Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-277 08/06/1990Resolution No. 90-2» NC.S. of the City of Petaluma, California SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE POLICE AND FIRE BINDING ARBITRATION PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT WHEREAS., a Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Petaluma, California on November 6, 1990, at which there will be submitted to the voters the following measure: "Section 82: POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS BINDING ARBITRATION Section 1. Declaration of Policy. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the City of Petaluma that strikes by firefighters and police officers pose an imminent threat to public health and safety and should be prohibited, and that a method should be adopted for peacefully and equitably resolving disputes that might otherwise lead to such strikes. Section 2. Prohibition Against Strikes. No City of Petaluma police officer or firefighter employee, employee union, association or organization shall, strike or engage in such concerted economic activity against the City of Petaluma. Disputes unresolved by negotiations should be resolved by the arbitration procedure set forth herein. Any such employee who fails to report for work without good and just cause during said negotiations or who aids, abets or encour- ages strikes, or other such economic activity against the City of Petaluma during such time shall be subject to disciplinary action, including, but not limited to termination from the City of Petaluma employment, subject to the provisions of this Charter, the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations and lawful procedures . Section 3. Obligation to Negotiate in Good Faith. The City, throwits duly authorized representatives, shall negotiate in good faith with the recognized fire and police department employee organizations on all matters relating to the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of the City employ- ment, including the establishment of procedures for the resolution of grievances submitted by either employee organization over the interpretation or application of any Nes. No...__..90 27.7.... N.C.S. negotiated agreement including a provision for binding arbitration of those grievances. Unless and until agreement is reached through negotiations between the City and the recognized employee organization for the fire or police depart- ment or a determination is made through the arbitration procedure hereinafter provided, no existing benefit or condition of employment for the members of the fire department or police department bargaining unit shall be eliminated or changed. Section 4. Impasse Resolution Procedures. All disputes or controversies pertaining to wages, hours, or terms and conditions of employment which remain unresolved after good faith negotiations between the City and either the fire or police department employee organization shall be submitted to a three-member Board of Arbitrators upon the declaration of an impasse by the city or by the recognized employee organization involved in the dispute. Representatives designated by the City and representatives of the recognized employee organization involved in the dispute, controversy or grievance shall each select one arbitrator to the Board of Arbitrators within three (3) days after either party has notified the other, in writing, that it desires to proceed to arbitration. The third member of the Arbitration Board shall be selected by agreement between the two arbitrators selected by the City and the employee organiza- tion, and shall serve as the neutral arbitrator and Chairman of the Board. In the event that the arbitrators selected by the City and the employee organization cannot agree upon the selection of the third arbitrator within ten (10) days from the date that either party has notified the other that it has declared an impasse, then either party may request the State of California Conciliation Service to provide a list of seven (7) persons who are qualified and experienced as labor arbitrators. If the arbitrators selected by the City and the employee organization cannot agree within three (3) days after receipt of such list on one of seven (7) to act as the third arbitrator, they shall alternately strike names from the list of nominees until only one name remains and that person shall then become the third arbitrator and chairman of the Arbitration Board. Any arbitration convened pursuant to this article shall be conducted in conformance with, subject to, and governed by Title 9 of Part 3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. At the conclusion of the arbitration hearings, the Arbitration Board shall direct each of the parties to submit, within such time as the Board may establish, a last offer of settlement on each of the issues in dispute. The Arbitration Board shall 2 Reso. 90-277 N.C.S. decide each issue by majority vote by selecting whichever last offer of settlement on that issue it finds most nearly conforms with those factors traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of wages, hours, and other terms and condi- tions of public and private employment, including, but not limited to, changes in the average consumer price index for goods and services, the wages, hours, and other terms and. conditions of employment of other employees performing similar services, and the financial condition of the City and its ability to meet the cost of the award. After reaching a decision, the Arbitration Board shall mail or otherwise deliver a true copy of its decision to the parties. The decision of the Arbitration Board shall not be publicly disclosed and shall not be binding until ten (10) days after it is delivered to the parties. During that ten-day period the parties may meet privately, attempt to resolve their differ- ences, and by mutual agreement amend or modify any of the decisions of the Arbitration.. Board. At the conclusion of the ten-day period, which may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties, the decision of the Arbitration Board together with any amendments or modifications agreed to by the parties shall be publicly disclosed and shall be binding upon the parties . The City and the recognized employee organization shall take whatever action is necessary to carry out and effectuate the award. The expense of any arbitration convened pursuant to this article, including the fee for the services of the Chairman of the Arbitration Board, shall be borne equally by the parties. All other expenses which the parties may incur individually are to be borne by the party incurring such expenses." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. That the City Council authorizes Rri an Snhal (Council Member Irrr3'/Against) Lynn Woolsey (Council Member Imo'/Against) Michael Davis John Balshaw Mayor Patricia Hilli~oss (Council Member Ir/Against) (Council Member T /Against) (£~~e~er /Against ) Res. 90-277 N.C.S. members of that body, to file written arguments regarding the City measure as specified above in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change the argument until and including August 20, 1990, the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. resolution 10 RE502 8/2/90 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the -..Approved as to - .. ~_,,. Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~jrar~)K meeting 1 on the .....6-th ............. day of ..............August............................-., 1x.90_, by the ~~' following vote: City Attorney AYES: Balshaw, Sobel, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss NOES : 0 ABSENT: 0 ~ ~___~~ ~i L ' Y _ _ _ , City Clerk Mayor ' Council Filep.-l.-1.--.~ ......................... cn ]0-85 Res. No. .....9Q.-.~.7.Z....... N.C.S.