HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2193 N.C.S. 10/04/2004 1 EFFECTIVE DATE OF
z ORDINANCE
3
4 Novemlber 4, 2004
s
~ ORDINANCE N0. 2193 IV.C.S.
s
~ Introduced by Seconded by
to
11
lz Mike O'Brien Mike Healy
13
14
is PRE-ZONING A 22.9 ACRES COMPRISED OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 019-210-017,
16 -019, -026, -027, -030, -031 8~ -037 TO PUD (PLANNNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), TO
l~ ALLOW FOR 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF 63 NEW RESIDENCES
is KNOWN AS THE RIVERVIEW SUBDIVISION,
19 LOCATED AT MCNEAR AVENUE AND MISSION DRIVE
zo
2t BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS FOLLOWS:
zz
z3 Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City Council
z4 its report set forth in its minutes of May 1 1 and June 8, 2004, recommending the adoption
zs of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 1072 N.C.S., as amended, by classifying
z~ and pre-zoning certain lands being more particularly described as Assessor's Parcel No.
z~ 019-210-017, -019, -026, -027, -030, -031 8~ -037 comprising the 22.9-acre Riverview project
zs site.
29
3o Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held public
31 hearings on said pre-zoning on May 11 and June 8, 2004, after giving notice of said
3z hearing, in the manner, for the period, and in the form required by said Ordinance No.
33 1072 N.C.S., as amended.
34
3s Section 3. The City Council held a public hearing on the Riverview proposal on
36 September 20, 2004, after giving notice of said hearing in the manner for the period and
37 in the form required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, and considered all
3a written and verbal communications. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No.
39 1072 N.C.S., as amended, the City Council finds as follows:
40
Ordinance No. 2193 N.C.S. Page 1
1 1. The proposed pre-zoning of the Riverview property to PUD is consistent with the
z Petaluma General Plan, and is in general conformity with the zoning regulations
3 of the City of Petaluma as described in the project staff report. Additionally, the
4 Fire Marshal, Police Department, and the Engineering Division have prepared
s conditions of approval to address safety issues and design criteria for grading, site
6 improvements and construction of the residences.
s 2. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare clearly permit the
~ adoption of the pre-zoning in that the zoning designation will result in residential
~o uses that are appropriate and compatible with the existing surrounding uses. The
proposed density would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The
~z project plans present a unified and organized arrangement of residential lots and
13 public streets, appropriate to adjacent and nearby properties. Proposed
14 landscaping would further insure compatibility. The proposed project would also
~s require review and approval by the Site Plan and Architectural Review
~6 Committee.
~s 3. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been
~9 satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study and the drafting of a
zo Mitigated Negative Declaration to avoid or reduce to a level of insignificance,
zi potential impacts generated by the proposed project. In compliance with the
z2 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was
z3 prepared for pre-zoning of the property to PUD. Based upon the Initial Study, a
z4 determination was made that no significant environmental impacts would result.
zs A copy of this notice was published in fhe Argus-Courier and provided to
z6 residents and occupants within 300 feet of the site, in compliance with CEQA
z~ requirements.
zs
z~ Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S:, and based
3o upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made, the City
31 Council hereby adopts an amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., so as
3z to pre-zone said property herein referred to, in accordance with the recommendation of
33 the Planning Commission.
34
Ordinance No. 2193 N.C.S. Page 2
~ Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this Ordinance for the period and in
z the manner required by the City Charter.
3
4 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this Ordinance is for
s any reason held to be unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid by a court of
6 competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the. validity of the remaining portions
7 of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would
8 have passed and adopted this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective
9 of the fact that any one or more of said provisions be declared unconstitutional, unlawful
to or otherwise invalid.
u
iz INTRODUCED and ordered Posted/~lisl~e~ this 20th day of September 2004.
]3
14 ADOPTED this 4th day of October 2004, by the following vote:
is
i6 AYES: Mayor Glass, Healy, Vice Mayor Moynihan, O'Brien, Thompson, Torliatt
17
is NOES: None
19
2n ABSENT: Harris
zt
zz
23
24
z5 David Glass, Mayor
z6
z7
za
z9 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
30
31 i
32 \
33
34
3s Claire Cooper, Deputy City erk Richard R. Rudnansky, City Attor
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Ordinance No. 2193 N.C.S. Page 3