HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 03/26/2001 (11) •
1
DRAFT DRAFT • DRAFT •
.'1
. .
2, Draft Minutes of a.
3 • City of Petaluma,;'California
4 ' City Council Meeting
5
6 Regular Meeting
Tuesday,,February 20, 2001
8 Council Chambers
9
,11 The Petaluma City Council met+on this date at 3:00 p.m ;inthe Council Chambers.
12
1'3' ROLL CALL
14 •
1'5 PRESENT: Council Members Healy, O'Brien, Healy, Maguire, Moynihan, Torliatt; Vice
P6 • Mayor'Cade? Thompson; MayorThompson
17'
18 ABSENT: None
19
20 PUBLIC COMMENT
21 ' •
22 Sandra Reed spoke regarding dOwntown development;,She would;like to see the
'Planning Commission review the Basin Street project.
24
25 Teresa Barrett, Planning Commissioner, would likethe.Basin Street project-brought
26 before the.Planning Commission for public review as it,deals with land use issues.
27 •
28 Wayne Vieler, Planning Commissioner, asked`City Attorney Rich Rudnansky how the
29 Basin Street project could be agendized'to come before the Planning Commission at
30 this stage in the process.
3.1 •
32 Richard Rudnansky, City Attorney, explained that-it:'was possible to add something to
33 thesagenda..after the agenda was posted. AS:.SPARC was scheduled to meet Thursday,
34 _ February 22, immediate action would have to be taken to add the item to the'agenda.
35 . .
36 COUNCILCOMMENT
37
38 Vice Mayor.Cader-Thompson: '
39
40 Asked that'the Planning Director not approve'any,Conditional Use Permits for the
41 Central Specific Plan until Council has formally adopted the Plan. She stated it was
42 a land use issue and should be heard at'the Planning Commission,level
43
44 • Would like Pamela Tuft, Director ofGenerai Plan Administration, to speak to Council
015 regarding land acquisitions being considered by'the-Lands for Public Trust.
Draft.Minutes'
of-a1City of Petaluma;'California
City'Council Meeting
Tuesday February 20;2001
Page 1
I
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 •
2 • Thought the City should look"into:a shared dredging process that the City of Marina
3 Del Ray is°using;.as it could put the^City of Petaluma.in a higher priority bracket.
4 There/was the possibility of looking at an assessment as the Central;Specific Plan
5 continued to move forward.
6 •
7 Council`Member Moynihan:
8
9 •' Recalled a policy that-,,was adopted by Council during the Central Petaluma Specific
10 Plan,reviewza`couple of years ago that any°projects proposed in the Plan area were
11 to go,first to'the•Central Petaluma Specific Plan-Committee:for review and input
12 before being processed. He thought.that policy needed'to be revisited
13
14 ,Council,,Member Healy:.
15 -
16 • Asked to agendize.for Council s•;next.meeting a discussion about;the process for
17 development applications within the Central'Specific Plan area,4including, but.not
18 limited to, the Basin Street project:
19
20 Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson: •
21
22 • Thought Council should discuss possible,rev_isions with-the Central Specific Plan -
23 Committee:,
2
Ili
4
25 . Council Member Torliatt: -
26
27 • Announced that;there was now•freightservice:on the rail line through Petaluma:
28 • Received an e-mail from,Steven,Delapp regarding the conditions ofithe,downtown
29 parking garage,'i.e., unsanitary:conditions, as well as conditions.in the downtown
30 area.
31 • • ReOeiVerlimatenals'regarding-prequalification`of public works contractors from the , .
32 Carpenters and Joinersof•America Local Union 751. She wanted,City Management,
33 to review the materials and to provide Council with direction to adopt,a standard
34 prequalification procedure to better protect\the'city from expensive:litigation .
35 • Noted that the:Adobe LumberSite has.been'identified by Sonoma County:asa
36 potential site"for low and moderate-income housing. Because.this property lies
37 within Petalumas Urban Growth Boundary,,she thought Council should havea
38 discussion about the land use:of that piece of property., •
39
40 Mayor Thompson:. , •
41 ,
42 Asked°to adjourn the meeting in memory of Council Member Mike•O`'Brien's father,
43 who died last<week.
44
45
Draft Minutes •
-of'a City of Petaluma,;California
:City Council Meeting
- • Tuesday February 20,x_2001 -
Page 2
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 CONSENT-CALENDAR •
2
3 2. Resolution 2001-031. N.C.S. Approving a Submittal by the Committee On The
4 Shelterless (COTS).to the California State Department of Housing and
5 Community Development for Emergency Housing.Assistance Program Funds
6 in the Amount of$1,000,000 to be Utilized for the Proposed Multi-Services
7 Facility to be Located on City Property.
8
9, MOTION: Council Member Torliattrmoved, seconded by Maguire, to Adopt
10 Resolution 2001=031 N.C.S. Approving a Submittal bythe
11 Committee On The Shelterless (COTS) to the California State
12 Department of Housing and Community Development for
13 Emergency Housing Assistance Program Funds in the Amount
14 of $1;000,000 to be Utilized for the Proposed Multi-Services Facility
15 to be Located on City Property.
16
17 MOTION
18 PASSED: . 7/0
19 •
20 3. Resolution 2001-032 N.C.S. Accepting Completion of the "D" Street Bridge
21 Rehabilitation Project No. 9861. Final Total Project Cost: $2,223,976.
22 Contractor: Parnum.Paving, Inc. Funding Sources: HBRR - $926,977 and
•23 Community Facilities Fund - $1,296,999. , -
24
25 MOTION: 'Council.Member Torliatt moved, seconded.by Maguire, to adopt
26 Resolution 2001.-031 N.C.S. Accepting Completion of the "D"
27 Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project No 9861 . Final Total Project
28 Cost: $2,223,976. Contractor: Parnum Paving, Inc. Funding
29 Sources: HBRR - $926,977 and Community Facilities Fund -
30 $1„296,999.
31
32 • MOTION
33 PASSED: .7/0 . •
34
35 4. Resolution 2001-033 N.C.S. Accepting Completion of the Petaluma River and
36 Creek Trails Project:No. 9876. Final Total Project Cost: $1,119,000.
37 Contractor: Frontier Contracting, Inc. Funding Sources: PCDC-- $156,000; TDA
38 - $161,000; ISTEA.- $522,000; Coastal Conservancy - $27,000; and TEA-21 -
39 $250,000. -
40 •
41 MOTION: Council Member Torliatt moved, seconded by Maguire, to adopt
42 ' Resolution 2001-033 N.C.S..Accepting Completion of the Petaluma
43 River and Creek"Trails Project:No. 9876. Final Total Project '
44 Cost: $1,119,000. Contractor: Frontier Contracting, Inc. Funding
• •
Draft Minutes •
of a City of Petaluma, California
City Council Meeting
Tuesday,;February 20, 2001
Page 3
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 Sources: PCDC $156,000; TDA -:$161 ,000; ISTEA- $522;000;
2 Coastal Conservancy - $27,000; and TEA-21 -.$250;000.
3
4 MOTION
5 PASSED: 7/0
6
7 7. Resolution 2001-034 N.C.S. Declaring Weeds Growing Upon Parcels,of:Public
8 and Private Property a Public Nuisance.
9
10 MOTION: Council Member Torliatt moved, seconded by Maguire, to adopt
1.1 Resolution 2001-034, N.C.S. Declaring•Weeds Growing Upon
12 . Parcels of Public•and Private Property a Public Nuisance_
13
14 MOTION
15 PASSED: 7/0 •
16
17 5. Resolution 2001-035 N.C.S. Authorizing-the City Manager to Sign Agreement
18 with Caltrans Administering Agency-State.Master Agreement Na 04-5022 to
19 Receive State-Administered Federal Funding for Transportation Projects.
20
21 MOTION: Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson moved, seconded by, Maguire,.
22 Adopting Resolution 2001-035 N,C:S..Authorizing the City Manager
23 to Sign Agreement with Caltrans Administering.Agency-State •
24 Master,Agreement-No. 04-50224o Receive;State-Administered
25 Federal Funding for Transportation Projects.
26
27 MOTION
28 PASSED: 6/0/0/1 (Council Member.Moynihan abstained) •
29
30 1. Resolution 2001-036 N.C.S. Accepting the Quarterly Treasurer's Report_
31
32 MOTION: Council Member Moynihan moved, seconded by Maguire, to.Adopt
33 Resolution 2001-036 N.C.S. Accepting the Quarterly Treasurer's
34 Report
35
36 MOTION •
37 PASSED: 7/0
38 •
39 6. Resolution 2001-037 N:C.S. Adopting the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
40 Program for,Year 2001.
41 •
42 MOTION: Council Member Maguire'moved, 'seconded by Vice Mayor Cader-
43 Thompson, to adopt Resolution 2001-037 N.C.S. Adopting the
44 . • . Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for Year 2001,
45 •
Draft Minutes
of a City of,Petaluma; California
City Council Meeting
Tuesday, Febivary 20, 2001
Page 4
•
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
•
•
• 1 MOTION
PASSED`: 7/0
3
4 8. Resolution 2001-038 N.C.S..Approving participation in Countywide Nexus Study,
5 to quantify the impact'of new nonresidential growth on housing need.
6
7 • MOTION: Council Member Healy moved, seconded by Maguire, to Adopt
8 Resolution 2001-038 N.C.S. Approving participation in Countywide
9: ' Nexus Study to quantify the impact•of•new nonresidential'growth on
1.0 housing need
1-1
12 MOTION •
13 PASSED: 7/0
14
1'3 PUBLIC HEARING
16
17 9. McDowell Boulevard/E. Washington Street= Intersection Transportation
18 Improvement Project Assessment District #2000-01 (Project No. 9863, Phase
19 • 3).
20
21 A. Continued Public Hearing and Receiving Ballots (Continued From
22 December 18,'2000 Council Meeting).
B. Adopt.Resolution Adopting Engineer's Report,,Confirming the
24 Assessment, Ordering'the'Work'and Acquisitions, and Directing Actions -'
25 with Respect hereto.
26 C. Resolution Waiving up to 25% of the Traffic Mitigation Fees for Property
27 Owners Within Assessment District,2000-2001.The public hearing was
28 opened forthe McDowell Boulevard/E. Washington Street Intersection
29 Transportation 'Improvement Project
30 '
31 Mr. Craig Wilmington Smith, Property Manager:representing the Plaza North
32 Shopping Center, explained that for over ten years, the primary objective for the
33 Shopping Center has been to improve the Washington/McDowell intersection.
34 Doctor and Mrs. Charles Syers, owners of the center, could not vote for the first
35 assessment for foot (4) reasons:
36
37 1. They thought there were some unnecessary costs or costs that could be ,
38 reduced.
39 •
40 2. With the help of the City'Manager, 'a resolution was passed for the City to
41 purchase $400,000 of the bonds.
42
43 3. Because of lease' rights, the anchor tenants needed to be involved in
44 discussions and approvals. They did want to negotiate the traffic
05 mitigation fees.
Draft Minutes
of a City of Petaluma, California
• City Council Meeting
Tuesday, February 20, 2001
• Page 5
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
•
1
2 4. The attorneys for the shopping center wanted to make "sure the
3 assessment contained legally binding language.
4
5 Mr. Wilmington-Smith had two signed ballots in favor of the assessment and a
6 letter signed by the City•Attorney and the shopping center owner's attorney that
7 .delivered the ballots conditional upon two things:
8
9 1 The ratification of the Traffic Mitigation Fees as negotiated and contained
10 in the Resolution.
11 •
12 2. The receipt of a signed letter from the City Attorney as negotiated by the
13 attorneys.
14
15 Mr. Wilmington-Smith explained that he was supposed'to receive a signed letter
16 that morning from the City Attorney, and he had heard that the attorney was
17 haying problems with signing it.
18
19 City Attorney Richard Rudnansky noted that there were two letters. ,before
20 Council on the dais. One was from Katherine Cotton, attorney for"Dr. Syers. That
• letter stated That the City would only receive the ballots of ,Dr: Syers if the.
22 • Resolution for the waiver of the Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees was adopted as it
23 was worded in a.copy of the Resolution attached to her letter. This Resolution
24 would not become effective unless the assessment district was established. He
25 advised Council they could pass the Resolution as is without any changes, and
26 he would then receive Dr. Syers' ballots
27
28 He added that he had spoken with.another lawyer for Dr. Syers; Mr. ,Maloney,
29 who asked him to sign a letter indicating that Council's action tonight would be
30 binding on future Councils. He replied that he did not think he had ithe.authority"
31 to sign such a letter, but was willing to indicate in a letter"that Dr. Syers, was
32 voting for the ;assessment district based on representations! and his
33 understanding that^the'Traffic Impact Fees would be .waived for his projects. He •
34 drafted such a letter, faxed it to Mr. Maloney,, and received a voice mail this
35 morning indicating that it was acceptable. Mr. IRudnansky had the letter before,
36 and would sign it only do so after the Resolution waiving the 25% Traffic Fees
37 was passed.
38 •
39 Mr. Wilmington-Smith thought the letter was acceptable. After the Resolution
40 was approved and the letter signed, he would give the letter with the two ballots
41 attached to°the°City Attorney.
42
43 PUBLIC H EARING CLOSED
44
Draft Minutes.
of a City;of'Petaiurna„California
'city CouncirMeeting
Tuesday, February 20, 2001
Page 6
'DRAFT DRAFT"' DRAFT 1.
•
Council Member Torliatt thanked, Dr. Syets and Mr. Wilmington-Smith. She
•'2 strongly encouraged the Plaza North and Plaza South Shopping Centers to meet
3 with the City of 'Petalurna "to 'consider ,redeveloping the: entire site, possibly
4 , 'increasing square footages, increasing ;traffic:flow and getting better tenants fdr
• 5 that area. Shethought'it could be a.tremendous asset for the community. •She
6 stated she was very much interested in participating in upgrading those two
7 centers.
8
99 MOTION; Council Member Maguire moved,,seconded by Vice Mayor Ceder-
110 Thompson; to approve Resolution 00-039 N.C.S. Waiving up to
11. 25% •of the Traffic Mitigation Fees for Property Owners within
12 McDowell Blvd/E".. Washington •Street Assessment District
13 2000-2001.
14
15 MOTION
16 PASSED: 7/1/0
17 •
18 Council Member Moynihan thought the assessrnent,was fine if the majority of the
19 property owners were in favor of the project: He was"concerned:that'it was unfair
20 to the small` property owners to not allow them an equal' opportunity or same
21 charge on-the`Traffic:MitigationFees.
22 •
3
Mary Grace Pawson of Harris and Associates, .,engineers for the ,assessment
4 district; read:the ballots. Almost 98%. of the• ballots were returned. Of those,
- 25 26.48% were opposition; 73;52%•were in favor:,
26
27 MOTION: Vice Mayor Cadet-Thompson moved, seconded by'Maguire, to
28 Adopt Resolution 2001-040 MC.S". Adopting Engineer's Report,
29 Confirming the Assessment, Ordering the Work;and Acquisitions
30 and-Directing Actions with.Respect to`the'MCDOwell Boulevard/E.
3.1 WashingtomAssessment District
32
33 MOTION •
34 PASSED'. • 7/0
35
36; UNFINISHED;BUSINESS.
37
38 10. McDowell Boulevard/E. Washington "Street? Intersection Transportation
39 Improvement Project:(Project No..9863, Phase:3). (Skladzien/Evert)
40
41 A. Consideration of Adoption.of the"Resolution of Necessity to Acquire.
42 Propertyb •Emithentbomain; Properties' Assessors Parcel
43 Numbers/Addresses;Are:
44 007-325-01.3 - 94 North McDowell'Boulevard'(William„and Ines Stark)
5 007-280-038 - 201 South McDowell Boulevard (Ann Morrissey)
Draft Minutes
•
of a`city,df-Petaluma;.California!
•
city Meeting
Tuesday;,February,20,2001
Page 7
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT •
1 007-280=070 -203 South McDowell.Boulevard (Washington Square •
2 Associates) .
3 007-213-030.--200 South McDowell Boulevard (Petaluma,Properties, Inc.)
4 007-325=012 — 98 North''McDowell Boulevard.(Constance Lechmanski)
5 007-340-007 — North McDowell Boulevard (MariaNOVakkand Martha'
6 Thorup)
7 007=213-002 — 228 South McDowell Boulevard (Petaluma Properties, Inc.) •
8
9 MOTION: Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson moved, seconded:by .Maguire,to
10 Adopt Resolution 2001-041 N.C.S. of Necessity to Acquire Property
11 by Eminent Domain with Respect to the McDowell Boulevard/E..
12 - Washington .Street" Intersection Transportation Improvement
13 • Project.
14 _
15 MOTION • -
16 PASSED: 7/0
17
18 11'. Adoption of Ordinance 2105.N.C.S. Approving Antenna Site Lease:Agreement • •
19 with XM Satellite Radio Inc.,-at Hayes Lane Site. (Introduced November 20,.
20 2000)..
21 •
22 MOTION: Council Member Torliatt moved, seconded by Maguire, to adopt
23. Ordinance 2.105''N.C.S. Approving Antenna-Site Lease •
24 Agreement with XM'Satellite Radio Inc ,'at Hayes Lane Site
25, .
26 MOTION
27 PASSED:' 7/0
28
29 12., Report Regarding'Status 'of'PayranProjectand Discussion and Possible
30 Direction Regarding Payran Flood Management Project Financing and Budget.,
31
32 Mr: Tom Hargis, Water Resources and Conservation Director gave a"report on
34 Pro'ect and Budget. The transition harfnel is about 90%A
33 the,status of.theg ayran Project regarding
the Pa ran Management complete. The .
35 '' Lakeville Bridge needs•one week more work, side yard fencing, resolution;of •
36 some construction issues and-controlling skateboarders'iaccess,to the sheet pile
37 wall.
38 •
39 1-3. Presentation of Annual Report;by'Empire Waste Managementand.Resolution
40 to Adopt 2001 Refute'Rates. .
41
42 MOTION: Council;Member:Maguire moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Cader-
43 Thompson, to Adopt Resolution 2001-042 N.C.S,.Adopting the
44. 2001. Refuse Rates. •
45 •
Draft Minutes:
of.a City of Petaluma, California
'City Council:Meeting .
Tuesday;.February20;2001 •
• Page.8 •
`CjRAFT DRAFT- DRAFT
IV! MOTION
• P PASSED: 7/0
3
4 14. Resolution Approving Agreement with. Petaluma Community Access for Cable
5 . Access Seivices.
6
7 MOTION: Council Member Maguire moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Cader-
8 Thompson, to Adopt Resolution 2001=043 N:C S. Approving
9 agreement with Petaluma Community Access for Cable Access
10 • Services.
11
12 MOTION
13 PASSED: 7/0
14
15 CLOSED SESSION
16 • •
17 City Attorney Rich Rudnansky announced that Council would adjourn to Closed Session
18 on the following items:
19
20 Conference With Labor Negotiator—Agency Negotiator City Manager.
21 Unrepresented Employee: City Attorney.
22 F
•;23 Conference With Real Property Negotiator Pursuant.to Government Code §54956:8.
24 Property: 41,04 Lakeville Highway (APN's 017-170-002 and 068-010-026), Formerly
25 Known as the Gray Property. Negotiating Party; Frederick 'Stouder. Under
26 Negotiation: Price, Terms or'Paymenf, or Both.
27
28 Conference With Legal Counsel'- Existing Litigation (Subdivision (a)'of §54956.9.
29 Olmstead vs. City of Petaluma, Sonoma County Superior Court Case #223404.
30 •
31 (Added) Conference With Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation, Significant Exposure
32 to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision 9b) of§54956.9: (1,' matter).
33
34 (Added) Conference With Real Property Negotiator Pursuant•to Government Code
35 §54956.8. Property: 556.North 'McDowell Boulevard. Negotiating Party: Gene Beatty.
36 Under Negotiation: Price, Terms or Payment, or Botha (Mosquito Abatement Building)•
37
38 ADJOURN TO CLOSED`SESSION I �
39
40 Council adjourned to Closed Session at 5:35 p.m. •
41
42 RECONVENE
43
44 Council reconvened its"regular7rieeting at 7:10 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
.,5
Draft-Minutes;
of,a City of Petaluma; California
City;Council Meeting
Tuesday, February 20,:2001
Page 9
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 ROLL CALL
2
3 PRESENT: Council'Members Healy, O'Brien, Healy, Maguire, Moynihan, TOrliattr Vice
4 Mayor'Cader-Thompson; Mayer Thompson
5
6 ABSENT: None
7
8 PLEDGEOF ALLEGIANCE
9 . .
10 At'the'request of Mayor Thompson, David'Gass led the Pledge of Allegiance.
U. •
• 12 MOMENT OF SILENCE
1.3
14 At they request of Mayor Thompson, a.moment:of silence was observed.
15
16 REPORT OUT OEC LOSED_SESSION
17
18 Mayor announced that there was nothing°to report out of Closed Session.y � p ion.. .
19
20 PUBLIC COMMENT' •
21
22 Maureen Lynch and Dick Lieb thanked'',the City for supporting the Christmas in April
23 Home Rehabilitation program. The name of the program was changed to 'Rebuilding
24 Together!' A workday is 'scheduled for April 21 , 2001, and,there are 420 volunteers
25 ready:
26
27 David yGlass spoke regarding flooding, 'saying it was not possible to "build your way out
28. of congestion."
29
30 Terrance Garvey spoke regarding,the cost of the new Water Recycling‘Plant.
31
32 Isadore Berman spoke regarding the homeless in Petaluma_ •
33
34 Mary Glardon; Rushmore Avenue, spoke regarding the negative effects;-that building a
35 cross-town connector at Rainier would have on the neighborhood.
36
37 Patricia Tuttle Brown went to Lafferty Ranch on Monday,February-19'to seethe snow. •
38. She took pictures of her daughter and shared;them with the Council: The EIR will come
39 before the Planning Commission on February 27, and .before Council;on March 26. She
40 urged citizens to come and;participate in that:meeting.
41 •
42 Diane Reilly Torres, Rainier Avenue, read a letter to Council regarding a Public Records
43 Act request for a•copy`of a memorandum or report justifying the January 2, 2001 .Closed
44 Session with the 'City Council. Thislitem was on the agenda as follows:„ January 2, 2001
45 Agenda, "Closed Session: Conference with Legal Council, Initiation of Litigation •
Draft Minutes •
of a'City of Petaluma -California
City;Council Meeting
Tuesday, February 20, 2001
Page 10
DRAFT DRAFT • DRAFT,•
• 1 Pursuant to Subdivision (c) Government Code§54956.9'(t Potential Case)."She asked
,2 for a response to,this request:.within 10 days.
3 •
4 Geoff Cartwright, 56 Rocca Drive, 'stated that continued development upstream..of the
5 Payran Flood Project would diminish the project's effectiveness, and added that Rainier
6 Drive was the floodplaimaccess road into many neighborhoods. He objected to building
7 in the floodplaim.
8
,9 COUNCIL COMMENT •
10 •
1.1 Council Member'Toriiatt
`12 •
13! • Regarding Ms. Reilly's public records request, thought that if the document in
14 question was not of'utmost concern regarding threat of litigation, Council should
15 consider if it would be appropriate to release the document:
'16 .
17 Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson: •
18
19 • Mentioned that one of the property owners on Sonoma :Mountain had encouraged.
20 people onto their property.to play in the snow and had shared'hot chocolate with the
'21 visitors.
22
11123 • Attended a Brown' Act,seminar'that was• informative, and announced an FPP�C
24 seminar to be.held March 12 atr'City Hall.
25'
26 Council Mernber'Maguire
27 •
. 28 • Encouraged cable "subscribers check the "Yes" box on'their Cable bill to pay the $2 a
29 month fee.
30
31 Council Member Healy
32
33 • •Thought proactive action was needed to preserve the long-term effectiveness of the
34 Corps of Engineers flood'fix.
35 • Noted that the Planning Commission would ;soon be dealing with fine-tuning the
36 expansion•of'the'Zero Net Fill Ordinance:
37 •
38 Council Member Moynihan • -
39 •
40 • Announced a tree' planting on°Saturday; February24'at Lynch Creek from'9:00 a.m.
- 41 to 3:00 p.m..
42
43 PRESENTATION/APPOINTMENT.
44 • .
•45
15. Presentation by Sheila Romero, Executive Director of. the Sonoma County
Tourism Council, on Accomplishments, Future Goals and. Programs; and
Draft Minutes
of a City of Petaluma, California
City:Council Meeting
Tuesday,•F,ebruary 20,;2001
Page 11
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT •
1 Appointment of One Representative to the Sonoma County Tourism Council's •
2 Investors Committee.
3
4 Ms. Romero, Jessica Van Gardner and Matt_Connolly spoke regarding the Sonoma
5 County Tourism.
6
7 PUBLIC HEARING
8
9 16. Reconsideration and Possible Action on a Resolution Adopting a Mitigated
10 Negative Declaration for the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision and a
11 Resolution_Approving the Tentative Map and PUD Development Standards
12' for the Ridgeview Heights Subdivision.
13 .
14 MOTION: Council Member Healy moved, seconded by O'Brien, to Adopt
15 Resolution 2001-044 N:C S; Adopting a Mitigated Negative'
16 Declaration with all references to a Bicycle/Pedestrian Path
17 removed from the resolution. -
18
19 MOTION
20 PASSED:`: 4/3 (Council Members, .Maguire and Torliatt, .Vice 'Mayor Cadet.-
21 Thompson voting"no")
22
23 MOTION: Council Member .Healy moved, seconded by O'Brien, to Adopt, a
24 Resolution 2001-045 N.C'S. Approving the Tentative Map and PUD
25 Development Standards'for Ridgeview Heights Subdivision, with
26 all references to a Bicycle/Pedestrian Path removed from the
27 resolution.
28
29 MOTION'
30 PASSED: 4/3 (Council Members Maguire and Torliatt, Vice Mayor'bader-
31 Thompson voting "no")
32
33 17. Public Hearing to Review Mid-Year Budget Results for FY 2000/2001 and
34 Possible Action to Amend Ordinance No. 3001 N.C.S.
35
36 MOTION: Council Member Torliatt moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to
37 Introduce Ordinance 3101. N.C.S. to change certain,
38 Appropriations'for the Operation of the City of Petaluma from
39 .July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001.
40
41 ' MOTION
42 . PASSED: 7/0
43
44 MOTION: Council Member Maguire moved, seconded by''Healy, to Adopt
45 Resolution 2001=046 N.O.S. Establishing a Vehicle and
Draft,Minutes
of"a City of Petaluma, California
City;Council Meeting
Tuesday,,February 20,.2001
Page 12
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
•
• 1 - Equipment.Replacement Fund and transferring $1,,000,000 from
2. the General Fund. •
•3 - • - • .
4: MOTION
5 PASSED: 7/0
6
7 MOTION: Council Member Maguire moved,,seconded by Healy, to Adopt
8 Resolution 2001-047 N.C.S. Authorizing the"City Manager to
9 Transfer $400,000 from theGeneral Fund'to the Risk Fund.
10
11 MOTION -
12 PASSED: 7/0 ,
13 '
•
14 UNFINISHED BUSINESS '
15
16 18. Status Report, Continued Discussion, and Possible, Action Authorizing the City
17 Manager to Enter Into an Agreement'With Mardell, LLC, Regarding the Adobe
• 18 Creek Weir and Diversion Channel and Directing City Management to Send a
19 Letter to FEMA Withdrawing the City's Appeal of the Letter of Map Revision
20 Upon Execution'of Said Agreement. (Continued' From.February 5, 2001 Council
21 Meeting) (Continued,to March 5,.2001 meeting)
22 I
23 19. Discussion of Scope of Work, Schedule and Budget for the General Plan
Mr.24• 2000-2020 Chapters (Housing; Water Resources;,Recreation, Music and Parks;
25 Community and Public Facilities; Public Safety; Traffic and Circulation; Family
26 - and Children; Economic. .Health, Redevelopment, Fiscal Sustainability; Natural
27 Environment and Land' Use; Sustainability) and Possible Action Regarding '
28 Potential Amendment to Dyett & Bhatia Contract for the Completion of the
29 General Plan. (Continued ao:March•5, 2001 meeting) 1
30
31 APPROVAL OF`PROPOSED AGENDA .
32
33 20. Approval`ofProposedeAgenda for Council's Regular Meeting of March 5, 2001.1
34 •
35 It was Council consensus to approve the March 5, 2001 agenda with the
36 following additions:
37
38 1. Status Report, Continued Discussion, and Possible Action Authorizing the
39 City;jvlanagerto Enter Into an•Agreement With Mardell, LLC, Regarding
40 the Adobe Creek Weir and Diversion Channel and Directing City
41 'Management to Send a Letter to FEMA Withdrawing the City's Appeal of
42 the Letter of Map Revision Upon Execution of Said Agreement.
43
44 2. Discussion of Scope of Work, Schedultand Budget for the General
4'5 Plan 2000-2020 Chapters (Housing; Water Resources; Recreation, Musi
W46 • and Parks; Community-and Public Facilities; Public Safety;-Traffic and
Draft Minutes
of a City;of Petaluma, California
City Council Meeting :
Tuesday,February,20, 2001
Page 13
•
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 Circulation; Family.and Child'ren;'Economic Health, Redevelopment,
2 Fiscal Sustainability;, Natural Environment;and Land Use;-Sustainability)
3 and Possible Action Regarding:Potential.Amendment to Dyett & Bhatia
4 Contract for the Completion of the General Plan.
5
6
7 ADJOURN •
8 •
9 The meeting Was'adjourned at 10'35,p.m.
10'
11 • •
12
13
14 •
15 E.,Clark•Thompson„Mayor
16 •
17
18 ATTEST: •
19
20 ,
21
22 Paulette Lyon, Deputy-City.Clerk
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
34 •
32
33
34
35 •
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Draft Minutes.
of,a:City;of Petaluma, California
City Council Meeting
Tuesday;,Februai 20, 2001
Page 14,