HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-267 08/06/1990 ~~S®Il.itl®1`1 N®. 90-267 N ~.J.
L_
1 of the City of Petaluma, California
2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PUD UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
3 SONOMA GATEWAY (SONOMA GLEN) SUBDIVISION, ASINGLE-FAMILY
4 AND CONDOMINIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON MARIA
5 DRIVE NEAR YARBERRY, APN 137-060-01
6
7 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1811 N.C.S., Assessor's Parcel Number 137-060-01, has
8 been rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
9
10 WHEREAS, by action taken on June 26, 1990, the Planning Commission considered and
11 forwarded a recommendation to the City Council on the unit development plan for a
12 single-family and condominium project in said Planned Unit District; and
13
14 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental
15 Quality Act Guidelines and Section 15083 have been satisfied through the preparation and
16 certification of the Corona/Ely Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report in which the
17 anticipated specific impacts have been. adequately identified and mitigated through the
18 adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the proposed G1enBrook project.
19
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the
21 following findings:
22
23 Findin s:
24 1. That the development plan as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the
25 land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single
26 zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
27 2. That the plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and
28 organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in
29 relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and
30 that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
31 compatibility.
32 3. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site will be protected through the
33 implementation of tree preservation conditions of approval, and that adequate
34 available public and private spaces are designated on the Unit Development Plan.
35 4. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the
36 applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
37 will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent
90-267
aes. ~o ..............1.............. v.cs.
1 and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma
2 General Plan.
3 5. That the PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to
4 one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway, Maria Drive) to carry any
5 additional traffic generated by the development.
6
7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Sonoma Glen unit
8 development plan as presented at the July 16, 1990 meeting of this Council is hereby
9 approved pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. as amended
10 subject to the following conditions:
11
12 PUD Conditions:
13 1. Project CC&R's shall be developed for both the detached single family units and the
14 attached condominium units. The CC&R's shall be subject to staff review and
15 approval prior to Final Map and shall include a reference to PUD Development
16 Standards for governing the following:
17 a. Maximum lot coverage, minimum setbacks height and design criteria for
18 principal dwellings and accessory uses and structures, including fences.
19 b. Identification of options and/or restrictions applicable to homeowners
20 relative to the construction of building additions, permitted detached
21 accessory structures or other improvements (i.e., decks, patios, spas, pools,
22 etc.).
23 c. Garage conversions shall be prohibited for attached dwelling units.
24 Provisions for replacement of off-street covered parking for detached units
25 shall be required.
26 d. Accessory dwellings shall be permitted subject to applicable regulations
27 contained in the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.
28 e. Protection of solar access.
29 f. Creation of a homeowner's association for private landscaping and
30 improvement maintenance.
31 2. All aspects of the proposed development plan are subject to review by the Site Plan
32 and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for Final Map including
33 but not limited to: architecture, public and private landscaping, hardscape surface
34 treatments, irrigation and fencing. Particular emphasis shall be placed on SPARC
35 review of the following:
90-267 N.C.S.
2
1 a. Unit architecture for both the detached single family units and the attached
2 condominium units for compliance of all units with the intent of General
3 Plan and Corona/Ely Specific Plan provisions for diversity.
4 b. Additional distinction and variation between detached single family model
5 types, particularly the two story units. Additional distinction and variation in
6 townhouse cluster designs to avoid repetition. Further variety provided
7 between single family and townhouse units architectural styles and
8 construction materials.
9 c. Redesign of unit architecture/lot layout as necessary to further reduce
10 prominence of garages. Further recessing of garages, detached garages, or
11 side-entry garage (with doors not facing streets) are encouraged.
12 d. Revision of lot pattern, as necessary, and redesign of Mountain Way Circle to
13 introduce a more curvilinear roadway section along lots 1-9/50-59 and 18-
14 31/38-49.
15 e. Introduction of greater front yard setback variety for lots 33-48. Attempt to
16 incorporate additional variety in front yard and side yard setbacks throughout
17 the development.
18 3. Landscape plans for the development shall be revised for SPARC review and
19 approval to include the following:
20 a. Provision of landscape buffer of trees on school site and minimum eight (8)
21 foot high solid fence on private parcels (school to act as "good neighbor" for
22 fence maintenance.)
23 b. Detail provided of landscaping/fencing along Maria Drive. An attractive
24 streetscape shall be created consistent with the treatment proposed by the
25 adjacent Glen Brook subdivision.
26 c. Unified landscape plan submitted for property within both the Sonoma
27 Gateway and the Glen Brook PG&E 40 foot wide utility easement. Each
28 project shall be responsible for provision of initial landscaping within its
29 portion of this easement.
30 d. Landscaping within the Sunrise Parkway median designed to be compatible
31 with adjacent subdivision landscaping and to be visually attractive
32 (Maintenance of the median island shall through a landscape assessment
33 district.)
34 e. Appropriate design linkage with different sections of the development;
35 building architecture and fencing; appropriate water, soil and space
36 conditions.
90-267 N.C.S.
3
1 f. Perimeter wall and interior fencing design. Enhancement of fencing
2 detail through the incorporation of special design features (e.g., substantial
3 corner posts with decorative capes, lattice height addition, etc.)
4 g. Subdivision entry treatment.
5 h. Addressing Parks and Recreation Department concerns related to public
6 landscape areas.
7 i. Provision of landscaped parking island within the interior of all cul-de-sac
8 bulbs, including the knuckles serving lots 12-16, 52-57 and 93-97.
9 4. Parcels H and I of the Sonoma Gateway Subdivision and Lot B of Glen Brook shall
10 be offered for dedication. The parcel southeast of the intersection of Sonoma
11 Mountain Parkway and Maria Drive shall be offered for dedication. Maintenance
12 of these parcels shall be through a landscape assessment district.
13 5. Development of the townhouse condominium project shall be revised to increase
14 the density to a minimum of 10 units/acre. Townhouses abutting Sonoma Mountain
15 Parkway shall be revised to not exceed one story or 15 feet at a distance of 30 feet
16 from Sonoma Parkway. An additional one foot of building height shall be permitted
17 for each added foot of setback. Revised plans shall be brought to the Planning
18 Commission for review prior to undergoing SPARC review and approval.
19 6. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Petaluma Street Naming
20 Committee prior to Final Map.
21 7. The following requirements of the Chief Building Inspector shall be met prior to
22 issuance of building permits:
23 a. Grading must be certified when completed to indicate compliance with
24 approved plans and will be required for occupancy.
25 b. Soils with expansion index greater than 20 requires special design foundation
26 per Uniform Building Code 2904(b).
27 c. Show site drainage and grading topography.
28 d. Indicate all utilities on site plan.
29 e. Verify utilities are adequate for building (i.e., size of water, electrical and gas
30 service and size of sewer).
31 f. Responsible party to sign plans.
32 g. Submit soils report to verify foundation design.
33 h. Pool must have the approval of Sonoma County Health Department.
34 i. Sound wall must be detailed.
35 j. Any abandoned wells require Health Department permit.
90-267 N.C.S.
4
1 8. Site drainage design shall be in conformance with the Sonoma County Water
2 Agency Flood Control Design Criteria.
3 9. A bus pullout shall be provided on Maria Drive between Ely Road and Gate Way at
4 or near the proposed elementary school site, subject to the approval of the City
5 Transit Coordinator.
6 10. The following requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met prior to issuance of
7 development permits:
8 a. All dwelling groups including garage areas with 8,000 or more square feet in
9 area, shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
10 b. All dwelling groups with three or more units, but having less than 8,000
11 square feet shall be provided with an approved fire alarm system.
12 c. All roof covering material shall have a class "B" rating or better, treated in
13 accordance with the Uniform Fire Code Standard 32.7.
14 d. Provide fire hydrants as required by the Fire Marshal's Office. 43 fire
15 hydrants for projects. Hydrants shall have a single 2 1/2 and single 4 1/2
16 inch outlets. Fire flow required 2,250 gallons per minute at 20 PSI residual
17 pressure.
18 11. Hours of construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 AM to 6 PM,
19 Monday through Friday (non-holiday.)
20 12. Timing of the development and sales of the residential areas is subject to City staff
21 decision relative to Zone 4 Water System completion and Sonoma Mountain
22 Parkway completion.
23 13. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the final proposed contour levels for
24 improvements along Maria Drive from the existing edge of pavement to the row of
25 houses proposed adjacent to Maria Drive. Grading, landscaping and roadway
26 improvements along .Maria Drive shall minimize the impact of the grade differential
27 between existing and proposed development, subject to SPARC review and
28 approval.
29 14. Revised architectural elevations of the detached single-family units shall be brought
30 back to the Planning Commission to review prior to SPARC review of the
31 architecture.
32 15. A revised Tentative Map shall be provided for SPARC review which includes the
33 closure of Ely Road at Maria Drive. An emergency vehicle roadway access shall be
34 provided from Maria Drive to Ely Road, in conjunction with public improvements.
35 The improvement of the closure, including landscaping, fencing, emergency vehicle
36 roadway design and location, etc., shall be subject to SPARC review and approval.
90-267 N.C.S.
5
1 16. .All hazardous materials (as recognized by the City Fire Marshal) utilized on the
2 construction site shall be kept within a fenced, locked enclosure, subject to review
3 and approval of City staff.
4 17. Garage doors to be a variety of materials and designs.
5 1$. Tentative map/PUD approval shall become effective following City Council
6 approval and recordation of a (revised) development agreement between the
7 applicant and City which reflects all relevant conditions of tentative. map and
8 development plan.
9
10
11
12 PUDsogo/gb4/council-3
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of .said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of .Petaluma at a (Regular) (~~i~e~X{~) meeting form
on the ...---F t.~l day of _.................4~Lt~l? s ~ 19..9 by the
.following vote: - - • • -
City Attorney
AYES: Balshaw, Sobel, Davis, LJoolsey, Tenter, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES : 0
L
ABSENT: U
ATTEST : ~ ' G~
City C1er1~EP'(.~T~ CITE( CLE~~ Mayor
until File......~
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No. ....:.~~..~.....-.~L. 6.7... N.C.S.