HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2013 N.C.S. 05/20/1996~~
' - ~~ ,,~~++
JINN 2 0.1996 _~
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ORDINANCE NO. 2013 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman
Seconded by Councilman
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND
REZONING A 19.6 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED EAST OF "D" STREET AT
WINDSOR DRIVE TO A PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAXWELL RESIDENTIAL PROJECT;
AP No. 019-120-045 & 046
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
Council on May 6, 1996, its report set forth in its minutes of March 26, 1996 (File
#TSM0086) recommending the adoption of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N.C.S., as amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more
particularly described as Assessor's Parcel Number 019-120-045 & 046; a 19.6± acre site
located east of "D" Street at Windsor Drive.
Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held public
hearings on said proposed amendment on June 13, 1995, July 11, 1995, December 12,
1995, and lastly on March 26, 1996, after giving notice of said hearings, in the manner,
for the period and in the form required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended.
Section 3. The City Council further finds that the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study
which indicates that the proposed amendment, as mitigated through the adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Resolution g6-121N.C.S. will not result in a
significant impact on the environment.
Ord. 2013 NCS page 1 of 3
1 Section. 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. as amended
2 the City Council finds as follows:
3
4 PUD Rezoning Findings:
5
6 1. The proposed Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., to reclassify
7 and rezone Assessor's Parcel No. 019-120-045, known as Maxwell Subdivision, to
8 Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is in general conformity with the
9 Petaluma General Plan.
to
11 2. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare clearly permit and will be
12 furthered by the proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, reclassifying and
13 rezoning the Maxwell Subdivision to PUD.
14
l5 3. The proposed PUD Development Plan has complied with the requirements of
16 CEQA pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, through the
17 preparation and certification of the FEIR for the Sunny Slope Annexation and the
18 subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared and adopted (Resolution
19 No. 96-121N.C.S.) by the City Council for this project which addresses the
20 potential environmental impacts associated with its development, and no further
2 i environmental analysis is necessary.
22
23 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is
24 for any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
25 decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City
26 Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted
27 this ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
28 more of said provisions be declared unconstitutional.
29
3o INTRODUCED and ordered Posted this 6th day of May
31
32 ADOPTED this 20ttday of May, 1996, by the following vote:
33
34 AYES: Maguire, Stompe, Read, Shea, Vice Mayor Barlas, Mayor Hilligoss
35
36 NOES: None
2
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1S
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ABSENT: Hamilton
ABSr.
ATTEST:
._---~ .
City Clerk
MAXREZ/hg24/word6
~`~~APPROV~ED ASST FO FO O.RM:
1 City Attorney
Ord. 2013 NCS
Page 3 of 3
3