HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2004 N.C.S. 02/05/1996~•-- .
' ,r
~,~ FFE~T~~E DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
MAR 6 1996
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman
Seconded by Councilman
Matt Maguire
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND
REZONING A 17~ ACRE PARCEL LOCATED NORTH OF PETALUMA
BOULEVARD SOUTH AT McNEAR AVENUE FROM A PLANNED UNIT
DISTRICT TO A NEW PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF THE McNEAR LANDING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT; AP No.
008-530-004
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
Council on January 2, 1996, its report set forth in its minutes of December 5, 1995 (File
#REZ0139) recommending the adoption of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.
1072 N.C.S., as amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more
particularly described as Assessor's Parcel Number 008-530-004 as shown on Exhibit A,
attached.
Section 2. The City Council. further finds that said Planning Commission held public
hearings on said proposed amendment on November 28, and December 5, 1995, after
giving notice of said hearings, in the manner, for the period and in the form required by
said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended.
Section 3, The City Council further finds that the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied through the preparation of an Initial Study
which indicates that the proposed amendment, as mitigated through the adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Resolution 96-27 N.C.S. will not result in a
significant impact on the environment.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. as amended
the City Council finds as follows:
Ors. 2004 NCS Page 1 of 2
! l `
r~
~~',.
1 Rezoning Findings:
2
3 1. The proposed amendment from Planned Unit District to Planned Unit District is in
4 general conformity with the Petaluma General Plan and any applicable plans.
5
6 2. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare require or clearly permit the
7 adoption of the proposed amendment.
8
9 IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is for
to any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
11 shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council
12 of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this
13 ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
of said provisions be declared unconstitutional.
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted this 16th day of January, 1996.
ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: Stompe, Maguire, Read, Shea, Vice Mayor Barlas, .Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hamilton
AB S';
ATTEST--~'-~
/~' ~--
~-~ ~ rty Clerk
LANDREZ/hg20
Ord. 2004 NCS Page 2 of 2