HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2061 N.C.S. 10/20/1997IN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
F. ✓ice � ,, i ''yi..
ORDINANCE NO. 2061 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilmember
Seconded by Councilmember
Pamela Torhatt Matt Maguire
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S., AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND
REZONING A 10.2± ACRE PARCEL LOCATED WEST OF SUNNYSLOPE ROAD
BETWEEN SMITH DRIVE AND SUNCREST HILL DRIVE; APN 019-203-007
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council Finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
Council on October 6, 1997, its report set forth in its minutes of July 22, 1997 (File 4
TSM97001; Larry's Lollipop PUD) recommending the adoption of an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain
lands being more particularly described as Assessor's Parcel Number 019-203-007; a
10.2± acre site located on the west side of Sunnyslope Road between Smith Drive and
Suncrest Hill Drive.
Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a
public hearing on said proposed amendment on July 22, 1997, after giving notice of said
hearings, in the manner, for the period and in the form required by said Ordinance No.
1072 N.C.S., as amended.
Section 3. The City Council further finds that the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study
which indicated that the proposed amendment, as mitigated through the adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Resolution 97-274 N.C.S. will not result in a
significant impact on the environment.
Ord. 2061 N1 CS Page 1 of 2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as
amended, the City Council finds as follows:
IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is
for any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted
this ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
more of said provisio} be declared unconstitutional.
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted/Rxkkxl this 6th day of October
19 97 .
ADOPTED this 20th day of October , 19 97 , by the following vote:
AYES: Read, Stompe, Torliatt, Maguire, Vice Mayor Hamilton, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Keller
ATTEST:
City Clerk
lolliord/hg33
Ord. 2061 NCS
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 2 of 2
2