HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2041 N.C.S. 12/02/1996 Y
r ~ ~~VC
1 JAN 1 1997
2
3
4 ORDINANCE NO. 2041 N.C.S.
5
6 Introduced by Councilmember Seconded by Councilmember
7
8 Nancy Read Carole Barlas
9
10
11 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. BY RECLASSIFYING AND
12 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE TUXHORN ESTATES
13 SUBDIVISION SITE, TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT
14 370 SONOMA MOUNTAIN PARKWAY, AP NO. 136-570-017
15
16 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
17 FOLLOWS:
18
19 Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
20 Council on October 8, 1996, its report as set forth in its minutes of October 8, 1996,
21 recommending the adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., by
22 reclassifying and rezoning from Kingsmill/Church of Christ PUD (Planned Unit
23 Development) to Tuxhorn Estates PUD, certain land more particularly described as a 0.97
24 acre portion of AP No. 136-.570-017, consisting of 4.22 acres situated at 370 Sonoma
25 Mountain Parkway.
26
27 Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a
28 public hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., on
29 October 8, 1996, after giving notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in
30 the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S.
31
32 Section 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., the City
33 Council finds that the proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. to
34 reclassify and rezone a 0.97 acre portion of Assessors Parcel No. 136-570-017, known as
35 Tuxhorn Estates, to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is in general conformity
36 with the Petaluma General Plan.
37
38 Section 4. The City Council further finds that the public necessity, convenience and
39 general welfare clearly permit and will be furthered by the proposed amendment to the
40 Zoning Ordinance, reclassifying and rezoning the Tuxhorn Estates site to PUD.
41
42 Section 5. The City Council further finds that the requirements of the California
43 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been satisfied through the preparation of an
44 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration to avoid or reduce to a level of
45 insignificance, potential impacts generated by the proposed Tuxhorn Estates PUD.
ord 2041 Page 1 of 2
1
1
2 Section 6. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., and
3 based upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made, the
4 City Council hereby adopts an amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., so
5 as to reclassify and rezone said property herein referred to, in accordance with the
6 recommendations of the Planning Commission.
7
8 Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this Ordinance for the period and
9 in the manner required by the City Charter.
10
11 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is
12 for any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
13 decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City
14 Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted
15 this ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
16 more of said provisions be declared unconstitutional.
17
18 INTRODUCED and ordered Posted/1~~iI~~~ this 18th day of November
19 1996.
20
21 ADOPTED this 2nd day of December , 1996, by the following vote:
22
23 AYES: Maguire, Hamilton, Barlas, Read, Mayor Hilligoss
24
25 NOES: None
26
27 ABSENT: Shea, Vice Mayor Stompe
28
29 ABSTAIN: None ~ ~ .
32 ~ Ma or
Y
33
34 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
35
37 ity Jerk City Attorney
38
39
40 tuxhordl/tp32
Ord. 2041 NCS Page 2 of 2
2
i