Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2005-215 N.C.S. 12/05/2005 Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF BALOTTING TABULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIID OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 53753, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE 2006-2007 FISCAL YEAR WHEREAS, the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 ("1972 Act"), codified in California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq., establishes procedures whereby local agencies whose annual taxes are carried on the county assessment roll and are collected by the county may fund the construction and maintenance of improvements by formation of assessment districts; ~ and, WHEREAS, the general procedures for formation of an assessment district under the 1972 Act inchide: adoption of a resolution initiating proceedings, proposing formation of a district and ordering an engineer's report; approval of the engineer's report; adoption of a resolution of intention to form an assessment district, levy and collect assessments, and, if desired, issue bonds or notes; and following canvassing of balloting that has been noticed and conducted in accordance with California Government Code Section 53753, and a noticed public hearing on the assessment, adoption of a resolution ordering the improvements and formation of the district and confirming the diagram and assessment; ~ and, ~ Cal. St. & High. Code ~§22500 - 22501 ~ Cal. St. & High. Code X523585 - 22587, 22594 Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 1 WHEREAS, improvements that may be funded under the 1972 Act include: installation or construction of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, appurtenant structures or facilities, park or recreational improvements, acquisition of land or existing improvements for park, recreational or open space purposes, and acquisition or construction of community centers, auditoriums, halls or similar public facilities, for indoor presentation of performances and events, including public and private events; 3 and, WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2005-201 N.C.S., adopted November 21, 2005, the City Council of the City of Petaluma initiated proceedings for formation of the Stratford Park Subdivision Landscape & Lighting Assessment District ("District"), designated Craig Spaulding, City Engineer, as the Engineer of Record ("Engineer") for the proposed District, and ordered the Engineer to prepare and file a report pursuant to the 1972 Act; and, WHEREAS, the Engineer prepared a report ("Report") concerning the District, District improvements ("Improvements") and the proposed assessment ("Assessment") in accordance with the requirements of the 1972 Act, filed a copy of the Report with the City Clerk and submitted a copy of the Report to the City Council for consideration; and, WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on November 21, 2005, the City Council of the City of Petaluma duly considered the Report and found that it complied with all applicable requirements of the 1972 Act and other applicable law, including the requirements that the Report refer to the assessment district by its designation, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and contain improvement plans and specifications, an estimate of the improvement costs, a diagram of the district, an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements, and estimate of the principal amount of improvement bonds or notes to be issued, if any; and, 3 Cal. St. & High. Code X22525 Resolution No. ZOOS-215 N.C.S. Page 2 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2005-202 N.C.S., adopted November 21, 2005, the City Council of the City of Petaluma preliminarily approved the Report subject to pending proceedings, including balloting proceedings and noticed hearing proceedings concerning the District in accordance with California Constitution Article XIIID, California Government Code Section 53753 and the 1972 Act; and, WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2005-203 N.C.S. adopted November 21, 2005, the City Council of the City of Petaluma declared its intention to order the levy and collect assessments for the District and set a public hearing on the formation of the District and levy of the proposed assessment pursuant to the 1972 Act; and, WHEREAS, California Goveniment Code Section 53753 (which implements California Constitution Article XIIID, known as Proposition 218) requires that prior to levying a new or increased assessment local agencies must provide mailed notice, including balloting materials and instructions as specified in Section 53753, to each record owner of a parcel within the proposed assessment at least 45 days prior to a public hearing on the assessment; and, WHEREAS, on October 21, 2005, City staff mailed notices and balloting materials and instructions to each record owner of a parcel within the District announcing that ballots would be canvassed and a hearing conducted on December 5, 2005 on the formation of the District and levy and collection of the Assessment for the 2006 - 2007 fiscal year, and, for each future year following establishment of the District, of the percentage increases specified in the U.S. Department of labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Prices Indexes, Pacific Cities and the U.S. City Average, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose from February 1; and, Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 3 WHEREAS, the mailed notices included: the total amount of the proposed Assessment chargeable to the entire District, the amount chargeable to the record owner's parcel, the duration of the payments, the reason for the Assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed Assessment was calculated, the date, time and location of a public hearing on the proposed Assessment, a summary of the procedures for the completion, return, and tabulation of the Assessment ballots, including a statement that the Assessment shall not be imposed if the ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the Assessment, with ballots weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property, an assessment ballot, including the City's address for receipt of ballots, a place for the person returning the ballot to indicate his or her name, reasonable identification of the parcel, and his or her support of opposition to the proposed Assessment;4 and, WHEREAS, the 1972 Act requires one published notice at least 10 days before the public hearing on the Assessment; and, WHEREAS, on November 23, 2005, City staff published notice in accordance with California Government Code Section 6061 of the public hearing on the Assessment; and, WHEREAS, ballots mailed concerning the proposed Assessment were in a form that concealed their contents once sealed by the person submitting the ballot, and all assessment ballots were received at the address indicated on the ballot for tabulation; and, WHEREAS, on December 5, 2005, at a regularly schedule meeting at the time date and place stated in the mailed and the published notices, the City Council of the City Petaluma conducted a hearing on the proposed Assessment, a Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(b), (c) Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 4 permitted any interested person to present written or oral testimony, and considered all objections or protests to the proposed Assessment, including any objections to the Improvements, maintenance of the Improvements, the extent of the District, and/or any zones within the District, the District diagram, and the Engineer's cost estimate, and. the City Council of Petaluma fully considered any such written or oral testimony concerning the proposed Assessments and, WHEREAS, ballots on the Assessment were permitted to be submitted, changed or withdrawn by the person who submitted the ballot until the conclusion of the public testimony at the hearing on the proposed Assessment, and ballots remained sealed until the City Clerk commenced tabulation of the ballots following the conclusion of public testimony; and, WHEREAS, if there is a majority protest against the imposition of a new assessment or the extension or increase of an existing assessment, the assessment may not be imposed, extended, or increased; and, WHEREAS, a majority protest exists if assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in favor of the assessment, weighting the assessment ballots by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed on the identified parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted;8 and, WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public testimony on the proposed Assessment, the City Clerk tabulated three (3) ballots submitted and not withdrawn in support of the proposed Assessment, and three (3) ballots submitted and not withdrawn in opposition to the proposed Assessment; and, s Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(d) ~ Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(c), (e) ~ Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(e)(3) s Cal. Gov't. Code §53753(e)(2) Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 5 WHEREAS, when weighted according to the amount of the proposed Assessment to be imposed upon the parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted, the ballots submitted and not withdrawn in opposition to the proposed Assessment did not exceed the ballots submitted and not withdrawn in support of the proposed Assessment, and thus a majority protest does not exist concerning formation of the Assessment; and, WHEREAS, if a majority protest has not been filed concerning a proposed assessment, the legislative body may adopt a resolution ordering the improvements and the formation of the assessment district and confirming the diagram and assessment either as originally proposed by the legislative body or as changed by it, and adoption of the resolution constitutes levy of an assessment for the first year referred to in the assessment; and, Findings WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma finds, based on substantial evidence in the whole record before the Council, as follows: 1. Formation of the proposed District and levy of the proposed Assessment is for the purpose of meeting operating expenses of maintaining the District and the Improvements in accordance with the 1972 Act, and/or for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain services within existing service areas in accordance with Title 14, Section 15273, subsection (a)(4) of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines. 2. Maintenance of the Improvements funded pursuant to the Assessment constitutes maintenance of existing landscaping in accordance with Title 14, Section 15301, subsection (h) of the CEQA Guidelines. ~ Cal. St. & High. Code §22594 Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 6 3. The Improvements constitute minor public alterations in the condition of land, water and/or vegetation that do not involve removal of healthy, mature scenic trees in the form of new gardening or landscaping in accordance with Title 14, Section 15304, subsection (b). NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma does resolve as follows: 1. The above recitals are true and correct and hereby declared to be findings of the City Council of the City of Petaluma. 2. Formation of the proposed District and levy of the proposed Assessment, the Improvements and maintenance of the Improvements are exempt from CEQA in accordance with Title 14, Section 15273, subsection (a)(4), Section 15301, subsection (h) and Section 15304, subsection (b) of the CEQA Guidelines. 3. All protests against the Improvements, the proposed District and annual Assessment proposed for Fiscal year 2006-2007, including protests against maintenance of the Improvements, the extent of the District and/or any zones in the District, the District diagrams or the Engineer's estimate of the cost of the Improvements and/or their maintenance have been received and considered. 4. The District that will benefit from and be assessed for the Improvements and their construction and/or installation and maintenance is situated in the City of Petaluma, Califonlia and is more particularly described in the diagrams of the District contained in the Engineer's Report on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Engineer's Report is attached to and made a part of this resolution as Exhibit A. The diagram of the District indicates by a boundary Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 7 line the extent of the territory included in the District and any zone within the District and the general location of the District. 5. The plans and specifications for the Improvements (both existing and proposed) within the District as contained in the Engineer's Report are adopted and approved. 6. The Engineer's estimate of the cost of the Improvements, and of constructing and/or installing and maintaining the Improvements as contained in the Engineer's Report is adopted and approved. 7. The public interest, convenience and necessity require and the City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby orders the Improvements to be made and/or installed and maintained as described in the Engineer's Report. 8. The public interest, convenience and necessity require and the City Council of the City of Petahtma hereby orders the formation of the District and the levy and collection of assessments, including the annual Assessment proposed for the 2006-2007 fiscal year pursuant to the 1972 Act and other applicable law for the construction and/or installation and maintenance of the improvements as described in the Engineer's Report. 9. The diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the boundaries of any zone within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District as such lot or parcel is shown on the County Assessor's map for the applicable fiscal year, each lot or parcel of land of which has been given a separate number on such diagram, as contained in the Engineer's Report, is approved and confirmed. 10. The Assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses, including incidental expenses, concealing the Improvements fairly distributes Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 8 such costs amount all assessable lots or parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots or parcels from the Improvements and from the maintenance of the Improvements as contained in the Engineer's Report, and such Assessment is approved and confirmed. 11. The entire Engineer's Report concerning the District, the Improvements, related costs and the Assessment is adopted and approved. 12. The City Clerk is directed to file with the Auditor-Controller of Sonoma County the Assessment and any attachments and diagrams as confirmed by the City Council of the City of Petaluma along with a certificate of such confirmation to be attached to the Assessment. 13. The Sonoma County Auditor-Controller and the Sonoma County Tax Collector are directed pursuant to the 1972 Act to apply the Assessment filed with the Auditor-Controller as contained in the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk to the tax roll and the Sonoma County Tax Collector is directed in pursuant to the 1972 Act to collect the Assessment in the same manner as all other such assessments collected by the Sonoma County Tax Collector. Under the power and authority confen•ed upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by proved s t the Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on the 5'~' day ~ m of December, 2005, by the following vote: City Attorney AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Vice Mayor Harris, Healy, Nau, O'Brien, Torliatt NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None b ATTEST: U City Clerk ayor Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 9 Exhibit A LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. Dated: , 2005 Craig Spaulding City Engineer City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of , 2005. Claire Cooper City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Petaluma California, on the day of , 2005. Claire Cooper City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the day of , 2005. Claire Cooper City Clerk City of Petaluma County of Sonoma, CA By Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 10 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Craig Spaulding, City Engineer and Engineer of Work for Southgate Subdivision Landscape Assessment District, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution No. N.C.S., pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements which are the subject of this report, are briefly described as follows: The maintenance of all the public landscaping improvements as part of "Southgate Subdivision" consisting of plant material, trees, outdoor furniture, pathway lighting, irrigation systems, soundwall and street lighting, including electrical and water costs, located in the following public areas. Public landscape areas are defined as those areas that are irrigated from water meters separate from residential water meters. Public landscape areas include portions of land on the eastern side of Frates Road along the project frontage from the edge of pavement and back of curb to the subject property line, bounded by South Ely Road to the north and the northern right of way line of Lakeville Highway to the south; portions of land on the northern side of Lakeville Highway along the project frontage from the Caltrans right of way line to the subject property line; portions of land on the southern side of South Ely Road along the project frontage from the back. of curb to the subject property line, bounded by Frates Road on the north and the southern boundary of the Urban Separator on the south; a portion of land bounded by the existing City pump station on the east, the Frates Road sound wall on the north, Lot 1 of Phase 3 on the south, and back of sidewalk on the west; the landscaped medians on Frates Road bounded by the Lakeville Highway on the west and South Ely Road to the east. The Urban Separator is a 120' wide strip of land bounded on the north by the subject property line, the adjacent property owners property line on the south, Lakeville Highway on the west, and South Ely Road on the east. The area designated as Park on the Southgate Subdivision final map bounded by Southridge Drive on the north, the Urban Separator on the south, Southgate Drive on the east, and Tessa Way on the west. The triangular landscaped public area at the intersection of Lakeville Highway and Frates Road which is bounded by Frates Road on the north, Lakeville Highway on the south and Shern Way on the east is included. Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 11 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT A SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 CITY OF PETALUMA PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS A PART OF THIS RECORD Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 12 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT B SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPINGJLIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL COSTS Estimate Of Costs for twelve (12) months Maintenance of Landscaping 22,800 Utilities 8,350 Supervision 1,000 Improvements & Repairs 2,280 Other Services 2,280 Street Light Maintenance 2,500 Park Maintenance Total Maintenance Costs 49,210 Incidental Costs County Collection Fee (1 l4%) 124 City Administration (15%) 7,380 Total Estimated Costs for Maintenance and Incidental Costs 56,714 Reserve for Delinquent, Cash Flow, unusual repairs 4,921 TOTAL BASE ANNUAL COSTS $bl 635 Number of Parcels to be Assessed 216 Total Costs Per Parcel to be Assessed Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 13 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT D SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS AND ANNUAL INDEXING FACTOR All benefits of the improvements are special benefits to land with the district. General benefits to the public generally are nominal or non-existent. Allocation of Assessments The total maintenance costs per year were estimated, and incidental administrative expenses added to yield a total annual cost. This cost was then prorated equally to the 216 lots, so that each lot will share equally in the annual landscape maintenance expenses. Annual Indexing Factor In any year the assessment shall not be deemed to have been increased if the amount of the increase is not more than the percentage of the increase in the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Prices Indexes, Pacific Cities and the U.S. City Average, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose from February 1 to the February 1. The first fiscal year 2007-08 assessment levy increase shall be determined from the percentage increase from February 2006 ' to February 2007. Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 14 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT C SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 ASSESSMENT ROLL: Assessment Amount of Assessor's Number Assessment Parcel Number 1-216 $61,635 Southgate Subdivision recorded final map Phases 1, 2, and 3. ResoluCion No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 15 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT E SOUTHGATE SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY OF PETALUMA FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST: Assessment Property Owner's Assessor's Number Name & Address Parcel Number 1-78 Southgate Partners LLC Southgate Subdivision 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 260 recorded final map Phase 1 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 1-63 Mardel LLC Southgate Subdivision 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 260 recorded final map Phase 2 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 1-75 G8~W Ventures, LLC Southgate Subdivision 201 First Street, Suite 100 recorded final map Phase 3 Resolution No. 2005-215 N.C.S. Page 16