
~~~
a<~s. No.........90-22~„ N.cs. Page 1 of 4
,~
,,
The improvements shall be constructed in North McDowell
`Boulevard between Corona. Road and Lynch Creek Road and on
Corona Road between the Northwestern Pacific Railroad
crossing to U.S. Highway 101.
3. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed,
and the City Council called a hearing on the report as required by
Section 10.3:01 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the
hearing was given by publication, by street posting and by mailing
to affected property owners, all according to the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913. Affidavits of publication, posting and
mailing were filed with the City Clerk.
4. At the time and place for which notice was given, the
City Council continued the public hearing to June 18, 1990. At the
time set for the hearing on June 18, the City Council further
continued the hearing to July 2, 2990.
5. At the time and place set for the continuance of the
hearing on July 2, the City Council conducted the public hearing
and gave every interested person an opportunity to object to the
proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the
proposed assessment. Following the hearing, at the direction of
the City Council, the Engineer of Work filed an amended report.
6. The Council finds that written protests against the
proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing more
than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the
improvement.
7. The documents and events described in paragraphs 1 to
5, .inclusive, are stated here in tabular form, with their dates
and, where appropriate, their numbers. All documents are now on
file with the City Clerk.
Page 2 of 4
Reso . 90-224 IdCS
`.
1
Document or Event Date Number
a. Resolution approving boundary map 4/30/90 90-139
b. Boundary map filed with County Recorder 5/7/90
c. Resolution of Intention 4/30/90 90-143
d. Filing of Eng:ineer's Report 4/30/90
e. Resolution accepting Report 4/30/90 90-145
f. Certificate of Mailing
Notice of Improvement 5/3/90
g. Affidavit of publication
of Notice of Improvement 5/17/90
h. Certificate of posting
Notice of. Improvement 5/14/90
i. Opened public hearing 6/4/90
j. Certificate of posting resolution
continuing hearing 6/5/90
k. Continued public hearing 6/18,/90
1. Certificate of posting notice of
continuance of hear-in'g 6/19/90
m. Continued public hearing 7/2/90
n. Filing of Amended Engineer's Report 7/2/90
8. The Council approves the Amended Engineer's Report
and each component part of it, including each exhibit incorporated
by reference in the report.
9. The Council finds that the Engineer of Work, in the
Amended Engineer's Report has fairly and properly apportioned the
cost of the improvement to each parcel~of, land in the assessment
district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City Council
hereby confirms and leve's:each indivdua assessment as stated in
the Amended Engineer's Report.
10. This City Council orders the. :improvement described
in paragraph 2 and as detailed in the Amended Engineer's Report.
11. The City Council finds that the total amount of the
principal sum of all unpaid special assessments levied against the
parcels proposed to be assessed, pans: the principal amount of the
special. assessment proposed to be levied in the instant proceedings
~.9(}-724 PdCS
Page 3 of 4
;~
.~ do not exceed one-half of the total value of the parcels proposed
to be assessed.
12. Serial bonds representing unpaid assessments, and
bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per
annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement
Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and Highways Code), and the
last installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-
four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding
twelve (12) months from their date.
13. According to Section 10603 of the Streets and
Highways Code, the City Council designates the City Treasurer to
collect and receive payment of the assessments. The property
owners who elect to pay their assessments in cash before the
issuance of improvement bonds will not be required to pay their pro
rata share of the allowance for special reserve fund and. allowance
for bond discount.
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~ac~x(~x~iad) meeting m'
on the ---- 2nd.-.......... day of ........... JU 1X ..................................... 19...9 0 by the
-~.
._._----
following vote: ........---•----•----•• .....................
City Attorney
AYES: Tencer, Davis, Vice Mayor Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
alsh,
City Clerk
eo,~~i F,i~....._404.-16-........
CA 10-55 Res. No. .......9fl_2.2(+..".N.C.S.
NOES: None
ABSENT: ool , Cavanagh - STAIN: B
ATTEST: .- --- -- - .. '-. .-.... .- ... ... .
Page 4 of 4