HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6113 N.C.S. 08/21/1972 EER:btr. 8/21/72 t
'Resolution• No 6113 N.L it g�,
DEVELOPMEI9T ` n
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A RESIDENTIAL/CONTROL
SYSTEM FOR THE CITY. OF PETALUMA : C
4
1.
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN AIX 4<a "r . At A Regular Meeting of
the City Council of the City of Petaluma on the 21st day of August 1972
WHEREAS, a Residential Development Control Systeni .for the City of
Petaluma has been reviewed by this Council and the Planning Commission has
recommended its adoption in the form as 'attached hereto; and this Council
finds that said System should be adopted;
NOW, THEREFORE ,BE IT 'RESOLVED that the City of Petaluma adopt a
Residential Control System for the City in the .form as attached hereto and
made a part hereof, ,
undetche-power and but cy confe e pon,this Council by•the Charter of said City.
'' - % / COUNCILMEN' VOTE
Seconded by.. - i -'�--. =' `"— Ayes Noes Assent
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and Councilman Robert A. Brunner
regularly introduced and adopted by the Council of the City of " J Jr.Cavanagh,h ohn W. C ,
i,i
Petaluma, on the 21 day of Au st 1972 , by Richard W. Clecak
l
the following vote: _
" Robert E. Daly v'
(SEAL) -" t�42 C d. z�C.-.,:.1�a.
Mayor of theCityfof Petaluma Fred V. Mattei
/ William A. Perry, Jr. V
�..
Attest c t.��f >� r:=.' :"
City Clerk
Mayor Helen Putnam
-j
RESIDENTIAL .DEVELOPMENTCONTROL SYSTEM
OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA
It is the adopted policy of the City of Petaluma to es-
tablish control. oer the quality , distribution, and rate of
growth of the City in the interest of :
Preserving the quality of the community ;
. Protecting the green open-spade frame of the City ;
Insuring the adequacy of City facilities and services
within .acceptable allocation' of City and school tax
funds ;
Insuring a balance of housing types and values in the
City which will accommodate a Variety of families in-
cluding families of moderate income and older families
on limited„ fixed incomes ; and
Cr,-seri.ng the balanced development of the City east ,
north and west of the central core.
Theee policies are more completely set forth in the Official
Statement of Development Policy for the City of Petaluma , adopted
by thhe City Council , Resolution No . i7G0 N-C , S . , June 7 , 1971.
The policies of the City are given increasingly specific
form In three docur:erL-s :
1 . The PetaiDma General Plan adopted March 5 , 1962 , and
ap subsequently amended Dram tithe to tine ,
_ , the Petaluma Environmental Design Plans adopted' March 27 ,
The housing .Element of the General Plan adapted , j- :r%.5- /'7)—
•
of
y
i hn /J:eher,-,i Flan establishes long-range general. development
. i.cy . The Ln.',iionmental Design Plan establishes medium-:range
and ray recif:ic and detailed deve-lopment policy directed to
re __ pm nt period 1973-1977 . The Housing Element of the
.. r ?Ian defines the housing policy goals of the City and
esablidhles a proposed Residential Development Program 1973- 1.977
ES ._ forth on Page 24 of the Housing Element ,
4L is ..hE uuIpose of this Residential Development Control
System ifthalemont the policies of the city of Petaluma as
in the Development Policy Resolution and the three
offididl i c Mme i referred to above . In order `o,
_._ to cotupilsn
this purpbse , the City must be able to control the rate ,
I
Ft r%�t c i , 5
distribution, quality and economic revel of proposed. develop-
ment on a year-to-year _bas_is . To this end the City Council
hereby establishes the following Residential Development Control
System for the City Of Petaluma which system shall be in effect
from and after its adoption by resolution of the City Council
until modified or terminated by resolution of the Council .
I . APPLICABILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL SYSTEM
The provisions of the Residential Development Control System
shall apply to all residential development in the City of
Petaluma including single and multi=family housing and mobile
homes , with the exception of projects not defined as subdivisions
under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act (i .e. , four or
less lots) , fourplexes or lesser. numbered multiple dwellings
on a single existing lot, single family residential units on
a single existing Lot .
II . ESTABLISHMENT OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION BOARD
In order to administer the system set forth herein, and
especially to make the evaluations ,set forth in Section V below,
a Residential Developnient 'Evaluation Board (hereafter called
the Board) iS hereby established,. the membership of which shall
be appointed by the City Council as follows :
2 members from the City Council
2 members from the Planning Commission
3 citizens from either a business or profession E/W/Central
4 members from each of the local school boards :
1 from the Petaluma Elementary School District
1 from the Old Adob: Union School District
1 from the Cinnabar School District
1 from the St . Vincent School System
6 citizens at large E/W/Central
17 Total Members
The Board members will oe -:_� ,.rated `or in day's, and then
the Board wiZZ disband unle ' a r ,r e e;rt sion is deemed
necessary and required b-y h � Ci , Council . 'this will give
them time for the rating. .an. ion of projects and any
reevaluations that are necessary . The B-oard tti. 17 make its
recommendations to the City CorU `, i, and wi% Z have no relation-
shi-p with other boards.. 'or corm-itt -es, �w .th :t:he exception of
the membership gu-i.delines as put forth. above . It will nott be
concerned with policy, biyt wi77 ,'t only In an rdvisory ca acit
P y •
tit
r c� . wit
III . ESTABLISHMENT. OF ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT QUOTAS
The numbers of dwelling units hereinafter to be constructed
each year in the City of Petaluma (except fbr dwelling units
exempted in accordance with time provisions of Section I above)
shall be established by action of the City Council as follows :
1. The quantitative quotas shall be based on the numbers
of single family and multi-family units set forth
in the Residential Development Program, Page 24 of
the Housing Element of the Petaluma General Plan.
2 . The distribution of the quotas in east, central and
west Petaluma shall be based on the Residential !De-
velopment Program of the Housing Element of the Petaluma
General Plan.
The annual quota for any housing type and for any section
of the City as set forth in the Housing Element may be modified
by the Council to an. amount not greater than 10 percent more
or less , than the respective figure for any given year as set
forth in the Residential Development. Program, provided that the
annual quota for the next. succeeding year shall be set higher
or lower ; as the case may be , in order to redress any excess
or deficiency and maintain in-so-far-as-possible the balance
set forth in the Residential Development Program.
Refer to the Residential Development Program on Page 24
of the Housing Element for an example. The table shows a pro-
posed total of 50 units of Single family, medium density housing
in East Petatuma for year 2 of the Program . According to the
above limitations, a minimum of 45 and a maximum of 55 units
may be allocated for that year. if possibis, the under- or
Over-allocation in the category should be offset by an under-
or over-allocation in anotiep category in the same year to
bring the total to as near 500 sni: s possible.9 s q. ble. However,
it is acceptable for the yearly total to vary by 10% Or 50
units ) providing that no one category; exceed its 10% variance
limitation. The variances must be restsed as much as possible
in the following year of dve iopment in order to attain the
desired quotas .
In addition to the annual quotas for quantity and dis-
tribution of housing, the Council Mev L quire that between eight
• percept and twelve percent of each year ' s total quota shall be
low to moderate income housing ae set forth on Page 27 of the
Housing Element.
Not less than three months prior to the submittal date
for the ensuing year , the City Council shall , by resolution ,
establish allocation quotas of the ar°i-ous types of dwelling
units, shall direct the Board to nThere to said quotas for the
ensuing year and shall publish them in '- p ,rop i.ate ways .
(Note : This will not apply for the 1973-74 building year,
•
•
The City Council should establish these quotas on or about
May 1, in order to allow approximately four months for developers
to submit proposals . Proposals will he accepted prior to this
date, but they may later be rejected if they exceed the quotas
established by the Council ,
IV . DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENT APPLICATION
Before a developer may submit any residential development
application as defiled in Section I herein for approval or may
be issued a building permit (except for an individual one or
two family unit as specified in I above) he shall apply for and
be granted a Development Allotment as set forth herein :
A . AppliCati:on for an 3-1.lotgent shall be made by the
developer on a form provided by the City.
B . The application shall be accompanied by the following
documents ; or so many of them as are applicable :
1 .. Site Utilization Map including :
a . Vicinity Map to show relationship to:
Adjacent development ,
Surrounding area , and
The City .
b .. Size use layout map to show amount of areas
and intensity of use :
Industrial ,
Commercial ,
Residential categories , and
Open Space .
The sine use ),hour, map i;s of ca,Jor importance;
the Ho ni ty Tap map Pe 8,/l own as a sula Li o_r
?inset: map .
.
2 , Site Develo,^raent
Lot layout to pre 7 Ili) L.nary subdivision ma :, standards ,
Tcpccraphy ,
Lot Sizes ,
S _ alignments , st _wia3 coordination with City
y
street system, and
E xisLing and proposed _ o.l ldi.no , '' fees , J.andscaped
areas . ..
3 , Ppiliminary A-PcuitectupaL Pjans
t pic 3J:oh _t ct..uL a I = le\, ptinns , llyoes and numbers
at r : llir .j
4 Preliminary f a ids' i c ans
General indications of planting..
5 . Housing Marketability and Price Distribution .
Expected ranges of rental amounts or sales prices .
C. The application shall bp submitted by the close of
business on September 1 in order to be considered for
development during the ensuing year commencing May 1 .
D. Eadh application shall be accompanied by a fee in the
amount of $25 . 00 plus $2 . 00 per dwelling unit included
in the application up to a makimuni of $100 . 00 . Such
fee shall not be returnable in the event that no
Development Allocation is awarded.
•
It is expe.cted tba foie should reflect the costs
incurred bid. the Elanning Stuff and the Board in process-
ing the app7-, cot ions . A -mb-rii<trrum fee is necessary
because all proposed ed dove lopments, no matter how
smalls will require a certain amount of study . The
incremental pJr1iu-n of the fee should reflect the
additional sire needed to study larger developments .
V . DEVELOl'MENil ALLOCATION EVAhu/DIJON
The Board s-:ha1..1 consider all applications properly submitted
and shall make recommendations to the City Council based on the
criteria set forth below:
A. Conformity with Plans
1 . The Board shall examine each application for a
Development Allotment for its conformity with the
provisions cf the Petaluma General. Plan .
2 . Each application shall also conform to the pro-
visions for of the Pat a igma Environmental Design Plan.
The Bosid a;a1I. not recommend that a Development
Allotment he awarded for any proposed development which
it detorillines not to ba in conformity with said plans .
B. [3v-c a.abi.Ji ,.y of PablIc Facilities and Services
The Board sha l J: examins each application for its rela-
tion Lc , or impact upon Local public facilities and
services ,, and shall rate each development by the
assignment off from dr; to five points ( zero indi-
cating " (- .rj pLOor ` five indicating "excellent" ) on
each of the following Ltri_b .'- es :
.I__ The capacity `.0 the water system to provide for
the needs of ?. proposed e_d devel_opme'nt without
sysifem extensions beyond those normal ;_y installed
by the -. . - ' er .
2 . The capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of
the wastes of the proposed development without
system extensions, beyond those normally installed
by the developer.
3 . The capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately
dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed de-
velopment without system extensions beyond those
normally installed by the developer.
4 . The ability of the Fire Department of the City of
Petaluma to provide fire protection according
to the established response standards of the
City without the necessity of establishing a new
station or. requiring addition of major equipment
to an existing station.
5 . The capacity of the appropriate school to absorb
the children expected to inhabit a proposed de-
velopment without necessitating or adding to
double sessions or other unusual scheduling or
classroom overcrowding .
6 . The capacity of major street linkages to provide
for the needs of the proposed development without
Substantially altering existing traffic patterns
or overloading the existing street system, and the
availability of other public facilities (such as
parks , playgrounds , etc. ) to meet the additional
demands for vital public services without exten-
sion of services beyond those provided by the
developer.
Since it will be difficult for any developer to
only partially comply with the above criteria,
it is expected that the Board will assign either
0 or 5 points on each .
The Supplemental Material Coordinating the Housing
Element and the Residenm-i.al Development Control
System located in the hack of the Housing Element
has been prepared to facilitate the Board in its
evaluation of proposed projects . It may be of
particular help in the evaluation of items 7, 2,
5 and 6 in this section.
C. Quality of Design and Contribution to Public Welfare
and Amenity
The Board shall examine each application which has
not been withdrawn by the applicant for failure to
meet criteria A and B , and shall rate each develop-
ment by the assignment of from zero to ten points
on each of the following a ttributes ;
6-
I ,....71)
. .
1 , Site and, architectural design quality which may
be in.c.1194t.ed by the hai ruony of the proposed build:-
ingS in terms of size, height, Wo lor and location
with existing ;neighboring dev.0.3.Ppmcnt ,
2 , Site and architectural. design qualit-2-„, which may
be ±rodicated by ths ampont and character of J and-
.
sc.a.ping and c,.,:cE.-,,,n.1,..t.1.g.,
3 . Site and arphitec.tucci design quality which may
be indicated by tht:, arrangement of the site for
ei..r.f:i c ler cy ot on cu.).a tipn, on and off s ite traffic
safety , .pri'v6cy , etc .
4 . Thc pto7isin. cf poblic ar3d/br private usable
ooen space a.udlcd. pathways along the Petaluma
RAV-er or any ereok .
5 . Con l:r.ibut.ions to iid. extr.1!nsions -af. Js.ri..isting systems
of. fadt .or, bicycle 'paths , :elbestrian trails , and
the green„beit pro ijj.(Af.,--id fu.:: In the Environmental
Desigp Plan.
6 , The provision 0f needed public Lapaiiides such as
critical linkages i.e. the Majo,: street system,.
school rooms : or other vital. pubj.ic facilities .
7. The. exJ.e.nt to which the prbpbsed development
d.SiUME:Q..ILS11.6.!S au o..„...dbta.y ,,,tni. contiTious extension.
itf osist rt.n.g c36-:;v1.c.:,pme'ilit as against hi.t...,2ip f.rog"
dov.e",.1.6pMent..„
*8, The .proyAsion or wilts ba inset the Ci.ty ' s 1.:K:C.Licy
goal of .eight percent to ' We .;.e percent low and
moderoto income avc,s...L.L1tn9 urjts annua:!, 1y ,
*Not cpplIcabla LP 197-)-74 year .
D. Aft...et havtn.g. stud:Leel es.,...dt appli..c.c.F..ibn An accord arc
with, pax.ts, A, and E.„', , f..o regast7d tt) each c..i. thcs..e ority.. ia.
br so maby of th,cA, as 'may he app it t..i.e , ?'.3 ad .hav tag
assigned. ccialuati.o ....)ants; on a.. spa - tf ZeVG, LC., be;,
in. 6.0(20,r,:JJAncle wS,th. Lb a 3.c finding .,1;'3 tc: ths uimi,Ub or
thb Pot0...'st1iatiL.L.,....o to 1..f. ,.... uality or .......b.d,', tec.',:..ttre
site. design and ."AAS '2,e'I r t;1 CO td'...0 jj..)lit 3..:S!!::: to the bbike
we...L.f..are or s.fl...,s.i..),.:,. ty la,...de. ',..-,y 5;1 L Ph ii..i.!: ...:...,pc') ft6 d,Dv.E.:11.,:yualcEn.“1
this Board atia.L.,1 autrdn7.4q„ the nevri.ppmcsT.07s J. order
by hPusi.sq i-... T.,s 6d(„.1 lay s,...4.-i....1.b.1..1 !..tf iho 11:i.,..1.,,, „ ftui.l. Ot,st
'pece..id,t)..,(4g the. cp.wttj,.. st 7 -...-ttaj immaber c:± evaiHiatiGYi.
t a t ts that; receiv.i. m) the i e.E.,..s.r. .1.: rflul:atp.::-.!r:,
1: /...7!: )k „IF : .',/ .--.' s.1.1.01e ptP,' al..,-..
el..,3-0e. Z0*(.(s.17:1; ./...y,,, Par.L. :: ' f.„ 0(7:Hi.irj.t..4■ p 0 i,;i .1.2 7 .: ... Y „i,p.i.( . c:f
ii f:isti., /bi..,,t.b1) an.li: a0 pbso ),.bles ...b,,in.1:s .1.t■-'i 1,s:,..at. C .`„71 1..21.1 (t.s.
r.2.,a.r„7L.!,7t..? fI•,(„, ry:e.,c4 ..:1' 9 C.-::' 'r4,5"...) , Thsb:s3 r'.0,2
0
tota'l`s sha'il be listed s.eparatel ' for each development.
It is conceivable that a development may be accepted
even if it has fewer points than one that is re,jec.ted,
if they are of two different housing types or sections
of the City, and the one. with the lower point total
still ranks at the top of its category .
E. Having evaluated each development in accordance with
the foregoing criteria, the Board shall publish in
appropriate ways the rating given to each development
on each of those criteria. The Board shall then
schedule a public hearing to be held within 15 days
following the publication of said ratings which may
be attended by any or all applicants for the purpose
of c-lassifca"tion of any point assignments made by
the Board.
1. Any applicant may request the Board to reevaluate
the pdint assignment made on any or all of the
criteria.
2. Any applicant who is dissatisfied with the Board ' s
reevaluation may submit written notification of
such dissent, which will be furnished to the City
Council prior to the awarding of Development
Allotments .
The .above proceedings will serve as an appeals process .
It is intended that the Board will only alter their
point assignment on a particular development if the
applicant can show that there exists pertinent infor-
mation of which the Board was not aware at the time
of the original evaluation .
F . Having evaluated each development and clarified all
point assignments to the applicants , the Board shall
present their list of evaluations along with the deci-
sions readhed on any appeals ,. to the City Council
for the awarding of Development Allotments .
As previously stated, all applications must be sub-
mitted by September 1 . From September 1 to September
30 the Planning Deportment will study the applications
and will present its findings to the Board on or
about. October 1. The Board will meet as often as
necessary during the month of October to evaluate
all of the applications, and will publish their 'ratings
on or about November 1 . The Board will hold their
public session within 25 days thereafter, and will
present the point rankings to the City Council on the
third Monday in Noroember. (See attached Schedule
for Development) ,
VI . DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENT AWARDS
A. Having received the recommendations and rankings of
the prbposed developments from the Board along with
_2-
.
R.,�:T 5;C3? rr
any action taken by the ,Board concerning appealed
decisions as specified in Section V, the City Council
shall , by resolution., award .Development Allotments
as applied for, starting with those projects receiving
the most evaluation points in each housing type cate-
gory and proceeding in order down the list provided:
It is the intent of the Council to listen to only
those applicants who have requested reevaluation by
the Board and are still dissatisfied with the Board 's
decision. The Board will have passed all pertinent
information concerning these appeals on to the City
Council who will then be prepared to dispose of said
appeals in an efficient manner, and award the Develop-
ment Allotments at their meeting on the third Monday
in November or at -a subsequent or special meeting of
the City Council Veld before Dec. 15 of each year.
1 . Development Program Quota
The number of dwelling units for each housing
type and for each section of the City for which
Development Allotments shall be issued shall not
exceed the quotas established by the City Council
in accordance with Section III herein.
2 . Allocation Limi-ration
NO SINGLE DEVELOPER SHALL IN ANY ONE YEAR, BE
ISSUED A DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENT FOR DWELLING UNITS
IN EXCESS OF A NUMBER TO BE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLU-
TION O.FtTHE CITY COUNCIL.
The City Council shall sett this limitation at the
Same time it cabl? shes quotas for housing types,
on or ragout May I .
When a developer has applied for a Development
Allotment in excess of either the above limitation
or the quotas sstabr heal for each housing, type,
but has receined a. high ez, ration point rating,
the Council ma,g, at its discretion, award the
maximum Deoelcoment A.Ilotmert allowable to the
developer with Th2 stip2,, lativn that the excess
units shall be corst2c,icted during the following
year of tile brparam . lhio /Jill, of course, limit
the number of odd tL raj_ units that may be approved
for that part c lar housing tt.pe is the ensuing
year .
3 . Minimum Feint Requi_cements
The City Council shall eliminate from considera-
tion any development which has not been assigned a
,- - ... ...
.... (,...,"„--„,,
..
.
R.::::-5,0;. . c, 1 v.
minimum of 25 points •n.her g.iection V‘..B herein,
or a minimum of 52. points under Section. V--C .
A developrier.a. must. yree.b. both pc,1.47... .1 ?.:.74:77. .,mt.,.3
iv/. ox,di,:r t;...2. qualify for. coderati.cn TOY, a Oe-
ve.Zopmnt A -.Ornent.. Si ....- o delJelopm'ent maFt
re.c,g1Pe , 2.5 o.z,v, ,21! 30 ob • e polnts' ?4nde2, M3c-
tion V-8„ ii: MUG-1.; flU1,: aS )ast 5 .:,: f the 6 cr4ter-la
7.':vt t;hats :',1,-..k ., Tif):dei::r, In awarding i.7he ni.2.ve.71..Qp-
men.* 47.j..otmm.t: 1::/-fq colsncJij, ahohltd rapor those
appl-tqasts who ha-t)e tot (217 5 of I:hose (rviteria
(a a.csol.s 10 iiz.,,I../Lt.$) even if they hard ranked
al.igh.tly 7 on -;:the ;..4.1v4karia '1'1 5,&,21... .i.on 1/..-.0„
If he kighes !.... !-...c.flkEn.g dsvely-ipmt. • .:.) any houoing
typ,2. .and .8--2:::.-, I'l :f the: Clan; does not meet Or ex-
cef,id one or both. of th.ci ./.7 ..4.111Ium point requirements,
the C• ±w Ces-iFi-/. 1. olla17., make no Deco Allot-
meot for thsi: fa..-Levo.ic;./.:v7.T. caV,ago.oy , The number of
ul;.4,ts aZiob2.q.6 ? 0 for t7nE2t categ'opy nay then he
added to the quiflet for til :,. enaziing gear.
B. Should a deNelopr fail to LhEtiate construction within
six months of the issuance of a. buiidinij permit: par-
shant to a aetielnpm..c.at ikl-tntluen.t., the City Council,
after a heari&g. , m31 by lAajox. 11:2 vote , rescind all
or part. of the DeVEJ.Ciprilt AlIGEEiant and may award
the Allotment to the tE!..E.!mt natisfaptcy applicant on
the rank award. 1.5.:,..:.
. t whose proposal, an of the sane.
type and in the sft.i. : soct.ct .53 the withdramr allotment;
or the Cdty Couucal may 4,..-A.,:l. the unlined Allotment
for addition to the ,...-.,n8iug year ' s quota. .
Th:,,. City Cc,u001. 7. :Jni. / 1?) it 0 ii..-1:e t.)!.TEl.:? .:...piri AiLotmento
on. ?Mb -tHz,d ( / / / Ln 21:2. s f,e ot ..f fiubseq.ifsst
or spec.7..a , T1.,,..f::. 774]..,. ...,.. ,..,.2e, , :. ...:... .. _.?.‘2.1.J.1. , 4t,, ,,...
' i$ each year.. Tif,c, cle0, 21)pr f,: L17 h20e n.i.neiy dan;
from i://at. ciat .:),./:. HE.Y.d. .'2h 'i.:,...... ,...H.,,q;.. -s 0.,!.(i. uubmi a tc:Nj.7.0-
tive rflcip of ii.:) :..1;::4.',....- i-2,- .:21.7, . ±h:.,.! (0.11 ,;./. 1 1 the.n.
ha2) -; UNt“ MOT 1. t,::: ±1...r. Y.:y .: :: '.:±. 1- 1:11:1 -ki-E O >0' z ( Of
d. VelOPMOnt, at wS . ifLy71:3 0 ,-slisRfo pnmit iThsitl.
he i.sau,9d. Thi].,, d.,?..o,:= Zss,-, ,:i 14/"-- l'if; i: iniLLC-I;Y
tion pribi, to N . . . h ai.-) os
"Limith-f;isns , ( Gic ays.f.-H,:j 5 ::,..!..44f: f..v.,P 1) e/J.7)nlent...:L
C . Should a d.E.welopfix _Lili tA '.-7:1' .- y out fully the de-
velopmnt , as dei.:.ai En tiL,. ..H,..pn.Lic.:,..itr..1,11 om.y uhOsed.
po:E-tic,n of hi..,: Deve.11 :.)mi,n . Alicitir.::::pt: msy be Eesci..flded
in. the mnhaier set foi,:til lo D sbr,vf, , us:Jess the de-
veloper ha&t shown gcod faA-Th ... r.“1 h.s, developed at
lesSt 25:, of 'his alintn,7:a , ... r .Ln. tbe_ 7..,:a5 c. of: sub-
diviLSions , hfss ada:ad .;.7.i:fl:A. Ls -,...cs:q:sy..saidc-s.iwo Nata_..r.H.
sewer, .5 Liceets , etc , ofid asK:.s.1*tic:s:.1 which, .sicsJ Al at.
least 25% of the t;_ ,..! .ie ..nr.j.., mr.fnr :.;,-„F:,tn , and
.3 ow ff:F:d: 'rn,i, wil -,i conclufJ,:-.: ds:ss.2L,:-)p.i.rIssisc.. witbin cse
yeor,
- yoc
6
D. An application may be amended upon application made
in the same manner as for the original application.
In addition, the application for an amendment shall
set forth the reasons for requesting the amendment.
1 . The City Council shall review such an amendment
application in the same manner as an original
application and may grant the amendment as re-
quested , modify the amendment ,, or deny the amend-
ment.
2 . An amendment or modified amendment may be granted
only if.:
a . The proposed development meets the requirements
of Section V-A and B and does not exceed the
quota as specified in VI-A, and
b. The City Council after reviewing the proposed
development in relation to the criteria set
forth in Section V-B and C shall find that
the modified development has earned as many
or more evaluation points than the original
development for which the Development Allot-
ment was .issued.
The amendment procedure should not be confused with
the. i coat tion process outlined in Section V-E. An
application may be amended either before or after the
Development Allotment is awarded. Prior to the appli-
cation submissd on deadline (September 11 any amend-
ment shall be automatically accepted. After the sub-
mission deadline hot before the Board makes their recom-
menda '.bna to the City Coun'ci-l. amendment a plications
_ tall be oonsidered by the planning Department and
passed on io the Board. after the Board has made its
recommendations butt before the City Council has made
the awards, no amendment applications will be received.
After the City C onoi1 has awarded the Development Allot-
ments, a developer who has received such award may file
an amendment upp ? rcat an which will he reviewed by the
City Coune-I1.
VII . ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
A-. Amendment of Environmental Design Plans-, General Plan,
and Zoning Ordinance .
Should any applicant wish to apply for an amendment
to the General Plan , the Environmental Design Plan or
the Zorti.ng Ordinance A.r, order to provide for a pro-
posed development, such amendments will be applied
fox in the usual manner and al.l processing will be
completed prior to the d ate for submitting applica-
ti.nn , for D :3ve.lropm n - t l tments .
B. Should the arrangement of projects as provided in
Section V-D produce the, si;tuation in which two pro-
jects have equal evaluation, point scores , but only one
project can be permitted' within the quota, the City
Council may offer those applicants a pro rata share
of the number of units available within the quota ,
or may dispose of such a tie in any other manner deemed
equitable by the City Council.
C. The Board may, by majority vote , make rules and reg-
ulations for the conduct of its business not in con-
flict with the provisions of this resolution.
1.2._
... .
t c t ,---,,
...,.., 1/4. .,
. _
SCHEDULE FOR DEVEL.OPMENT
Ke4;0t_ /,:; 1 \ --2-,
7.
Council awards 0
Development Alic.ftmenf=: , Tentative map {tow develop4,3r
3rd Biondav iri .Nov. due , 90 days after Council
•,..••
■ cl appccival
6: -D i
Bubil,c hearif-Jg with 1
the Board .
. \ 0
c't 1
, ■ ! ,,..)
C., ... ,
‘
,.'
5. ''.. \
\
, y„,. .„... ,
yartIciny S / NOV .. 1 ' i `, ,. „,,,V,,,,, ,...-- '-.,..:-..„.,
.
\N.
,,,,/7 Ns;\
*
\ .)\>
\
/ / Z
...., ,i
//
■
6/ // 9 --- %
Development program-- \
Board / / eabablished , Nov, 11
/ 71 ''' -, to 11.E.ty I.
Oc::. 1 to :oc, . 1/ / .
12. - \
I I / DeadTine icy beginning
1 j
nodstruction, Nov. 1 ,
i
. i
\ j
II , /
.. .? cctrli dolis. ,, ucLion /;!
-- ' '—' .
I
li
• .3
Eb: :if evie .---- \ t.
; 10 4 r
J . \
Buildini pen it .
\ \ \ iSLIVJW,11
. - ir.sued „ 1`i a V 1. -.- 1-7
\ 1 —
•\\ /I
■4::•:' \ / 7
I \ \‘'..,N--, / ,/ / I
2 )
s•,, --„,..._
,..,. , g
......
AT.7p.LicacLonli dce ; --., ",,._ ------------ ------- „.....-- 7 Counci.:
Sapt. , .-
1 , 7 ec/c.abiH■...:
.---
N .. .-- .
.. - quocar ,
..., ,.--
— ...--
‘,.
r-,
DATE
APPLICATION NO.
APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENT
Applicant ' s Name :
Address :
Phone No:
Location of Proposed Development:
Description of Property (Parcel No . , Size , Etc. ) :
Existing Land Use :
Existing Zoning :
Type of Development Proposed (P .U..D. , Single Family, Multi-
Family, etc. ) and Density:
No. of Units of each, Type :
Names and Last Known Addresses of the Recorded Legal Owners of
Adjacent Properties :
I , , am the owner/authorized agent of
the property for which the residential development is proposed.
The above information and attached documents are true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge .
Filing Date Signature of Applicant
This application shall be accompanied by the following documents ,
or so many of them as are applicable.:
SITE UTILIZATION MAP including:
1 . A Vicinity Map to show relationship to adjacent development,
surrounding area, and the City.
2. A Site Use Layout Map to show the amount of areas and intensity
of use for industrial, commercial , and residential categories
and open space.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN : This plan should show lot layout to
preliminary subdivision map standards , topography, lot sizes ,
street alignments , showing coordination with City street system,
and existing and proposed buildings , trees and landscaped areas .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS showing typical architectural
elevations and types and numbers of dwelling units .
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANS with general indications of planting.
HOUSING MARKETABILITY AND PRICE DISTRIBUTION indicating the
expected ranges of rental amounts or sales prices .
FILING FEE; Each application for a Development Allotment shall
be accompanied by a receipt showing payment of the Development
Allotment application fee of $25 . 00 plus $2. 00 per dwelling unit
in the application up to a maximum of $100 . 00 .
-2-