HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2061 N.C.S. 10/20/1997 1 ~ '
2 NO U 19 1997 4~ ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
_ 9
1o ORDINANCE NO. 2061 N.C.S.
11
12 Introduced by Councilmember Seconded by Councilmember
13
14 Pamela Torliatt Matt Maguire
15
16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING ZONING
17 ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S., AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND
18 REZONING A 10.2 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED WEST OF SUNNYSLOPE ROAD
19 BETWEEN SMITH DRIVE AND SUNCREST HILL DRIVE; APN 019-203-007
20
21
22
23
24 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
25 FOLLOWS:
26
27 Section 1. The City Council Finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
28 Council on October 6, 1997, its report set forth in its minutes of July 22, 1997 (File #
29 TSM97001; Larry's Lollipop PUD) recommending the adoption of an amendment to the
3o Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain
31 lands being more particularly described as Assessor's Parcel Number 019-203-007; a
32 10.2 acre site located on the west side of Sunnyslope Road between Smith Drive and
33 Suncrest Hill Drive.
34
35 Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a
36 public hearing on said proposed amendment on July 22, 1997, after giving notice of said
37 hearings, in the manner, for the period and in the form required by said Ordinance No.
38 1072 N.C.S., as amended.
39
4o Section 3. The City Council further finds that the requirements of the California
41 Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study
42 which indicated that the proposed amendment, as mitigated through the adoption of a
43 Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Resolution 97-274 N.C.S. will not result in a
44 significant impact on the environment.
45
Ord. 2061 NCS Page 1 of 2
1
1 Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as
2 amended, the City Council finds as follows:
3
4 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is
5 for any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
6 decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City
7 Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted
8 this ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
9 more of said provisio} be declared unconstitutional.
10
11
12 INTRODUCED and ordered Posted/>~t~~~xJthis 6th day of October ,
13 19 97 .
14
15 ADOPTED this 20th day of October , 19 97 , by the following vote:
16
17 AYES: Read, Stompe, Torliatt, Maguire, Vice Mayor Hamilton, Mayor Hilligoss
18
19 NOES.: None
20
21 ABSENT: Keller
22 r"
23 ABSTAIN: None
24 l~ _
25 I '
/
26 / , 'i
27 Mayor
28
29
30 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
31 r---- 1
33 ~ ,l
34 City Clerk City Attorney
35
36
37 lolliord/hg33
Ord. 2061 NCS Page 2 of 2
2