HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-365 11/05/19901
J ~
. '.~Y
FZesolutiohl No. 90-365 N ~.5.
of the City of Petaluma, California
1
2
3 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4 FOR KINGSMILL SUBDIVISION, A 113-UNIT
5 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON
6 SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY, SOUTH OF RAINIER,
7 AP NO.'S 136-120-09, 10 AND 11
8
9
10 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1828 N.C.S., Assessor's Parcel Number 136-120-09,
11 10, and 11, has been rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
12
13 WHEREAS, by action taken on September 25, 1990, the Planning Commission considered
14 and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council on the unit development plan for 113
15 single-family units in said Planned Unit District; and
16
17 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the requirements of the California Environmental
18 Quality Act Guidelines and Section 15083 have been satisfied through the preparation and
19 certification of the Corona/Ely Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report in which the
20 anticipated specific impacts have been adequately identified and mitigated through the
21 adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the proposed Kingsmill project.
22
23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the
24 following findings:
25
26 PUD Findings:
27 1. That the development plan as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the
28 land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single
29 zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
30
31 2. That the plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and
32 organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in
33 relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and
34 that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
35 compatibility.
36
37 3. That the natural and scenic qualities of the .site will be protected through the
38 implementation of tree preservation conditions of approval, and that adequate
39 available public and private spaces are designated on the Unit Development Plan.
90-365
aES. N~ ............._1._.......... N.cs.
1
2 4. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the
3 applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
4 will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent
5 and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma
6 General Plan.
7
8 5. That the PUD District is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to
9 one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway) to carry any additional
10 traffic generated by the development.
1.1
12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council hereby adopts the following
13 conditions:
14
15 P.U.D. Conditions:
16
17 1. All aspects of the proposed development plan are subject to review by the Site Plan
18 and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for Final Map including
19 but not limited to: architecture, public and private landscaping, hardscape surface
20 treatments, irrigation and fencing. Particular emphasis shall be placed on SPARC
21 review of the following:
22
23 a. Development plan shall be revised to provide a substantial variety of front
24 setbacks; emphasis of design to provide garage location to the rear of the
25 house; a more diverse streetscape along the south side of Kingsmill Drive
26 (area of Lots 44,45,87 and 78).
27 b. Evaluation of streetscape landscaping in terms of conformance with the
28 Specific Plan (view corridors, unification/clarification of neighborhood
29 layout, etc.). Landscape plan to provide appropriate street tree species
30 (large and rural in nature), increasing planting frequency to a minimum
31 spacing of 20' - 30', toward developing a linear tree-lined appearance,
32 augmented by accent tree clusters. Street landscape plan shall specify
33 irrigation, street signage, street lighting and mailbox details.
34 c. Building envelopes for custom lots 3, 4 and 24 shall be in accordance with
35 arborists recommendations: Horticultural Associates report dated August
36 23rd. Arborist to supervise construction.
Reso. 90-365 N.C.S.
2
1
2 d. Swale area south of Knight Court shall be developed as a dry Swale to
3 include delineation of swale, preservation of existing vegetation, swale
4 enhancement (rock treatment, introduction of appropriate new landscaping,
5 etc.). Building envelopes for lots 54 and 55 shall be located outside of swale.
6 Some poplars may be removed, subject to staff review and approval prior to
7 removal.
8 e. As proposed, fence and wall design shall emphasize a rural estate character.
9 A solid fence option shall be offered for locations where privacy is desired.
10 Fence design and location shall be in response to creek location, topography,
11 and mature vegetation as applicable. Special attention (i.e., landscape
12 treatment) shall be given to sideyard fences visible from streets. Fence
13 design shall be enhanced through use of decorative post and cap at corners
14 or other means.
15 f. Street luminaries, roof design, and house color (within 300 feet of the
16 Separator) shall comply with the Specific Plan.
17 g. Enforcement of Corona/Ely Specific Plan minimum structure height and
18 setback standards for properties abutting Sonoma Mountain Parkway; and
19 variety of setbacks, building heights, and building massing.
20 h. Potential utilization of additional shared driveways.
21 i. A sense of neighborhood entry and identification shall be provided at cul-de-
22 sacs.
23 j. All conditions required per approval of the Tentative Map.
24 k. Unit architecture and individual site design for compliance with the intent
25 and requirements of the General Plan and Corona/Ely Specific Plan.
26 1. Subdivision entry treatment in terms of adequacy as a Gateway. This shall
27 include parcels D and E adjoining the church site.
28 m. Strict limits on tree removal, grading, and view preservation for the custom
29 lots. Guidelines for building design, exterior materials, architectural quality,
30 etc., shall also be required for the custom lots.
31
32 2. Prop osed treatment along the Urban Separator shall include the following subject to
33 review and approval by the Recreation and Parks Commission prior to Final Map:
34
35
36
Reso. 90-365 N.C.S.
3
Specific requirements (to be performed by developers):
a. Transition zone (interface) with treatment equivalent or superior (parking,
fencing, landscaping, walking/bike paths) to Wiseman Linear Park.
b. Utilities/sewer shall be brought across road/parking area to U.S. property
line and stubbed.
c. Parking along Kingsmill Drive (adjacent to Separator), design subject to
SPARC approval.
d. Mounding and special screening shall be provided at the south boundary
interface with the agribusiness (of the Urban Separator).
e. Location of utility stubs shall be determined by the Parks and Recreation
Director at a later date.
f. Urban Separator adjacent to this project shall be designed to accommodate a
playing field, subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation Director.
3. All landscaping and irrigation systems within the public right-of-way, street tree
planting strips and landscape median/islands shall be maintained by an Assessment
District through contract services, subject to approval of the City Council
concurrently with the approval of the Final Map. Landscaping and irrigation
systems within the areas shall be designed to standards acceptable to the City of
Petaluma. Cost of formation of the required Assessment District shall be borne by
the project proponent, and shall be assessed at time of Final Map submittal.
4. The following concerns of the Police Department shall be addressed prior to
issuance of building permits:
a. Lighted house numbers shall be provided for each residential unit.
b. Dead bolt locks shall be provided.
c. Windows and sliding glass doors shall be provided with self locking tamper
proof devices.
5. Timing of the development and sales of the residential units is subject to City staff
decision relative to Zone 4 Water System and Sonoma Mountain Parkway
completion.
6. PUD Development Standards shall be developed, subject to staff review and
approval prior to Final Map, to include provisions for governing the .following:
Reso. 90-365 N.C.S.
4
1
2 a. Cross-over access and maintenance easement on shared driveway lots.
3 b. Maximum lot. coverage for principal dwellings and accessory uses and
4 structures, definition of specific minimum setbacks, per unit type if
5 appropriate.
6 c. Identification of options and/or restrictions applicable to homeowner's for
7 construction of either building additions, permitted detached accessory
8 structures or associated improvements (decks, patios, spas, etc.). Structural
9 additions are permitted, and shall be contained within the building envelope,
10 as defined within this PUD and set forth on the approved unit development
11 plan and subdivision map. Design shall be in keeping with the approved
12 PUD development plan, to staff review and approval prior to issuance of a
13 development permit. Accessory structures shall be permitted, subject to
14 development standards, prepared by the developer and subject to SPARC
15 review and approval, prior to Final Map approval. Accessory units shall be
16 permitted, pursuant to applicable regulations within the Petaluma Zoning
17 Ordinance.
18 d. Standards for height, location and design of fencing, as well as maintenance
19 and replacement provisions to conform to the approved PUD plan.
20 Proposed fence detail shall be enhanced through the incorporation of special
21 accent features (e.g., substantial corner posts with decorative caps, lattice
22 height addition, etc.), subject to SPARC review and approval.
23 e. Allowance for partial or full garage conversion, replacement of off-street
24 covered parking.
25 f. Rebuilding and/or replacement of residential structures shall conform to the
26 approved unit development plan.
27 g. Any future use of Lot 115, except for continuation. of the existing cucumber
28 farm and associated uses, shall require a PUD amendment. Any future use
29 of Lot 114 (church site) shall require a PUD amendment.
30
31 7. Project CC&R's, if prepared and recorded for this project, shall include reference to
32 the PUD Development Standards, and shall not include regulation of signs which is
33 any more restrictive than the Zoning Ordinance for R-1, 6500, subject to staff review
34 and approval prior to Final Map approval.
35
Reso. 90-365 N.C.S.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8. Access to the existing agribusiness (Lot 115) shall be provided, subject to staff
approval.
kingsml/council-4
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by theme' ~ ed s to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (1~~}QI~~:~fR4) meetufg
on the ..-5.~kt ............... day of ..................I`1S2.v.~.kt~z.................-..., 19..90., by the
following vote: .-•T-•r••.-,....
AYES: Balshaw, Sobel, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0 '' T
ATTEST: . --- .......-.... ... ..:................................
City Clerk ,. Mayor
Council Filel!l1 ........ .............. ........
CA 10-85 ~ Res. No...9.V..-.3.~.5.......... N.C.S.