HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-242 07/16/1990_,
Resolution No. 90-242 N ~.5.
of the City of Petal~ima, California
1
2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
3 MORNINGSIDE SUBDIVISION, A 182-UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY
4 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON ELY BOULEVARD
5 NORTH ACROSS FROM ACADIA DRIVE, APN 136-120-15
6
7 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1807 N.C.S., Assessor's Parcel Number 136-120-15,
8 has been. rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
9
10 WHEREAS, by action taken on June 5, 1990, the Planning Commission considered and
11 forwarded a recommendation to the City Council on the unit development plan for 183
12 single-family units in said Planned Unit District; and
13
14 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental
15 Quality Act Guidelines and Section 15083 have been satisfied through the preparation and
16 certification of the Corona/Eiy Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. in which the
17 anticipated specific impacts have been adequately identified and mitigated through the
18 adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the proposed Morningside project.
19
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the
21 following findings:
22
23 PUD Findings:
24 1. That the development plan as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the
25 land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single
26 zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
27 2. That the plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and
28 organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in
29 relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and
30 that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
31 compatibility.
32 3. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site will be protected through the
33 implementation of tree preservation conditions of approval, and that adequate
34 available public and private spaces are designated on the Unit Development Plan.
35 4. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the
36 applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
37 will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent
90-242
Res. No. _.._..... ~ ................ N.C.S.
1 and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma
2 General Plan.
3 5. That the PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to
4 one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway) to carry any additional
5 traffic generated by the development.
6
7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Morningside unit
8 development plan as referred by the Planning Commission and presented at the July 16,
9 1990 meeting of this Council is hereby approved pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning
10 Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. as amended subject to the following conditions:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
PUD Conditions:
1. Plans submitted at time of application for SPARC review shall reflect the following
amendments:
a. Widening of cul-de-sac streets in the Urban Diversified portion of the site to
accommodate parking lanes or addition of head-in parking pockets.
b. Widening of Streets E & F, and redesign of cul-de-sac bulbs to include
parking islands as required by Tentative Map conditions.
c. Redesign of the common private street serving lots 96 through 107 to prevent
usage by through-traffic as a shortcut.
d. Redesign of driveways for lots 83 and 84, 89 and 90 to better define them as
two-car spaces.
e. Redesign or elimination of the common area adjacent to lots 138, 148, 149
and 163 to better promote residential security.
f. The number of lots directly abutting the park site shall be reduced to five and
reconfigured to reflect two detached units and three attached units as
presented in Exhibit A at the July 16, 1990 meeting of the Council. Unit
setbacks and design shall be subject to SPARC approval.
g. Redesign of all subdivision .fencing to incorporate a more cohesive and
decorative residential theme.
h. Information on the proposed grading plan relative to street and pad
elevations on the neighboring Cader Farms project to ensure appropriate
interface.
i. Reconfiguration of Lots 91 through 93 to avoid rear yard fencing along
Rainier Circle.
90-242 N.C.S.
2
1 2. 'The proposed project architecture shall be modified prior to SPARC review to
2 develop a more unique and identifiable exterior appearance, created through
3 further variation in materials, setbacks, and/or building form. Revised elevations
4 and site plan shall be subject to final approval by the Planning Commission. Plans
$ shall include provisions for the required 10% architecturally different unit.
6 3. Project CC&R's shall be subject to staff review and approval prior to Final Map and
'7 shall include a reference to PUD Development Standards for governing the
g following:
9 a. Maximum lot coverage, minimum setbacks height and design criteria for
10 principal dwellings and accessory uses and structures, including fences.
11 b. Identification of options and/or restrictions applicable to homeowners
12 relative to the construction of building additions, permitted detached
13 accessory structures or other improvements (i.e., decks, patios, spas, pools,
14 etc.).
15 c. Garage conversions shall be prohibited for attached dwelling units.
16 Provisions for replacement of off-street covered parking for detached units
17 shall be required.
18 d. Accessory dwellings shall be permitted subject to applicable regulations
19 contained in the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.
20 4. All aspects of the proposed development plan are subject to review by the Site Plan
21 and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for Final Map including
22 but not limited to: architecture, public and private landscaping, hardscape surface
23 treatments, irrigation and fencing. Particular emphasis shall be placed on SPARC
24 review of the following:
25 a. Unit architecture for the designated 10% units as well as for compliance of
26 all units with the intent of General Plan and Corona/Ely Specific Plan
27 provisions for diversity.
28 b. Landscape plans for appropriate design linkage with different sections of the
29 development; building architecture and fencing; appropriate water, soil and
30 space conditions.
31 c. Perimeter wall, Urban Separator, and interior fencing design.
32 d. Subdivision entry treatment.
33 e. Appropriate redesign of areas specified under Condition 1.
34 f. Appropriate design of perpendicular parking and landscape treatment within
35 the Urban Separator, incorporating recommendations of the Recreation and
36 Parks Commission.
90-242 N.C.S.
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
5. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Petaluma Street Naming
Committee prior to Final Map.
6. The .following requirements of the Chief Building Inspector shall be met prior to
issuance of building permits:
a. One-hour wall without openings required at property lines.
b. Building overhangs may not cross property lines.
7. The following requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met prior to issuance of
development permits:
a. Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the Fire Marshal's office and as
marked on the plans forwarded to MacKay & Somps:
16 hydrants are required: 13 with single 2-1/2" and 4-1/2" outlets
3 with double 2-1/2" and 4-1/2" outlets
b. All groups of attached townhouses with 8,000 or more square feet total
combined floor area shall be protected by an approved automatic fire
extinguishing system in accordance with Section 10.308(a) of the Uniform
Fire Code (see attached).
c. All attached townhouses with a grouping of 3 or more units shall be equipped
with approved heat activated fire alarm systems.
d. Required fire flow for project is 3,500 gallons from any two hydrants at PSI
residual pressure.
e. All roof covering material shall -have a class "B" rating or better, treated in
accordance with the Uniform Fire Code Standard 32.7.
8. School buildings and parking shall not be located within the Urban Separator (per
the Corona/Ely Specific Plan). School structures may be placed within the Urban
Separator, for a temporary period of time, while construction on the permanent site
occurs, subject to City Council authorization. Placement of temporary structures
shall not preclude development. of a continuous pathway along the urban separator.
9. Proposed treatment along the Urban Separator shall include the following subject to
review and approval by the Recreation and Parks Commission prior to Final Map:
Specific requirements (to be performed by developers):
a. Transition zone (interface) with similar treatment (parking, fencing,
landscaping, walking/bike path) as Wiseman Linear Park.
b. Grading (1-1/2 - 2%) to City specs (see IV.A.) to accommodate playing
.fields.
c. Utilities/sewer should be brought across road/parking area to U.S. property
line and stubbed.
90-242 N.C.S.
4
1 d. Parking along Street F, design subject to SPARC approval.
2 10. The following Parks and Recreation Commission requirements on the park site
3 development, shall be followed:
4 a. No placement of extensive fill on park site, .generally flat or gently consistent
5 grading shall be provided.
6 b. Turf and irrigation shall be provided within the park site, subject to City staff
7 review and approval.
8 c. A sewer stub-out shall be provided to the park site, location subject to City
9 staff review and approval.
10 11. Tentative map/PUD approval becomes effective upon City Council approval and
11 recordation of a (revised) development agreement between the applicant and City
12 that reflects conditions of tentative map and development plan approval.
13
14
15
16 PUDmorn/council-2
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Eo~rx~x~9lne~)t)xneeting f°~,~1
on the......-..lb.th_.--.... day of ...............Iuly.................................-., 19-...9.Q by the ~ ~ /~....
following vote
City Attorney
AYES:Balshaw, Sobel, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: C ~ /
ABSENT: p /J~~jQ
ATTEST: .-•-•-----•-•---•.R,~.~X.J~-~.. ...................................._ .........:...............................-•-------....-....-•--••--••--- •---"..r--'----•
City Clerk pe Mayor
®E'P U~ C I '~S L~ cil File..(.~ ...............................
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No.........°1.'.24.2.... N.C.S.