HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2016 N.C.S. 07/01/19964
5
6
7
8
9
to
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ORDINANCE NO. 2016 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman Seconded by Councilman
Nancy Read Mary Stompe
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND
REZONING A 6.7f ACRE PARCEL LOCATED BETWEEN CAPRI AVENUE
AND CAPRI CREEK AND SOUTH OF MARIA DRIVE TO A PLANNED UNIT
DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE
WOODSIDE VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL, PROJECT; AP No. 13b-061-027
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
Council on June 3, 1996, its report set forth in its minutes of May 14, 1996 (File
#TSM96002) recommending the adoption of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N.C.S., as amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more
particularly described as Assessor's Parcel Number 136-061-027; a 6.7± acre site located
between Capri Avenue and Capri Creek and south of Maria Drive.
Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held public
hearings on said proposed amendment on March 26, 1.996, and on May 14, 1996, after
giving notice of said hearings, in the mamier, for the period and in the form required by
said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended.
1
Ord. 2016 NCS
Page 1 of 3 pages
„ .,
~,
..f
l Section 3. The City Council further finds that the requirements of the California
2 Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study
3 which indicates that the proposed amendment, as mitigated through the adoption of a
4 Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Resolution No. 96-166 N.C.S. will not result
5 in a significant impact on the environment.
6
7 Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. as amended
8 the City Council finds as follows:
9
t0 PUTD Rezoning Findings:
u 1. The proposed Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C_S., to reclassify
12 and rezone Assessor's Parcel No. 137-061-027, known as Woodside Village
~ 3 Subdivision, to Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is in general conformity
14 with the Petaluma General Plan.
15
t6 2. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare clearly permit and will be
17 furthered by the proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, reclassifying and
18 rezoning the Woodside Village Subdivision to PUD.
19
20 3. The proposed PUD Development Plan has complied with the requirements of
21 CE.QA through the preparation and certification of the Mitigated Negative
22 Declaration prepared and adopted (Resolution No. 96-166N.C.S.) by the City
23 Council for this project which addresses the potential environmental impacts
24 associated with its development, and no further environmental analysis is
25 necessary.
26
27 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is
28 for .any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
29 decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City
3o Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted
2
Ord. 96-166 NCS Page 2 of 3 pages
.y
• ~ ~>
./~
1 this ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
2 more of said provisions be declared unconstitutional.
4
s
6
7
8
9
]0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted this 17thday of June
ADOPTED this 1st day of July , 1996 , by the following vote:.
AYES: Maguire, Hamilton, Stompe, Read, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Shea
ABSTAIN: Vice May rlas
G~f~`"
Mayor
ATTESl~ t
City Clerk
WOODREZ/hg26/word6
3
Ord. 2016 NCS
Page 3 of 3 pages