HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 03/26/2001 (24) :.
•
. NOTICE OF`DETERMINATION
•
TO 1-1 Office ofaPlammng; d an Research From:. City of Petaluma i
1400 Tenth.Street,,R'oom 121.. 11 English'Street .
• Sacramento, CA 958;14 . . Petaluma, CA 94952
. ❑ County.Clerk '
County,of':Sonoma -
. Subject: „ Filingaof'Notice of.Determinatiomin compliance with Section 21108..or 21152 of the , -
' Public ResourcesCoder
Project Title:' Eleventh Amended':Agreement-tor Water Supply
. . . . . - -..
1 SCHB: 93023038 Contact: Tom Hargis. Phone: (707) 778-43091
' ' - 1
• Project Location: The proposed Eleventh.Amended.Agreenienttot Water Supply (Amendment 11)
amends a,water supply.agreement thatiestablishes the contractual ,obligation:of the Sonoma County
Water Agency(Agency).to supply water,to eight water contractors within the Agency's service area • " -.'
(cities of Santa-Rosa, Rohnert Park'Cotati, Petaluma,and Sonoma„and"the Forestville;North.Marin and .
� Valley of the !Moon water-.districts) and other customers in.soithern Sonoma County and portions of
Marin County.
Project Description: Amendment '11 obligates the Agency to 1 construct or ac uire'additions;to the -'
' existing transmission,system SO meet increased delivery entitlements established' by the agreement b
reliably deliver; and to make the deliveries.authorized,to be made,to Mahn Municipal
• ' by the agreement, (2) construct:additional Russian "River water production facilities (up to •a total
capacity of:188.9'mgd)'so that the total:water'produetialt capacity availabl'e'at all times is not:less than
the average daily delivery to the regular customers..and Marin=Municipal' (excluding surplus water and
water in excess of entitlement(s) during the monthot the highest historical use plus 20 mgd; (3)
construct emergency wells with capacities ;which. are from: time to' time determined by the iwater
;
- contractors: (4) construct additionalistorage°facilities'to the extentnecessai'y to maintain a quantity equal
to 1.5 times the average,dailydelivery to:the regularcustomersexcept;North Malin during the month of
highest historical use; (5)' replace.existing„facilities and construct additional facilities,:related buildings.
and appurtenances as necessary„to insure the reliable and efficient operation of the transmission system •
and the.quality-of'the water delivered,. and (6) -requue the-water contractors, and the Agency, to -
implement or use their best efforts to secure the:implementation,of urban water conservation best
management practices..of,alternative water conservation measures that secure'at least the same level of
water savings. - •
This is to advisee thatthe'City of,Petaluma; a-ResponsibleAgency, considered the EIR for the Vater
Supply and Transmission System Project prepared by the County Water-Agency ash Lead
Agency. Amendment 11,will will the Project. The City approved”Amendment,11 on January 22,
\ 2001 and ratified that approval one April 2, 2001, and has'made the following"determinations regarding
Amendment 11:. . .
1. Amendment 11 will have a signiticant:effectorethe environment: '
2 , • This determination is based on several environmental-documents;previously prepared,
pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental•Quality Act (CEQA), that -
. address&the•potential.•environmentaliimpacts,related to Amendment.11, including, but not .
• limited to, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the.. Water •Supply, and
• Tt•ansmission'System Project and subsequent Environmental .Analysis by the Sonoma
County, Water Agency in-Ai gust 2000. -
:3. Mitigation measures .were made a:;condition of approval. of projects for which•
environmental documents were previously prepared,.but were,not made La condition of
• approval of Amendment 11. ,
4. A,Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the Sonoma'County Water
Agency and by the City•of Petaluma`forproject(s), which will be undertaken pirsuant to - -••
. Amendment 11. . • .
5. -•• .Findings were made,,pursuant to the:provisions:of'CEQA, by-the.Sonoma County Water -
Agency and by City of-Petaluma for projects(s), which-will be undertaken pursuant
Amendment 1a. •
6. There have been no•changes.in circumstances or n. •n information not knownt.at the time
the EIR for the Wdter,Supply and Transmission;System.Project was Certified by the .
- •Sonoma. County Water: Agency that will.result in substantially' more severe or new - -.
• sigmfican •im p acts be y and those descnbed mthe:p revious environriental,doc
uments.
• NwsubsequenVorsupplementai environmental document is re q uiredfor
the approval of �`
. K. Amendment 11 • -. c- •
•
-This: is to certify that the Final EIR with comments and responses and record' of project.approval is
available to'the General Public at: .
Sonoma County•Water Agency
• - - - - - =2.150 West'College Avenue ' •- - - -- - • -
Santa Rosa..CA 95401
�Si'gnature� Date Title
Date received for filingrand:posting at OPR`.
- I.
. 2
Resolution No:: 2001- N.C:S. :. -
ofthe Cityof Petaluma. California' .
AUTHORIZING"THE,ADOPTION'OE_FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS STATEMENT OF. OVERRIDING
•
CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDA_NCE'WITHTHE CALIFORNIA i -
ENVIRONNIENT:4L QUALITY Y ACTd•RELATING TO
- :THE ELEVENTH•AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR'WATER SUPPLY .
.
WHEREAS the Sonoma County Water Agency (Agency�)y"as the lead,agency for,the,Wat-e,r ..
Supply, and Transmission System Project:;(Project);,prepared an Environmental Impact Reporty(EIR)
dated-October 1998, that drscloses:the potential envuonmental impacts of the Project,.and among -
the purposes:of the Project is the provision of a safe; reliable and`economical water supply.to•ineet
' ' •the defined future needs of the.-Agency'ss='service area. and the defined:future water need of the
_ Agency's water supply contractors including the;City+of Petaluma.(City); and '-' - - I, _ .
WHEREAS the.Poject IR incrporated byeerence the piojectefuture and uses ` •d
udocmented n city and county
general plans and related environmental documentation for the areas
.5 •in which the Project could supply waterpan d d s
-. 1,, .
• ' - ' " WHEREAS„'the City of•Petaluma_General Pl"amestablishes'that,future land wthintheCity -
-weretappropriately projected and environmentally.documented, and information has been'
provided by thei y concerning-they water supply, requir`ed:to ser-.ve.said
_C land uses•was also ;••
incorporated in the Project EIR:- and- . -
WHEREAS,tbe'ProjeetEIRidentified potentially significant'adveise:impacts on the f
environment,_including significant.unavoidable.•impacts asia,result of construction'and ,
implementation of the.Project;;and theEBoard.of Directorsl,of the Agency, on November. 17, 1998,
considered the environmental effects of the Project;asrepiesented.in the_EIR,.and'thereafter adopted
Resolution;98 1423; certifying the EIR as havingbeen completed in accordance and compliance
with•the California Environmental Quality Act.'(CEQA), and;thereafter, on December 15, 1998, the
Board-,adopted specific findings, mitigation rneasiifes, a inoriitoung?program,and a statement of
overriding considerations asconditions of:approval for the.Project,'by Resolution,98-1614 and - •
approved the Project, and.thereafter filed a Noticeof Determination. dated December 1-5, 1998, in
accordance With the provislonsof'the tEQA; and -
WHEREAS, the Eleventh Amended. Agreement for Water Supply (Amendment 11;) will.
implement the Water-Supply and Transmission System'Projects and the environmental impacts of
Amendment"11 are evaluatedin the Water Supply:and'Transmission System Project EIR;and
WHEREAS, in August 2000 the.Agency conducted an:Environmental Analysis,to assess
whether a.subsequentsor stippleinental-EIR, or otter environmental document was required puisuant
1
• to lei al tornia Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) for the Project, and that Environmental
y ncluded there were;no changes rn ciicumstancesor new'infoimatron:'that was'.not known
• at theitime the Water'Supply and Transrtiission,System'-ProjectEIR.was certified that result in .'''
substantially more severe or new significant:impacts'beyond those described initheprevious EIR;•
• :and: • -
.
- . WHEREAS the'Agency'Board of Directors on August 22, 2000;adopted Resolution 00-1021,
finding were no changes.in circumstances or new information not?known at the;time the
Water Supply and Transmission System'P-rolect EIR was certified that-AA/ill result•in substantially -
more severe!or new significant impacts beyond 'those described in the previous'EIR, and thatino ,
subsequent'or supplemental EIR, or other'environmental document is required'prior''to;proceeding•- '
:r.
with Amendment l l,tand'approved Amendment 1=1 and
WHEREAS the City,of Petaluma has:assessed,whether a a subsequent,or supplementalEIR, ' --'
ot rother:environmental;documentwas"requited pursuant to the California Environmental';Quality
Act:(CEQA) for the:Project or,Arnendment.11,and has concluded that there have been;no changes.
..-' -in^crrcum"stances`ormew information which;was not.known at the time;the•Water Supply'and i- . . --- i'-
a-
Tiansmissron System,Project EIR was certified that result.in'substantially more'severe or new
significant impacts beyond those described in the`previous FIR; and - .
. WHEREAS the,,Agency,'in'order,to,,implement its decision'to'.approvelsaid`Piolect,ihas ' • .
requested`tl at,the Agency's water supply_contractors approve execution of Amendment_11 and;in: ••
response tosard request the City Council:of•Petaluma acting asia Responsible Agency pursuant`to•
CEQA and the State;CEQA Guidelines,;thas considered theenvironmental effects of Amendment
_ ' • 11; as disclosed and documented in the Final EIR.prepared`,by the Agency for the•Project;,in
' connection with the`City's;consideration of Amendment 11, as well as all findings made by'the:
-
Agency related to'the Project. -
. - - .- y y g .
NOW'THEREEORE:BE IT RESOLVED b .the Cit Council`of Petaluma actin ;as a' • - .
• . Responsible Agency_under?CEQA,.and=having,considered;the EIR;for the;Proj'ect.certified by'the •.,. ,.. - _-r
• Agency.,all`public.testimony,,and all,comments,•and evidence, written and oral`,.relatedto:the .
, Projectand:Amendment 11, the City Council of Petaluma, hereby finds, determines:and:declares as
follows: '
All of.the-abevefindings are true.and correct;the City of Petalumaiadoptsand
incoipoiates herein by reference the findings and`determinations made by Agency Board of
.Directors'on.December 15, 1998'by Resolution98-1614,'attached;hereto,'and August 22,2000'by =
.
Resolution 1021,.`attached hereto. in connection-with approval of the Project, insofar as those '
findingsiand determinations apply to:implementation ofsaid Project to serve°the City of Petaluma
by meansof the measures provided for in Amendment.11. •: `
2; In addition to the Statement<of Overriding Considerations incorporated=herein from
Water Agency Resolution 98-1614, the Petaluma City Council finds and`.determines that;'based on
'evidencetsetforth in the;administrative record„the:Petaluma Aqueduct currently vulnerable:toI
"mechanical,structural,-and'electrical outages that coul(''substantially=reduca°th"e'City's water .
supply, that the facilities tb be constr'uetetiTaSuant to Amendment 1-1 are critical'to ensure that,tl e ) •
. 2,
citizens of the City'of Petalumayhave a safe andreliable water supply.to ensure;protection of public '
•
•
- 'health, safety and welfare :and-that this critical need outweighs the unavoidable significant
t
envtronnieptal risks and impacts identified in the EIR for the•Project certified by the Agency, all
public testimony, and all comments and evidence; written and oral, related to the Project,and .
•Amendment T 1.
f 3: . There have been'no,changess in circumstances or new.information that will result in
t .
substantially more severe or new significant impacts beyond' described in the previous EIR
• and'that require preparation of>asul5seguentor Supplemental environmental,document pursuant to
CEQA. .
* _ Under the,power andjpuihonty:conferred upon this Council by the.Chaiter of said City.
• • REFERENCE: I hereby certify the tore�oing-Resoluiion was introduced and adopted-by the .
Council of the City,of Petaluma at Regular meenng on April 2, 2001
by'the tollowidg votei.
�PProved as;to
form:
,•. City Attorney
. AYES: ' •
NOES:
ABSENT:
AI.IEST: _ _ •
City Clerk ' Mayor
3•
. , - .. t .'
. ..
.. -
CORRECT,COPY OF THE ORIGIN �..
ON FILE-INTHIS.OFFICE { _ - 1163.
Resolution:No. 00-1021
County Administration Bldg.
ATTEST 24 2000 •Santa'.Rosa„CA .
Nor _{ EEVE T.,LEWIS County i:Clerk a e Of�CO -Date-, _ 'Augur t 22, 2000
Cler 'ot"the B•pprd:o. Directorsr of°the - -A. •' Alli'D 'U Y CLER '
RE •LOTION OF ThE BOARD OF DIRECTORSOF THE•SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY. -
1) •FINDING THAT A, SUBSEQUENT.
OF SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT -
'IS 'NOT REQUIRED. PURSUANT TO• THE CALIFORNIA. ENVIRONEMNTAL •QUALITY ACT
FOR THE ELEVENTH AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR WATER, SUPPLY; 2) APPROVING
THE ELEVENTH AMENDED' AGREEMENT FOR WATER SUPPLY,• 3) DIRECTING AND
AUTHORIZING THE ,,GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ;ENGINEER TO - EXECUTE THE-
• ELEVENTH AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR WATER SUPPLY UPON EXECUTION- BY ALL .
OTHER,PARTIES; 4) :DIRECTING.THE GENERAL.MANAGER/CHIEF'ENGINEER TO WORK
WITH COUNTY COUNSEL TO,PREPARE.NEW AGREEMENT(S)FOR WATER ,SUPPLY IF
ALL OTHER PARTIES HAVE NOT°EXECUTED THE:ELEVENTH AMENDED AGREEMENT.
- FOR WATER SUPPLY BY :SEPTEMBER •15, 2000;. •5) DIRECTING THE GENERAL
'r ; -MANAGER/CHIEF'rENGlNEER TO WORK,'WITH'; THE CITIE& AND WATER DISTRICTS . ::
SERVED. BY. THE AGENCY 'TO EVALUATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE, CITIES AND ' .
WATER DISTRICTS TO - DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT MANDATORY WATER •i CONSERVATION=ACTNITIES; 6)!DIRECTING THE GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF-ENGINEER •
s ''., ' TO DEVELOP FOR BOARD' "CONSIDERATIONS. CONSULTANT ' CONTRACT(S) TO .
EVALUATE MANDATORY WATER CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES.AS NECESSARY; AND 7) - -
DIRECTING THE GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINES
R TO "WORK WITH”THE CITIES ,'s..
. 'AND:; WATER DISTRICTS SERVED BY THE AGENCY TO: EVALUATE POTENTIAL
..REGIONAL WATER', ,DEMANDS IDENTIFIED SINCE "THE, WATER SUPPLY AND
TRANSMISSION;SYSTEMPROJECT WASrDEVELOPED'.. •
w WHEREAS, the environmental impacts: of the Eleventh ,Amended: Agreement for Water Supply are ,
evaluated inthe Water Supply and Transmission System∎Project Environmental Impact Report,(EIR); and!- -
WHEREAS, the Water Supply and"Transmtsston"System ProJect EIR.was certified by the.'Sonoma County
_ Water'Agency's (Agency) 'Board of Directors on November 17, 1998, by Resolution 98-1423, and the Water
Supply and Transmission System Project was approved by`the Agency's Board of Directors on December 15,
1998 by Resolution No 98-1614; and 1%
WHEREAS, ,has Environmental Analysis,to assess whether a subsequent or
su Pp le e tE R ,. e snal document, •is required pursuant
toithe California•Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA)for the;Eleventh Amended Agreementfor Water Supply;and _
WHEREAS,."the Environmental'"r Analysisjcondudes that the Eleventh Amended!Agreement implements but
does not change the+Water=Supply and;Transmission System Project, and
WHEREAS,,the Environmental Analysis concludes that there are no changes' in circumstances or new
information which•was,not known at the time the;Waters Supply'and Transmission System Project EIR was certified
that"will result in substantially.more,severe ornevf significant impacts beyond those described in the previous EIR;.
Aid
� 1 R,1
•` RS2WICLtAGENOAUGREESIAMENOMENT 11?AUTHORIZATION' . FILE:WC160-0i7PRIME:CONTRACTORS'-WATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS
.
e Sea tee; 42.c,,
' , •
. . .
• .
. .
• - • -
. '
et.1,
WHEREAS,. the Environmen•
tal Analysis concludes that a subsequent or supplemental El R or other
environmental document, is not required,poor proceeding with the Eleventh Amends,Agreement for Waters
Supply;and
11/. . -
. .
WHEREAS, the Agency's Board of Directors adopted Resolution No 98-1614 which'directed the General . .
Manager/Chief Engineer to take the necessary steps to 'tingle the proposed agreement far water supply in
substantially the same form on file with the Clerk.of the •
• . . . . .
. .... . ..
th Amended
' WHEREAS:,the ,Elevended ,Agreement for Water, Supply'was completed as directed by.the •
. .
Agency's Board of Ditedorsibytheend ofJune1999t7tand . • '
- .• .
. _ .
•WHEREAS, the Eleventh Amended Agreement for•Water Supply has been approved and executed by .
seven of the eight contractors; and
_. .. , . . ..
• , „ -
.
- ._, . -• -
WHEREAS;;theAgenty:',,needa to move forward WithltheElecenth'ArnendediAgreement for Water Supply
• - or equivalent agreement(s) in order to :proceed with design and construction of necessary water supply rand
•/,
transmission system Syeten fthailiee, and ,
. .
. - .
. , •
, • .
. .
-• • • - . • WHEREAS:,affew.-_of the water contractors have indicated:a desire;tO. PCirStrie more aggressiVewater-
conservation aCticitiestharithose includecliri,the Water Supply an&TratiaMissiOn[Systernarbjett•and theEleVerith
Amended Agreementand
. . , . .. • - „ • . , .., . • .
. • .,„ , „ ,
. . WHEREAS,:theAgencY may require conSultartseiviCes to help eVeh:late:mandatory water conservation . '9'".'"'
activities; and t ' :c", • - 7 , . , - •' * • •
• .., . • . _ ,„ „, ..,. , . . ... - ' „ •" • •
WHEREAS; theAgency:in cooperatiorilWitlt,the cities and water districts Served by the,Agency'4=need. .
to evaluate potential regional-Water demands identified since the Water Supply and 'Transmi rn ssior0Syste _-•
. „,.. .
. I
Project was .
. • „. .• ,.... , _ ,..,
. .
- .
•
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency •, -
,hereby finde,determineeand'.declares as follows . . ._ - ...
1. All of the above recitals are true end carrept. ... ,. . - , _ •• -- r
.. , .
•
. .
• ' 2. - The Board has'reviewed.anckoritideteclthe Environmental Analysis and concluded that a
subsequent or supplemental environmental document is not required pursuant to the '.
California Environmental Quality' Act for the Eleventh ,Amended Agreement fon Water •-
'SupplY. . r
•
. , 3. "t: TheEleVerith Amended Agreement'for water'SUpply1Sapproved. • . •
- • . ,
4, - -TheAgency!sGeneral Manager/Chief Engineer is directed and authorized to execute the
Eleventh Amended Agreement for Water Supply,upon its execution by all other parties. . .
. .
. . ., - •• - -- .
, .
5. TheAgency'e General Manager/Chief Engineer is directed to work with Cdunty:COunsel'to
prepare new agreement( ) for water supply if all other:parties have not executed the
Eleventh Amended Agreement for Water Supply by September 15, 2000. .
6. The Agency's General Manager/Chief Engineer is directed to work with the cities and
- - water districts served by the Agency to opportunities for the Cilia and wate ,
____.- •
• ' diStricte.to develop and implement:mandatary WaterconservatiOn activities.
- • •
. . .
7. . The Agency's General Manager/Chief Engineer is directed to develop for Board .
consideration consultant contract(s) to obtain outside expertise and assistance to ..
.evaluatemandatory Watettanservation activities a&rietwesgini,, •
. ,
• ,i. ,
8. The Agency's, Genehl Manager/Chief Engine-errs diredted to work with the cities and
water districts•:served by the, Agency to evaluate potential regional water demands
identified•since the Water Supply and'TransmissionSystem Project was developed., •
.
DIRECTORS: - . ' -
CALE --KERNS' "`SMITH, _ KELLEY REILLY .
Ayes 5 Noes Absent, Abstain
SO ORDERED .
. R1-3
_ _ :c .. -- - . .
r
H
• - _ -•
S •
. •
•
■
_•
.•
• . • " .
. ••
•
• • ,
. •
•
• __
. .
. :.
• .• - .
- - .
•
•
- -
• .
THL'WITHIN INSTRUMENT'IS.A •
- CORRECT COPY OF THE',ORIGINAL `53 •
ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE - • - - •
•
Resolunon No., 98 1;423'
lip ATTEST: DEC' •1 0 1998 • ' countvApministration''Blao.F`
. Santa Rosa_.0 A
_ EEVC 7.'LEWIS •Courq Clerk:' B affiCro Jerk of the Boift 0f ,
5uoervko MI Slat. • I 'Init.for '_ • -
th. P,Of./10.l %,0 ► i ' oeai;a _, Date • November_•1.77; 1998 1 ,.
RESOLUTION"OFTHE BOARD O,F`.DIRECTORS OFI TI- E'SONOMA;COU?yTY: -
WATER AGENCY`CERL I•YING ThEE FINA:1, ENVIRONMENTAL:IMPACT •-. -
REPORT.FOR THE'WATER SUPPLY AND•TRANSIv1iSSION;`SYS L t.M PROJECT. -
MAKhIG CERTALN FI_TIDINGS IN CONNECTIOty=TI-�REWITH, AND SETT-LNG—PI A
'DATE TO CONSIDERP•ROJECT.4PPROVAL '
f•- • 'I - • Tne.BoardoDtrec ors oithe Sonoma County:R'ate Agency-(Boardt) herebyfiries, - w-
determines. declares
and'orders as;follows
Historical Facts, • I I
1 :,
(. • 1� The'.Sonama;:Liuntie'Water Agency and the Russtan River Project.. The-
.-! Sonoma County Vy'at r Agency ("theeAQen v'),was created:by the California Legislature in
1949 to act as a.local sponsor'foi federal flood'control and'water conservation projects in the .
' Russian-River;basm. The federal'projects'sponsor d by.the Agency Consist:of Coyote Valley-
- ,_ Dam,:which'began:Storingw,ater in-Lake Mendocino in 1959, and Warm Springs Dam: which.
began storing water.'in Lake:Sonoma'in 1982-: .
I .
2' • Tne 1974 Water Suvv v Ag eement In 1-97.4, the 4gency, pursuant to!,its
- authority to provice?an adeuuate watertsuaply to municipalities and other public agencies in
•
its service area, entered lintO a *Ater'•supply ag-eement,'with' cities and special districts in
Sonoma and Marin Counties;to construet the Russian River=Cotati Interne Project and' to
provide.them Writli`&spe.,med water.supply ('the 197".Project"). .
• 3. The .19774 Project and rd
ak. In adcoance!wrth the;CaI fotnia:Environmen al, • '
-
Quality-Aar ("CEQA"); a final Environmental.Impact°Report (""EIR") was certified for the -
197^ Project and the initial'components of the.197 Proje t were completed and have been
supplemented from time to time with improvements necessary to serve the demand
anticipated b� th 1974.EIR. - I -- - ,
?. The Need tor'adSuvolementa?'Warei Suvvivtand Transmission System Prof jct.
In 1992. 'the AQ ncv's General Manager determined that within thee;foreseeable future.
.
increased demands for ware: wotil'd reaurre-tha*__the 1974 Project be supolementedwith!an
2574S 11/17/98 - - 1-1•
. - 377
_ - -
•
• Additional.pro:jec:fridincre.2,se:waterdelivelie..s, beyond'Ithose antitipatedvand evaluated in the .0.
1974 Ea: This new project was identified as?,theVatier..SUpply. tad Transmission System
-Project:("the 7kSTSP") -and in IYIIY; 1992,, themGeneral-Maniaer was authorized' ipy this
Board to :nrenare.an appropriate"Ea ,Pursuant to this authority, the General•;Manazer_ •
• „ defe rnne& hat the project is described inane VSTSR Ea should thclune,analyses ax both
' a .•prba-ti-nw level, to 'address the general ithpatts of providing a Water.supply over an
extended drne,p=iod,,and at a "project" level to:address-site-specific inapatts..of constructing •
specified:facilities that were proposed for early completion. Additional facilities needed to -
• Drovide a wati, supply into the 'future, would be .preceded by additfOriali project
• • envii-tii-iniental teYieW, The WSTSP ET_Rvaiso; incorporated; for'admit-halt-anye and public
conienience,',certain,site-specific analyses.of fatuities which Were,neededlto cornPlete'tht
. .1974 Project and•which werantioipatedat alprom-ait leVek by the 1974 Ea: ' •
•
- :Procedural.Facts
, •• •
•
oticeA6fintentto,kfedre FIR. On January 26,, 1993, the Aaemcyreleased
"NOtibt.,tifPreparazionO5 an-EnyirOninental;Impiet•Report:Vv'atet,siipplyand Transmission
System P lan! whicu described the Water;Sup plS and:Tran sMiSs ion.„Syster PrOjett The
--Nonce Of Preparation was mailed to7,abolit3D0 federal state regional, andlbcal "aattities and
intefested-PatTh 4 A 437daY1511ilie rev1iWilperiod was established, eneling on March
_
1993. During the reyiewneriod.,,fbur noticed public §tdping meetings were e1d. atldifferent .11/
locations within'the:kteneys.serCite,rafe2, to inform the public about the..prOp-Osed project
and;reOeiVel'phitilit pdmmeflt. '
:.• 6 Tfie,F737,' 3R-Drafi:EIR. In September 2.1995, the Aaency.released..theDraf
for the WSTSP tor,an 85-day tommerit,tertod, On November 13 and 14 anciDecettiber 9,
1996 the:Aict;ICY'heldknoricedipublit:hea..i.nzs atwhitiititneall„intere.ad•Paillies"were given -- •
• an Opportunity to be heard. Tneteaftet .oP December 10, 1996 this Board ec'ted the
General Mina_aeriChief Enviteet ("General Mariairer"); by its Minute ;Order 96,1620.,to
. respond to speci& comments and qillestidaS &orn the Board. More than',1,660..etimments •
werereceived-fromabotat 100,aaenties,iorkanizations,ia.nd hadiyiduals)aS ismore particularly
described:in the Response to Comments document, provided as Volume,VM of the Final
• ,
-Es... dated 1998.
• •
• _ - • - •
. •
7.
1998 A4bdificarions ioF1757:7)..'Oni'May 5. 1998. follOWiriz public tionfication•
• -
through the Board's rezulat'aFzetida,:and notice mailed to,,ammilna',list;of about 866,nd:sons
.
and entitles the A..cieney'S Board of 15trEttors, considered''the General ,Manazer's
rebbrimeadatiori to modify' the. WSTSP. The General Manacztr recommended that the
Aquifer Storage and (A.SR).!-Coinponentjbe,deteted,fronl, thepreferreii.prOject.thaf
diversion afteitatiVet, other-than,,C011ettor No 6 be analyzed at a pratanpleyel,Trather than
project level, and that-, a subsequent ER be prepared to analyze site-specific divetsion .411
•
#25748 11/17/98
•
• •
• • '
•
• •
•
3278
„ . .. •.
. . .
. . ,
. . — •.
. • • ..
. . .
. . . .
' . •
. . . . .
• • . . . - • .
. „ . . . .
0 :alternatives The General Manager also recommanded! 'that 'the, Board determine that •,-
. • . . . - - - _•._.
CollectorNo, 6-Was-needed tb,rsei-Ve demand unner tne'•19,74 Project,.Atthel•May, ',meeting,
. .
..
members. of the -stated:that public notice of the,prOposal•tomodify the project vcas
..
' .inadequate. In response, theBoard continued the:marterfOr an additional two week period, - •
iintiLits May 19,1',1998:piiblidnietting, andthe Agency mailedta,neW public notice to the 800
person mailing list; adViSingftgipienta•of the General1Manaier'S proposal: the May 19 1998
. --
meeting date, and the ayailabiii7 of the.:relevant writienatniterial; - _ • - i . •
. ,
-,.... I- .
i - . . • 4: . .
IL 8. Board Resolution 98-0644. Following review; and consideration of public”
. -
comment the Board, on May 19, 1998; adopiedResolution:98-0644 which Modified the ' - •
,
WSTSP as deseribed abOVe. In Resolution 98064A, the Board considered Whether the .
.
. .
,modifications.proposedby;theyGeneralManagerthatitiedther WSTSP in such a way as to
. trigger arequirement'underCEQA that the be recirculated: ,Because;the project was not
being changed in a way that wouldcrratr. new or more severe environmental impacts, and
- instead, Was,being,changled'fb tbrOVide,more-OppOrninities foi.Pliblie comment the Board • ' - -
. . ....,.. ..__., ..
,..
determined ihat reCirculationwasnofwarranted. TherFindings;,Determinations, Declarations ••
E --• " - .
and Orders contained in Resolution 98-0644:are:hereby inediporatedhereinhy reference. " - ' — ";--'
- •"' . . . ,.
. . .
. , :
. • - - .9.- • CRev-iSiorzs'to,DT:a ft EIR:a7,24-RespollseS ta•Cainnients. The Agency has through
' • - '''' . :
its staff and in conjunction tvidilits-cohsultants, completed ith review of ebininents`liete. Ved
on the September 1996 Drat:1E13,f revised the DraftlEIRto, adopt suggested Changes, to
,.
respond to Board Resolutions 96-1620 and 98-0644 and to4respondto other oral and
:- ••-'• • - - th
comments,that-were received., as more particulaily-described;in the Response to Comments
_ . t C
, ,
-'--- • • - document provided at Volume V,LII,Of the Final EIR,and..dated October 1298. Thereafter,
further anitalificationsit,clanp:cationsan-d. inaitaiiicatit,modifications,were made to the.Draft,-
-:- • EIR dated Si.;pteinhea1996, ad as:so reVised, aproposed,Final, EIR was prepared by the
Agency and-submitted tOs:theBriard of Directors on OCtober:f3; 11998. •
10. Notice Of BOatdMStiht to Release.Fincil.EIR. Public notice,Of,the General
. , Manages:proposal thaithe BOardafithbrizerelease,•&the,Final EIR was provided pursuant
to provisiOns,of law as part of the public notice of the Boards regular agenda for its
October '13; (1998 Board meeting; :copies of which are mailed to about 190 persons and
• entities. -
_ . . _
.
1,1. /3c2c174.,,A)feeri7.7gto Release Final 17R,ern'aSet:Ce7illearion Dare. At October •
•
13 meeting,„..:his,B oa. d:consideredhe:General Managers ,p ro.-Posar to a rel eaSe. he Final EIR
•
. and to set NOVcaliber 1998 as the date:"•for Board consideration of Final:ELR_•cenification. $
Members ofthe: public appeared ax ibe Board meeting and requested that the November 2
date be delayed so the Could' nave more time to cpyi;W. the Final r In response,lithe
Board adoptedReSOlinion:9&1333, authorfiingthe•Aency!Steneral Manager to release-the .
ai
lir Final EIR and setting Nbvember 1.:1, 11928,,q-athert than November 1. as the datel.for
- II
( ..
. I ,
#2..5748 11717/98 . . " '1-3 • ".
...... " ' ., • - . .
• I .
..,, .
• • I - .2.
.- .]
379
. . . 1
., . ...
. .
. .
• . . .
•
. •
consideration of:certification,of.the.Final,EIR Tne.Board requestedlhat written comments 0
•
pertaining to certification of the Final Ea be submitted.'by'Friday, Noyember- U., 1,998 at
..
5:00 pan.: . .
. .
. .. . , . .
' 12: ..Vorice ofAvailabiliTY'gt Finale= On October 14,1:99-8,..the2pigency mailed
a Notice of Availability!of Final EfR to the VISTSP mailing Iist,„..towtotaling,about 950
, ..,
persons and entities, The NO-rice,iticiiided informanon about the November;.:17,,,public .
... ,
meeting'-dMe and the request-for;written comments by November'.13, 1998 18-
,locations in:ithree;counties wherethe Final EIR.was available,.and.Stated...hOwthe Final= . • •
• • cOtild:15...a.,obritedt IrrieNoticerwas-alowested at several locations near the Agen-cyas"'W. tiller • * i
property and altheiSonoma, Marin and Mendocino County Clerit2i0iaces.,The.A6-encvy.ilso
mailed copies of the;FinalETR, including Responses to Comments, to about 100 loCal,,s;tate
• • and federal agencieTs,:orgapi7stiOnsi.and individuals. - .
. •
. .
•
13 Arctic. eof Board Meiting,:io Consider Certification121ELL 4 In addition.to the •• '
. , t•
, .
Noticerto the1950 person WSTSP mailing. Iist,:thepubiic was also notified of the date,of the
Board-nieetingqci.OcinSiderFina1,1EIR certification as-liiir of thepublic:noticefolthe Board's •
-.Yeg-tilar.agendi.for:its November 17...1998 BoarcImeeiing. .
. _ . ,.. _ _ .. ,..
. • • - • - • • ‘ . !-— . . • . - .-
• . , . . . .
• •
- Certification'Of the Final EIR
0 .
• • . - - .. , .
IA., • The.Final EIR for the prohosed Water Stipply and transmission System Pro. ^t
.
consists of,Voliitnes:I.throtsii VIII as follows:, _ . -- .,. • . • • - '
. .
a. Volume Idated October, 1998, is the‘.1-evised-J-27aft.E . which .: . .
consists Of the Dr-AM-Ea and clarifications: aniblinbations and insiodificant'modifications
. . .,„
di'efeto: • . . t.
'b. Volume'fl . and unChanged from the Draft EIR, consists of
• Appendix A. the "1993 Notice of Pre.paration of and Em" and Appendix B, a "1993
Report of Public,Scoping Meetings and Written Comments in Response to the Notice of
• Preparatibn." . -
. .
. " c., Voltu-ne III, undated. and:unchanged from the Draft EIR, consists of
,.A.ppendix C Wetland Resources", _A.ppencibe.D, "Wildlif e R- esourct.-s Survey
Report"; Appendix .,E, '"FiSheries, :Study" and AppendiV 7, "Simulation Of 'Water . -
Te..frifiera."tire' within !Lake Sbnornat Dry .Creek and the 'Russian RliVer1" Addenda to
• .,_
Appendices.D and E:are included in Volume.VII.
. . -
• d.. - Volume'IV. undatethand unchanged morn the Draft,EIRconEists of
.
Appendix GI- "Outline of_Agency's Existing Water Rights", Appendix EI, "Economic and •
25748 I 141!:7198. 14 '
. . •
.
, •
-_
. . - •
. .
. . .
.. ,
• - • 380
. .
• . . ' .
Financial Report"' and Appends,; I, ,"Socin-Ecgnomtc Impacts Of, the No prof et
.Alternative." Appendtx,G and Appendix H nave been sup rseded by new Appendices G .
. and.,H in new Volume VII:'
e. •V olume V, -undated and_unchanged from the Draft EIR, consists of
. Appendix I, the "Russian;R y r- Model", Appendx I% 'Demand=..Estimates Used in.Russian
-'` " River Modeiing Study" :Appendix L, '"Demand Analysis", Appendix M, "dater and .
Wastewater Eficiency/Avoided Cost ,Sway", Appendix. N, 'Preliminary Alterrratives '
• Evaluation Process", Appendix 0, "Alternatives Analysts",.Appendix;P, "Evaluation of
Groundwater Supply.Alternatives",',and Appendix. Q',. "Transmission System Facilities'
.. Report. Appendix Q has be n super ded;by new'•_Appendi , Q in Volume VII. • .
• I Volume VI; dated October 1998; contains the Draft Mitigation .
Monitoring Plan. undated from'tliat.released:with the Draft EIR •••
Volume VII: dated October 1998, consists•• of an Addendum to -
Appendix D „an Addendum to Appendix E, an Updated.Appendix G; an Updated
Appendix H, an Uncated,Appendi„ Q; a new=_app n# R "An.Analysis of SCWA Water
„- Transmission System'Reliability; and the •Risic or Curtailment:',-a;new Appendix S, •'"An _
, . Evaluation of SCWA Wate ; Transmissions System Reliability"-and a new Appeno •.-T, . ..
s _ "May o,- 1998 Agenda Item'Transmittal.Report and May 19; 1998 Board Resolution,l98-
•; . 0644." ...
..1. h. . _Volume VIII; .dated October 19948, is the Response to Comments
document. and ncmdes' -.a� 'ilk of `-persons, organ,7ations, ,and public .agencies that-
. . - commented on•the Draft,EIR and: in Appenaic s A_through E;-the coiiunenf letters and . ;
public hearing'tanscrips of oral comments on the :Draf'EIR. The Response to-Comments
' = • ' document also contains the Agency's-_comments on and r"espouses to significant
environmental points raised oy public and agency comments submitted•during the review
and consultation process. 1
• 1
'15. The Final `EIR has ,been completed in accordance =with, all applicable
procedural and substantive recuiientents of CEQA the State,CEQA Guidelines; and the •
Agency's Procedures for the -Implementation 'of CEQA_., . .
_16. . The Final EIR describes a range of reasonable alternatives. •
• 17. The Board further'=finds that: . '
a. tne`,preparation orthe,.Final EIR represents a; good with, effort to achieve
completeness.and 'full environmental.diciosure; .
25748 I I/17!98. I-�
.
ti
381
. . .
. ,
- - • • •
. • '
. ..
•
. ..
_ b. the degree 'of spec...inci-ry set: forth ih' the Final; ER CorfespbndS;td.the 4111,
degree of specificity-aptiroptiare;for the-proposed Water Supply and Transmission System
Project; • - .
, . •
c. Tne:ReVised Elk does not require recirculation, for the reasons,Set forth-
belOw. ' , _ , - -
.
. .
. .
• ' • -• • • •
'the Board-: hereby, cenifies',tharithe Final EIR constitutes:an "ddecuate-: • .
• 4 .
acturate, objective and 'corripleteFingEIR:in.4cc_ordance,tith cEg-A., the State CEQA .
• :
Gtiidelines and the,ASielitCtis Procedures for e Implementation bf'CEQA•L for the purpose
. . .
of apProying the Water Supply and:cfranSmitslon System Project
. • ..
• • . .. -
Recirculation of FEW . .
- — .
.... _ . ., - . s_....,_ . . .•• ,
.- •
' 19. The revisions and krnodificatiOnsmade to-the Final Ell.-after"the close:of the . .
public review and;comment Teriodibut prior to, cerdfiCation of tha,Finial,EIR"in'response
. •
.,
to comments .received do not result in new or more severe adverse effectg, on the . .
. ' -.• erndrcnWentfflOv.prejliously;diseldsed.in.tiid.D1. .7ER. Tnak;reviSibiis,and,rhOdifidations , & .
-,.- to thetFinal.ElaR. crenerally-may bade-scribed as copsisting,of: " _ , -
, .
•
a an ekpanded discuisfon of previously identified inapaats::and 0
. , • . .
. .
. . , b. -• an expanded listing;of appropriate mitigation-measures Which
generally are of the type previously identified in the Draft Ell. dated Septatiiier 1996
circtiatd for pbic c cinmeng_
, and -
_
•
' - •" . c. enannes icres dive ambiguiti es or inconsistencies DET_k;
.
and - .
. . -d. charigeS, to eliminate- ciiscassibn of iinpactt which, dile to
project modifications, Will no'.1oncienhenilt from the project
20. None of the,:reyisiOns .constitutes “simif cant newinforination" within;the
meaning:, of.CEQ,A_.inasmuch as.nona!discloses:
. .
a. - a new ,sUbStantial" environmental impact resulting from •tha... . .
proposed projeat or from a new'mitigation measuraproposed to be implemented: or
'a. iibta±ial men:as,. ftc the severity, o ,f an!environmental inapaer
that will mit'he mitigated to a'leyel of insimificande through adopteCI:niiiigation rneasnres;,
0 or
. .
. ;.
4.774S, 11n:7;9S . •
• , . . •
.,
' 1
(•
. ..
'382
_
. .. .
. .
. . . •
. •
. . .
. . . . . .
. . . , •
• . - .
S .c., a fe.asible, prOject alternative or Mitigation measure that clearly .
.. .. ]
MI would lessen the lenvironmental impacts of the project but.wiiich is not required by the
• proposed.project; nr • . - • , . • .
..
d. - - that, the ,Draft EIR Was so fundamentally and basicirs:
_
• iriadeqtuate and Conclusory in nanire.that fne plink.'comment on the 'draft'was in effect
, .
- 1, •
meatiModess.
: • : •: • .-• 71. For the reasons stated •aboy.e,..and :those stated elsewhere :in me record,
.-,_ •
inducing in the NoVembet:4,. 1998CandNOvenaber 16, 19,98'letters from Gotnry.Colin sel,
the Board finds that die i-leViSitirt to the Draft ER'cdo not constitute "sicrificant new
.
information” within the meaning of'CBQA so as to triterredirctilatiOn of that Draft ER .
More particularly, the Beard finds: . -
.
. :
AS .- . . . Ta..-. JR. ...Deletilitthe:kSP: Compoigentiof theWSTSP lessens rather than, . .
increases environmental'impacts;of te.WSTSP, The ASR Component consisted of Wells.
pipelines and other facilities'inttlie Santa Rosa,Plana. Wnith,Wfotild inject Russian River .
.. .
water into and enact Water from.the;•aquifer: beneath the Santa Rosa Plain. The ASR .,
;._ ... .. Component functioned as.a4epatateeenietgendy Waterstipply system, and, although:ASR ...
facilities would havetbeen connected t6HtlieAgencY;S;'fransmisSicin system, they were not
in any vymy,necessaryto:the Operation of any other Agency, 'faCilities. Deleting the ASR, • -
' . component eliminates environmental impacts associated', with the construction and
•
- _..
' . . _ '. ,
operation of ASR facilitiet. ',Deleting: ASR.does, not .Claanze the scope or nature of th e
remaining WSTSP component. :The size and design b-1.-.:thorerztaiiiint fa.ciiiiieS and the
. .... . .. . ., .
. ,
quantities at'proposedRussian Rivercnversions is nor chanted 1)3/1.12e-deletion.
;--9.."C : - • . - _ - . - _. • --
1 _ b. Subsequelfr ciiiierii(m alternative ETR. .Preparin2 a subSecment Ea to
' •-• - ' -arialtze. .all-nronoSed di,tersion alternatives. other than Coda:tor:NO. 6... will increase the•• -
. - proposed
• - - Public's opportunity. to provideJneaninth-hlcomments,on,;these. other diversion'alternatives
before they are considered for approval by this Board. None of the ingnacts from
constructing these diversion alternatives will occur if at all ;until the .public has 'had the
opporruninr to comment on and Me Agency has completed that staiDequent.EIR.
c., . . Oi Ong& 'in 141)e! ,of analysis. Changing the leve.F of analysis of
'. diversion alliernatiVes, other than Collector No 6, from a ,Prbject (sitersoeciifid) level to a
.. . ,
. ..,.
prorarri level in the WSTSP "Ea lessens:11re tinpadts, of the'WSTSP because the sire-
. : specific environmental impacts associated Witli COnStniction Of Collectors:Icio. 1 and 8;.Will
not occur.' if at all until Completion.of Me stibsequent FLIR, In adciition. to the extent
•
.general prOpratn.SeVel information about the impacts of other,.diversion alternatives n'i as
. • .
been added. general informatibn`riSL-alto added.regarding'Wayst mitigate the impacts, thus
.._
: • the new information does not increase e the enVireilinental iirupattt of the WSTSP. I .
40, . 1
..
,
• 1
:#25748 11/17/98 . . -• - '. 1-7
, . . . "
. . .
. .
.
. , - . , . I
i . . . 383
. .
. • . , . i 1
• •
•
•
a. Collector Se. 6: tolled:tor No 6 is needed to serVe exitting,:demand •
author:I-Zed by the 1974 Russian Pitier4COtan;Interne Project;rather than future demand
to be provided- by the WSTSP.: The site=s-DeCifit environmental impacts associated with
construction of Collector No 6; including the site-specific cumulative impacts, were •
destribed the.,DMft.;EER. and "are ,descrihed inthe Final Elk. Because Collector No 6 '
is an element of the Russian River-Cotan Intel-tie- Project, the •inseam, and
curnulanyeamnacts.associated Withrit use for Water:supply operations are disclosed in the
1934 EEC thentinaos.rof Collector No: 6; as describ,ed-in the Final ELk..for the
_
• WSTSP, been chatig.ed from WSTSP ,fa.cility to an element of the Russiin River-
Comb Intende:PrOject.. the environmental ihipacts !constructing:it--haVe not changed and
. -
are filly disclosed at a site-Speeifie level in the:Final TER and at a program level in the
1974 EIR.
• •
, _
• th. Fact-ides cilready approved and.-therefore.dilered from WSTSP ER.
The Final Ea-for the WSTSP dbeatibt discuss impacts associated With:the.acquisition,of
the West Transriii5siOn Main and pturenase:,ofroa.PatitY•in the •OaloMont Pipeline from the
. ‘-.•City of!Santa-.:12.osa;-acqUiSition of a portion .0f:theNorth Mann Aqueduct .from North: . •
Mann Wateibistrict acquisition Of Ka:mania:Booster:Pump Statical frorn'Marha Municipal
Water District and constriction of the 'kawana Springs Pipeline -and Booster Pump :.:- -• • --
'Station. These faCilities are no longer proposed tb be constructed:as part of WSTSP. -
There are no environmental impacts !associated with ,eliniinatinZthiSidiscussionrfrom the. di
:WSTSP Final Eh: The environmental impacts;of tonstmcting.:orsatc*ng those facilities: lir
• -
were ;already, 'considered by the Board as part of its 1997 approvals of acquiring or _
constructing the:projects,
•
• : - Ckanges,Ito-Chavrer 3.4Backaround) of Volume r,,thapter''.3 of the'
Final'HP. has been*updated to.include,-addidenal. information regarding ekisrinMAszencv
activities and oOlizations. The Final•EIR includes clarifications .and updated information
regarding the Agency's emergency wells, Russian River Well Field, remaining authorized
facilities, Water Conservation Prom-am. watershed:management activities, and Fisheries
•
*Enhancement PrOt-ina. New text further describes'the Agency's contract with;Marin '
Municipal Water District; the history of Mann and Mendocino counties' inVolvement in
Russian River water sootily,issues, water rights in the lower Russian River, the changes
in Agency water rights- necessary for the Agent to carry out;its water supply'conwact
with the Mendocino County Russian River Flood:Control and Water Conservation
Improvement Disnict. the kgency'S Water Policy, and the Agency's'obligation tb-nia.intain
Dry Creek channel improvement! obSctea 'oy the U.S'. Corns of Enthneers. New text - •
.also describes,'events and actions related ro the Agency's water supply that have occurred
Since felease of the Draft-Ea in 1996, including two water shortages in August 1996'and
July Y997, approval of the Kawana. Springs Pipeime and Booster P,ump.:Station,
Amendment No 10 to the 1974 Aueeniett for Water Supplj,'„ May 1998 modifications
to the' WSTSP, discussed,above; and the ongoing consultation between the Agency'arid
- ,
#2.5748 1'1. LI 7/98' . 1=8
• • •
• 384
•
the espoz�ties of all.three parties underoSeC on7of�tbe federal Endangered Species
Y rP.
Species
Act. None of the change sto chapter are'si_antncant becaisethe) are.all clarifications
. ' and amplifications of existing;oackgouna information;:�regarding Agency activities. "None. •
'of'the 'changes' inftext-relate to.the ,environmental impacts Of the WSTSP or change,;or •-
. increase impacts 'disclosed in.the"Draft EIR:
.
. ` a Changes iato dpto,"44(Protect'Description) of'Volume I. Chapte
4 has been updated to reflect and discuss the, changes to the WSTSP, more tmoughly ,
'describe the analytical=process used by' lie Agency ana its consultant Montgomery Watson .
to determine-future •water°,deman'ds, :further, discuss the Proposed Agreement for Water
Supply, provide further :information ,retarding. the water 'conservation measures and ,
monetary sanctions°which;could be',imposed,on water.contiactors for not implementing
those measures or achieving;equivalent savings, provide'additional,general descriptions,of
.,_ „ ' ' potential;aiversion altemanves, and tpaate,the'total cost of the project. The information -
'regarding:the Montgomery Watson demand calculations added to the text of Chapter.:4 of .
. 'the Final EIR is not new; it summari ess'information that,was-presented in the,Draft EIR .
and is',presented without change in the Final,ElR as Apnendix.IvL`"Water and Wastewater
' Efciency/Avoided Cost Study' The information regarding water conservation"measures
and monetary sanctions clarifies how=wat r contractor,:may exceed recommended water
conservation measures s and the manner in which monetary sanctions will be imposed on
the water contractors'who do not implement thes measures or°achieve equivalent savings.
• The .additional descnptiens .of potential diversion:. alternatives, contain, some new '
information but none of the nevv: alternatives are ;pioposed'. to be approved until the
:subsequent 'DR has been completed: None of the changes to Chapter 4. increase the
_ . environmental impacts of the WSTSP from'thoseridescribed in the Draft ER. As -- , .
discussed above.. consideration of specific diversion,alternatives, other'than ;Collector No
•• - ---6,.has been deferred until"completio `o the ubsequerit,FIR; -n -
h-. • :. .Changes' to'Chanter 5 Rnvironinentai Setting;. Impacts, and
Mitigation Measures) of Volume,7. Eacii sub-cnapt of`Chapter 5'.has been modified-to
reflect,the Agency's decision to defer consideration of construction of:diversion facilities
. other than Collector No 6'unti'completion of a subseouent EIR While each.sub-chapter
continues to identify. the site=sbeciiicor project-level impacts of 4.constructing Collector No. •
o, the site-spetifit irnpacts,of constructing.Collectors No 7, and,-8 are no longer included
. because those collectors"are not currently proposed for construction. Instead the Final _
EI . identifies to the extent=possible,;general pro-am level: impacts of diversion.facilities.
"Each sub-chapter also ihcluces reference.to thetsuoseauentenviromnental impact report
. that the Agency Will prepare -which will evaluate and disclose the ,project-level (site-
specific) impacts of aiv rsion,facilities once the impacts' can bee id ntified.:Ibis change
is not significant-because it ,does not result in :new Or increased environmental impacts.
W.
In addition, the pubic will`:be ',provided an-;additional' opportunity comment,to co on the. .
^-57481,1/17%98 l'=9
- 1
.
385 .
. . .
. -
. , .
• . — •
. . •
. .
. . .
. .
. - _ .. •• . .
environtriettal iMpacts, of the various diversion affernatiVes, in the subsequent En..
S.
. .
- - - - i. Changes tO aSUO-cnapters 52 ff.artil) a n d,-5.3 (TVcce7i) Of Volume II - -
Sub-chanters and 5:31 of the Final Elk additional information from U.S.
_
. . Geologic.StirYey- data to ,support a.conclusion identified in the Draft. Ea —that there .
would not be.:I stihstannal:increase insedin-ient:transport as a result Of the WiSTSR. ,Sub-
Chapter 5.3 of the:„FinatEER proYides,uPdatecLinformarion regarding,water'quality testing •
of the Russian River Well Field and 19.01, emergency Wellsiase., This .s4b,Chapter also .
., ..
provides.. aaciitionaliinforthation from .the U. S. Geologic ,Survey- whilr, clarifies the .
- relationship-Of ,Yelbeity and flow. Mitigation Measure '513:11 induces more ,specific _
‘rtipabripp: reggirthtent,of wells in the vicinity of Collector No 6, Meta-4'distance
, narameters1nd period of monitoring: None of these Changes are simaificant. -The;Changes
exthandinfOrmariOn:prOvided in the-Draft;FIR or, in:the case of Mitigation.Measure 5,3- .
13, jprovide further mitigation of an impact at was already mitigated,to a Iess4han-
.
sigiifiCatii4eVel,iif.tlie.Dtait Ea• None of the,-changes disclose-or'resUlt-iri hew; or more .- .
.
. ._ seVete prOjectjrnpacts, • .
.
, . .
. .•. - . ‘
• . ....- ,. , . , ... .
.. - j. ' . Changes,19.Sub-therpter 55 (Biological Resources),and to,Appeithiir D
of VoluM:e'll. The Final FIR describes:acidnional Wildlife surveys conducted to'update
. ,
Sub-chapter 5-.5, Tnese.5-urycys:support-the same conclusion inentiffed: in the„..Draf :EIR-,
.. .
that no sialifitant impactsito specialfstanisspeCies would result tronithe -WSTSP,'but that
construction and operation of Collector No 6 may result in sio-nificatil impacts to plant
•
• cbrintituntieS and Wilcifile: The new Strvevlintibtrhation,is not Sitilfitant bebanse', it does
not result in or,identify any new:environmental impacts but only•confirrns impacts fully
disclosed in the Draft FIR. In,addition: Mitigation Measures 5,5.'1-5,54,J. 5:560; and-
. ,:•5-.5=10 were clarified and rInapact 5.571 Lanii•Mitigation Measure 5.5-41 were added.in, • . ..-. .r.,
'teSpbn-se tbiconafnents. The-,Clarincations of Mitigation Measures 5,.5..;,3,,5.-5-4, •5-.5-6C, and
5.-5,10. add: additional measures to Mitigation measures identified in the Draft Elk.,
Mitigation Measure 55,-3 includes ,additonalasstirances4hat revegetanon,will effectively
mitigate impacts to riparian woodland and,masslancPvege:tation. Mitigation Measure:5-.54
pr_Oyides further assurance that tree itrimining/limi5ing:will be monitored by an arborist. .,
Mitigation Measure.5.5,6t clarifies that•mitigation of sensitive tree species will occur as
near as pC3SSible to the inipacted area Mitigation Measure'5.510, clarifies,that power lines .
may be .overhead. or, if feasible i underm-ound. Mitigation Measure P.:541 Siiiaate.s •an
..
.
impact that could. be, caused -by Mitre.p43eilifie.5 tolistrildici, aftef completion ,of future
project-level (site-specific) environmental documents and induces provisions to :avoid or .
minimize Mita-Otis .thatilting!from :pipeline- e;,&ayation. The reviions to the mitigation
. .
measures are not,!sitificant:be.bitthe they db. not Change. the project S. environmental
" . . . . . _ . . .
fiTIPacts, but Provide fulther.assurance,that:.ithriacts identified in the Draft Ea as less-than,
,siMaificanfteinain lets.4.bansiMil.fi cant. Altheugh,Impact 5.5-1.1 and Mitigation Measure
5-'!5-1. 1, disclose a new impact and a new mitigation measure, including this new
• .
InfOnnation is not simiifcant: The new 4nipaCt, -as tnitigatd, is ileSt4tharif:simaificant,:-, In ..
. .
23748;117i 7/98 . . , - 1-.10
.. .
. , . .
. . ;
. .
• •
. - • • -
386 :
. . .
. . . ' . .
. , .
• . .-a . .
. . . . .
- • . " - •
. .. .
• • .. , • . . . . •• -
,. .
addition., ruturej.nmelines are•proposed at4a program level at time and the public'will
nave a imeantni.opportunity to comment onpipeline excavanon impacts as project-level
. .. .
environmental,analYses arg4repared for proposecPpipelittes. . .
. .
. • • -
• • • -k. 'Changes,tatSztb±Cnavte.r15.6,,(FiShif.ries Resources) and to Apperbdrizi E
of Volume: 1:!. !Sun-chapter 5.6 ,updates 77informatiOn tatartii#g the 'federal:'Endangered . .
Species Act listing of:Con° 'sal-thou and.steethead.,,,iand the proposed,listing of chinook
. . ..
salmcth by the National Marine,FiSli-erieS Service. The proposed !listing,of these sPeeies
was identified in the Draft ER and Was takeifinto consideration curing project impact .
1 • analysis. The Final ER also.includes additional.life,his-tory inforination-and ternperatire
a, _ •• - ,
c-riterionfornhese three saltnOnidispecies and tor,warmwater•species of Lake Sonoma (i.e., ,.
bass, crappie, bluecrill). Althon6a.156th-the•ii - 1:Ea andtthe,Fihal EIR conclude that the
. - _
WSTSP IA./lilt-tot have a simEicandadyerse.'4inapact_Of dobb salmon, steelhead, and chinook ,
salmon. the.additional,analysis changedthe conCliiSibiareabiied in the Final'ElIR regarciitib I.
_ a , _ ._ -
- - ' innpacts:to rainbow'trout:in take, Sonoma. ,•The Draft 'E1R-Stated that rainbow trout .i.n. .
• •
Lake Sonoma would be impaCted av teraperatures-'above 5°F The additional research
•-,described.in•the Addendum to Appendix',E.,,hoWeVer, indicates that rainbow trout in Lake.
..•
•
Sonoma would•not be impacted iunth temperatiret,eAteeded.:77°.F. As a result of this
research and additional danalysis of temperature modeling anditiSheriesimpaets„.I.rnpatt 516-
- • . ' 1 (to rainbow trout in Lake,SOrionia)-TWas reevaluated,and•the,Diaft•ta's,conclusion Oat
ak the impact is significant and unavoidable has been changed, in the Final Ea to a
..._
lipconclusion that the imnactiscless-than-sianificant No .eliangeS to inapact analysis of Lake
•, , a
, - .. .. --.• , Sonoma warmwater specieSat-siilied fromthistadditional,research. Tile,expanded analYsis. .
in Sub-chapter 5.6 does not :Congtinne significant new inforniation. With respect to ..
rainbow /tont. the expanded analysis in the :Final. Ea touCludes, based on additional
' .. . . research; thaf.thej,,impaCts.(cifilie.WSTSP are Jets.than":"-thotef.diSclosed,..in.the'Draft:EEL .... .. • ,
With respect to other ftshery2reSbiirces,. including those,salmonid species listed or proposed
. . „
. • ' tot listing under the -Endarii.,ered Species Act, the expanded•andlYsis•-does,*not change the ' • - .
. . determination that the --prOjf.tt will not have a •SimifiCanf.aaVerte impact, rather, the - '
analysis amplifies the basis. forthat.Conclusion.-Accordingly, the c'hang.es do not
or identify any new sicnificatirprojectampacts. .
. •
1. Chattges,4o Sub-chapter.5.8" le:and'Else)•of VOluthe I. Sun-chapter•5.8
includes two added, sections regarciiiag General Plan domiStency and the Public Trust
. . - .
• Doctrine. These 'Sections clarify information ;regarding the WSTSF•s• consistency With
,
Sonoma County s General,.-Plan and conformance with the Public Trust Doctrine. By
'adding these 'sections.- pOteritial impacts to land use resulting,from the WSTSP an not
change. A.dding these new sections doeSnot:dOnstirate"addiligiSitifiCarit'new information
because the new information, clarifies,informatibt..iii the Draft'Ea and Ldoes not result:1 in
or identify any new Sialifidant environmental impacts from the WSTSP
c
. • - • in. Changes to SuO.chanter 5'43 (Publit,Healrir and Safety) of Volutno
11
1 42574 I 1/17/98 1,11
. . . .
. . 1
(
. ,
.
37
8
. • • , • ri
•
/. The Final EIRImow-includes infOnnation regarding recent;scientifipovaluaton of the
impacts of ciiloririe4pated chetnicals. The new text 'states that regulatory agencies have
not developed,new standards or adjUtted.eXis-tirie•stantiards.based on this recent research.
The additional information does not change the impact•analySis. The:Agency assessed the
impacts of the project using cuitently .accepted standards, ;Until regulatory agencies
evaluate this isSue,and .adOpt standards tnddress the effects onteproduction associated
with cialorihe-based tcnerthcals it is not posSible for theAtency to evaluate environmental
impacts which may be associated with use of chemicals or the siificance2 of iatiy, such
impacts. • •
. . • .
• •
Changes to Sub.-chapter. 5.13 (Visual. Duality); of'Volume I. The
- Final Ea •siatea:Mat future' diversion facilities .could impact the visual 'quality of the
-
surrotincling..area, descnbea-at a proMmta leVell, the nature of the impacts, td identifies
Mitigation .measures Whidh,are 'expected to reduce the impact to 'a less-thansimdficant
level thitil'the-IsubSemiett.ER is prepared, however, it is not possible to,deterniine,with
• Certainty'what lhe impacts:are or the extent to which specific mitigation will eliminate the
• impacts.: „ This: change is not simifidanit because it does not result in or maclose more
simuncant'vrOjett imnacis.. Until-the specific diversion alternatives are identified and the
. . ,
subsequent ER is :Prepared, it is not possible.to .conohide which impacts would'. result:.
whicu Mitigation,rne.astireS,Watild be available to reduce the impacts,' or the extent of any
.
'reduction. ink
• •• _
_ 0. - Changes to SUbCchabter .64? (Growth).of Volume I: ,Sub-chapter 62
of thetTinal BR now'inClUdes a disdriatibn,of UFO anGtowthIBotindari forc.the.pmes
of,kolmert Park, Santa Rosa. and Petaluma, and three':updated general plans:for the cities
of Sonoma, Santa 13:cisa ,and Rohnert;.Parkf Environmental._documents prepared,,by the
•
cities for'their general plan updates':have been incorporated by reference. Information
from the undated general plans has been included wherJ4ppropriate. althougn.information- •
, -
from the general plans adopted at:the/time the Draft FIR prepared was used,i±•the
Final EIR. for planning and impact analysis Because of the number of szeneralTlans
within the .A.gency',s service area it is likely that one or.more• general -plans are being
updated at any even moment No changes to me WSTSP are proposed as:a result of the
updated general Plans,and the =bunt of water to whicn.each contactor will he,entitled'
. haanOt claing.ed: ficirmithattideritified and ialiaiyted in the Draft ER Also in atsponse to
commerita this suboliapter provides further clarification of the dernattlprcayeetions lite& _.
by the .kcifinCy'and presented in the Draft.Ea; The new information is not significant
because it does not cnatig&the environmental impacts of;the WSTSP from thaisedisclbsed
in the Draft Ea! The amount of Water to be served by•the WSTSP.to each contractor
remains:the,same as it was in frie Draft . • . •
p. Cifariges to Sub.:chapter 6.3 :(Cumulative Impacts) Of Volume I.
Chapter 6.-3-includes, update4 infOrrhatiOn regarding the !Federal, Energy •-legtilatory
42574s liii7/98 1.-12
• •
. 388
• •
• .... . , . . .
• . • .
-. • -.
. .
. . - .
. ,
._.
.,„ - -,, - CominisSibri's -proceedings to implement license terms ,for•Packt!'s Potter Valley Project. -
0
and tue onszoing;con.stiltatibt<between,the Agency aim the.:tr.S-.;Arniy:Corps of Engineers
.
and National .1.4atine'Fisheries:Service;tinder Section 7 of the?federal Endangered Species
' •,Act In adciirlet4,Undated information regarcihaa.certain sanitation projects in west Sonoma
County is alsQ:included. .These proceedings, and:projects are not at stageS where their . .
effects, if any on the WS-ESP can be„deterrriiiie.d., ThetefOre*While _general updates Of the . .
status of each is provided, it is speculative at;this time to assess impacts of these
proceedings and projects in,canioinaii0P•With the WSTSP 1 -Updated information is also
,- • included regarding othersanitation projects in west Sonoma-Count) and the city of Santa , . .:.
, .
- • Rosa's Subregional Long Tetra' Wastewater Projett. The cumulative impacts of these
. .. . projects and the WSTSP are ditbUfseddri the Final Elk. In-addition. Mitigation Measure
6.3-1 has been clarified to' explain: imnacts; caused by erosion versus those caused
:
by an alteration in topoaanhy., This,sub7chapter,also sinclitheS the updated information
regarding iinpacts`onrainbow,•trotit in'Lake Sonoma discussed in Paragraph 21(k) aboVe.
None of these• niodiiibatibat COnstitute—Sinificants new information because the . .
• modifidarions•do not testiltin,bi-disblose neW.ormore severe environmental impacts than
1
those disclosed in the Draft Ta - • --
_
1
• . .
i .
.. . . q. Changes to 0w/17— refr 7 (Airernciives) of'Volume L Chapter.7.has been
i ,
• --modified to delete ASR•as t a preferred project component and, to-inelude ianalysis pi-
,_ ...
. .
alternative locations and facilities for Collector No '6. The alternative locations and
facilities were presented in the Draft Ea as diversion:aliteinatiVes or in the case Of one
alternative location for Cdifeenif.NO. -6 -2, Mirabel site was identified as an alternatire
i
Ramey collector location in 'tige:f§74. E.IR for the RuSsian.River-Cbtati:Intertie Project -
Additional potential diverSion.;facilities have also been'added in response to comments] ; •
.. hoWever. these will be the sutisequent,diversionalternanVe Elk. None of this .-
, added information is simificant because no nevi or more severe environmental impacts
_.
. . would.result In addition none ofthe,alternanyes.presented -for Collector No.-6, whether
- - identified in the Draft Ea or the 1974 EIR would "clearly lessen the simiificant
environmental'impact. of',the project" so as to migter a recirculation requirement under •
State CEQA Guidelines'Section>15088.5 (a)(3). . .
- -
.22. All of the above-referenced ,revisions.: 'serve' only to 'clarify or amplify •
statements contained in theDraft.,EIR or otherwisemiake insignificant chancres.. .
. .
' 23. Trig Board further finds that none, of the;ptirpoSes of CEQA would be served
bY-add.itional •publit Otinitneht roh i the DraftEIR, bilighat only' needless Aielay would result.
. , .
Additional Public Chrtirnerit
. ,
. .
. .
2 Fotiftetuadditidiaal,COrithent letters were received,by the Agency prior to the
i.
AK Board s November-I-7, 1998itneeting. Agency and,County Counsel sta have prepared
Ilp
1
4 25748 11217195 „ . . 1-13
• .1
c .
• 1
. •
386 - -
„ . li
•
•
written responses to all letters received bf 5H10;44-_,.Fnday'NtiVember :13, 19.98. .Tnose •
TesPonses are container:bin three;doeurnents submitted:to the Boardon.November 16 1998
and on file with the Clerk of the.Bdatd: a November 16, 1998 memo to,Randy. D. ,Poole,
General Manager/Chief Ensdnee.r, from Erica. Headricki,.. Prineipal, Environmental
Specialist and Shelly. Hatleberg, Senior,Environmental Stietialisz.aiNtiVenaber 16 k998
memo to t.Randy D Poole from 'Sean White;Ynncipal Environmental
and Shawn Chase Senior Environmental Specialisi-Fis'neries; and a.,.Novenaber 16, 1998
_ .
to,Randy:.D. PoOle from Jill GoliS, Deputy •County Counsel.
. .
- .25:. .A.t the NOvember 17; 1998 Board meeting, tnembersiolthe,ptibItHwere, given
the oppdfriniity to address the Board on the issue of cerdercatiOn of the 'Final EIR, for the
WSTSP . Eleven c JepresearatiVes of public agencies and
,
_environmental tuoups. addressed comments to the Board
26'. ,Aln additional letter received by the Board was from Panick Itt Rrtittenz
SuperviSor;},Northern:CaliforniaProtected ReSources:Division,_,National Marine Fisheries •
- Service.,(sti‘;):Es);2.dated NOvenabet .16,.:1998. In .that' letter :Mr: Bitten indicated that
wotildbe: submitting comments, on:the Final EIR on Deter-abet'8, -1998.,.At the
' •
November 127, 1998, ;rnee.iing,, members of this Board inquired as to whether .a •
repreSentatiye,.of present me the audience. No person 'responded. Board
.•
Members Kelley-and Smith reported-that,they had, that morning, spoken by telephond with
Mr. Ruttert in an *effort to determine the nature of the comtnetts, to be submitted by
,
NMES.- -Board,Menibers Kelly and Smith indicated'that Mi. Rutten advised them that the
-;. • _
forthcoming NS comments would not be of'a:substantive i nature:but:ratherwduld
• indicate that ENIVIFS was intending-to proceed with its Section 7 Om:saltation.with the
„Agency and the United States Army Corps of Engineers:
•
The Board has reviewed. and considered all comments 'received' retarding •
certification of theFiiial EP, inciudinEtheLunSimed-Novertiber 13,4998 faxed memo from
:Friends of theRussian'RiVer, as well as'iother,conaments regarding the impacts of the WSTSP •
on coho salmon and Steelhead. two -fin species listed as threatened 'under the federal
Endangered Species'Act. The Boar&has also-reVieWe&and..cOnaidered the NinVeniber 16
1998 nietho. from Sean White:iand Shawn Chase, Water, Agency:fishery biologists on this
• slibject,and basy'eValiiated the•trailuna, ethication and experience of Mr. White and Mr.
Chase. The Board has also evaluated the record asia wnole particularly Sub-chaptev5:6 of
VOltine 1, ,Appendices C, D, and F of youpe.:Ifl and the 'Addendum to A.ppendix,E in •
Volume U. According:1Vc thiS,Sbard finds that: .'
a. the Draft E . disclosed the fae1 that coho Salinon;an&Stet:lead were • '
•
under consideration for listing pursuant to the federal Endangered' Species Act: and the
analysis in the Draft FIR ;considered 'the potential NotWiilistandirg. that the
25748 11/17/98 • 1-14
•
390
a
.
information and analysts iii th D ELR took the potential listing into account, after the
listing additional evaluation_of tue;impacts of the WSTSP' on,cube salmon'and steelhead has .
been performed;and is describeei the Final E1. and in;tneNoveinber 10,:.1998 memo from
'Mr. White-and M_:;Chase Agency fishery biologists. Tne�Fina1EI E .has taken into account
and adequately evaluates the fact that coho salmon and steelhead have: been listed as
threatened under the federal;Endangered Sp- ties Act and;:accordingly, the+;Board"finds that
the conciisionaeacnea by the FinakE1R that the WSTSP will not'have a significant adverse
impact on coho salmon and ste ihead, is.supported.by:substantial'evidence:inthe record;
b. • the,listing of coho salmon and siteelnead as threatened by NMFS does
g e g f e California'Environniental Q»ality Act.to '
not change th obIi_atton of the Board under the
consider, in an adequate environmental impact report, the impact of the WSTSP on those
species [Charah-a/ Greens v;•City ofOhula'Vura,(r99o) 50 Ca1.:App. 4th 1134, 1149]; ',
C.- - the Final R adequately'desc i es the.impacts'of t1 e'WSTSP on fishery 2.
resources, including specifically cube salmon and steelheaa; •
d. none of the purposes,of CEQAwould be served by delaying certification
of this.EIRuntil theAgen 'has received,an additional letter fromNMFS-or-until the Agency - -
- has completed any necessary consultation`witfl NMFS' regarding the WSTSP and only -
needless delay would result
Additional Finding Regarding ASR
28. On May 19„ 1998, rtes;Board modified tue"WSTSP to among other things,
delete the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Component tom the description of the preferred :
project for the WSTSP. In response to public comment at the November 17, 1998 -
.. _ meeting, this Board hereby,declares`that if at a future date; it intends to move forward to
consider a project with any ASR component similar to that described in the Draft ETR,jit
shall prepare an environmental impact-repot for any such project. I
Project Segmentation
39: The WSTSP :Final E1R. contains an adequate analysis of not only direot
changes in the environment out also reasonaoly foreseeable indirect changes. The -environmenral impacts of:diversion;faciitues, wgicn,wtll be needed'to divert the,additional `
water supply proposed by the WSTSP, are;analvzed°at a ,program level throughout the
Final Ea to'the xtent that these impacts can reasonaolv be foreseen. As directed by this
Board in Resolution 980641-4,,she specific impacts of nece_ssary_diversion facilities will be
considered by this 3oard.in asubseauent.environtpental impact.report.
- . • 1
I•
#25748 11/17/98 1-15
•
391
. .
- . •-
- Additional :Finding
. , .
. - ' •
, .
. 30. The Bard certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information m
. .
the Final EIR and ,finds?that it represents the independent judgement and analysis of the
, ,
- . Sonoma County Water Acency ,and is an actaiiate ,iniormatiorial."dbeurnent, arid that
:the
.—.
'
Final EIR:has,proyided tiiisfBoard'and the,public Withl-dll and fair disclosure of potential
environmental impacts associated with me project Tne. Board Will consider tus Frnalq Ea
prior to:making its decision on the Merits Of the Water Supply and Transmission System .
• , - Project.
NOW,H=REFORE, based on the record proceeding and the foregoing
. findings and determinations l the-Board of Directors of the Sonoma-County Water Agency
does hereby certify that the Final- EIR nas been completed.-reviewed:. and considered in
compliance with CEOA, the State CEQA 6hicieiine's and the AgencY'SProcedures for the
Implementation Of CEQA and that the Final .EIR4-eilects the :independent judgement and - . •
analysis of,this'BOaid: ( . . .
. . .
. .
BE IT EURTFER.RESOLVED that the Board sets December 1'5E. 1998,,at 10:00 '' -. - •
a.fri. as the time and place to consider Whether to approve:thet Water Supply and .
Transmission Project and affects:the General Manager to•mail notice of SticiTitieetinct to
. .1
. .
the WSTSP smailinc., H.'S-L .
_ .
• - .. '
41)
• .
. .
DIR_F,CIOPS,: . .
. . .
. .
. *. , .., • . ._ .
CA.Ti# •4Ye ; .14:4RBEkSON aye S'IVEITH aye REILLY 'I° KELLEY* ay•--
Ayes .."4. _-Noes, 1 ... Abs-etit A'ostain
, .
. . SO-ORDERED. .
. .
•
. .
• - . .
. -
. '
• . . - . . - . ,
. I .
' • . . ..
.-.-
. .
. 1 .
. . .
„'1/4 .
7425/48 1111:1 /18 1'-16
. .
. . .
. •
392
, .1 • . i
. _