Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 90-366 11/05/1990~~/ ~ .' 1~eSOlLlt101'1 N®. 90-366 N ~.5. of the City of Petaluma, California 1 2 3 4 5 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 6 FOR KINGSMILL, CREATING 113 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7 LOTS; A 3.9 ACRE CHURCH SITE; AND A 1.7 ACRE SITE 8 TO REMAIN IN AGRIBUSINESS, LOCATED ON SONOMA 9 MOUNTAIN PARKWAY, SOUTH OF RAINIER, 10 AP NO.'S 136-120-09, 10, AND 11 11 12 WHEREAS, Benjamin-Tuxhorn, as owner, has filed with this Council a Tentative Map to 13 subdivide land within this City to be known as Kingsmill Subdivision, and has paid all 14 required filing fees; and 15 16 WHEREAS, the City Engineer, the Director of Community Development, and the 17 Planning Commission have examined and reviewed the same as required by law and all 18 reports, recommendations, and comments thereon have been forwarded to and considered 19 by this Council at its meeting held on October 15, 1990; and 20 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Council hereby finds for the Tentative 22 Map as follows: 23 24 Tentative Map Findings: 25 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditionally approved, together with provisions for its 26 design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and Corona/Ely 27 Specific Plan objectives, policies, general land uses and programs. 28 29 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed, as 30 conditionally approved. 31 32 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements therefore, as 33 conditionally approved, will not cause substantial environmental damage, and no 34 substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish and/or wildlife or their habitat. 35 36 4. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed will not 37 conflict with easement, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of 38 property within the proposed subdivision. 39 Reso. 90-366 N.C.S. Rcs. No. _ .............!..........._. N.C.S. 1 5. The design of the Subdivision and the type of improvements proposed will not 2 conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of 3 property within the proposed subdivision. 4 5 6. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community 6 sewer system will not result in violation of the existing requirements prescribed by 7 the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 8 9 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Council hereby adopts the following conditions: 10 11 Tentative Map Conditions: 12 1. The subdivider shall comply with the following requirements of the City Engineer: 13 14 a. The City does not allow 100 year flood relief swales to be located on private 15 property or between property lines. Therefore, the proposed relief Swale, 16 and the end of Street J and through two proposed lots on parcel A 17 (affordable housing site) shall be redesigned with the relief flow directed and 18 contained within the public street or within an adequate overflow channel 19 and dedicated to the City for maintenance. 20 21 b. Bishop Lane and Street A shall have a minimum public right-of-way of 48 22 feet with face of curb to face of curb width of 32 feet. Atypical street section 23 would consist of two 9 foot travel lanes, and two 7 foot parking lanes. 24 Sidewalk shall be installed on both sides of the street. If this installation 25 meanders outside the public right-of-way, then it shall be contained within a 26 public access easement. Cul-de-sacs and Kingsmill Circle shall have a 27 minimum public right-of-way width of 48 feet with a minimum face of curb- 28 to-curb width of 28 feet. Atypical street section would consist of two, 10 foot 29 travel lanes and one, 8 foot parking lane (sidewalk on one side). 30 31 c. Kingsmill Drive through the entire subdivision up to the Kings Court 32 transition shall be 56 foot right-of-way with face of curb to face of curb of 36 33 feet. Atypical street section would consist of two, 10 feet travel lanes and 34 two, 8 foot parking lanes, with sidewalk installed on both sides of the street 35 within the right-of-way: 36 Reso. 90-366 N.C.S. 2 d. The City shall not maintain the seasonal Swale through Lots 54 and 55; therefore, an appropriate maintenance mechanism shall be required. e. Provisions allowing the Swale flow to pass under the public right-of-way shall be required and designed to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. £ If positive lot drainage cannot be obtained then all backyard drainage control shall be within an underground pipe system with surface catchment swales and inlets. g. This development may be dependent upon utility improvements to be installed adjacent to developments. Appropriate calculations shall be submitted to verify their adequacy. If off-site improvements are required as determined by the Director of Engineering, they shall be installed concurrent with these improvements. h. Lots 35 and 71 shall incorporate the land area within the subdivision boundary designated on the tentative map as future lot line adjustment. After the final map has been approved, then this property line may be adjusted. i. The Wilmington Sewer Pump Station is at capacity during wet weather conditions. The proposed five year capital improvement program includes provisions for expansion of the Wilmington Pump Station to handle proposed development. as well as improvements to better serve existing development. This development shall pay a pro-rata share of the costs of these improvements. j. All utilities located on private property and dedicated to the City for maintenance shall be contained within a 10 foot exclusive easement, with sanitary sewer and watermains contained within a 10 foot exclusive paved easement. k. The streets, utilities within the streets, and storm drainage improvements, are proposed to be installed in three phases. It is recommended the first final map dedicate all those improvements to be constructed within the first phase Reso. 90-366 N.C.S. 3 and the remainder of those improvements to be dedicated to the City with each subsequent phase of final map. 1. All street lights within this development shall have standard metal fixtures dedicated to the City for ownership and maintenance. Special lighting fixtures may be provided, subject to maintenance costs being the responsibility of the Landscape Assessment District. Prior to City acceptance, the developer shall verify all lights meet PG&E's LS2 rating system. m. Signing and striping shall conform to City standards, or as approved by City staff. n. A one-foot, non-access easement shall be required along Sonoma Mountain Parkway (formerly Ely Boulevard). o. The developer shall comply with the Petaluma Municipal Code Section 20.36.010 and 20.36.020 which require the developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in Chapter 17.30) on construction in all sections of the City of Petaluma. 2. Tentative Map shall be revised to reflect 'the following, subject to SPARC review and approval: a. Private access drives serving Lots 63/64 and 106/107 shall be incorporated into respective lots. b. Private access drive serving Lots 41 through 48 shall be incorporated into respective lots as shared flag strips. c. Sidewalk shall be extended across the frontage of Lot 115. d. Queens Court shall be modified to incorporate a more curvilinear alignment. Reso. 90-366 N.C.S. 4 3. Tentative Map shall be revised to insure that the Urban Separator area contains a minimum area as determined by the calculation of a 300 foot width to a point 300 feet south of the City Limit line, subject to staff review and approval. 4. As proposed, developer shall relocate scenic windmill so that it is contained on the church site subject to staff review and approval. This shall occur prior to commencement of public improvements. 5. Building pad elevations shall be revised to more closely conform to natural grade, subject to staff approval prior to SPARC review. 6. Any changes required pursuant to Council consideration of Urban Separator location shall be made to map, prior to Final Map submittal. 7. On- and off-site storm drain improvements shall be installed by the developer or through the assessment district as applicable, in conformance with the Specific Plan. 8. Sonoma Mountain Parkway streetscape improvements (landscape, soundwall and entry treatment), for the entire frontage of the project site (including moderate income project portion), shall be completed by the developer concurrently with the subdivision's public improvements. Design shall be consistent with the adopted Sonoma Mountain Parkway Design Plan, timing shall be subject to City staffs determination. 9. The Tentative Map shall be amended prior to submittal for Final Map review and approval to reflect all applicable modifications required under the PUD Conditions of Approval. Said map amendment shall meet specifications of the City Engineer and Community Development Director and shall also incorporate any SPARC conditions of approval pertinent to the map. 10. This development shall be subject to all appropriate development fees, and on and off-site improvements as set forth within the adopted Development Agreement or any subsequent amendment thereto. 11. Any labeling errors or other erroneous information appearing on the map, development or landscape plans shall be corrected prior to Final Map approval. Reso. 90-366 N.C.S. 5 12. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the Petaluma Street Naming Committee prior to Final Map. 13. The subdivider shall comply with requirements of the public utility agencies and the City Department of Public Works, prior to Final Map approval. 14. All hazardous materials (as recognized by the City Fire Marshal) utilized on the construction site shall be kept within a fenced, locked enclosure, subject to review and approval of City staff. 15. Temporary protective fencing shall be erected at the drip line of all trees to be preserved/protected and of all trees (on neighboring property) in proximity to construction activities. The fencing shall be erected prior to any grading/construction activity and subject to staff inspection prior to grading permit issuance. 16. All requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be complied with, including: a. Fire hydrants shall be located as required by Fire Marshal. b. Fire flow shall be as required by Fire Marshal. Flow cannot be calculated without building and site plans. c. All roof covering and exterior wall covering materials shall have a minimum Class "B" fire rating. 17. The project sponsor shall execute a binding agreement which shall stipulate that upon close of escrow of each residential dwelling unit in Kingsmill, developer shall pay $150.00 to the City per daily trip end estimated to be generated by said unit. Each unit is estimated to generate 10.0 trip ends per day. If the City establishes a Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee prior to close of escrow of any unit(s), the fee for said unit(s) and all subsequent units in this project thereafter be the Major Facilities Traffic Mitigation Fee. Reso. 90-366 N.C.S. 6 1 18. The applicant/developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or any 2 of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, 3 or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or 4 employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the tentative/parcel 5 map when such claim or action is brought within the time period provided for in 6 Section 66499.37. The City shall promptly notify the applicant/developer of any 7 such claim, action, or proceeding. The. City shall coordinate fully in the defense. 8 Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participating in a 9 defense of any claim, action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees 10 and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith. 11 12 kngsmill/council-4 Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by thfe ved-as~to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (A~~nxrxse~~~($pec~k) meeting ° /) on the ..-.-.5.th..-.-.-..... day of .............I~Lov~mhe_7r........................., 19...~.Q, by the '' ~- following vote: .. -....-::..--• ... ... :................. City Att ney AYES: Balshaw, Sobel, Davis, Woolsey, Tencer, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss NOES: 0 ABSENT: ATTEST: .............. .... ... ...... .:" .. .... ............-........ ity Clerk ~' i ~,.. i Mayor Council File...... .L ......................... CA 10-85 ~ Res. No....9.0.-~~. (j........ N.C.S.