HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances 1982 06/19/1995-, ~ •
;,~ i.., ' ~
;i
1
2
,~... 3
r~ 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
~~~~~~~, , ~~~~
~~ ~~Y~'Rl 4~ ~~
~i~ }~ 1 9 1`~ ~_
ORDINANCE NO. 1982 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilmember
Matt Maguire
Seconded by Councilmember
Carole Barlas
AN ORDINANCE AMENI)ING ZONING OIZDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. BY ~ZONING
A 3.46 ACiZ1E PARCEL LOCATEI) AT 911 S~TNNY SLOPE It~AD, WES'T OF "I"
S~I~ET, KNOWN AS PAMEI.A PLACE S~JBDIVISION, APN 019-201-018
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
21 Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City Council
22 on June 5, 1995, its report as set forth in its minutes of May 9, 1995, recommending the
23 adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., by rezoning Assessor
24 Parcel Number 019-201-018 from the Planned Unit Development District (P.U.D.} for the
25 Sunnyslope Annexation Area to a site specific P.U.D. for the Pamela Place Subdivision.
26
27 Section 2. The City Council further finds that the Planning Commission held a public
28 hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., on May 9,
29 1995 after giving notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in the form
30 required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S.
31
32 Section 3. Pursuant to the provision of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., the City
33 Council finds that the proposed amendment is in general conformity with the Petaluma
34 General Plan, and further, that the public interest, convenience and general welfare will be
35 furthered by the proposed amendment.
36
Ord. 1982 NCS
1 ~. i ~~ 3
,
1 Seetion 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended,
2 and based upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made as
3 follows, the City Council hereby adopts amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072
4 N.C.S. so as to rezone said property hereinbefore referred to in accordance with the
5 recommendation of the Planning Commission:
6
7 1. That the proposed rezoning is consistent with the General Plan.
8 2. That public necessity, convenience, and general welfare permit the adoption of the
9 proposed amendment.
10 3. That a determination that this project is exempt from further environmental review
11 pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act because a
12 Final EIR was prepared and certified in conjuction with the Sunnyslope Annexation
13 Area which included the project site, adopted by Ordinance 1856 on June 3, 1991.
14
15 Section 5. The City Council finds that the proposed project is exempt from further
16 environmental review pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality
17 Act (CEQA) because a Final EIR was prepared and certified for the Sunnyslope
18 Annexation Area which included the project site.
19
20 Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or work of this ordinance is
21 for any reason held to be unconstitutianal by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
22 decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City
23 Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would ha~e passed and adopted this
24 ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more
25 of said provisions be declared unconstitutional.
26
Ord. 1982 NCS
2
~r~ , a, s ~ 3
.~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of
the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this ordinance
and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said
provisions be declared unconstitutional.
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted this Sth day of June, 1995.
ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1995, by the following vote:
AYES: Maquire, Barlas, Stompe, Hamilton, Vice Mayor Read
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Hilligoss
ABSTAIN: Shea
~'
V~
ayor
ATTEST:
i er
APPROVE~I .~S TO FORM:
, ,~ ~ ~~~.°~---
ity ttorney
28 ord/dh1
Ord. 1982 NCS
3
~~. 3 ~ 3